Exposed - Britain’s Internal Rendition

[TonyGosling]

Exposed: Britain’s internal rendition

by Anindya Bhattacharyya

In an astonishing breach of normal legal procedure, home secretary Jacqui Smith last week sent five bailed men to prison, overriding the ruling of a senior judge.

Mr Justice Mitting had refused a government request to detain the men on Thursday of last week. Yet Smith simply ignored this decision – and ordered that the men be taken into custody anyway.

Two were driven off in vans from their court hearing. They thought they were heading home – but found themselves taken to Belmarsh prison instead. The others were arrested at home that evening in front of their families.

After sharp legal arguments the following day, four of the men were released back on bail. But a fifth man, known only as Mr U, remained in Belmarsh prison as Socialist Worker went to press.

Lawyers for the men condemned the home secretary’s arbitrary use of custodial power, accusing her of “open contempt for the role of the judiciary”.

“If ministers decide to simply flaunt decisions of the court in that very direct way, we’re in the midst of a constitutional crisis,” said solicitor Gareth Peirce. “It’s dangerous, it’s ugly and it’s unlawful.”

Civil liberties campaigners also condemned the move. “We seem to be experiencing a new version of the divine right of kings,” said writer and activist Andy Worthington, author of The Guantanamo Files.

“It’s the self-declared right of an elected government official to ignore her own judges, and cast foreign ‘terror suspects’ into the modern day version of the Tower of London – Belmarsh prison.”

Kidnap

According to some observers, lawyers for the men had pressed for legal moves against Jacqui Smith on grounds of contempt of court and kidnap following her decision to detain them.

A court decision to free four of the men back on bail was taken on Friday of last week as an alternative to this embarrassing course of action.

The government presented “secret evidence” against Mr U to justify his imprisonment.

The use of “secret evidence” is one of the most unjust aspects of the shadowy Special Immigration Appeals Court (SIAC) system, which was set up by the government to help it deport immigrants considered a “threat to national security”..............

http://www.socialistworker.co.uk/art.php?id=17290