Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Posted: Mon Jan 24, 2011 12:04 am Post subject:
Wikileaks: No Serious Derogatory Information about US, UK, Israel
It is illuminating that none of Assange’s document dumps have revealed any notable scandals involving Great Britain or Israel. No US public figures have had to resign because of anything Wikileaks has done. No major ongoing covert operation or highly placed agent of influence has been blown. After all these months, there are still no US indictments against Assange, even though we know that a US grand jury will readily indict a ham sandwich if the US Attorney demands it. If the CIA had wanted to silence Assange, they could have subjected him to the classic kidnapping aka rendition, meaning that he would have been beaten, drugged, and carted off to wake up in a black site prison in Egypt, Poland, or Guantanamo Bay. Otherwise, the CIA could have had recourse to the usual extralegal wetwork. We must also assume that the new US Cybercommand with its vast resources would have little trouble shutting down the Wikileaks mirror sites, no matter how numerous they might be. The same goes for Anonymous and other flanking organizations of Wikileaks. But these considerations are purely fantastic. Assange emerges today as the pampered darling and golden boy of The New York Times, Der Spiegel. The Guardian, El Pais — in short, of the entire Anglo-American official media Wurlitzer. He reclines today in baronial splendor in the country house of a well-connected retired British officer who should be quizzed by the media about his ties to British intelligence. The radical-chic world, from Bianca Jagger to Michael Moore, is at Assange’s feet.
The following, posted a while ago, summarizes my view on Assange:
From thread: WikiLeaks - partial Afghan War Diary, 2004-2010
Posted: Wed Aug 04, 2010 8:21 pm
Assange wrote:
Quote:
I believe in facts about conspiracies.
Any time people with power plan in secret, they are conducting a conspiracy. So there are conspiracies everywhere.
There are also crazed conspiracy theories. It's important not to confuse these two.
Generally, when there's enough facts about a conspiracy we simply call this news.
I'm constantly annoyed that people are distracted by false conspiracies such as 9/11, when all around we provide evidence of real conspiracies, for war or mass financial fraud.
The statement above is so subtly manipulative (conspiracy with facts=news, 9/11=false conspiracy) that I will dare to speculate Assange is a controlled asset.
How do we know the leaks are not controlled?
We don't.
How grave was the latest 'super' leak?
Surely it's hurtful to Anglo-American imperialism, but the handlers may have decided it's worth the price if they can create a credible figure that decides what is and what is not a government conspiracy.
The strategy would have been simple but effective: build Assange's credibility with a first emotional leak (helicopters executing 10 civilians).
Then, once his credibility is established, control the message.
Given the perceived scale of the latest revelations, is it plausible that Assange's site was not taken down?
No.
As American is imploding and every one knows it as they have lost two wars, they need to be able to justify their politics by showing to their own country that their whole world supports them.
I bet the revelations about what politicians say about America the world over is given a positive light in the US press whilst it ddoes the exact opposite the world over, destroying faith in all politicians who say one thing internally and another externally.
The Pentagon leaks have blown apart the notion that the Arab elites were a) ever interested in the Palestinian issue
b) were anything more than self-serving corrupt dictators in it for the ride
c) nepotism was endemic
In WW2 the very noisy story was that the world was at war, and people were dying. The very quiet and insidious story was the eugenics programme, not widely known until much later.
I wonder if the same is now going on.
The very noisy story is about countries at war, weapons and violence.
The very quiet, insidious story is about human re-engineering, deleted by Wikileaks.
Posted: Fri Jan 28, 2011 5:43 am Post subject: Assange and Wikileaks: Committee of 300/John Adam St Gang
At 1.52 minutes on the following video, in the third column, it is clearly headed ‘human re-engineering’, which is where I originally came across the expression. The sub-headings are also interesting. This is certainly not my expression. I take it then that EIM Group, whose website this was, is certainly involved in 'social manipulation' and 'human re-engineering'. (Conveniently, the youtube cover screen shot is of this image, the image you see below).
Also, I specifically said to Andrzej Kuszell, head of Studioearchitects, who designed the Ark Academy in Brent, ‘I don’t suppose this is about human re-engineering, whereby you can reframe someone’s mind on account of the physical environment you place them in’, to which he replied ‘I’d rather not go into the detail about that.’
I also told him that there was a rumour in Brent, which came in two parts, the first being that the planning permission for the concrete slab on Bridge Road would never be found. (I didn’t mention the second part). To my knowledge it has indeed never been found.
If Assange, (or whoever it was at Wikileaks) is capable of removing an expose of a Committee of 300/John Adam St Gang institution (Ark), then they are supporting the efforts to hide this expose, being driven presumably by ARK and their supporters (Committee of 300/John Adam St Gang).
Joined: 11 Nov 2008 Posts: 558 Location: Lancashire
Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2011 11:40 pm Post subject:
Desperate For Heros'
Think Nonconformist's and you have the dark priest craft nailed, of course not forgetting the Zionist's are but a branch of the nonconformist theosophical script and remember, the Imperial bloodlines took the seed of Attila and formed the Khazars. See Rothschild see elect 13 front.
Evangelicals - Zionist's - Muslim Brotherhood - Triads - Hong Kong Society - Anarchist's - Freeman movement - La Rouche - BNP-EDL - Hammas - Taliban - ad infinitum.....these are theosophical wings of the corporate empire, as such from all fronts do they come in all cultures and religions.
Assange is dirtying the people of the West for the sins of the shadow, they want war Assange is giving war to the world on a plate. I despise the actions our troops are forced to carry out, but the keyword here is forced. The Army is not a debating shop, men act under orders and as war changes ones frequency, what seem to be insane acts to those outside the theatre of war is so because there are a whole raft of differing frequency parameters between peace and war, they are opposites.
All wars exist in a completely different morality scale than those of peace, we are all horrified at what we hear, but we hear this information while existing in the comfort of our peace bubble as such we all judge actions not within the peace bubble and are quite obviously horrified.
Assange is horrifying the West with news he claims is secret, secret it is but only within the global media regions they wish it to be so. Secret it was to Great Britain and America, not so in Europe and the Middle and Far East.
We do need to know the facts and be disgusted, we need to demand all our troops are withdrawn from all warzones, what we must not do is begin to despise our own armed forces, they are ours, they are being abused by the war pigs in command of NATO.
Understanding the Navy is the key...
They have laid siege against all humanity created that was good, they have programmed us to see of our own cultures nothing but the darkside, when all along the darkside they present in history and present live on 'war TV', albeit presented as our institutions carrying out such evil, it is they having shifted all of the above theosophical cells in the positions of power within all that was good in all nations, we as a people need to understand this and let the world know we understand.
They are in the same predicament....
What we face today is complete infiltration and takeover of our entire system by this priestcraft, and what served the people leading to healthy cohesion based nations, now serve the shadow, they achieve this in the physical through the implementation of the Hamurabi Code, Statute Law.
There is not a body nor Constitutional office mandated to enforce Statute Law in Great Britain, yet it controls us all.It does so after getting you to deny your humanity and accept you are a commercial debt account at which all Statute claims are aimed.
School registration takes on a whole new meaning when the above is understood, programming is the reason.
The shadow is the cult of death, death is good for business when under the Hamurabi Code for it serves the biggest fish. We need to remember what is life and live as we were born, free to be responsible for our own behaviour first.
As yet many in the game of awakening are of no such thing, they are gatekeepers. Only by looking hard at the physical expression of such people as Assange over their presented script, will you cease to jump in on the emotional frequency without the remaining frequencies being consulted. Most damage is achieved at the onset of rituals, Assange is the physical expression of a supreme ritual. Rituals are for the hidden, this is a supreme ritual and so is hiding major deceptions .
Shutting down the alternative media must be the biggest physical expression after Wikileaks and the drama called; ‘Julian Assange’, or rather at this stage in the ritual that seems to be so.
In WW2 the very noisy story was that the world was at war, and people were dying. The very quiet and insidious story was the eugenics programme, not widely known until much later.
I wonder if the same is now going on.
The very noisy story is about countries at war, weapons and violence.
The very quiet, insidious story is about human re-engineering, deleted by Wikileaks.
Josef Mengele (also known as the angel of death) kept a lab book during WW2. Why does this remain classified????
One of those items they brought me in a wicker basket one day was the actual lab book that belonged to Dr. Mengele, along with piles of random photographs taken in his lab of his "patients" during his experiments. [[For some odd reason it is claimed today that no such lab book exists; but it did, as I held it in my hands several times]]. One set of twin experiments attracted my attention - those performed on about three-year old blonde hair, blue eyed Eastern European Gypsy twins. One twin would be held as the "control" of the experiment; the other twin was subjected to serial experiments, designed to mimic wounds of Nazi soldiers in the battle fields.
