Rushbridger paves the way for Cheney's attack on the West

[TonyGosling]

It is clear that the British press is being used to build a case for the Iran attack and yet another criminal invasion of a peaceful country.
Today's Guardian's front page lead is Al-Qaida has revived, spread and is capable of a spectacular This is all blurted out uncritically by the G from the International Institute of Strategic Studies (IISS).


a tee shirt is presented as evidence that the story is true

Could this be the same IISS that got it all so very conveniently wrong in the run-up to the invasion of Iraq (see below). Why on earth is any half-decent journalist trusting them now? Because these journalists and editors are conned and bought by the war faction.
Combined with the efforts discredit the Kennebunkport Warning (despite the publication of the typed statement with the original signatories to the Warning) it is clear another false flag is being planned, prepared and could be imminent. Please see my assessment of how to prevent this and what to do if it happens.

911 truth media strategy & how to stop false flag terror

[Rowan Berkeley]

I have been following the Kennebunkport Warning saga with close attention and I am satisfied that it was a ploy by Tarpley and his Larouchist backers to destroy the peace movement.

[TonyGosling]

The same people who 'sexed up' the case for the Iraq invasion are being used by Alan Rushbridger and Richard Norton Taylor in today's Guardian front page here to 'sex up' the case for an Iran invasion. These two individuals have pushed freedom of speech to absurd levels and are heavily implicated in this war crime - if it happens. Let us all hope and pray that it doesn't.
If anyone can be bothered to view Rowan Berkely's attempts to discredit and divide the crystal clear warnings coming out of the US Peace Movement about a soon-to-come false flag which Cheney and his mates are planning have a look here.

[chek]

Tony, I don't believe there's any dispute about the urgency, content and relevance of the KW.

What however is undeniable is that for still murky reasons, a document that should have been the clear, unified voice of the left, the Peace Movement and 911 Truth ringing out a wake up call instead descended into a welter of accusation, counter-accusation and smear over who did or did not sign whatever piece of paper.

In the meantime, the warning is as relevant as ever, particularly with news today of British troops being sent to the Iranian border.

Does anybody smell a set up that would be used to facilitate a no-questions UK entry into Cheney's WWIII?

[Thermate911]

[conspiracy analyst]

The Guardian is the premier pro-war paper over the last decade.
Since imperialism adopted the mantra of human rights interventions saving the poor from poverty and all the other nonsense they sold to inaugurate a New World Order it has sold one lie after the other, one scare story after another.

But this time it looks they are preparing the agenda for a false flag attack publishing nonsense about the man in the cave and how he has got stronger. Its ironic that Al Quaeda has got stronger yet no terrorist event has occurred on US soil since 9/11.

So allegedly islamic terrorists attacked the USA, America invaded 2 countries in return, created millions of dead and refugees, and they have done nothing for 6 years and they are about to do something and it is reported in the media. Maybe thats why Rumsfieldbridger appeared in the Bourne Ultimatum, to get 'left' credentials to justify the PNAC agenda.

The crime in the matter is that the official opposition to the war believe the Guardian is holy gospel in the UK when it is like every other rag.

There is no truth in newsprint and the media only sells lies.

[TonyGosling]

Bizarrely, the war faction are driven by fear just as they are trying to control and con us 'useless' masses using fear.

Never before have they been approaching a major global or nuclear war with such a wealth of info out there about who they are and what they are up to. So they may be about to launch a madcap plan for no better reason than to save their asses by distracting the world's attention. That can only ever be a temporary fix for them.

Certainly Benjamin Fulford and his Chinese pals know who all the top Iluminati from Kissinger and Rockefeller down are so they may be the only hope we have here in Europe and the US of disarming these parasites. Maybe they used one of the social network websites (no not twitter or facebook!) such as Daniel Brandt's namebase to get all the names?

I admire Vladimir Putin's independent stance from Europe - he's a wise old bird - At least he is taking the US/NewLabour/Israeli madness seriously by withdrawing from the European peace treaty. You can be sure there will have been diplomatic requests beforehand asking our government to give assurances over our idiotic allegiance to the US and you can guarantee if the EU had given guarantees that Iran would not be attacked in cold blood then Putin wouldn't have had to withdraw.

Even my MP wouldn't. What a cow. Would the Foreign Office have reported those threats to withdraw to us public? Of course not, the weasels, they're all so into Richard Dawkins they think they can behave like stupid animals and trash human life in the blink of an eye. They should be arrested for incitement to or conspiracy to commit a crime before they bring this whole '* house' down. But then that's part of the plan - order from chaos.

If only our English speaking press would do a little self-critical reflection then we may still be able to avert this disaster. What they do with the obedience to the Zionist advertisers' agenda is to create a culture of impunity where anyone, proven liar or not, that supports our whithered zomboid government and the RIIA corporate lobby is lauded to the hills. All critical judgement, balance, and journalistic professionalism is out of the window.

But it's my firm belief that Mahmoud Ahmadinejad DOES have nukes up his sleeve. Does anybody remember that Roger Cook chap? He was undercover investigating arms dealers back in the 1980s and was offered nukes! If Roger Cook could get them don't you think the Iranians might too? Duh!

Those nukes could alread be deployed in the West for an instant retaliation if Bush, Brown and Ohlmert are arrogant enough to bomb the uranium enrichment programme.

Maybe we need a truth and reconciliation commission for 9/11 and 7/7? But it's more likely gone well beyond that stage now.

Illuminati in a nutshell
http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=9582

[TonyGosling]

Looks like 'Alan's' changed his mind
nice piece in the paper


Dick Cheney defends the dark side
Dick Cheney's audacious power grab has been fully discredited. But in his fantasy world, he's still fighting the good fight
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2009/may/21/dick-ch eney-national-security-speech

....The embattled intelligence, defence and diplomatic communities waited Cheney out, and eventually won. Today, Obama is pursuing a traditional, moderate course on foreign affairs, defence and terrorism. So Cheney's argument is not just with Obama, but with everybody in the Washington establishment who ever disagreed with him.

Cheney has exactly two things going for him – the lack of a terrorist attack in the past eight years and the prospect of another one. But there's no reason to believe Cheney – who has no qualms about lying and exaggerating for political effect – when he takes credit for the former.

It would be nice to see a truth commission sort through the record and tell us the degree to which the policies Cheney is associated with, such as torture or extra-constitutional surveillance, worked compared with all the other methods employed. (Of course, Cheney's speech denigrated such an idea.) Cheney's only remaining card is another perverse fantasy: to make a public bet that there will be another terrorist attack, at which point he'll get to say "I told you so."