FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist  Chat Chat  UsergroupsUsergroups  CalendarCalendar RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

US 'releases 9/11 Pentagon tape'
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7, Covid-1984 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> Stratehy Of Tension, Fake Terror, 9/11 & 7/7 Truth News
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
flamesong
Major Poster
Major Poster


Joined: 27 Jul 2005
Posts: 1305
Location: okulo news

PostPosted: Tue May 16, 2006 5:22 pm    Post subject: US 'releases 9/11 Pentagon tape' Reply with quote

US 'releases 9/11 Pentagon tape'
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4987716.stm
The BBC wrote:
The US defence department is to release a video of the plane crashing into the Pentagon on 11 September 2001, legal rights group Judicial Watch has said.
The US will release the previously unseen footage at 1300 (1700 GMT).

American Airlines Flight 77 crashed into the US military headquarters, killing 184 people, after it was hijacked as part of an al-Qaeda plot.

The release of the video, taken from a Pentagon security camera, comes after a freedom of information act request.

Judicial Watch said it would release the footage as soon as it could, but it was not clear when that would be.

Judicial Watch filed the freedom of information request in 2004, but the Pentagon refused to release the video because it was part of the investigation involving al-Qaeda plotter Zacarias Moussaoui, the group said.

Judicial Watch filed a lawsuit this February, arguing that there was "no legal basis" for the refusal.

Earlier this month Moussaoui was jailed for life for his role in the 2001 attacks.

Judicial Watch said they wanted to obtain the video because "it was very important to complete the public record" on the attacks.

"Finally, we hope that this video will put to rest the conspiracy theories involving American Airlines Flight 77," President Tom Fitton said.

Should be interesting!

At the moment, the Judicial Watch website - http://www.judicialwatch.org - seems to be overwhelmed.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Pikey
Banned
Banned


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 1491
Location: North Lancashire

PostPosted: Tue May 16, 2006 5:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yep Alf this should be interesting.

Will they also release the video footage confiscated by the FBI agents at the hotel and vehicle filling station opposite?

Peace & truth

_________________
Pikey

Peace, truth, respect and a Mason free society

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RaH-lGafwtE#
www.wholetruthcoalition.org
www.truthforum.co.uk
www.checktheevidence.com
www.newhorizonsstannes.com
www.tpuc.org
www.cpexposed.com
www.thebcgroup.org.uk
www.fmotl.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bouncy Castle
New Poster
New Poster


Joined: 27 Apr 2006
Posts: 4
Location: Edinburgh

PostPosted: Tue May 16, 2006 5:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Loose Change, Edition 3 anyone?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jason67
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 07 May 2006
Posts: 129
Location: SE London

PostPosted: Tue May 16, 2006 6:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Anybody got an idea when we can see it?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
flamesong
Major Poster
Major Poster


Joined: 27 Jul 2005
Posts: 1305
Location: okulo news

PostPosted: Tue May 16, 2006 6:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dunno how long you will have to wait.

I only know that as a graphic designer, if I kept a client waiting nearly five years whilst I rearranged the pixels on a handful of poor quality, low resolution video stills, I would have got the sack.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Licenced2chill
Minor Poster
Minor Poster


Joined: 15 May 2006
Posts: 19
Location: Delta ProspeKt,Section 28,Wales

PostPosted: Tue May 16, 2006 7:15 pm    Post subject: oh dear... Reply with quote

Ive seen it on bbc news,its the same damn video as the famous three frames...thanks pentagon,we all believe you now(someone should really tell these guys that their "new video" is the same bit that people are using to prove the inside job,ie:there is no plane on yer new video suckers.
I was at least hoping that they would have made an effort and released some faked scene or something.
Rolling Eyes

_________________
"When you sit with a nice girl for two hours, it seems like two minutes. When you sit on a hot stove for two minutes, it seems like two hours that's relativity." -- Albert Einstein
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Licenced2chill
Minor Poster
Minor Poster


Joined: 15 May 2006
Posts: 19
Location: Delta ProspeKt,Section 28,Wales

PostPosted: Tue May 16, 2006 7:18 pm    Post subject: link Reply with quote

heres what the gaurdian say(same video we`ve all seen)

http://www.guardian.co.uk/september11/story/0,,1776224,00.html

_________________
"When you sit with a nice girl for two hours, it seems like two minutes. When you sit on a hot stove for two minutes, it seems like two hours that's relativity." -- Albert Einstein
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jason67
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 07 May 2006
Posts: 129
Location: SE London