The twins were kept in cages right in Mengele's laboratory, just off his office. The cages measured 1 by 1 by 1 meters. During the mornings Mengele would come into the lab to visit with his "girls"; such times he was always dressed impeccably in his suit. He would take the girls out of their cages and bounce them on his knees, asking them to call him "Papa". But in the afternoons he would come back to the lab wearing his starched white lab coat, and the girls knew then that it was time for more experimenting. He would take one of the twins into a small narrow closet-like space, where he would take a knife and remove more and more of her femur bone in one leg - and then observe. No anesthetic, no pain killers, no antibiotics, no ice, no bandages, no nothing - thus resembling the conditions of the battle field. After he finished cutting the twin's leg bone, he would simply carry her over to a "stretcher" and let her remain there until she was ready to be placed back into her cage with her sister. The photos of the tiny suffering little girl in that dense and dark "recovery" room, so butchered, and bloody and pathetic, would be etched into my memory for a long long time - a memory that I would carry with me into the rest of my work to come.
The Four Horsemen of Banking (Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase, Citigroup and Wells Fargo) own the Four Horsemen of Oil (Exxon Mobil, Royal Dutch/Shell, BP Amoco and Chevron Texaco); in tandem with Deutsche Bank, BNP, Barclays and other European old money behemoths. But their monopoly over the global economy does not end at the edge of the oil patch.
According to company 10K filings to the SEC, the Four Horsemen of Banking are among the top ten stock holders of virtually every Fortune 500 corporation.[1]
So who then are the stockholders in these money center banks?
This information is guarded much more closely. My queries to bank regulatory agencies regarding stock ownership in the top 25 US bank holding companies were given Freedom of Information Act status, before being denied on “national security” grounds. This is rather ironic, since many of the bank’s stockholders reside in Europe.
One important repository for the wealth of the global oligarchy that owns these bank holding companies is US Trust Corporation - founded in 1853 and now owned by Bank of America. A recent US Trust Corporate Director and Honorary Trustee was Walter Rothschild. Other directors included Daniel Davison of JP Morgan Chase, Richard Tucker of Exxon Mobil, Daniel Roberts of Citigroup and Marshall Schwartz of Morgan Stanley. [2]
J. W. McCallister, an oil industry insider with House of Saud connections, wrote in The Grim Reaper that information he acquired from Saudi bankers cited 80% ownership of the New York Federal Reserve Bank- by far the most powerful Fed branch- by just eight families, four of which reside in the US. They are the Goldman Sachs, Rockefellers, Lehmans and Kuhn Loebs of New York; the Rothschilds of Paris and London; the Warburgs of Hamburg; the Lazards of Paris; and the Israel Moses Seifs of Rome.
CPA Thomas D. Schauf corroborates McCallister’s claims, adding that ten banks control all twelve Federal Reserve Bank branches. He names N.M. Rothschild of London, Rothschild Bank of Berlin, Warburg Bank of Hamburg, Warburg Bank of Amsterdam, Lehman Brothers of New York, Lazard Brothers of Paris, Kuhn Loeb Bank of New York, Israel Moses Seif Bank of Italy, Goldman Sachs of New York and JP Morgan Chase Bank of New York. Schauf lists William Rockefeller, Paul Warburg, Jacob Schiff and James Stillman as individuals who own large shares of the Fed. [3] The Schiffs are insiders at Kuhn Loeb. The Stillmans are Citigroup insiders, who married into the Rockefeller clan at the turn of the century.
Eustace Mullins came to the same conclusions in his book The Secrets of the Federal Reserve, in which he displays charts connecting the Fed and its member banks to the families of Rothschild, Warburg, Rockefeller and the others. [4]
The control that these banking families exert over the global economy cannot be overstated and is quite intentionally shrouded in secrecy. Their corporate media arm is quick to discredit any information exposing this private central banking cartel as “conspiracy theory”. Yet the facts remain.
... ... ...
_________________ "We will lead every revolution against us!" - attrib: Theodor Herzl
"Timely Demise to All Oppressors - at their Convenience!" - 'Interesting Times', Terry Pratchett
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2011 1:06 pm Post subject: Re: Assange and Wikileaks: Committee of 300/John Adam St Gan
Caz wrote:
At 1.52 minutes on the following video, in the third column, it is clearly headed ‘human re-engineering’, which is where I originally came across the expression. The sub-headings are also interesting. This is certainly not my expression. I take it then that EIM Group, whose website this was, is certainly involved in 'social manipulation' and 'human re-engineering'. (Conveniently, the youtube cover screen shot is of this image, the image you see below).
Also, I specifically said to Andrzej Kuszell, head of Studioearchitects, who designed the Ark Academy in Brent, ‘I don’t suppose this is about human re-engineering, whereby you can reframe someone’s mind on account of the physical environment you place them in’, to which he replied ‘I’d rather not go into the detail about that.’
I also told him that there was a rumour in Brent, which came in two parts, the first being that the planning permission for the concrete slab on Bridge Road would never be found. (I didn’t mention the second part). To my knowledge it has indeed never been found.
If Assange, (or whoever it was at Wikileaks) is capable of removing an expose of a Committee of 300/John Adam St Gang institution (Ark), then they are supporting the efforts to hide this expose, being driven presumably by ARK and their supporters (Committee of 300/John Adam St Gang).
The name Rothschild is arguably the most powerful in the world of high finance. The family operates in a rarefied, aristocratic and largely private realm of mega-investments and major shareholdings in international banks. As you read this, Nathaniel Rothschild is concluding a deal to turn a £100m investment into a new £1bn gas and oil company, in 11 days.
But now, at a centre for the Rothschild Foundation and Archive at the family's historic home, the Waddesdon Manor estate in Buckinghamshire, the inner workings of this great dynasty between 1839 and 1957 have become available to the public in a new complex of buildings at Windmill Hill designed by Stephen Marshall.
They include a large archive store, and seminar and meeting rooms. Marshall, whose other projects have included the sculpture gallery at Roche Court, Hampshire, has created a refined modernist courtyard on a hilltop site overlooking the Vale of Aylesbury. Beautifully crafted in oak, brick and glass, the restrained forms are the opposite of the grossly splendid and literally gilt-edged 19th-century architecture of Waddesdon Manor.
The financial ascent of the Rothschilds began in the late 18th century in Germany and extended to lending banks, industrialists and governments vast sums of money. Such was the family's power that, according to Niall Ferguson, historian and author of The Ascent of Money, the Rothschilds decided the outcome of the Napoleonic Wars by putting their financial weight behind Britain. Today, the family's core businesses have assets worth nearly €30bn, but the value of their network of financial holdings runs into trillions of dollars.
But is that more interesting than the chance to sit down in a stylish Eames chair at a large oak table and pore over the personal papers of a family whose wealth and influence makes even outlandishly rich fictional characters such as Orson Welles' Citizen Kane and F. Scott Fitzgerald's omniscient Jay Gatsby look like barrow-boys? Academics, and the casually inquisitive, can now riffle through the papers of Baron Ferdinand de Rothschild (1839-9, his sister Alice (1847-1922), James Armand de Rothschild (1878-1957) and his wife Dorothy, and the current head of the family, Jacob, 4th Lord Rothschild. The Windmill Hill archive also holds papers relating to the Palestine Jewish Colonisation Association, founded by Baron Edmond de Rothschild in 1924 to settle displaced Jews in self-supporting agricultural communities.
The archive is a treasure-trove of the fine detail of lives ensconced in ultimate privilege. There are menus and recipes, including for lunch when Queen Victoria visited Waddesdon Manor in 1890. Alice de Rothschild's letters to her head gardener, George Johnson, can be seen, along with her flower arrangement instructions; and there will surely be a queue of feverishly whimpering vinophiles desperate to sniff out spectacularly grand wine-lists.
The family described by Niall Ferguson as "the world's banker" has chosen to reveal its difference by exposing something of its history, charitable work, and cultural and environmental projects.
Windmill Hill reading-room and archive, at Waddesdon Manor, Buckinghamshire, is open Monday to Friday
Rothschilds at a glance
* The founder of the Rothschild fortune, Mayer Amschel Rothschild, a goldsmith and money-lender, settled in the Jewish ghetto in Frankfurt in 1744.
* The British branch of the business was founded by one of Mayer's sons, Nathan.
* Nathan's grandson, also Nathan, was the first Jew to sit in the House of Lords, as Baron Rothschild in 1885.
* In 1996, Amschel Rothschild, under pressure to work in the family bank, hanged himself in a London hotel.
