Daily Mail "Rumours that Government Staged 7/7"

[onetruevoice]

Qute a controversial headline today in Britain's most right-wing tabloid.

Even though it contains little more than a re-telling of the Conspiracy Files programme, it will no doubt set some readers thinking.

I thought it would be interest of readers of this forum too, so here's the link to the Mail's website:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1197419/Conspiracy-fever-As-ru mours-swell-government-staged-7-7-victims-relatives-proper-inquiry.htm l

[scienceplease 2]

I think quite a good article. I would have thought www.911forum.org.uk headline material. The Daily Mail has seemed to have concentrated on the prospect of anti-government feelings in the Muslim community rather than any real desire for seeking the truth and doing the right thing, but still... better than the usual MSM treatment such as Rudin's 7/7 "documentary".

If Brown has any political sense at all, he should nip this in the bud: hold an independent inquiry, send police into MI5/MI6 to impound documents and computer systems, suspend top officials in that and related organisations and ensure that Tony Blair does not leave the country.

Hmmm, some hope.

[onetruevoice]

What surprises me is how "pro-truth" the tone of the article is.

The writer dismissively states:

The report insisted that the bombers acted on their own, constructing explosives from chapatti flour and hair bleach mixed in the bath at a flat in Leeds, Yorkshire, where all four had family and friends.

To point out such absurdities is quite a bold step for an establishment newpaper like the Mail.

[Frank Freedom]

Yes the Mail is re-emphasising the errors,unanswered questions and speculations made in the 7/7 program (notedly un-addressed there also).

It seems to me the "7/7" official narrative (aka the official conspiracy theory) is being heavily attacked,and the un-official conspiracy theories are being heavily promoted.

So the question is are they trying to wake people up to how bad "government" is?

And we need a "Change" in the type of "governance"?

I forget who said words to this effect:

"The people will demand "Change", and the solution given will be the
One World Government"

P-R-S

[kbo234]

Tony Gosling says something very surprising (to me) in his talk at Heathrow earlier this year. See here:

http://blip.tv/file/2202180

He said the press is not 'controlled'. It is a battleground.

Maybe he meant, 'completely controlled'. Perhaps you can say a little more about this Tony.

Just knowing human beings as we all do, I find it easier to believe that many, or even most, journalists imagine they are part of a 'free' press and struggle against the 'moderation' (subtle control) of content by older and more senior colleagues.

Perhaps there are writers and executives on the Mail who are genuinely outraged that there has been no 7/7 Inquiry. Perhaps they are beginning to harbour their own suspicions. Perhaps there is a genuine 'waking up' going on amongst persons in the media. Perhaps some are beginning to say to themselves "Enough is enough".

I'd certainly rather believe that than that they are all working consciously in the service of wickedness, which cannot be the case.

Really......if there is an 'evil' overclass in the press that serves the interests of the global NWO satanic agenda....then one of their biggest headaches is bound to be keeping their decent employees on board.......and that will require some recognition and expression of their real concerns.

http://blip.tv/file/2202180

[rodin]

[Micpsi]

"They say it takes seven minutes to walk from the Thameslink line station to the main King's Cross station, where there is an entrance to the Tube network.

Police say the four men were seen on the main King's Cross concourse at 8.26am, although no CCTV footage has ever been made public."
But photos HAVE:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1176280/The-supper-Chilling-ne w-pictures-7-7-bombers-casually-buying-snacks-way-kill-52-innocent-peo ple.html


"But is this possible? How had the men got there in three short minutes after getting off the Luton train at 8.23am?"

Um. Perhaps they did not "walk" but dashed to catch the Tube train they had intended to board. Then three minutes might have been adequate.

"The Luton image is also contentious: the quality is poor and the faces of three of the bombers are unidentifiable. The conspiracy theorists say it could be a fake."

I wonder why? The original reason given by 7/7 truthers was that they suspected the bombers never got to London and there was only one image made public, which they tried hard to debunk. But now other images have been released, there was no motivation to fake just this image and the pathetic, misconceived attempts by 7/7 truthers to find fault with it are now irrelevant.