PostPosted: Tue May 16, 2006 7:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hey, Licenced2chill, are you sure it was the new video that has been released and not the pics of the old one?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Licenced2chill
Minor Poster
Minor Poster


Joined: 15 May 2006
Posts: 19
Location: Delta ProspeKt,Section 28,Wales

PostPosted: Tue May 16, 2006 7:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well,i couldn`t believe it ,but i think it is!
"The video has not been officially released before but it has been leaked and publicly circulated on the internet."
The guardian,today 7pm.
News 24 were showing it a bit ago saying"pentagon decided to release the footage to finally put to rest the conspiracy theories"

PUKE

I could be wrong,they may yet show us a nice cut n paste job...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Licenced2chill
Minor Poster
Minor Poster


Joined: 15 May 2006
Posts: 19
Location: Delta ProspeKt,Section 28,Wales

PostPosted: Tue May 16, 2006 7:54 pm    Post subject: news 24 now! Reply with quote

quick watch news 24 now-merseyside detonation of ww2 bomb in 5 mins!!! quick
_________________
"When you sit with a nice girl for two hours, it seems like two minutes. When you sit on a hot stove for two minutes, it seems like two hours that's relativity." -- Albert Einstein
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
brian
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 18 Aug 2005
Posts: 611
Location: Scotland

PostPosted: Tue May 16, 2006 8:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Same video still showing Sep 12 2001 date.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Licenced2chill
Minor Poster
Minor Poster


Joined: 15 May 2006
Posts: 19
Location: Delta ProspeKt,Section 28,Wales

PostPosted: Tue May 16, 2006 8:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

AAArgh dont bother ,its tony teaching us about how hes going to poison us all with nuclear plants.
_________________
"When you sit with a nice girl for two hours, it seems like two minutes. When you sit on a hot stove for two minutes, it seems like two hours that's relativity." -- Albert Einstein
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ian
Editor
Editor


Joined: 26 Jul 2005
Posts: 68
Location: Oxford

PostPosted: Tue May 16, 2006 9:00 pm    Post subject: nod Reply with quote

from the last line of the Guardian article...

"Most journalists, scientists and military experts have dismissed the conspiracy theories, but a minority of experts support them."

Is the the first 'nod' towards Scholars for 9/11 Truth (and other such groups) we've seen in the Guardian?

_________________
"The rocket bombs which fell daily on London were probably fired by the Government of Oceania itself, 'just to keep people frightened'."
1984, George Orwell.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
jason67
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 07 May 2006
Posts: 129
Location: SE London

PostPosted: Tue May 16, 2006 9:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I really cant understand why they would release this video which is exactly the same shot as the still photos. Whats the point? I thought that it would be brand new footage from at least another angle.
And how about those media reports on how it will prove that all of the conspiracy theories are now proved incorrect? I dont think so.
With desperate attempts like this the future is only going to get better!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TimmyG
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 04 Apr 2006
Posts: 489
Location: Manchester

PostPosted: Tue May 16, 2006 9:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ahh. didn't see this thread.
posted about the bbc news just on in another thread i made in general.

yeah.. still no sign of a 747. few more frames than we had already seen

_________________
"During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
alkmyst
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 21 Jan 2006
Posts: 177
Location: UK

PostPosted: Tue May 16, 2006 9:37 pm    Post subject: Flight 77 Reply with quote

www.edition.cnn.com/2006/US/05/16/pentagon.video/index.html

I have just spent the past two hours repeatedly running this newly released footage... and do you know what?

I still can't see anything that resembles a 757!

What I do see...is a white vapour trail ... at ground level?

It seems to me that the Emperor still ain't wearin' no clothes!!

Any suggestions?

Al K Myst
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
jason67
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 07 May 2006
Posts: 129
Location: SE London

PostPosted: Tue May 16, 2006 9:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Your just not looking hard enough Alkmyst, it must be there...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
gypsum
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 29 Mar 2006
Posts: 211
Location: Scotland

PostPosted: Tue May 16, 2006 9:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've done the same alkmyst, and I still see no evidence of a plane. They were dribbling the same nonsense on sky -
http://www.sky.com/skynews/video/videoplayer/0,,30000-pentagon_160506, 00.html
At least the guy admits he can't see a plane even though he's been assured by others that there's a plane there.