In her history of the Rothschilds historian Beryl Escott gives states reason as to why the family chose to buy their holdings all in one are: "knowing the immense difficulties facing a foreign Jewish family into accepted and ruling social circles, they were advised to concentrate together in the same area,where by sheer numbers they could no longer be ignored"[10]
Whatever the reasoning bedind the decisions to mass their estates in one area, a third and far less philosophical reason for the settlement in the Vale is that land appeared in sufficient quantities for sale at just the right time. This was largely dues to the penurious state of not just the local sqiarachy anxious sell their mortgaged farms, but three huge aristocratic landowners who found themselves heavily in debt. The bankruptcy of the Duke of Buckingham, owner of Stowe, in 1848, and the penurious circumastances of Sir John Dashwood of West Wycombe Park saw vast tracts of Buckinghamshire on the market. Within a few years, the Duke of Marlborough found himself in a similar situation, owner of Englands largest house, Blenheim Palace, the Duke was struggling to maintain it, the sale of the Waddesdon and Winchendon estates in Buckinghamshire, preceeded the sale of jewellery and many of the palace's treasures. Ferdinand (date) bought the estate, while other members of the family bought many of the furnishings and artistic treasures from both Stowe House and Blenheim Palace [11]
The final advantage to settling n the Vale of Aylesbury was the coming of the railway. The area was just an hour from London, with a special train pulling one of the Rothschild's blue and yellow liveried carriages it could be even faster.[12]
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 11:48 am Post subject:
Victory for Daily Mail as Banker Nathaniel Rothschild loses libel action over Lord Mandelson meeting story
By James White - Last updated at 11:35 AM on 10th February 2012
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2099254/Victory-Daily-Mail-Ban ker-Nathaniel-Rothschild-loses-libel-action-Lord-Mandelson-meeting-sto ry.html
Banker Nathaniel Rothschild lost his libel action today over being portrayed as a 'puppet-master' who brought together Lord Mandelson and Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska.
The 40-year-old heir to the Rothschild banking dynasty demanded 'very substantial' damages following the publication of a story in the Daily Mail which suggested that he had helped smooth a £500 million aluminium deal in 2005.
The article claimed that Mr Rothschild used Lord Mandelson - then European Commissioner for Trade - to impress Oleg Deripaska, the billionaire owner of Russia's biggest aluminium plant, during a visit to Siberia.
But Mr Justice Tugendhat, sitting without a jury, found that Mr Rothschild's conduct had been 'inappropriate in a number of respects'.
He said: 'In my judgment that conduct foreseeably brought Lord Mandelson's public office and personal integrity into disrepute and exposed him to accusations of conflict of interest, and it gave rise to the reasonable grounds to suspect that Lord Mandelson had engaged in improper discussions with Mr Deripaska about aluminium.'
The judge said that it found the words used by the Daily Mail to be 'substantially true'.
The newspaper denied libel and pleaded justification.
Andrew Caldecott QC, for Associated Newspapers, said that the defence should succeed as it was 'clear beyond doubt' that the article meant there was a 'wider malaise', and that aspects of the trip made good the 'central sting'.
Mr Rothschild fostered a relationship between Lord Mandelson and Mr Deripaska which endangered the dignity and reputation of Lord Mandelson's office by bringing him inappropriately close to Mr Deripaska, he added.
Mr Caldecott said that the hospitality provided by Mr Deripaska included a private jet flight from Moscow to Siberia, transport, wining and dining.
The extreme brevity of the trip, the four-hour flight, the temperature of -25 degrees, all invited the outsider to think there was a 'keenness' to meet Mr Deripaska.
'All these were the results of Mr Rothschild's invitation to Lord Mandelson and the effect is cumulative as well as individual,' he said.
Mr Caldecott added: 'It is way beyond the norm for a Russian oligarch to be flying the trade commissioner, who he does not know well at the time, to fly him in his private jet to his private chalet to be wined and dined by him.
'It creates the perception that Lord Mandelson may be beholden to his host and also gives Mr Deripaska cachet.'
He said there was no dispute that Mr Deripaska was a man 'who has been and is interested in political influence'.
The heart of the purpose of the trip was plainly to allow Mr Deripaska to get to know Lord Mandelson better, and the newspaper said that was inappropriate.
It was accepted that there were recreational moments to the trip, but counsel said the court should be wary of the photos it had seen, which Mr Rothschild said showed a 'light-hearted and enjoyable visit' by friends.
'Businessmen discuss business on ski lifts - and when they are having banyas. You may have a recreational background to a business discussion,' he said.
After the decision, Mr Rothschild, who was not present, said in a statement that he intended to appeal.
'I am disappointed with today's ruling, although I do not regret bringing the action,' he said.
Mr Rothschild's counsel, Hugh Tomlinson QC, said during last month's trial that the newspaper's case was that the banker took Lord Mandelson on a January 2005 trip to Siberia in order to impress Mr Deripaska when he knew, or ought to have known, that if anyone found out about it, Lord Mandelson would have been compromised.
He added that it was also said there were grounds for believing that Lord Mandelson discussed aluminium tariffs with Mr Deripaska and Mr Rothschild encouraged the inappropriate relationship.
Lord Mandelson and Mr Deripaska were not parties to the action and did not take any part in the trial.
Mr Tomlinson emphasised that the case was not about them and the newspaper made no allegations they had done anything wrong.
'It is not said that Lord Mandelson had in fact a conflict of interest - simply there was an appearance.
'It is not said that Lord Mandelson failed to make any declarations of interest that he ought to have made or anything of that sort.'
Giving evidence, Mr Rothschild said he was 'incredibly upset and distressed and amazed' when he saw the story, which he dismissed as 'fiction'.
In his statement today, he said: 'I brought this action seeking an apology for the Daily Mail's utterly false claim that I had arranged for Lord Mandelson to attend a dinner in Moscow to close a deal between Alcoa and Rusal and that this had caused the loss of 300 British jobs.
'The truth is, as the Daily Mail has now accepted, that I had nothing whatsoever to do with this deal and that it had in any event been completed before Lord Mandelson and I even arrived in Moscow.
'Lord Mandelson's trip to Russia was entirely recreational - as the court has accepted - and Lord Mandelson had obtained clearance for the trip from his office before undertaking it.'
Mr Rothschild said in evidence that the overnight trip to Abakan taken by himself, Lord Mandelson, another friend, Sebastian Taylor, Peter Munk, chairman of Barrick Gold, and Mr Deripaska, who had a chalet nearby - was 'purely social'.
It included a visit to a smelter facility and its museum, a banya - a Russian-style sauna - skiing, five-a-side football, ice-hockey, Russian billiards and entertainment by a Cossack band.
He added: 'No EU tariffs or other matters of that nature were discussed. The only business was to take place in Central Asia, after Lord Mandelson had returned to Brussels.'
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Posted: Thu May 31, 2012 9:11 pm Post subject:
What does the coming together of this duopoly signify?
Cashing in before the storm they are busy fomenting in the Middle East breaks?
Time for this monstrosity to be nationalised before they drag us all to hell.
T
Iran says Syria massacre aimed at fomenting chaos http://news.yahoo.com/iran-says-syria-massacre-aimed-fomenting-chaos-0 92058142.html
By Marcus George | Reuters – Mon, May 28, 2012
DUBAI (Reuters) - Iran said on Monday the killing of more than 100 people, many of them children, in the Syrian town of Houla had been carried out in order to spread chaos and instability in Syria and block peace efforts. "We are certain that foreign interference, terrorist and suspicious measures which have targeted the resilient Syrian people are doomed to fail," the website of the state television network, Press TV, which is banned in the UK, quoted Foreign Ministry spokesman Ramin Mehmanparast as saying. ......
Rothschild and Rockefeller families team up for some extra wealth creation
The Rothschild and Rockefeller families have teamed up to buy assets from banks and other distressed sellers in a union between two of the best-known names in financial history.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/banksandfinance/930078 4/Rothschild-and-Rockefeller-families-team-up-for-some-extra-wealth-cr eation.html
By Alistair Osborne, Business Editor - 4:51PM BST 30 May 2012
RIT Capital Partners, which is chaired by Lord Rothschild, has taken a 37pc stake in Rockefeller Financial Services, the family’s wealth advisory and asset management wing. It has snapped up the holding from French bank Société Générale for less than £100m.
The transatlantic alliance cements a five-decade acquaintance between the now ennobled Jacob Rothschild, 76, and David Rockefeller, 96, the grandson of the ruthlessly acquisitive American oilman and philanthropist John D Rockefeller.
The two patricians now plan to capitalise on their family names to buy other asset managers or their portfolios, using their networks of top-notch contacts to ensure they get a seat at the table for any deal.
“We’ve known each other for a long time, they have a good business,” said Lord Rothschild yesterday. “We haven’t got a presence in the US and this brings together two formidable names in finance.”
He said the two firms planned to capitalise on current market conditions where banks, like SocGen in this instance, are selling non-core assets to rebuild capital ratios. “At a time when big banks are destabilised, there may well be opportunities,” he said. “We could buy an asset management company or grow one. Rockefeller already has $34bn (£21.9bn) assets under administration.”
He said David Rockefeller was still “very involved” in the business, though it is run day to day by chief executive Reuben Jeffery.
The Rockefeller group goes back to 1882, set up to invest the family money made by John D Rockefeller’s Standard Oil, the forerunner for today’s Exxon Corporation, which he built with a Darwinian aggression. “Do you know the only thing that gives me pleasure? It’s to see my dividends coming in,” he once said.
The Rothschild banking dynasty has its roots in the 18th century when Mayer Amschel Rothschild set up a business in Frankfurt.
Lord Rothschild fell out three decades ago with his cousin Sir Evelyn de Rothschild, who then ran the UK branch of the family bank NM Rothschild. That sprang to fame in 1815 when it bought government bonds in anticipation of Napoleon’s defeat at Waterloo.
