View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
keithm Validated Poster
Joined: 05 Sep 2007 Posts: 93 Location: bournemouth
|
Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 5:43 pm Post subject: Heathrow crash landing as PM flies to Beijing |
|
|
There has been a lot of news in the last few weeks,
about boeing aircrafts onboard computers being vulnerable to terrorist hacking.
I just wonder if we will be told that iranians or al qaeda,hacked into the aircraft,and shut the engines down.
Either that or a flock of iranian (al qaeda) suicide geese were sucked into the engines. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
festival of snickers Validated Poster
Joined: 04 Apr 2007 Posts: 733 Location: the worlds greatest leper colony usa
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mark Gobell On Gardening Leave
Joined: 24 Jul 2006 Posts: 4529
|
Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
911th day since 21.7.5 today _________________ The Medium is the Massage - Marshall McLuhan. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
festival of snickers Validated Poster
Joined: 04 Apr 2007 Posts: 733 Location: the worlds greatest leper colony usa
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
TonyGosling Editor
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
fish5133 Site Admin
Joined: 13 Sep 2006 Posts: 2568 Location: One breath from Glory
|
Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2008 12:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Note the link to Gordon Brown who was due to fly out to China from the same airport that day?
The crashed plane had come from China, would it have possibly been the same one to take Mr Brown back! Or possibly the wrong China plane was targeted, or just coincidence.
Quote: | The incident happened as Prime Minister Gordon Brown was due to leave Heathrow for China and India and his flight was delayed. |
http://www.orange.co.uk/news/topstories/1587.htm?linkfrom=hp4&link=tic ker_pos_1_link_1&article=index _________________ JO911B.
"for we wrestle not against flesh and blood but against principalities, against powers, against rulers of the darkness of this world, against wicked spirits in high places " Eph.6 v 12 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
conspiracy analyst Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Joined: 27 Sep 2005 Posts: 2279
|
Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2008 12:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fish5133 wrote: | Note the link to Gordon Brown who was due to fly out to China from the same airport that day?
The crashed plane had come from China, would it have possibly been the same one to take Mr Brown back! Or possibly the wrong China plane was targeted, or just coincidence.
Quote: | The incident happened as Prime Minister Gordon Brown was due to leave Heathrow for China and India and his flight was delayed. |
http://www.orange.co.uk/news/topstories/1587.htm?linkfrom=hp4&link=tic ker_pos_1_link_1&article=index |
If he doesn't toe the line that may happen to him? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pikey Banned
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 1491 Location: North Lancashire
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
telecasterisation Banned
Joined: 10 Sep 2006 Posts: 1873 Location: Upstairs
|
Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2008 1:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Pikey wrote: | Quite interesting to note how a plane crash site is normally managed.
No hiding of any evidence, employees carrying off parts behind sheets etc(Re: 911: Flight 77 and Pentagon site) |
There is a major difference;
This is not a crime scene, there was no supposed hijacking, consequently there is no 'evidence' to hide. Besides which, what 'sheets' do you refer to? _________________ I completely challenge the official version of events - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC -I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC |
|
Back to top |
|
|
FlamingDeath New Poster
Joined: 18 Jan 2008 Posts: 1
|
Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2008 2:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
conspiracy analyst wrote: | fish5133 wrote: | Note the link to Gordon Brown who was due to fly out to China from the same airport that day?
The crashed plane had come from China, would it have possibly been the same one to take Mr Brown back! Or possibly the wrong China plane was targeted, or just coincidence.
Quote: | The incident happened as Prime Minister Gordon Brown was due to leave Heathrow for China and India and his flight was delayed. |
http://www.orange.co.uk/news/topstories/1587.htm?linkfrom=hp4&link=tic ker_pos_1_link_1&article=index |
If he doesn't toe the line that may happen to him? |
This is exactly what I was thinking, seems like too many coincedences to be coincedental!
BBC wrote: | Prime Minister Gordon Brown's own flight to China was delayed as the Boeing skidded across the grass short of the runway and pulled up about 1,000 metres from his plane.
An unnamed airport worker interviewed by the BBC said that the captain had told him that the Boeing 777-200ER had lost all power after "all the electronics" failed while the plane came in to land.
Antonio De Crescenzo, 52, from Naples in Italy, said there was little warning that the plane was in difficulty.
He said: "We were coming in to land but the plane felt like it should have been taking off. The engines were roaring and then we landed and it was just banging.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/7195298.stm |
Ok, failed electronics, roaring engines, 1000 meters from PM's plane. Does this mean the crashed plane was heading in that direction? If it was, it could be said that the plane might have continued on its course if something hadn't had happened?
That something could have been plane hitting the ground, damaging something, maybe an electronics device? remote hack does sound possible.
