Holocaust Survivor - Museum Shooter Akin to Suicide Bomber

[rodin]

Selected quotes

[rodin]

[rodin]

[cem]

.

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3730446,00.html


Holocaust Museum shooter: Obama created, used by Jews

Ynetnews, 12 June 2009

[rodin]

[rodin]

I am ashamed to say I did not think of this right away it is so obvious

[TonyGosling]

The unlikely friends of the Holocaust memorial killer
An anti-liberal ideology is being created by groups who would once have been sworn enemies
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/jun/14/james-von-brunn-fa r-right

I thought as I listened that, as so often in the past, what unites far left and far right is more important than what divides them, but readers may object that I am still talking only about tiny groups of extremists, who influence next to no one. The 9/11 "truthers" von Brunn joined have a far greater appeal, however. Admittedly, they do not seem appealing on first glance. In fact, they seem nutty geeks with wild eyes, who constantly film public meetings, in the hope that a member of the establishment will admit to being part of a global conspiracy in an unguarded moment.

Yet their idea that the west can only be the criminal and never be the victim of crime is everywhere. In 2003, a third of young Germans believed that al-Qaida was not a cult of death responsible for massacres.

A 2006 poll by the Pew Research Centre found that a majority of Muslims in Indonesia, Egypt, Turkey, Jordan and Pakistan denied that Arab terrorists could have carried out the 11 September attacks. Of British Muslims, 56% agreed that the hijackers were innocent and 25% went on to say "the British government was involved in some way" with the 7/7 atrocities in London.

Whenever I argue with "truthers", I point out as gently as I can that they are the children of the Holocaust-deniers. Just as the old far right denied the crimes of the German fascists of the 1940s, so they deny the crimes of the clerical fascists of our day. Yet although I have no doubt some of them will end up in neo-Nazi parties, I sense that the majority are moving in a new direction.

In Voodoo Histories, his elegant evisceration of the paranoid mentality, David Aaronovitch points out that former fascists and communists, secular Ba'athists, radical Islamists, Russian nationalists and America firsters - people who would never have worked together in the past, and who indeed killed each other in the past - are fusing ideas and creating a new ideology. Their politics, he writes, is "a loose coalescence of impulses: anti-globalisation, broadly anti-modernist and anti-imperialist - with imperialism being inevitably and solely associated with American power".

If you think this fusion is limited only to cranks, consider how human rights groups and secularists are having to combat new and powerful alliances the new anti-liberal ideology has encouraged. Earlier this year, the dictatorships which dominate the United Nations' comically named Human Rights Council tried to pass a motion stating that defamation of religion should everywhere be a crime. For obvious reasons, Islamic states pushed the new blasphemy law and abused the language of liberty as they attempted to justify the punishment of Muslims and non-Muslims who criticised or mocked orthodoxy.

[Thermate911]

[kbo234]

I was banned from the Observer forum yesterday. Like yourself, I was disgusted by Cohen's (typical) article. I pointed out that this 'holocaust-denial' charge is just another way that Zionist Jews and their sympathisers control the political debate to their advantage.

I also tried to post an article that demonstrates another way Zionists control our political process. Here it is:



“Mucking out” British politics

Stuart Littlewood – Redress June 1, 2009

Stuart Littlewood argues that the expenses scandal engulfing British Members of Parliament is nothing compared to the fact that supporters of Israel are embedded at all levels in the fabric of British political life and at the heart of the government, including at the core of the security establishment.

UK politicians are currently reeling from a public lashing for fiddling their expenses big-time. Such is their arrogance that many, when confronted with their crimes, don't see that they have done anything wrong.

The guilty ones who step down will be further enriched with a lavish resettlement allowance and a big pension pot.

To appease voters’ anger Parliament and government are now promising anti-sleaze reforms. They are calling on the impressive-sounding Committee on Standards in Public Life to investigate and make recommendations. Conservative leader David Cameron, who has expectations of becoming the next British prime minister, talks of purging his party of its cheats and racketeers.

But swindling the taxpayer over MPs' expenses is nothing compared to other corruption that's rife in Westminster. It is said that becoming a Friend of Israel is a necessary stepping-stone to high office. As a result, supporters of that foreign power are embedded at all levels in the fabric of British political life and at the heart of the government.

Eighteen months ago a group of concerned academics wrote to the Standards Committee complaining about Israel’s “deep penetration” of our political system and how it prevented Britain from taking a principled stand on Middle East affairs, including the Iraq war and the never-ending violations of Palestinian human rights. They asked the committee to consider the activities of the Friends of Israel as a matter for urgent investigation.

