China/Russia - New Flase Falg Operation?

[Disco_Destroyer]

IDK what next??

Russia: Sinks Chinese Ship, Claims Bound For US With Nuclear Warhead - Report
Russia: Sinks Chinese Ship, Claims Bound For US With Nuclear Warhead
by rescueliberty.com Feb.23, 2009


Link


Russian Military Analysts are reporting that Russian Coast Guard and Naval forces were 'forced' to sink the Chinese registered cargo ship New Star bound for US Port of Seattle after it refused orders to stop and be boarded over fears it was carrying a 'missing' nuclear warhead from a Russian Topol-M intercontinental ballistics missile.

Just released video of the warnings given to the New Star to halt clearly show its violations of International Law giving Russian Naval forces no choice but to sink the vessel, and the battle of which can read:

"The Global Times said the New Star was sequestered in Nakhodka for 'alleged smuggling,' a charged rejected by J-Rui. The newspaper said a Russian Coast Guard cruiser fired at least 500 rounds on the ship and 'forced it to sail back toward the port in force-6 winds.'

The ship began to sink on the way back to port and one of the two lifeboats was engulfed by high waves, the newspaper said. It said three of the eight missing crew were Chinese and the rest were Indonesian.

China's Foreign Ministry gave different numbers for the crew and missing, saying three of the 10 Chinese crew on board were rescued and seven were missing."

Most disturbing about these reports are them stating that the New Star is owned by the J Rui Lucky Shipping Co Ltd. which is a private limited company registered in Hong Kong and has long been known by Russian FSB Analysts to be an International shipping carrier of US Military and CIA cargo to support their Global War on Terror under contract with the American giant services company KBR whose former leader was US Vice President Cheney.

These reports further state that President Obama and the Globalist elite he represents are now 'desperate' in their attempts to stage a 9/11 type false flag operation in order to complete the subjugation of their citizens prior to the expected outbreak of massive social unrest they state will be occurring during the coming summer months as their economy continues to implode.

To the fears being felt by the American and European Globalists we can read as reported by German experts:

"The global financial crisis could lead to an economic meltdown - and to instable democratic structures in the western world. Because governments spend more billions than they possess, the outcome will probably be a massive inflation connected with millions of lost jobs - or even the total collapse. That's why President Hussein Obama needed an astronomic 3B-stimulus. But the Big Bailout will probably end as Big Bang: With no changes on the more-growth-more-capital-more financial market power mentality there will be no escape from the crisis. A global monetary reform seems to be the last exit from chaos and before social unrests will inevitably start."

These German fears were further confirmed yesterday by the former head of the US Federal Reserve, and as we can also read:

"Former U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan said on Tuesday the current global recession will "surely be the longest and deepest" since the 1930s and more government rescue funds are needed to stabilize the U.S. financial system."

[Disco_Destroyer]

In fact this is so rediculous I'm back =D
Why on earth would they take the risk of stealing a USSR/Chinese weapon when stacks are on the shelf? Oh and knowingly Missing in action.
Where in the video does it even hint at military hardware??
You dont see stolen Iranian Hardware in evidence put forward by Pentagon as proof of Iranian Meddling! Why would they bother with authenticity here?
Um and I'd say if all went to plan not much evidence of where a nuclear warhead came from would be left anyhow =D

[Disco_Destroyer]

I'll leave Lori Price to add the comentary

http://www.legitgov.org/

Taleban: we will launch attack on America that will amaze world [Yeah, it'll be *doubly* amazing because the guy is 'dead.'] 01 Apr 2009 Baitullah Mehsud, the leader of the Pakistani Taleban, threatened yesterday to launch an attack on Washington that would "amaze everyone in the world" as he claimed responsibility for the raid on a police academy in Lahore and boasted of a new regional militant alliance. The leader of Tehrik-e-Taleban Pakistan (Movement of Taleban Pakistan), made the claims after taking the highly unusual step of telephoning Western news organisations from an undisclosed location. [Um, Hades? Gee, I'd love to see his Verizon bill for *those* calls.] "We wholeheartedly take responsibility for this attack and will carry out more such attacks in future," he said.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/asia/article6011879.ece

Taliban Leader Vows to Attack D.C. "Soon" --Pakistani Taliban Commander Also Claims Responsibility For Attack On Police Academy 31 Mar 2009 The top Taliban commander in Pakistan promised an assault on Washington "soon" - one he says will "amaze" the world. "Soon we will launch an attack in Washington that will amaze everyone in the world," Baitullah Mehsud told The Associated Press by phone. Mehsud also claimed responsibility for Monday's attack on a police academy outside the eastern Pakistani city of Lahore, saying it was in retaliation for U.S. missile strikes against militants along the Afghan border.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/03/31/terror/main4905657.shtml