Lord Rothschild’s relations with the French side of the family have been better though and he likened the Rockefeller deal to RIT’s tie-up earlier this year with the Edmond de Rothschild Group, which has €150bn (£120bn) under management.
“We think that having that span of interests in Europe and America – as well as China – will give us a better chance of finding exceptional investment opportunities,” he said.
RIT, which has net assets £1.9bn, has had a tricky few months with the shares down about 14pc in the past year. They fell 6 today to £11.25.
Lord Rothschild said: “Everyone has been marked down. We didn’t have a brilliant year on the quoted side but we did do very well on the private side,” realising investments in North Sea operator Agora Oil and Gas and credit manager Harbourmaster.
Now that's rich: Rockefellers and Rothschilds team up http://rt.com/business/news/rothschild-rockefeller-strategic-partnersh ip-590/ 30th May 2012
.......Chaired by Lord Jacob Rothschild, RIT Capital Partners is a £1.9 billion ($3 billion) investment trust, which mainly focuses on capital growth through investing in a range of assets from equities to bonds and private equity from around the world. Now, the trust says it’s taking up a 37 per cent stake for an undisclosed sum in the parent company of Rockefeller & Co that was previously held by Société Générale Private Banking.
Société Générale, which has owned a stake in the Rockefeller wealth and asset management since 2008, appointed a new head of private banking in March, as it moved to overhaul the business.
The firms intend to work on investment solutions and other areas of shared expertise to further serve the needs of their clients and investors according to the statement.
The partnerships unite 96-year-old David Rockefeller, and Jacob Rothschild, 76 – whose personal ties span five decades and as stated by Rockefeller “the connection between the two families remains very strong.”
Lord Rothschild, chairman of RIT, added, “The creation of this partnership with the Rockefeller family is truly historic. We look forward to the development of our joint investment activities across the global capital markets.”
The deal is expected to be finalized by the end of September.
Established in 1882 by John D. Rockefeller, an American industrialist and one of the richest men in recent history, Rockefeller & Co provides asset management and advisory services and has $34 billion (£21.78 billion) of assets under administration.
The Rothschild banking dynasty started when Mayer Amschel Rothschild opened a business in Frankfurt in the late 18th century.
The family’s name is associated with some historical deals, such as helping finance Britain's war against Napoleon in the 19th century and raising funds for a loan allowing the British government to buy the Suez canal. _________________ www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org www.rethink911.org www.patriotsquestion911.com www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org www.mediafor911truth.org www.pilotsfor911truth.org www.mp911truth.org www.ae911truth.org www.rl911truth.org www.stj911.org www.v911t.org www.thisweek.org.uk www.abolishwar.org.uk www.elementary.org.uk www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149 http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2012 11:00 pm Post subject:
Rothschild 'spied as the Fifth Man'
By DAVID LEITCH Sunday 23 October 1994
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/rothschild-spied-as-the -fifth-man-1444440.html
THE LATE Lord Rothschild, scientist, think-tank head, first- class cricketer, bomb-disposal expert and MI5 agent, was a super-spy for the Russians, according to a forthcoming book.
The Fifth Man, by the Australian author Roland Perry, claims to prove that Victor Rothschild stole 'all major UK/US weapons developments in the Second World War', including biological warfare, the atomic bomb and radar.
Specifically, he alleges that Rothschild, not Klaus Fuchs, or, as is generally believed, the civil servant John Cairncross, first alerted Stalin to Allied plans to build an atom bomb using plutonium 235.
Perry also claims that Rothschild, who died in 1990, was involved 'in so many aspects of spying that he seemed like a super-agent, sabotaging every Western intelligence initiative for 20 years after the war'.
The evidence offered is largely derived from three days of interviews in Moscow with seven retired KGB officers, some identified only by initials.
The most important was Yuri Ivanovitch Modin, controller of the Cambridge spies, and orchestrator of the Burgess/Maclean defection.
But speaking from Moscow late last week, an 'astonished' Modin denied Perry's version comprehensively. Yes, there had been interviews supposedly as the basis of a documentary film about former KGB officers. But no, he had never hinted, nor did he believe, that Rothschild was the fifth man, or any kind of Soviet agent.
'We knew Rothschild was close to (Guy) Burgess and (Anthony) Blunt (later unveiled as the 'fourth man' in the Burgess and Donald Maclean affair).
Because he was in MI5 they learned things from him. This doesn't make him the fifth man, and he wasn't,' he said.
One explanation may be confusion. Perry attributes to the brilliant Rothschild a number of espionage coups which Modin knows from archives and personal contact were the work of the unassuming Cairncross. Modin provides corroborating detail in his own book, My Five Cambridge Friends, to be published by Hodder/Headline on 27 October.
So grateful were the KGB for Cairncross's early atom secrets, gleaned while secretary to the wartime scientific chief, Lord Hankey, that the Soviet ambassador presented him with the Order of the Red Banner at a secret ceremony in London in 1944. The insignia, in a velvet- lined case, were then taken back to the embassy.
Even Perry does not suggest that 'Victor', as everyone called him, was offered any such dubious honour to add to the British mention in dispatches and US awards he received for dangerous war work. A man who had proved his courage racing cars and batting against the fast bowler Harold Larwood, he became the top expert on bomb disposal. He was also responsible for the personal security of his friend Winston Churchill, testing, and sometimes tasting, the Prime Minister's gifts of exotic food and drink.
Rothschild survived the war and the Burgess/Maclean defection to become the acknowledged 'grand old man of espionage' consulted by successive governments. However, rumours based on his close association with Burgess, Maclean and Kim Philby, all of whom were habitues of his wartime house, surfaced again in the 1980s when he became embroiled in the Peter Wright Spycatcher affair.
In 1986 Rothschild wrote a public letter avowing his innocence, and soon after Mrs Thatcher issued a famously terse comment that 'we have no evidence he was ever a Soviet agent'.
As a clearance it was less than fulsome, but when he died in 1990 the Prime Minister attended his memorial.
A clue to her coolness emerged from the interviews of Kim Philby by the writer Phillip Knightley in Moscow. Philby believed that leaving MI5 in 1947, Rothschild had seized or copied all the six-by-four file- cards listing Soviet agents in Europe and elsewhere. These, Philby believed, were used by Mossad, the security service of the fledgling state of Israel, whose cause Rothschild's family had championed from the 19th century.
Mrs Thatcher may have taken the view that his conflict of loyalties was not between Whitehall and the Lubyanka, but his country of birth and his family's Zionist dreams. In his lifetime inquiries, let alone speculation about his exotic career as scientist and spymaster, were inhibited by his lawyer, the redoubtable Lord Goodman. But as William Armstrong of Sidgwick & Jackson, the book's publisher, said, 'dead men can't sue for libel'.
Rothschild's ghost and his surviving family may well wish that death did not inhibit libel actions, all the more so as 'Rothschild family members' are cited in the book describing his low spirits in the years before his death.
But their lawyers, Freshfields, said that in the circumstances their reaction would be 'a dignified silence'.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/rothschild-spied-as-the -fifth-man-1444440.html _________________ www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org www.rethink911.org www.patriotsquestion911.com www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org www.mediafor911truth.org www.pilotsfor911truth.org www.mp911truth.org www.ae911truth.org www.rl911truth.org www.stj911.org www.v911t.org www.thisweek.org.uk www.abolishwar.org.uk www.elementary.org.uk www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149 http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
You know you’ve really made it when your surname becomes an adjective.
In the late 19th century, the term “Rothschild Tudor” came into use to describe the family’s half-timbered estate cottages, sprinkled across their vast landholdings in Buckinghamshire. And in America, for more than 80 years, Rockefeller has been shorthand for “very rich indeed”. The name crops up in two classic Thirties Broadway numbers: On the Sunny Side of the Street (“If I never had a cent, I’d be rich as Rockefeller”) and the Gershwins’ They All Laughed (“…at Rockefeller Centre – now they’re fighting to get in”).
That’s why, for gilded dynasty watchers, the news of a union between these über-rich clans is so delicious: Lord Rothschild’s investment trust, RIT Capital Partners, is to buy a 37 per cent stake in Rockefeller Financial Services.
The numbers involved are pretty mind-boggling. RIT has £1.9 billion in net assets; the Rockefeller company has £22 billion. As if that wasn’t enough, these companies are just minor fragments of the two family empires. RIT was only founded in 1961; the principal family bank, NM Rothschild & Sons, was set up in 1811, and is run by Lord Rothschild’s cousin, David de Rothschild.
As we will see, there are a lot of Rothschild cousins, all of them pretty deep-pocketed, and plenty of them keen on starting new ventures. It’s symptomatic of the dynasty that Nat Rothschild, Lord Rothschild’s son, didn’t join the family bank when he left university but went to Lazard, before joining an investment management company, Atticus Capital, and then setting up a vast investment vehicle, Vallar plc.
As for Rockefeller Financial Services, that was founded as early as 1882, when John D Rockefeller set up one of the first investment management businesses designed to run a single family’s money. So, as well as making a fortune from their principal company – Standard Oil – the Rockefellers have been making money from their money, as it were, for 130 years.