I got really exited when i saw the link on msn 'US releases 9/11 Pentagon video', but i was disappointed to see the same 5 frames as before with a few more at the end. Typical Rolling Eyes
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Justin
9/11 Truth Organiser
9/11 Truth Organiser


Joined: 27 Jul 2005
Posts: 500
Location: Cumbria / Yorkshire Dales

PostPosted: Tue May 16, 2006 9:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Dam is breaking - just seen News at Ten. Did anyone record and can we have a transcript? These 'new' images are what we have known about for years - there is nothing new. Certainly no proof of a 757. And what about all the other security cameras, especially at the filling station and hotel which were confiscated?

True that the alternative viewpoints concerning the Pentagon strike were described as 'outlandish conspiracy theories' by ITN, but tonight the British 9/11 Truth Movement has been given one hell of a boost - we must all knuckle down and work even harder! The cracks are definitely appearing!

_________________
Connect to Infinite Consciousness - enjoy the ride!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Pikey
Banned
Banned


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 1491
Location: North Lancashire

PostPosted: Tue May 16, 2006 10:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just seen it on the BBC News at Ten.

In the words of Victor Meldrew "I dont believe it" its the same footage as appears on DVK's "In Plane site". You see no Boeing 757!

The BBC reporter stated that this should silence the very small minority of
Conspiracy theorists!

A totally dysfunctional and non independent media in terms of reporting the truth.

Sleep well but if you happen to wake up in a cold sweat dont be surprised!.

Peace & Truth

_________________
Pikey

Peace, truth, respect and a Mason free society

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RaH-lGafwtE#
www.wholetruthcoalition.org
www.truthforum.co.uk
www.checktheevidence.com
www.newhorizonsstannes.com
www.tpuc.org
www.cpexposed.com
www.thebcgroup.org.uk
www.fmotl.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
flamesong
Major Poster
Major Poster


Joined: 27 Jul 2005
Posts: 1305
Location: okulo news

PostPosted: Tue May 16, 2006 10:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You are all looking at the wrong video! And so is the BBC!

The newly released video, from two separate cameras, is here:

http://www.judicialwatch.org/flight77.shtml

I'm not saying that there is any sign of Flight 77 but this is not the footage we have all seen before.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
flamesong
Major Poster
Major Poster


Joined: 27 Jul 2005
Posts: 1305
Location: okulo news

PostPosted: Tue May 16, 2006 10:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

By the way, the 'aircraft' appears a few frames after the car passes the barrier. At 1:26 on the first video and 0:24 on the second.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
gypsum
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 29 Mar 2006
Posts: 211
Location: Scotland

PostPosted: Tue May 16, 2006 10:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Flamesong wrote:
By the way, the 'aircraft' appears a few frames after the car passes the barrier. At 1:26 on the first video and 0:24 on the second.


At 24 seconds you can see the white smoke starting to appear from the right hand side of the shot. Correct me if I'm wrong, but surely if the white smoke is there, then the plane should also be in that picture Question
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Pikey
Banned
Banned


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 1491
Location: North Lancashire

PostPosted: Tue May 16, 2006 10:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanx Alf.

Its as clear as mud, and its not recognisable as a civilian aircraft to me.

A couple of things struck me as being odd:- the taxi in video 1 and the car in video 2 are obviously very near to the camera yet you cannot read the reg plates and also after the impact there is no movement or anyone to be seen in the foreground.

_________________
Pikey

Peace, truth, respect and a Mason free society

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RaH-lGafwtE#
www.wholetruthcoalition.org
www.truthforum.co.uk
www.checktheevidence.com
www.newhorizonsstannes.com
www.tpuc.org
www.cpexposed.com
www.thebcgroup.org.uk
www.fmotl.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
flamesong
Major Poster
Major Poster


Joined: 27 Jul 2005
Posts: 1305
Location: okulo news

PostPosted: Tue May 16, 2006 10:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

For a size comparison between the flying object and a car in the same area, look at the following frames:

1:26 'Aircraft'
2:41 Car



pentagon2-41.jpg
 Description:
Pentagon Frame 2:41
 Filesize:  18.43 KB
 Viewed:  166 Time(s)

pentagon2-41.jpg



pentagon1-26.jpg
 Description:
Pentagon - Frame 1:26
 Filesize:  18.33 KB
 Viewed:  138 Time(s)

pentagon1-26.jpg


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
flamesong
Major Poster
Major Poster


Joined: 27 Jul 2005
Posts: 1305
Location: okulo news

PostPosted: Tue May 16, 2006 11:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

And, though I never thought it was down to anything other than an incompetent technician who couldn't set the clock properly, it's interesting that the timestamp which showed 'Sep. 12, 2001 17:37:19' has been removed. Furthermore, this video is of a far more inferior quality than the one which has been pored over for years.

