Thierry Meyssan Pentagon.

[brian]

Anyone familiar with these aspects? I thought I had come across most related stuff but first for me.


"2.The official version does not include the attack on the White House annex, the Old Executive Office Building (called the "Eisenhower Building"). Yet, on the morning of the eleventh, ABC television broadcast, live, pictures of a fire ravaging the presidential services building."

"Who, then, could have fired such a missile on the Pentagon? The answer was given by the off-the-record revelations of Ari Fleischer, the White House spokesman, and by Karl Rove, senior advisor to the president, to journalists from the New York Times and the Washington Post. Eighteen days later, these men discounted the veracity of the information they had given the journalists, claiming that they had been speaking under the stress of great emotion."

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=200605 18&articleId=2463

[jason67]

Hello Brian,

These topics are discussed in a book called '911 the ultimate truth' by Laura Knight-Jadczyk from the sign-of-the-times crew.

She suggests that the fires were started to simulate an attack that never happened (flight 93)

[orestes]

Webster Tarpley also mentions it in his book 'synthetic terror: made in usa'. He supports the thesis by Meyssan that 9/11 was a coup. There is some scary information about the context of the attacks and a potential confrontation with Russia. Apparently warnings were phoned in on the day using codes that implied the plotters may have had access to nuclear weapons. This would explain why Bush went to Offcuts (I think thats right) where the nuclear 'buttons' are: to ensure control of the arsenal.