[eogz]

I suspect that the 'Mail's'intentions are to demonise the labour gorvernment further.

Maybe a one world government will be offered, but not by the mail, they don't even like the EU.

They are a funny kind of newspaper. oftyen espousing the opinion others don't.

[Pugwash]

Re: Micpsi Mail Link

[scienceplease 2]

[John White]

[item7]

[John White]

[Thermate911]

[Andrew.]

"Then why did they tinker with the image at all. (And yes I am a expert), it is impossible believe the image as presented is submitted without modification . The problem I have is that it has obviously been modified. (If I were doing it to deceive rather than just decrease clarity , I would have made a better job). Speculation of which bits have been modified is fairly unproductive. It has been modified therefore it is invalid."

Hi Pugwash.

Since they have fabricated so called evidence. Any video-s released, time stamped included prove nothing and should not be used as evidence. Probably the reason they made a poor job of it so then when/if they release more videos they will fool people in to thinking that they had the real videos / and proof all along and thus by extension that the CT ers were mistaken. With the first release enough to fix in to the publics mind at large that they had evidence for that period and then to keep the con going with the release of further videos.

To fabricate evidence is to pervert the cause of Justice and in view of other evidence to frame others for murder.

[onetruevoice]

People should now re-visit this article and look at the comments that readers have placed underneath.

Each comment is given a positive or negative mark of approval by other readers.

In addition to this, the Daily Mail does not print all readers' submissions.

But, most of the comments are -"pro-truth" and these are given a high positive rating by other readers - most encouraging - and from experience a fairly accurate guage of public opinion.

For example:

To me the fact that the police were having a "practice" the so exactly matched what happened is right up there with one person winning the lottery every week for a year. Possible but not probable.

The fact that the government are trying to get their hands on the maker of this video also speaks volumes.

So - what happens if we find out there is evidence that our government has murdered it's own electorate - for political ends?

Now THAT is a question to which I dread the answer.

Is given a positive approval rating of 568 by other readers. This is very high

Public opinion is now on our side, folks.

[onetruevoice]

And I would also suggest that for one of Britain's most popular tabloids to even run this story, the tide is turning.

Running a story about 7/7 truth or 911 truth just a couple of years ago would have been unthinkable in the Daily Mail.

I imagine that many journalists, after exposing the truth of MPs' expenses, are in a mood to hint at other instances of fraud at a high level.

[Thermate911]

[ian neal]

[onetruevoice]

Somehow I missed that review from 2005 and was surprised it featured in the Mail.

However, given the prevalence of 911 Truth on the net, the amount of time given to it is still minuscule in the popular press.

[TonyGosling]

Actually the Mail seem simply to be using the story and all our hard work as a stick to beat Gordon Brown with. To be fair he is a nice guy but a confused and vascillating dunderhead which is why he was employed by the NWO in the first place as a different kind of puppet from Tony Blair.

It was almost certainly a foreign military such as Israel or the US or elements within NATO or NATO Intelligence services such as MI6 and the CIA.

The other obvious perpetrator is Private Military Companies such as Blackwater and MPRI. Possibly even commissioned to carry it out by a private individual through a numbered Swiss bank account?

[Thermate911]

Never in my wildest thoughts did I ever think the Wail would even let slip a mention of 'Dib's film '7/7 Ripple Effect'.

It is my misfortune to know a couple of avid Daily Wail readers - imagine my surprise when they asked if I knew where to obtain a copy of this film!

What is it the MoD said in one of their interminable reports recently? Something along the lines of 'The big danger is that revolution will be started by the middle classes'?

[TonyGosling]

The Daily Mail, like all our newspapers, is deeply flawed.
But as the paper of opposition at the moment it is flourishing.
Only national paper to do decent double page spread on 9/11 Truth.

Cultivate all journalists all the time - they may be wromng now so they need persuading, not despising.