How, Who, Why, Which is most urgently solved?

[Contrarian]

My 2p

I think it is possible that TV feeds were manipulated. Also possible that planes were switched. If planes were used at all remote control is the strongest suit to attain the precision required since 'computers and PSU' floors were targeted in both buildings.

Also is possible that airliners were diverted and no planes used, Instead, the (computer upgrades) were actually the placing of stunt effects to make it LOOK like planes struck.

Who has another explanation for such heavy work on those specific floors pre 911+ Demolishing buildings required placements throughout the buildings, not a single specific floor area. The work done on those floors was specific to requirements for those floors. A homing beacon? Could be the size of and RFID chip. No, those floors were prepared for industrial-strength floor-specific purpose ie something to do with making planes appear to have hit, or enhancing the effect of the hit. Hollywoodizing it.

But if planes really hit why the need for this? To keep fires burning?

Certainly stunt effects have been proven to be a part of the crime in the case of Shanksville, where the 'crash site' has been identified has already having had the 'wing' marks pre-911 - on backdated Google Earth views.

We are left to work out the exact 'how' in the presence of evidence having been removed form the crime scene (but not all). And we can probably get close.

HOW is an interesting question, WHO and WHY are more urgently understood

A good outline of the facts ma'am

http://theinfounderground.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=5367

re-post of post in nose thread - more appropriate as new thread I think