Since Brown has come to Government as PM, it seems like somebody doesnt like him, the media certianly dont and that speaks volumes.
bilderberg not happy? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TonyGosling Editor
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pikey Banned
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 1491 Location: North Lancashire
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
telecasterisation Banned
Joined: 10 Sep 2006 Posts: 1873 Location: Upstairs
|
Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2008 7:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | The tarpaulins sheet screening shown on DVKs "In plane site" presentation Tele. |
You said 'employees carrying off parts behind sheets' - can you supply a screen dump/a picture or a time it appears on the film?
Quote: | Crime scene or no crime scene they do not normally move the evidence until it has been adequately recorded Tele. |
It isn't a question of 'when' things are moved - this a crash site where the aircraft is virtually intact, no explosions, no fire - at present the cause being a systems failure of some sort. There is no comparison to be drawn with 911, besides which, how do you know things are not being moved from the site? _________________ I completely challenge the official version of events - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC -I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC |
|
Back to top |
|
|
suraci Minor Poster
Joined: 17 Jan 2008 Posts: 75
|
Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2008 8:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Tis a warning to Gordon to do as he is told, as when Blair's jet aborted take off at last second. What surprised me was the amount of damage done to the ground. I thought heavy commercial jets could crash and not mark a blade of grass. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TonyGosling Editor
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mark Gobell On Gardening Leave
Joined: 24 Jul 2006 Posts: 4529
|
Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2008 10:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Only 24 hours later . . .
Quote: | Initial indications from the interviews and Flight Recorder analyses show the flight and approach to have progressed normally until the aircraft was established on late finals for Runway 27L. At approximately 600 ft and 2 miles from touch down, the Autothrottle demanded an increase in thrust from the two engines but the engines did not respond. Following further demands for increased thrust from the Autothrottle, and subsequently the flight crew moving the throttle levers, the engines similarly failed to respond. The aircraft speed reduced and the aircraft descended onto the grass short of the paved runway surface. |
AAIB already has decided this
PPRUNE is too busy it seems . . .
Quote: | PPRuNe Message
The server is too busy at the moment. Please try again later.
To avoid this message, please register or login: |
_________________ The Medium is the Massage - Marshall McLuhan. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fish5133 Site Admin
Joined: 13 Sep 2006 Posts: 2568 Location: One breath from Glory
|
Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2008 11:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I noticed the Captain quickly passed the praise (buck) to his co pilot whom he said was in control.
Could have been a big c*** up by the co pilot (although I suspect its on auto pilot) but they want to shield him. _________________ JO911B.
"for we wrestle not against flesh and blood but against principalities, against powers, against rulers of the darkness of this world, against wicked spirits in high places " Eph.6 v 12 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TonyGosling Editor
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Thermate911 Angel - now passed away
Joined: 16 Jul 2007 Posts: 1451 Location: UEMS
|
Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2008 1:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Any pilots here? If so, you'll fully appreciate how incredible it is that these people brought the plane down so successfully. Heaped Praise for the captain of this aircraft is definitely in order - he deserves a medal at least! _________________ "We will lead every revolution against us!" - attrib: Theodor Herzl
"Timely Demise to All Oppressors - at their Convenience!" - 'Interesting Times', Terry Pratchett |
|
Back to top |
|
|
acrobat74 Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Joined: 03 Jun 2007 Posts: 836
|
Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2008 2:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Looks like the only thing that saved these people was the crew's skill.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/transport/Story/0,,2243357,00.html
Quote: |
Safety fears over crash jet's alarm failure
· Source reveals warning system faults
· Engines failed two miles from runway
Dan Milmo and Sam Jones
Saturday January 19, 2008
The Guardian
The pilots of the British Airways plane that crashlanded at Heathrow on Thursday received no warning that the aircraft was losing power because of a problem with the aircraft's alarm systems, a source has told the Guardian.
Because there was no signal from the Boeing 777's automatic warning system, the pilots did not realise anything was wrong until they approached the runway and noticed the plane was losing speed more rapidly than normal. The plane "fell out of the sky" just 10ft from the ground after stalling as it came in to land.
The first details of the pilots' desperate battle to land the jet safely emerged as the Air Accidents Investigation Branch (AAIB) said the two engines on flight BA038 "did not respond" to a demand for increased thrust about two miles from the runway with the aircraft about 500ft above the ground. All 136 passengers and 16 crew had a miraculous escape after the aircraft skidded 400ft along the Heathrow turf.
The fact that the pilots, Captain Peter Burkill and senior first officer, John Coward, did not receive an automated warning of the drop in engine power will cause concern about the safety of systems on the 777 of which more than 600 are in service. Although all commercial aeroplanes have programmed "inhibitions" on certain warnings so that the crew are not distracted by unnecessary alarms during the crucial takeoff and landing procedures, the alarm should have been triggered when the engines failed.