But remaining level-headed, there is still nothing conclusive here and the point is strongly made by Paul Watson, that we could all be being had - in pretty much the same way that I believe the missile/pod theory has the potential to destroy the credibility of the 9/11 Truth Movement:

http://www.propagandamatrix.com/articles/may2006/160506giantpsyop.htm



pentagonnew.jpg
 Description:
Pentagon New
 Filesize:  19.76 KB
 Viewed:  90 Time(s)

pentagonnew.jpg



pentagonoriginal.jpg
 Description:
Pentagon Original
 Filesize:  13.4 KB
 Viewed:  98 Time(s)

pentagonoriginal.jpg


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
is
Minor Poster
Minor Poster


Joined: 31 Mar 2006
Posts: 43

PostPosted: Wed May 17, 2006 12:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

know people think this is a double bluff, but im starting to think that the gov'munt really have nothing left to pull out of the bag.

I mean, that video DOESNT SHOW A PLANE. If it were a plane, it would fill the entire screen.

Now, I know some are concerned that the no-planers will be the death of us and that the pentagon will produce new tapes showing an undeniable commercial jet hitting, but if this 'new' footage is in fact genuine, I dont see how a commercial het could have hit it. What it shows is a small jet or a missile.

What if theyre not * with us? What if weve actually got em on the ropes, and this is a desperate attempt to solidify support for the offical version, by producing doesnts of headline repetitions of 'new footage proves conspircy theorists wrong' and lies of that nature.

Could be. I still don't know what to think on the pentagon. Just seems to me that if a commercial airliner did hit it we would have seen a STILL IMAGE of the plane NEAR the building by now. The fact that we havnt is sheer insanity.

_________________
The truth about 9/11: Everybody's Gotta Learn Sometime
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
flamesong
Major Poster
Major Poster


Joined: 27 Jul 2005
Posts: 1305
Location: okulo news

PostPosted: Wed May 17, 2006 12:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

What both fascinates and confuses me is that Judicial Watch seem to be motivated by the belief that the release of this video would shut the 'conspiracy theorists' up. A quick scan through the comments left on the videos clearly shows that it has done anything but shut up the doubters:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L75Gga92WO8

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TAaP4Z3zls8

If anything it has fueled even more doubt.

And whilst I have my own suspiscions about what might or might not have hit the Pentagon, I share the concern that we may succeed in waking a lot of people up only to have them hit the snooze button when concrete proof is either discovered or manufactured.

I liken this in many ways to the way that some, possible astroturf, organisations build their objections to ID cards on the argument that it will cost the tax payer a lot of money.

'We aren't going to pay £300 for an ID card'

'Well how about £75'

'Sounds very reasonable, don't mind if I do!'

A not too distant cousin of Problem, Reaction, Solution which is nothing more sophisticated than souk bartering - but also illustrates how easily and cynically the greater population can be manipulated.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Hazzard
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 14 May 2006
Posts: 368

PostPosted: Wed May 17, 2006 7:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Its actualy proving how hypnotised the world is.

By showing something they have already shown and then saying it shows something else. Is the equivalent of the hypnotist pouring ice water down your pants to make sure your still under his power.

_________________
Since when?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Justin
9/11 Truth Organiser
9/11 Truth Organiser


Joined: 27 Jul 2005
Posts: 500
Location: Cumbria / Yorkshire Dales

PostPosted: Wed May 17, 2006 8:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

My own gut feeling is that we have them, the PTB, on the defensive and they are getting desperate. I'm personally convinced that no Boeing 757 went into the Pentagon - and the main reason why I believe this is what commercial airliner pilots have told me, especially a guy who actually flies 757s.

Yes, it is just possible we are being set up, but we are attacking on all fronts and with over three hundred significant smoking guns, what hit the Pentagon is just one of very many major problems we have with the official 9/11 story. What hit the Pentagon must still remain an important part of our investigation.

_________________
Connect to Infinite Consciousness - enjoy the ride!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7, Covid-1984 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> Stratehy Of Tension, Fake Terror, 9/11 & 7/7 Truth News All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You can attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group