Taliban Leader's Washington Threat Is Credible, Analysts Say --Mehsud identified the White House as one of the targets. 31 Mar 2009 Baitullah Mehsud, commander of the Taliban in Pakistan, told The Associated Press in an interview Tuesday that his group was responsible for Monday's attack on a police academy in his country that killed seven police officers and injured more than 90 others. He also said, chillingly: "Soon we will launch an attack in Washington that will amaze everyone in the world." In an interview with local Dewa Radio, which was obtained by The Associated Press, Mehsud identified the White House as one of the targets.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,511873,00.html

Al Qaeda is planning attacks on US from Pakistan: Obama --US president says elimination of Al Qaeda in greater interest of Pakistan, Afghanistan 02 Apr 2009 United States President Barack Obama on Wednesday said Al Qaeda was planning attacks on the US from its hideouts in Pakistan, a private TV channel reported. Obama said the US would "chase and defeat the terrorist organisation wherever it is present in the world", the channel said.
http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2009%5C04%5C02%5Cstory_2 -4-2009_pg1_7

'Dead' Pakistan Taleban Chief Takes Credit for Lahore Terror Attack --What could possibly be the motive for this dialup from the dead? By Lori Price 31 Mar 2009 It's a miracle! Pakistan Taleban chief Baitullah Mehsud -- who supposedly died from kidney failure six months ago -- takes credit for three recent deadly terror attacks, including Monday's attack on a police academy in Lahore. He spoke to the BBC by phone. Meanwhile, Gen. David Petraeus [Betrayus] said Monday in an interview with FOX News, that the U.S. military reserves the 'right of last resort' for threats inside Pakistan.
http://www.legitgov.org/dead_taleban_leader_lahore_attack_310309.html

Taliban threatens 9/11-like attack on US 31 Mar 2009 The leader of Taliban in Pakistan has threatened to target the White House, saying that the terrorist attack is aimed to 'amaze' the world. "Soon we will launch an attack in Washington that will amaze everyone in the world," Baitullah Mehsud told The Associated Press by phone Tuesday, giving no further details. In his latest comments made during an interview with local Dewa Radio, Tehrik-e-Taliban (TTP) Pakistan leader had referred to the White house as a potential target.
http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=90130&sectionid=3510203

[Disco_Destroyer]

Ahahaha


Link


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_o_fHcGQbWo

April 9, 2009 - Chinese Spies Target US Power Grid http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123914805204099085.html

********************************************************************** ****
War Is Boring: US Struggles to Adapt to China's Economic Strategy
********************************************************************** ****

World Politics Review
David Axe
15 Apr 2009

http://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/article.aspx?id=3614

The tiny desert town of Abeche, in eastern Chad, offers a curious sight: Sandwiched between the mud huts that most people call home and the compounds belonging to international aid workers is a humble Chinese restaurant catering to Chad's growing population of Chinese engineers and managers.
Significantly, no equivalent American-style restaurant is to be found

The same holds true across the resource-rich, institution-poor developing world, in countries as remote as East Timor and as dangerous as Somalia. While much of the military establishment in Washington continues to plan for a possible conventional war with China, Beijing is studiously avoiding a direct confrontation, instead expanding its influence through means other than traditional warfare.
Principal among them is the deployment of Chinese technocrats abroad on profit-seeking missions for the world's third-largest economy

A series of events in Washington in March and April highlighted the ways in which the U.S. is struggling to come to terms with a rising China, whose greatest strength -- even during a global recession -- is not military, but rather economic in nature. Therein, too, lies its greatest threat to U.S.
interests

Two weeks ago, Defense Secretary Robert Gates announced a series of military reforms meant, in part, to prepare the U.S. for asymmetric threats, including economic warfare. Supporting these reforms, the Pentagon hosted a war game in March to test how Beijing might use its financial clout as a weapon by leveraging its global investments and huge portfolio of U.S. debt to destabilize the American economy.
The exercise coincided with the release of the Defense Department's controversial annual report on old-fashioned Chinese military power: its ships, tanks, airplanes and missiles

The report stated that the U.S. "welcomes the rise of a stable, peaceful, and prosperous China," but also emphasized Washington's concerns over China's rapidly modernizing and expanding military, and how it might be used.
Those concerns have been echoed across the military-industrial-media complex

In March, Rebecca Grant, a defense industry consultant, argued in her syndicated newspaper column that the U.S. must continue to buy F-22 fighters -- the most expensive tactical aircraft ever built at $150 million per plane -- in order to counter increasingly sophisticated mobile Chinese missile launchers as well as new Chinese jets that are a "near-even match with current U.S.
fighters"

The rumored existence of these sophisticated next-generation Chinese missiles has largely driven recent overhauls of the Navy's shipbuilding plans, including the cancellation -- after more than $10 billion in research -- of a $5 billion destroyer perceived to be particularly vulnerable to such missiles, and plans to add more anti-missile defenses to defend existing ships against them