Specialists from the AAIB will look at whether the Boeing 777's inhibition threshold is set too high and does not alert pilots to engine problems if they are below a certain height.
The Guardian has also learned that a key instrument, the engine pressure ratio gauge, which tells the crew how much power is available, had failed. The pilots tried to coax more power from the 777, but it did not respond, according to an aviation source.
Realising every ounce of lift would be needed to nurse the plane over Heathrow's perimeter fence, Coward, who was at the controls, dropped the nose to maintain speed. As he approached the fence, he lifted the nose, wringing the last reserves of energy from the plane. Then the aircraft narrowly missed a guidance beacon before stalling around 10ft from the ground. "It just fell out of the sky from a few feet," said the source. "It was the skill of the crew that kept those 136 people alive."
The plane, which was flying in from Beijing, hit the grassy approach to the runway at 12.43pm on Thursday, smashing its undercarriage as it slid along.
All 136 passengers and 16 crew members were evacuated on emergency slides within 90 seconds. Eighteen people, including four crew members, were treated for minor injuries in hospital.
The jet's auxiliary power unit, which is very rarely used in flight, was still running when the plane was on the ground, indicating that main power had been lost on the approach. Investigators also found the plane's thrust controls were on their maximum setting.
Greeted by rapturous applause at a press conference yesterday, Captain Burkill paid tribute to his crew and confirmed that it was his co-pilot who had landed the stricken aircraft. He said Coward had done "the most remarkable job" of bringing plane and its passengers to safety.
A spokesman for BA said the company would await the findings of the investigation. Boeing said it was "working with the AAIB to support the investigation". |
_________________ Summary of 9/11 scepticism: http://tinyurl.com/27ngaw6 and www.911summary.com
Off the TV: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M4szU19bQVE
Those who do not think that employment is systemic slavery are either blind or employed. (Nassim Taleb)
www.moneyasdebt.net
http://www.positivemoney.org.uk/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pete J Minor Poster
Joined: 06 Apr 2006 Posts: 57 Location: Scotland
|
Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2008 3:05 pm Post subject: any pilots |
|
|
Thermate911 wrote: | Any pilots here? If so, you'll fully appreciate how incredible it is that these people brought the plane down so successfully. Heaped Praise for the captain of this aircraft is definitely in order - he deserves a medal at least! |
What was incredible was that the failure occured at the precise point which would allow them to reach the grass with the airspeed margin over stall speed which remained. I don't think the crew would have engineered this.
What was also incredible was that the thrust command systems for both engines (I would imagine they are independent) became disabled just at that point. So the failure seems somehow co-ordinated.
I've got 2 theories - 1 normal, 1 'whacky'
1] (Normal theory) = it's a software bug
2] (Whacky theory) =
a) Boeing (may) have covertly installed anti-hijack systems in the 777 since (or before) 9/11 which allows it's systems to be selectively disabled.
b) Some aspect of UK secret services have unravelled the background to the Litvinenko poisoning which directly implicates high level folks in the Russian goverment or mafia or both.
c) The Russian's have found out how to hack the anti-hijack systems and have deliberately carried out a 'managed accident' stopping short of a catastrophic one which might trigger retaliation, in order to warn off enemies from taking things any further.
(b.t.w., all rights reserved on theory No2 in case it ends up in hollywood)
Cheers
Pete |
|
Back to top |
|
|
numeral Validated Poster
Joined: 23 Dec 2005 Posts: 500 Location: South London
|
Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2008 8:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attempted hit on Gordon?
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/topstories/2008/01/18/gordon-brown-just-2 5ft-from-death-in-heathrow-crash-89520-20289514/
Quote: | Gordon Brown just 25ft from death in Heathrow crash
MIRACLE OF FLIGHT BA038 Crash jet close to killing PM in his car
By Martin Fricker
Gordon Brown stared death in the face yesterday as the stricken Heathrow jet came hurtling in just 25 feet above his head before crash landing.
The Prime Minister was being driven to a VIP lounge along an airport perimeter road when the Boeing 777 lost all power and plummeted towards the ground.
He had arrived for a flight to China which was waiting on the ground. Already on board the jumbo was Mirror Political Editor Bob Roberts.
One aide told him of the terrifying moment the PM and his entourage feared they were about to be wiped out. The insider said: "It was just yards above our heads, almost skimming a lamppost as the plane came in fast and very, very low."
Advertisement
Mr Brown could only look on in horror as the jet narrowly missed his black Jaguar before smashing into grass just before the runway.