That is what makes these two dynasties so exceptional – not just their dizzying wealth, but the fact that they have held on to it for so long: and not just the loot, but also their family companies. Other banking dynasties have fallen by the wayside – SG Warburg, founded by Siegmund Warburg in 1946, was swallowed up by Swiss Bank Corporation in 1995; its asset management side, Mercury Asset Management, was taken over by Merrill Lynch in 1997.
Barings Bank, the oldest merchant bank in London, founded in 1762, collapsed in 1995, thanks to the disastrous £827 million punt taken by Nick Leeson. Lehman Brothers remained under family control until the death of Robert Lehman in 1969 – the bank’s collapse in 2008 was the spark that lit the greatest recession since the Thirties. And who now banks with the Medicis, the leading bankers in Europe in the Middle Ages, and the financial backers behind the Renaissance?
It’s true that enormous fortunes – big enough to match 19th-century Rothschild and Rockefeller figures – have been made in recent years. Mark Zuckerberg is thought to be worth more than £12 billion since Facebook went public this month, though that figure seems to diminish a little with each Wall Street trading day. But, still, it’s unlikely that the name Zuckerberg will be associated with dynastic wealth for more than a century, as the Rothschild and Rockefeller names have been.
Part of the reason is that dotcom fortunes, like Zuckerberg’s, can be founded within the four walls of a tiny Harvard dormitory. Great banking and oil ventures needed vast manpower, and vast representation across the world, to establish a foothold in the Victorian rich lists. Those deep foundations produce a lasting infrastructure, a lasting familial obligation to the business, and that lasting association in the popular mind between a particular surname and great wealth .
Also, the Rockefeller and Rothschild families were consciously dynastic from the moment their businesses began. The founder of the Rothschild empire, Mayer Amschel Rothschild, was born in Frankfurt, Germany, the Jewish descendant of a 16th-century Rothschild, Izaak, who took his name from the sign outside his house – “Zum roten Schild” (“At the sign of the red shield”).
It was Mayer Amschel who laid the foundations of today’s Rothschild power base, by sending his five sons off to different European financial hubs: Frankfurt, Vienna, Paris, Naples and London, where his third son, Nathan Mayer Rothschild, founded the eponymous bank in the City in 1811. Almost immediately, NM Rothschild became a major force in the City, bankrolling the Duke of Wellington during the Napoleonic Wars.
John D Rockefeller got going a little later. The son of a travelling salesman, he made a fortune in food supply, before turning to oil refining in Ohio. By 1868, he owned the biggest oil refinery in the world, in partnership with his brother.
Throughout Rockefeller history, the name has stamped itself deep into the popular psyche through its philanthropy. That first John D Rockefeller founded Chicago University and Rockefeller University, as well as the Rockefeller Foundation – backer of, inter alia, the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, and the New School in New York.
It was his son, John D Rockefeller Junior, who built New York’s Rockefeller Centre. The Gershwins were quite right in their lyrics, Manhattan’s gazillionaires did fight to get into the soaring art deco skyscraper, and it became one of the city’s biggest pieces of prime real estate: 19 buildings across 22 acres, all in the very centre of New York, between 5th and 6th Avenues and 48th and 51st Streets.
The cliché of fabulous new wealth is “rags to rags in three generations”, but each generation of the Rockefellers kept on building up the current account, while spreading the philanthropic interests. John D Rockefeller Junior gave the land for the Museum of Modern Art, stuffed the Met with medieval masonry and set up New York’s best-kept secret, the Cloisters museum, a staggering complex of five French monasteries perched on a cliff above the Hudson River.
His five sons continued the dynastic pattern – and that dynastic importance was intensified with the use of Roman numerals: JD Junior’s son was dubbed John D Rockefeller III. His brother Nelson was Gerald Ford’s vice-president; another brother, Winthrop, was Republican Governor of Arkansas. And the youngest brother, David, is still with us, at 96, now the Rockefeller patriarch and still hurling dollar bills at charitable institutions. In 2005, he gave away £64 million to the Museum of Modern Art and Rockefeller University – each.
A philanthropic streak runs through the Rothschilds, too. Jacob Rothschild’s home, Waddesdon, in Buckinghamshire – built in Rothschild Loire château style, rather than Rothschild Tudor – now belongs to the National Trust, but he continues to cram it with treasures appropriate to its Victorian builder, Baron Ferdinand de Rothschild. He also endowed the National Gallery generously during his time as chairman of its trustees, and did much to turn Somerset House from London’s biggest car park into its finest neo-classical palace.
Hidden Wealth & Power Revealed - Rothschilds Are Now Officially The Richest People On The Planet
http://t.co/F7NnO57V _________________ --
'Suppression of truth, human spirit and the holy chord of justice never works long-term. Something the suppressors never get.' David Southwell
http://aangirfan.blogspot.com http://aanirfan.blogspot.com
Martin Van Creveld: Let me quote General Moshe Dayan: "Israel must be like a mad dog, too dangerous to bother."
Martin Van Creveld: I'll quote Henry Kissinger: "In campaigns like this the antiterror forces lose, because they don't win, and the rebels win by not losing."
Lord Mandelson has always prized his invitations to spend Christmas with Nat Rothschild at his opulent Swiss chalet in Klosters, but this year, alas, the old chums will be spending the festive season apart.
Rothschild’s spokesman will give me no explanation, but there was a time when the former European Commissioner would pitch up at Klosters with all the regularity of Santa. And what larks Mandelson would have with Rothschild, who once thought nothing of telling his guests that they were welcome to make good use of the expensive fleet of cars he garaged there, including the Porsche and the Ferrari.
Rothschild loved, too, to spring unexpected surprises on Mandelson. Once, he even arranged for him to be thrashed with birch leaves, along with Oleg Deripaska, the Russian oligarch, by a youthful man in a sauna. Mandrake can only hope Mandelson didn’t blot his copybook after a stay with Rothschild a few years ago, when, according to one house guest, he proved less than scintillating company: he fell asleep on a sofa.
Meanwhile, with the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge spending Christmas Day at the Middleton family home in Berkshire – as Mandrake predicted earlier this month – and Prince Harry in Afghanistan, Sandringham will be quieter than usual.
Sarah Duchess of York, will, however, once again be separated from her children, Princess Beatrice, 24, and Princess Eugenie, 22, who will be joining the Queen for the traditional festivities with their father, the Duke of York. “The Duchess will be in Switzerland, staying privately with friends,” her spokesman tells me.
Oleg Deripaska, who bought a chalet in Davos, in the Swiss Alps
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/mandrake/3918609/Lord-Mande lson-slopes-off-with-Nat-Rothschild.html
The Business Secretary's stays with Lord Rothschild's son and heir at the fashionable Austrian ski resort are always lavish occasions. When he stayed in August another member of the house party, Yulia Wegg-Prosser, claimed in her blog that their host had urged his friends to make good use of his expensive fleet of cars, which include a Porsche and a Ferrari. Mandelson's relationship with Rothschild became a major talking point when I disclosed on October 6 that the former European trade commissioner had, while staying with Nat in Corfu, been entertained aboard the yacht of Oleg Deripaska, the aluminium tycoon, whose businesses benefited from tariffs the commission set.
It is not known whether the pair will be joined over Christmas by Deripaska, who bought a chalet in Davos, in the Swiss Alps.
On an overcast morning last December at the Four Seasons Jakarta, nearly two-dozen dignitaries arrived at the outlying steel gates. Security agents, armed with M-16 rifles, moved diligently along the sides of the assembled cars checking for explosives via a curved mirror. Waved on, the visitors ascended the driveway then walked to a basement room. The setting chosen to announce one of Indonesia’s biggest ever resource deals resembled a home counties conference centre: sliding walls, beige patterned carpet and a prefabricated bouquet of roses sitting on a makeshift desk next to the projector. Only the air conditioner whirring overhead, battling 34°C heat outside, gave a clue as to the tropical location.
Like his surroundings, the blue-suited speaker – who described his family business as “banking and wine” – kept a low profile, gliding in without greeting, the only indication of his presence a discreet sign in the lobby directing invitees to the Vallar presentation. The journalists – clustered around white-clothed tables, their chairs draped with creme-coloured organza in what resembled wedding preparations – took out pens and notebooks. Nathaniel Rothschild, 39, and the future Baron Rothschild, laid out his plans to create one of the world’s biggest coal producers from Vallar, a £707m “cash-shell” he had founded six months earlier. In so doing, he hopes to make his mark on the considerable family name.
Twenty-four hours later, Rothschild stepped off his jet to inspect Kaltim Prima Coal (KPC), the world’s largest thermal coal-producing mine. Accompanying him were the FT, his closest adviser and a recent friend: a fund manager with a metal ear stud and an Elvis-style quiff. “We met at a party in Wiltshire,” he said by way of explanation. The present environs could not have been less temperate. Sweating on a remote jungle airstrip on the island of Borneo, Rothschild cut an unlikely figure. Dressed in a monogrammed shirt and suede shoes he made a beeline for the air-conditioned welcome room. It was the closest Rothschild had been to any of the assets for which he had paid $3bn four weeks earlier.