The shifts reveal a military culture largely fixated on a perceived conventional military threat from China. But this threat is grossly exaggerated, even according to some of the Pentagon's own experts.
"China's ability to sustain military power at a distance remains limited," the DOD's 2009 China report states, adding that Beijing's forces remain tailored for "anti-access," or defensive, missions

In Africa, for instance, China "has limited military presence besides the assignment of personnel to U.N. peacekeeping operations, occasional training and exchange programs and the assignment of defense attachés to Chinese embassies," the Washington, D.C.-based Jamestown Foundation reported earlier this month. "China rarely sends its naval ships to African ports; its last naval visit took place in 2002.
" The Pentagon, by contrast, has 2,000 soldiers deployed on combat operations in Africa, in addition to warplanes and several warships

Instead of challenging U.S. military dominance on the continent, Beijing has long focused on forging economic ties. "China's investment in Africa is rising sharply, and Beijing boasts a proactive record on aid and debt relief, having given more than $5.5 billion in assistance and canceled the debt of 31 countries," Japanese Africa analyst Hisane Masaki wrote this month in the trade journal Japan Focus. Meanwhile, the growth rate for Chinese investment in Africa has far exceeded the growth rate for U.S. investment, leaving the two countries' two-way trade in Africa roughly equal today, despite the U.S.
having a much larger economy

"China's approach to securing minerals in Africa has been to sign agreements to build huge projects in exchange for minerals," the New York Times reported in March. As one example, "China won oil interests off the coast of Angola after wooing that African country with a . . .
$2 billion credit line," Masaki wrote in his report

China also seems to favor African countries that many American businesses find too dangerous. In 2007 alone, Chinese civilian technical teams came under attack by rebels and insurgents in Nigeria, Ethiopia and Sudan -- all countries where few Western nationals operate. The same year, death threats from Islamists drove Chinese engineers in Somalia to briefly seek refuge in a heavily guarded hotel.
Not until this year, with the deep global recession, did Beijing balk at potentially dangerous projects in Congo and Guinea

Still, the daring investments of previous years have helped feed China's growing appetite for imported energy resources, and given Beijing the diplomatic heft to cut off energy supplies to its main symbolic rival, Taiwan. In 2006, oil-rich Chad ended formal ties with Taiwan "under pressure from Beijing," Masaki recalled.
It was this kind of maneuver that the Pentagon's March war game tried to model

That's not to say Beijing's economic strategy is always successful, whether in Africa or elsewhere. The world recession has caused some marginal investments in Africa to turn sour, particularly in Guinea. And in Asia, Chinese attempts to gain a foothold in East Timor's expanding energy sector have "made little headway," Jamestown reported in March -- despite Beijing investing millions of dollars in infrastructure in the capital of Dili, establishing scholarship programs for Timorese students and even deploying teams of doctors to deliver free medical care.
Surely to Washington's relief, Dili has preferred to collaborate with Western governments to exploit its oil and gas reserves

Still, Beijing's successes outnumber its failures. In light of this, Defense Secretary Gates is fighting to reorganize the U.S. security apparatus to reflect, among other things, China's economic strategy. In early April, he announced deep cuts to traditional military hardware, and a shift in funding towards cyber security, assistance to allies and "soft power" approaches.
Among these are nontraditional measures relying heavily on partnerships with the State Department, private industry and the nonprofit sector -- in many ways mirroring the way that China's security rides on the backs of its engineers and state-owned companies

To meet rising challenges, including that posed by China, Gates' Pentagon "supports institutionalizing whole-of-government approaches to addressing national security challenges," according to the January Role and Missions Review Report

But Anthony Cordesman, from the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, said in an April statement that Gates' announced reforms don't go far enough towards achieving this "comprehensive" approach. Furthermore, old-fashioned firepower is still favored over economic measures as a means of advancing U.S.
interests by the individual military services, powerful industrial lobbies and many members of Congress

As long as that is the case, China will continue to outmaneuver the U.S.
on the economic battlefield

David Axe is an independent correspondent, a World Politics Review contributing editor, and the author of "War Bots." He blogs at War is Boring.
His WPR column, War is Boring, appears every Wednesday

Photo: Chinese President Hu Jintao on a state visit to Kenya, April 2006 (photo by Flickr user Demosh, licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.
0 License)

[Thermate911]

Flase Falg? That should defeat goooogle, anyroad ;)

Do you see the immense historical irony of the youngest, 'rawest', most naive empire ever known tackling the most ancient? It's been clear for quite a while that China can dance rings around American psychobabble.

What was it Gore Vidal said? 'The American Empire is historically the first in the world to go from barbarism to decadence without an intervening civilisation'.

[Disco_Destroyer]

Yep Flase Falg as a joke

[Thermate911]

Thought so ;-)

The ritten werd can be so misconstrood, innit?

Down wiv Flase Falgs!!