..... |
_________________ Follow the numbers |
|
Back to top |
|
|
paul wright Moderator
Joined: 26 Sep 2005 Posts: 2650 Location: Sunny Bradford, Northern Lights
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
wepmob2000 Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Joined: 03 Aug 2006 Posts: 431 Location: North East England
|
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 1:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thermate911 wrote: | Any pilots here? If so, you'll fully appreciate how incredible it is that these people brought the plane down so successfully. Heaped Praise for the captain of this aircraft is definitely in order - he deserves a medal at least! |
Yep, an amazing feat of airmanship by anyones standards, perfect energy management. In one report I read, one of the passengers said they just thought it was rough landing!
The most feasible speculation I've read so far is that it was a software fault, the problem seemed to start at 600ft, when most warning systems switch off, so maybe some sort of software conflict?
The whole incident carries a certain resonance for me, as a bit of an aeronut (some would say just 'nut') I've spent quite a bit of time at the end of runway 27L trying to get decent pictures. The best shots of the whole accident will be released in the next few days and were taken from my favourite shooting location (once the AAIB has finished with them and the photographer has got the best price for them).
Last edited by wepmob2000 on Sun Jan 20, 2008 1:48 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
karlos Validated Poster
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 2516 Location: london
|
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 1:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
I dont share peoples opinions about Gordon the Moron.
He is as committed to the new world order and the same zionist cabal as blair was if not more committed. If he was to have an accident it would be really doing the whole world a big favour.
Flights crash all the time. There is not a week that goes by that a plane does not crash somewhere in the world. All this incident points to is how dangerous flying is and especially for the local residents of the airport who everyday are at risk of a plane crashing through their roof.
Gordon is the architect of the Labour government and is a thoroughly evil man, it is him who gives warnings to others, eg John Smith, Robin Cook, Dr Kelly, etc |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mark Gobell On Gardening Leave
Joined: 24 Jul 2006 Posts: 4529
|
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 9:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
Is it normal for the AAIB to release information as early as 24 hours after the event ?
Also, if there is a problem with 777's why aren't they all grounded ? _________________ The Medium is the Massage - Marshall McLuhan. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
suraci Minor Poster
Joined: 17 Jan 2008 Posts: 75
|
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 11:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Triples 7's aren't grounded because Boeing is a big company and they don't want to piss them off. Disaster was averted because it wasn't bad weather, a strong crosswind and landing witout power would have been horrific.
I don't seriously suspect a conspiracy here, just * computers. We all know they don't work that well all the time, and fly by wire now means the pilots are merely sugggesting controls to a bank of chips, which then decide whether or not to bother firing up the engines. The Paris airshow crash a while bakc was immediatley blamed on pilot error, it then turned out he was demanding power increae but the onoard computer thought he was in landing mode.
This is the danger of fly by wire and relying on computers to fly a plane, which are not reliable. The Eurofighter turkey has the same issues, but politically it's too hard to admit it's nonsense and that they could have just gone out and bought any number of American or Russian aircraft to waste our billions on.
the whole hero thing annoys me though. the pilots were doing there job, and as they were on the plane as well you could argue they were as much intEveryone's a hero these days, from pilots saving their own skins to soldiers in Iraq fighting illegal wars for criminals. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
wepmob2000 Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Joined: 03 Aug 2006 Posts: 431 Location: North East England
|
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 2:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Can't quite see that, up until now at least, engine failure just prior to landing at 600ft has not been covered by the BA pilots training syllabus. So despite the fact the pilots might have understandably wanted to save their own lives, they still did a superb job of crash landing the aircraft and saving a lot of lives. A lot of lesser pilots would have plonked the jet on the A30............. They at least deserve some form of recognition.
Also I can't see your point about the Eurofighter, unless you're privy to info the rest of us are not..... Compared to most modern combat planes, its had a pretty smooth run in terms of software problems, at least most of them were ironed out long before they could compromise flight safety. Comparable Russian jets are junk compared to Typhoon (and who would want to deal with them anyway), and the only comparable U.S jet is so riddled with software bugs it sometimes won't even let the pilot out (and is horrendously expensive).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ieef0tLrv9c
I definitely agree though with your point about why the whole 777 fleet hasn't been grounded, as it should be pending the findings of the AAIB, how can the airlines be so confident that this fault doesn't affect all 777's? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
blackcat Validated Poster
Joined: 07 May 2006 Posts: 2376
|
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 5:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | how can the airlines be so confident that this fault doesn't affect all 777's? |
I suspect that somebody knows full well that all other 777s are fine. Rather like knowing that high rise buildings are fine to keep working in as they will never collapse due to fire. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
keithm Validated Poster
Joined: 05 Sep 2007 Posts: 93 Location: bournemouth
|
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 5:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I suspect that somebody knows full well that all other 777s are fine.
I agree. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|