Sitting down to a buffet lunch, which he didn’t touch, he explained why. “Coal mines all look the same, they’re just bigger or smaller.”
Moving mountains
In the Rothschild case, they’re definitely bigger. Kalimantan, the mining region located on the Indonesian part of Borneo, is central to a new Great Game for Asia’s energy resources. Abundant coal deposits – formed when rotting plants were pressed into long, hard seams 200 million years ago – have made it ground zero of the global coal industry.
As a result, the island’s topography has been transformed. Entire hillsides have been razed and new valleys dug to expose giant crevices of black carbon. In turn, new forest has sprung from the earth dumped nearby, much of it adjoining craterous blue-green lakes formed from collected rainwater. In some cases the fissures in the earth are so vast that the rising water vapour coalesces above them to form clouds. From Rothschild’s helicopter, trucks can be seen carrying 330 tonnes of coal each, scurrying up and down like beetles, ferrying their load to steaming knolls where colossal steel probosci scoop and deposit it on to a conveyor belt. From there it is taken to the end of a pier extending 2km out to sea where half-a-dozen ships bearing Korean and Hindi lettering wait to deliver the fuel to East Asia’s insatiable furnaces.
In the process the island has become rich, if at the cost of widespread deforestation. From the air, you can spot brown-black earth foundations being dug by the island’s local nouveaux riches to support their California-style condos.
The KPC mine is, according to the manager, the “biggest earthmoving operation in the world”, shifting a billion tonnes of dirt each year. It also forms the basis of Rothschild’s plans to create a new “international coal champion”. The new company hopes to produce 140m tonnes by 2014, which would make it the world’s largest producer of thermal coal. The plan is to list it on the FTSE 100 by this summer.
“We have global aluminium companies, global gold companies but no international coal champion. It makes sense to consolidate the coal industry,” said Rothschild.
His partners in ambition are Indonesia’s Bakrie family, a business dynasty in their own right, whose debt-ridden Bumi company owns the KPC coal mine and is now the largest single shareholder in Vallar. In fact, Vallar will be renamed Bumi Plc – or “earth” in Indonesia’s Bahasa language – after a share exchange later this month. The Bakries will take a 43 per cent stake and their business partner, Rosan Roeslani, a local private equity tycoon, 25 per cent. That leaves Rothschild with an 11 per cent stake in his own London-listed company.
“Let us be under no illusions – the Bakrie family and Roeslani will be the biggest shareholders,” said Rothschild, who put $180m of his own money into what he described as “a merger” and stands to make hundreds of millions of dollars. “You have to make hay whilst the sun shines.”
Nat Rothschild at the Tanjung Bara airport, East Kalimantan, Indonesia, December 2010
Trading on a name
Given his descent from a family that was at the forefront of Europe’s New World expansion, in a sense Rothschild’s venture to make his own name in Asia is well-trodden ground. A century earlier at the same location the family bank played a key role in the birth of south-east Asia’s oil industry – a legacy today preserved in the christening of the Amata pseudextensa Rothschild, a female tiger moth ubiquitous in Borneo’s undulating rainforest.
In the late 19th century, British engineer Marcus Samuel landed on the island’s east coast with a single aim: to find an alternative to the Rothschilds’ Russian oil. Short of equipment and relying on imported Chinese coolies – the local headhunter tribes were not eager for wage labour – he cut a four-mile path through virgin jungle to a place where, reportedly, oil seeped up from the ground. The “Black Spot”, as the site became known, formed the base for the Shell Transport and Trading Company, a precursor to Royal Dutch Shell, in which the Rothschilds became the largest shareholders in 1912.
It’s hard to square the air-conditioned clubhouse and multibillion-dollar infrastructure of Rothschild’s venture with that of the intrepid Samuel. Yet if the risks from Rothschild’s point of view are less clear then, conversely, the attraction to his Indonesian partners is equally obvious. It can be summed up in a piece of advice given to Samuel by his business partner a century ago as they debated letting the Rothschilds in on their new venture: “If this chance has slipped, we shall never get it again. Once we are combined with the Rothschilds everybody knows that we hold the future, but we cannot do without their name.”
Heir apparent
Nathaniel Philip Rothschild (more commonly known as Nat) is the youngest of four children and the only son of Jacob Rothschild, 4th Baron Rothschild. He is also the bearer of a name that links him indelibly with the 19th-century founder of the eponymous family bank: the buccaneering Nathan Mayer Rothschild.
Established in London via a Frankfurt ghetto, Nat’s Georgian ancestor built his fortune by shipping bullion to Wellington’s army in Portugal and Spain. In doing so, he cemented an image of savvy financier which has been associated with the family ever since. Legend has it that Nathan, on receiving news of Napoleon’s defeat in advance of the British government, sold stocks to cause market panic before buying them back on the cheap.
Despite such an auspicious heritage – or perhaps because of it – Nat Rothschild’s early years were problematic. Educated at Colet Court, a London private school, alongside the current chancellor, George Osborne, Rothschild moved on to Eton where he was remembered as a quiet boy who seemed to resent authority.
Persistent troublemaking saw him assigned to a schoolmaster whose job it was to try to tame him. It didn’t work. Moving on to Oxford, where he read history at Wadham, Rothschild is remembered for driving around in a blue Porsche and throwing lavish parties. He was also a member of the hard-drinking Bullingdon Club, an arcane ¬society whose establishment members – including the current prime minister, David Cameron – were infamous for vandalising the ¬restaurants they dined in.
There were several minor scandals. These included a year-long driving ban after being pulled over and failing to provide a specimen for analysis to the police and allegations made by an escort that he ordered drugs and call girls to Waddesdon Manor, the family’s stately home in Buckinghamshire, which Rothschild strongly denied.
He went straight to work after graduating in 1994 – first at Lazard Brothers, a private bank that competes with the Rothschild bank, and then Gleacher Partners, the New York investment advisers.
The circumstances of a marriage in his early twenties in Las Vegas to Annabelle Neilson, a model he met on a beach in India, did little to change his wild-child media image. The relationship ended after three years with a confidentiality agreement and an out-of-court settlement.
In his mid-twenties, Rothschild performed a U-turn of sorts, partially precipitated by the suicide of his uncle Amschel in a Paris hotel suite in 1996. Tragedy dogs the Rothschilds: his cousin, Raphael de Rothschild, died of a heroin overdose on the streets of New York five years later.
Nat himself relocated to New York from London, but swapped alcohol and partying for days dedicated to networking and business. Like his ancestors, money has since come to define his life.
After swapping Cristal for Coca-Cola, Rothschild joined Atticus, a hedge fund named after Atticus Finch, the lawyer in To Kill a Mockingbird, where he worked feverishly for the next decade. At its peak it managed $23bn until its main fund was disbanded in the credit-crunch amid heavy losses. Rothschild maintained those investors who got in early “did very well”.
Peter Munk, the octogenarian chairman of Barrick Gold, the world’s biggest gold producer, first met Rothschild in his mid-twenties when the latter’s reputation was still more playboy than business patron. He did so because he was asked to by Lord Jacob, Nat’s father and a close friend who was concerned about his son’s “issues”. Munk ended up becoming a sort of surrogate father figure for Rothschild in the investment world and persuaded him to move to Klosters, the Alpine ski resort in Switzerland where Rothschild is now based.
“It began as a favour and yet I ended up becoming an investor, a follower of his career,” said Munk, who described Rothschild as one of the most internationally mobile businessmen he knows, something attested to by the 700 hours a year that he spends on his private jet, “N4T”.
Along the way he courted politicians and business tycoons, his surname usually enough to open closed doors. Yet despite being a friend to the likes of Lord Mandelson, the former Labour minister, and Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska, Rothschild prefers, like his father, to keep a low profile.
This facade has cracked just once – in 2008 – when Rothschild became angry with his schoolboy contemporary George Osborne, then in opposition, for breaching the confidentiality of a summer party. Revenge was swift: Rothschild wrote a letter to The Times alleging that Osborne had sought a donation from Deripaska while on the Russian’s yacht – an allegation which Osborne vehemently denied.
The dealmaker
On a freezing night in mid-November I met Rothschild at the family owned Spencer House, the last Georgian mansion to overlook Green Park in London. Next door are the Vallar offices, an unremarkable former town house given to the company by a hard-up client.
In an austere oak drawing room, surrounded by classical portraits, and after two days without sleep, Rothschild sat with his gangly frame hunched forward as if the weight of the family expectations lay on his shoulders. He had just flown in from Singapore where his multibillion-dollar deal – for three weeks based only upon a handshake – was formally sealed. “I met the Bakrie family face to face a month ago; so one has to be decisive when opportunities present themselves,” he said in his softly spoken voice – a characteristic which comes across as alternately shy and aloof.
The original Vallar proposal was nearly a father-and-son double act. RIT Capital Partners, the investment trust owned by Nat’s father, Lord Jacob Rothschild, had some $2bn in capital. Nat wanted to invest it in his position as successor at RIT – a de facto stepping down for Lord Jacob.