The chairman, Sir Christopher Kelly, refused. Why? He wouldn't say. But some members of his committee were found to have close links with Friends of Israel. Even this inner sanctum of British correctness and fair play is compromised.


Integrity is lacking

One of the Seven Principles of Public Life, and perhaps the most important, is integrity – "Holders of public office should not place themselves under any financial or other obligation to outside individuals or organizations that might seek to influence them in the performance of their official duties.” That’s plain enough for even a schoolboy to understand.

Yet the authorities turn a blind eye to the various Israel Lobby organizations, which go to great lengths to influence not only those in power, but those wishing to achieve power in the future. Conservative Friends of Israel (CFI) claim that, with over 2,000 members and registered supporters, alongside 80 per cent of the Conservative MPs, it has become the largest affiliated group in the party.

Its website states that the CFI, in the run-up to the last general election, supported candidates up and down the country.


As candidates are now being continuously selected for target seats, CFI has developed a special programme of weekly briefings, events with speakers and a chance to participate in delegations to Israel. CFI encourages all members to help campaign for parliamentary candidates and also for local council, London and European elections.

It also “fast-tracks” candidates fighting target marginal seats. Senior Conservatives try to justify the turning of would-be MPs into Zionist stooges by insisting that Israel is “a force for good in the world” and that in the battle for democratic liberal values against repression “Israel's enemies are our enemies and this is a battle in which we all stand together...”

A top Conservative Friend of Israel confidently predicted there would be no investigation by the Standards Committee, his cocksure attitude adding to the view that his like are a protected species within the Westminster village.


Security and defence are undermined

But there are deadly serious consequences. The Israel lobby is even more heavily represented at the centre of Britain's security establishment since the appointment of Kim Howells, formerly minister in charge of Middle East affairs and a one-time chairman of Labour Friends of Israel, to the chair of the Intelligence and Security Committee.

This committee has oversight of the Security Service (MI5), the Secret Intelligence Service (MI6), the Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) and the work of the Joint Intelligence Committee and the Intelligence and Security Secretariat, which includes the Assessment Staff in the Cabinet Office. The committee also takes evidence from the Defence Intelligence Staff (DIS), part of the Ministry of Defence.

These people have access to highly classified material. How can we trust them? Another member of the committee is Sir Alan Beith, president of the Liberal Democrat Friends of Israel, whose aims and objectives are stated thus:

* To maximize support for the State of Israel not only within the Liberal Democrats but within Parliament itself.
* To influence the party’s Middle East policy.
* To liaise with Israeli politicians and government.
* To provide parliamentarians with briefing material for parliamentary debates, questions to ministers and public appearances.
* To rebut attacks on Israel in the media, Parliament and the party.
* To arrange and accompany Liberal Democrat Friends of Israel delegations to Israel.
* To keep in regular contact with the Embassy of Israel.

Other pro-Israel groups have similar objectives.

British citizens would horrified to know that Zionist tentacles have spread everywhere in Westminster and that our most important security bodies – the Intelligence and Security Committee, Foreign Affairs Committee and Defence Committee – are all chaired by Israel flag-wavers. They inhibit a proper British response on issues such as the cruel and unlawful blockade of Gaza, and more recently the 22 days of lethal terror unleashed by Israel in an attempt to crush the trapped and half-starved men, women and children of the Gaza Strip.

Cameron has painted himself into a corner by declaring he’s a Zionist, leaving one to wonder if he actually knows the meaning of the word and all the nastiness it implies. His ideas about the situation in the Middle East seem confused. Take this gem:

"The West has to understand that there isn’t an equivalence between a democratically elected government of Israel, a state of Israel that is a democracy, that’s a member of the United Nations, that has a totally legitimate right to exist and defend itself – there is no equivalence between that and a group like Hamas..."

Hamas was democratically elected in 2006. Why not acknowledge and respect that? Israel, of course, is no Western-style democracy but a racist ethnocracy. It flouts dozens of UN resolutions and defies international law. Its every act is designed to make the illegal occupation permanent and realize the Zionist dream of a “Greater Israel” at the expense of world peace.

The Israeli cabinet has just approved a draft law to ban Palestinians from marking the Naqba – the "catastrophe" of 1948 widely regarded as the Palestinians’ holocaust, when the state of Israel was declared and some 700,000 were subjected to an Israeli campaign of terror and ethnic cleansing, and subsequently lost their homes and lands, including the land on which the much-mentioned town of Sderot was later built. To this day, they and their descendants, an estimated 4.5 million, have been denied the right to return to their homes.

