George Galloway loves world government

[uselesseater]

Was listening to george tonight. A caller rang up asking if George thought a world government was a good idea. 'I would love for there to be a world government but I think we are a long way off' replied George or words to that effect.

[Linda]

I heard this too.
I Thing Galloway is a prize pratt, he is so up his own backside.

I tune into radio five on a friday and saturday night.

He is well up Obama's backside and won't have a thing said against him.(DOH) Obam'a is the biggest fraud going.

[Newspeak International]

Been listening to his show tonight and although he makes some excellent points in regard to the Palastinian problems as usual,he cut someone off regarding the history of the Kashmir problem like he didn't want the listeners to know another point of view.

Also he believes "Lola" a 1970's song about a transsexual by The Kinks,beats most musical output from the 80's

[Linda]

Just tuned into talksport, radio. Galloway is on again, says he is on mon /tues/wed/ mornings this week.

Still he is praising his Obama saying he can not do anything about the situation in Palestine, because he ain't president until Jan. He will not have it that the Obama cabinet are all Zionist Pigs.

[Thermate911]

Why slag George when there are far more 'fragile' political personalities to deal with first?

In some respects, a 'world government' could be seen as an ideal we could all aspire to, given a more co-operative basis!

For those who would like to tarnish Galloway further, I would respectfully suggest they re-acquaint themselves first with his US Senate speech/defense:-

http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0517-35.htm

and

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HrdFFCnYtbk

Now ask yourselves, could you do better? Have you ever done so?

Food for thought?
.

[Newspeak International]

How could we forget his magnificent performance that left the senate pretty much speechless,also the unedited footage was most gratifying wasn't it?

Further food for thought is that lovely George is a plant who makes no pretense that he would welcome a new world order to sort out the pre-designed problems of the world.

I've lost count of the times he cuts off and rants at anyone that dares portay events in history that do not conform to the norms that we have all been fed.

Why have a go at George you say>

Well it just so happens he has the ear of a large percentage of peaceniks,so if he can (as he does) give a slanted view of historical fact,and not portay the UN as anything other than the elitist wet dream of world domination,why protest at it's ethics and aims?

For such an intelligent person he apparrently has not worked out the freefall of buildings,or the BS of man made global warming,and to add neither have many in this so called "truth" movement.

Go figure!