“He didn’t go for it – he didn’t want to retire,” said a person who knows both men. “So Nat said, ‘I’ll raise the money on my own then.’”
But, having just climbed out of the worst commodity depression in a generation, capital was scarce, even among investors of Rothschildean calibre. So Rothschild opened his considerable black book.
“Nat is unique in his international contacts – there’s no one he doesn’t ski, sail or party with,” said Munk, who added that weeks before the Vallar deal Nat was climbing mountains in Nepal with the head of the China Investment Corporation, the country’s sovereign wealth fund.
As a result Vallar raised £707m in a stock market flotation last July, a war chest with which to go shopping for assets.
At Rothschild’s side during this coup was Daren Morris, a former industrials banker at UBS who races catamarans around the Isle of Man in his spare time. He is Vallar’s business partner – along with the company’s co-founder James Campbell, former head of coal at the mining giant Anglo-American – in a relationship with Rothschild formed during their days flat-sharing at Oxford.
One of the company’s first investors was a Russian friend who lives near the Israeli embassy in Kensington, London. Not unlike a couple of door-to-door salesmen, Rothschild and Morris turned up at the Russian’s house and, after talking through a proposal for a natural resource fund, walked away with a £50m pledge.
Other investors included the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority and Schroders bank; the latter, according to someone familiar with the situation, after Mr Rothschild paid a surprised Bruno Schroder, the owner, a visit while he was lounging on a sunbed in the Turks and Caicos Islands. Mr Rothschild said he solicited the investment from Schroder’s “head of equities”.
“Chief executives love that approach, striking while the iron’s hot,” said Morris. “Nat will call an investor up and ask, ‘Where are you? Doing business in China? Will you be there tomorrow? Right, see you there then,’ and he’s off.”
Asset hunt
Over the summer of 2010, N4T had a busy flight schedule. With the money raised, Rothschild went in search of the asset that would make his name, descending on the runways of gold, iron ore and coal mines in Brazil, Colombia, Russia and Canada as well as the financial centres of four continents.
For reasons of both economy and ambition, Vallar was looking to buy on a grand scale.
“I wanted to do a transaction sufficiently large so that the shareholders of Vallar have a platform on which to go and build a company which is a FTSE 100 entrant. We will be,” said Rothschild.
There was an Oedipal element too. More than Rothschild’s desire for money is the wish to forge a legacy.
“He wants to make a mark as the Rothschild of his generation,” said Sir Julian Horn-Smith, a former chief executive of Vodafone and currently a non-executive director of Vallar.
Ever since Atticus closed, the jury of executive opinion had been hung on whether Rothschild would emerge from the shadow of his father. “After Atticus Nat felt his reputation was still a question mark … he felt like he didn’t get the credit for its early success. Vallar is unequivocally his,” said one reliable source. When Lord Jacob hadn’t acceded to his son’s earlier proposal, Nat had managed to raise his own money. Now he had to prove what he could do with it.
Then, in late October, Vallar got a phone call from Ian Hannam, a banker at JPMorgan well-known in the natural resource sector.
“There are some coal mines in Indonesia you should look at,” said Hannam. The first was Berau, Indonesia’s fifth-largest coal producer. A 35 per cent stake was being sold by Roeslani, now a partner with Rothschild, to pay off a loan from Credit Suisse. The second bigger mine was owned by the controversial Bakrie family through Bumi Resources, one of Indonesia’s biggest companies and also one of its most debt-laden, dogged by accusations of tax evasion and corporate misgovernance.
Fortunately Hannam knew both owners. During the Asian currency crisis of the late 1990s, he had advised the Bakries on reconfiguring their business empire and he knew that the family had been something of a patron to Roeslani, who had acted as an adviser to them on several previous business acquisitions. Perhaps Vallar, Hannam suggested, with its golden carrot of a London listing, could help out both companies?
Business with the Bakries
Vallar chairman Indra Bakrie sits down with the FT, Jakarta, December 2010
Vallar chairman Indra Bakrie sits down with the FT, Jakarta, December 2010
Shortly before the trip to the mines, I entered a basement wine bar in downtown Jakarta. The scene looked like an east Asian adaptation of Miami Vice. Beckoning me in was the new chairman of Vallar, Indra Bakrie, the younger brother of clan head Aburizal and the middle of the three brothers who run the family businesses. Surrounded by dimly lit bottles of Meursault and flanked by two consiglieri he held court from an oversized armchair, his stout body sporting a floral Indonesian shirt.
Indra is one scion of a family business that began when his father traded pepper and coffee under Dutch colonial rule in the 1940s. The resulting conglomerate continued to expand into virtually every sector of the economy under Indonesia’s former dictator, Muhammad Suharto.
“During Suharto the government was criticised for giving too much power to the Chinese business community [so] Suharto used Bumi as a symbol of the ‘Indonesian’ businessman being successful. It was a balancing act, Bumi was a counterweight,” said Sofjan Wanandi, head of a Jakarta-based business lobby group who has known the Bakrie family for four decades.
Since Suharto, the Bakrie bank balance has suffered. The 1997 collapse of the rupiah nearly bankrupted the empire. An economic boom after 2000 allowed the family to re-accumulate a majority stake and invest in a new headquarters: a phallic tower of steel and glass rising irresistibly from Jakarta’s business district.
Then came the subprime lending crisis. Hundreds of millions of dollars of value were wiped off the Bakrie companies, sparking fears that they were again teetering on the brink of bankruptcy. Their current debt stands at some $4.4bn.
Enter Rothschild. Indra Bakrie, a man whose family is decried by critics as “untouchable” and whom supporters liken to “the Indonesian Rothschilds”, is remarkably frank about the Vallar deal. “Everybody knows the debt that Bumi has is not a cheap deal with the lenders. Vallar’s job is to try to decrease [our] debt, decrease the cost of funds and to help the capital expenditure.”
“When we met the first time, what I see from Nat Rothschild, for someone to go IPO (initial public offering) without any assets and get £770m – I thought this must be somebody,” said Bakrie. “So my brothers and I decided this is what we’re looking for.”
Others agree that this deal adds to the Bakries’ considerable clout. “He (Aburizal Bakrie) is a kind of shadow president [of Indonesia] and the Vallar deal makes his shadow bigger,” said Drajad Wibowo, an outspoken government critic and deputy head of the opposition National Mandate party. “Maybe, if one day he becomes president, he will have to thank the Rothschilds.”
The new Vallar deal may also help to rehabilitate the Bakrie reputation. The 2006 Lapindo mudflow disaster, in which a drilling hole operated by the family oil and gas company began gushing noxious mud and gas, displaced tens of thousands of people.
More recently, the Bakries have faced allegations of dodging more than a billion dollars in taxes as well as corruption charges against three Bakrie-owned businesses, including Bumi. The Bakries deny the charges and claim their businesses are among Indonesia’s largest corporate taxpayers.
“The perception about Bakrie is bad; I talked to the family and said we need to rectify this,” Indra Bakrie said, explaining that Bumi had been looking to list on a western market for three years.
“For me as a Muslim [the deal] is God’s will. We have the assets, Rothschild has the money – it’s a marriage just like that.”
Next stop China
Rothschild closed the deal with the Bakries after meeting them once in Los Angeles and again in Singapore – two meetings spread over just three weeks. “It will raise eyebrows in the City,” said one London-based mining analyst of the partnership. Another added that Bumi had governance issues “across the board”.
Back at the KPC mine Rothschild was unconcerned. He told me that speed was the reason for the deal’s success. “I think the fact we’ve done something quickly is heartening to the people who put money in Vallar.” He was also sure he and the Bakries would get along fine, regardless of the size of their respective shareholdings or alleged misdemeanours. His attention turned back to his BlackBerry where he was busy trading texts with Niall Ferguson, the historian and biographer of the Rothschild family, who was staying at his house in Switzerland.
Soon after lunch, having spent no more than a few hours at the site, Rothschild returned to his jet, leaving the remaining analysts to number-crunch in his absence. With his entourage he flew to Bali to stay at Roeslani’s villa. “It rents out for $15,000 a night and is popular with celebrities and former dictators,” said one colleague. From there it was on to Beijing and a meeting with the China Investment Corporation. Treading in the footsteps of his predecessor Nathan, he wanted to discuss finance for a possible $1bn acquisition, the ink having barely dried on the Bumi deal.
“His pleasure is making money and Vallar is his vehicle for doing it,” according to one of Rothschild’s friends, who also invests with him. “Some people are saying he may have bitten off more than he can chew – but Nat is here to make a mark. It’s a big call.”
This story is subject to a correction and clarification.
Christopher Thompson is an FT UK companies reporter and Anthony Deutsch is Jakarta correspondent
The Rothschild dynasty was founded by Mayer Amschel Rothschild in the Jewish ghetto of Frankfurt in the late 18th century, writes Richard Dennis. What began as trading in coins and commercial papers soon turned to private banking. Mayer sent four of his five sons to establish banks in London, Paris, Naples and Vienna.