And the Israeli gestapo this week closed down the Palestine Festival of Literature, sponsored by the British Council. Does any of this sound like the work of a democratic government, Mr Cameron? Do you seriously think your party is fit to govern if it aligns with an apartheid regime that has no regard for the rights of others or for the sanctity of human life, and uses depleted uranium and white phosphorus bombs against civilians in densely populated areas?

Did you and your colleagues learn nothing from Gaza 2009?

And how does it look, standing shoulder to shoulder with religious fanatics who horribly persecute the Christian communities in the Holy Land? Why do you condemn Palestinian resistance when Israelis are killing Palestinians at the rate of nearly 12 to 1? Why insist that they “recognize” Israel while Israel’s boot is on their necks?

Prime Minister Gordon Brown's conduct is equally odd. Brown, like Blair before him, also seems indifferent to the 90 years of British betrayal and the Palestinians’ present plight. He was "delighted" when invited to become a patron of the Jewish National Fund (JNF) in the UK. Set up to help establish a Jews-only state in Arab Palestine, the JNF is a principal tool for Israel's programme of land theft. The JNF’s constitution requires it to benefit Jews exclusively; therefore, it promotes and implements policies that discriminate against the Arab population of Israel.

The JNF stands accused of ethnic cleansing, the destruction of hundreds of Palestinian villages and the expropriation of Palestinian land on a massive scale – war crimes in anyone’s language. And yet – can you believe it – Cameron too has become a patron.

It is not enough for party leaders to sack a few scoundrels, reduce a few perks and claim to have cleaned up the system. There’s a mountain of mucking out to do before the British parliamentary system can call itself “fit for purpose”.

www.redress.cc/stooges/slittlewood20090601

[TonyGosling]

Alleged Holocaust Museum Shooter: Perfect story for Zionist Media: Guilty before Trial:

Written by www.daily.pk - Wednesday, 17 June 2009

Sad but true! The President of the United States had more to say about the museum shooting than he said about the destruction of the entire city of Gaza by Israel. He does not speak on police brutality against African-Amercans either.

June 10, 2009: A man named James Von Brunn tried to enter the so-called Holocaust Museum in Washington, DC. He exchanged shots with museum guards, injured one of them and was himself shot. Both were taken to hospital where the guard died of his injuries.

This incident was a god-send for the corporate-zionist media. They went on the rampage and within hours had "proven" the shooter not only to be a murderer but an anti-semitic monster and perhaps a Klan man.

To top it all the dead guard turned out to be African American.

This was the ideal mix for the media: A White man tried to break into the "Holocaust" museum and in the process killed a Black security guard. Wolf Blitzer of CNN, himself a Jew and an Israel-firster, took the lead. Lou Dobbs of CNN wanted to prove that one doesn't have to be a Jew to do the dirty work of the Israel-firsters.

The media threw everything they could into the battle against this lone 88 year old man who had tried to break into their museum of hate. [He didn't make it inside.] Among the media hounds was The Southern Poverty Law Center [little to do with Law], an extreme Zionist clique which steadily tries to prove that anti-semitism is a great danger to America [though there have been ZERO serious incidents against Amercan Jews.].

Lou Dobbs called in a woman from the extreme Jewish group known as ADL and gave her all the time she wanted.
Lou Dobbs also tried to link the museum violence to the Muslims allegedly plotting to attack synagogues working for Israel.

Rachel Maddow [MSNBC TV] called in the Simon Wiesenthal representative to add fuel to the fire. [She regularly tries to justify homosexuality, using a major TV channel to do advocacy for a tiny but well funded and organized fringe group.]......

http://www.daily.pk/world/americas/10441-alleged-holocaust-museum-shoo ter-perfect-story-for-zionist-media-guilty-before-trial-.html

[rodin]

Show me a security video of the event, or a guard who would open the door for a looney with a gun

This stinks of set up start to finish

It is in character

[TonyGosling]

I don't think the museum guards will be trained to deal with an armed attack.

[item7]

An interesting development in this issue by way of a smear on 9/11 truthers from Glen Beck, with a response from "We Are Change"


Link



Link

[ian neal]

FYI

http://world911truth.org/911-truth-activist-to-sue-glenn-beck-and-fox- news-for-defamation/

NB new 'world' 9/11 truth site

[rodin]

[KP50]

Just wandering around a few of these links and seeing the comments written, I am always amazed by people's eagerness to believe the media - even those who know 9/11 was staged. Then again I had no reason to doubt Columbine was just 2 shooters gone mad until I realised what all the eye-witness reports were saying.

We know "they" have the ability to stage such an event as this, we can see that the event has been used in the propaganda war thus we must keep an open mind as to any and all "facts" presented to us via the media.

[rodin]

[Thermate911]

[KP50]

[rodin]

[scienceplease 2]