His fourth child, Nathan Mayer Rothschild, founded the London branch in 1809 and became fundamental in the Napoleonic Wars when, in 1814, he was commissioned by the British government to raise funds. This involved co-ordinating agents and couriers, and transporting gold and information around Europe.
The next generation of Rothschilds continued to refine the family business. Most notable among them was Lionel Nathan Rothschild, son of Nathan, who became the first Jew to be elected to the House of Commons, in 1858. In 1875, he was able to raise £4m within hours to make the British the principal stockholders in the Suez Canal. His son, Nathan Mayer Rothschild, became the first Jewish member of the House of Lords. Since then, the Rothschild dynasty has been responsible for funding such commercial operations as the creation of diamond dealers De Beers in 1887, and the London Underground in 1926.
Jacob Rothschild (b. 1936) was chairman of N.M. Rothschild before retiring in 1980. Since then he has chaired the National Heritage Memorial Fund, providing £1.2bn in lottery grants and became deputy chairman of BSkyB. In 2009 his personal fortune was estimated at £360m by The Sunday Times Rich List.
The Rothschild family interests are not restricted to banking. Dame Miriam Louisa Rothschild (1908-2005) was a natural scientist, vegetarian and teetotaller who became a leading authority on fleas – The Rothschild Collection of Fleas is part of the Natural History Museum collection.
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:32 am Post subject:
THE FACETS OF THE PSYCHOPATHIC ROTHSCHILD FAMILY PART 1: MONEY, BANKS, AND THE TRUTH
March 9, 2013 · by Evan Batterton · in Rothschild Family World Rulers
THE FACETS OF THE PSYCHOPATHIC ROTHSCHILD FAMILY PART 1: MONEY, BANKS, AND THE TRUTH
By Evan Batterton
Edited by Rick Wilson
Certain articles of mine are featured and will continued to be featured in the best Global Non-Compliance Site in the entire United Kingdom and soon the world and everything is edited by Blair Lorimer (GNC Editor)
My special thanks go out to Rick Wilson for his expert editing and getting me through this with a ton of support and encouragement. Check out Rick’s Facebook Group: Scream the News and my other friend’s page Daniel Anthony who also has a group called Age of Enlightenment.
DADDY AND THE DEADLIEST ARROW EVER SHOT
The epic started in 1744 with the birth Mayer Amschel Rothschild. I like to call him “Daddy” Rothschild. “Daddy” can easily be credited with being the very first in his family that achieved international power and influence. He began to learn the trade of money-changing from his father when he was just 10 years old and he fell in love with money instantly. I’m going to fast forward to “Daddy’s” golden years and put this in perspective. This man began his life in money at 10 and finished as a banker that wield enough money, power, and influence to allow him to give out international loans to nations and personal loans to kings. The most historically influential thing that “Daddy” ever did was to send out his sons to bank for the Rothschild Family and to grow the family wealth, power structure and expand influence. These five sons have been dubbed by many biographers and historians as the “Five Arrows.” The notion that this was a commencement for all five the sons at once would be false. They left to make their mark in Europe and history at different times. The son named Amschel Mayer Rothschild (not a junior and not to be confused with “Daddy”) remained in the city of origin for the family, Frankfurt, Germany, and took over the business there. Salomon Mayer von Rothschild was dispatched to the bank branch in Venice and was known as the diplomat of the family. Carl Mayer Von Rothschild was dispatched to the branch in Naples and proved he could overcome the stigma of being the dumbest of the brothers. Jacob Mayer De Rothschild went to Paris cultivate and grow the French branch of the family bank. I saved the best for last and waited to introduce Nathaniel De Rothschild, the infamous London financial powerhouse. “Daddy (Mayer)” was referred to as the first man or father of international finance based on his success, and I often wonder what kind of lofty title would have gone to Nathan. Out of all the Five Arrows Nathan was the most successful in his gaining, hoarding, and lust for wealth. Like any tyrant he possessed an innate and compulsive desire to control. Jacob was a son “Daddy could really be proud of too. He changed his name 5 years after he arrived in the French capital to James and he was instrumental in the Rothschild Family’s rise to power. Jacob made a ton of money in Paris and his wealth dwarfed all other bankers in the city and there have been testimonies that it may have been larger than all the bankers combined in Paris, and to be fair, all of the Rothschild sons were cases of extreme success. I’ve seen a myriad of videos, read a lot of books and browsed online articles concerning Jacob, and he was raked in the wealth of Paris, France. If Jacob was a success and he did the Rothschild Family name proud by growing the business, then what would that make Nathan De Rothschild in the eyes of his family and history? Nathan was not the typical son or human being. Normal human beings are born possessing a conscious, but Nathan was far from normal. I’m declaring that I think that out of every son (arrow) that was dispatched by Mayer Rothschild, that Nathan was the specific Rothschild I was referring to when I gave this section its title of “Daddy and the Deadliest Arrow Ever Shot.”
CAN AN ARROW BE DIPPED IN CORRUPTION AFTER IT HAS BEEN SUFFICIENTLY SOAKED IN POISON?
The deadliest brother (Arrow), Nathan Mayer Rothschild destroyed all good that economics would have had a chance to do, and I’m convinced that many of the frustrations we feel, the justified sense of complete despair, countless broken livelihoods, and the blood of countless millions can be placed on the list of things Nathan should have answered for. The case can be made after more is read and absorbed in this piece that all future strife, oppression, despair, homelessness, war, and the death of countless millions all over the world, since Nathan moved to London, can also be blamed on him. He was not only a sociopath; he was a brilliant financial scam inventor, and more cunning than anyone I’ve ever learned about in history. He truly was Daddy’s most ambitious, tyrannical, and deadliest “Arrow” that was sent out and we all feel the impact of it and recognize it vividly today namely for what he did to the London Markets and the economy of the entire country of England. Nathan De Rothschild was the epitome of corruption.
THE BANK OF ENGLAND CAN’T BE A PRIVATE CENTRAL BANK BECAUSE IT SAYS “ENGLAND” AND THAT MEANS IT IS GOVERNMENT, RIGHT?
No, it sure doesn’t. The names of every single privately owned central bank in the entire world have names that have the expressed intent on making the public believe that they’re government institutions. The Bank of England was privately owned and ownership was granted to investors that bought shares. They are run like companies and have little to no oversight. That was exactly how the very first, First Bank of England was too.
WAS OPENING THE BANK OF ENGLAND A ROTHSCHILD ACCOLADE?
The Bank of England and the economy of England belonged to the various investors responsible for its creation. Nathan did not invent the central bank but I’m sure he wanted bad because he set it in his sights. He was the busiest and most cunning Rothschild, and I’m going to recount the tale of how Nathan Rothschild stole England.
THEY ARE EITHER MANIPULATORS OR THEY ARE VERY WELL TRAINED SOCIAL OUTCOME ENGINEERS
The biggest project Nathan and his brother Jacob were worked on at the time was some war profiteering and business was great. The Napoleonic Wars were approaching their climactic end and Jacob was financing Napoleon and France, while Nathan was eager to aid England in the effort led by Wellington. This war had benefited the Rothschild brothers and family immensely. Nathan aided England and continued until Jacob had arrived in France and the primary reason at that time was to aid Nathan in his various schemes that were profitable that required teamwork but everything he did then screamed criminal rather than “evil genius.”
At some point, and it was probably psycho-Nathan’s idea, Nathan and Jacob developed an “Insider Trading” scam for the battlefield. The profits were essentially based of market manipulations done by both using advanced knowledge of battle outcomes. They used the Family’s personal courier system to obtain knowledge and news before anything arrived from leaders on the field. How all this was done is really is nothing more than a description of a financial crime taking place, but knowing how it was done and knowing how to utilize information for maximum profit were two different animals . I know they were able to communicate with one another and I know that was used too. The two communicated sensitive info which was risky no matter whom they had bribed, but it probably didn’t matter because the family had a code language that developed from Mayer (Daddy). “Daddy” was a relatively uncultured and only learned a little bit of German that he spoke poorly, and this terrible German was then mixed with his native tongue of Yiddish (Rothschild Family are Ashkenazi Jews) and a code language was born. The brothers were not psychic, although they probably appeared to be to their peers because at the close of each battle they’d go down and buy or sell in areas that were affected most by the battle and Nathan and Jacob were both buying and selling in huge amounts and they profited big from it too. Nathan was especially fortunate because England was struggling to prevent collapse so every single battle’s outcome was critical for England and England’s financial markets and so the profits and losses were both substantial and so Nathan was as happy as a psycho can possibly get and his peers at market were also starting to follow his lead, and I’m sure Jacob had a similar experience of investors and bankers that had followed his lead. The Rothschild brothers became the best indicators of market trends towards the end of the Napoleonic Wars.
The final battle of the Napoleonic War took place at Waterloo on June 18th, 1815. That is arguably the most important day in banking history and should be committed to memory. Every single English citizen was terrified, from the working class to the leadership. England had no choice but to win, and France like any nation entrenched in war needed and desired a French victory. I remember learning things about this battle when I was a teenager, and what stuck out to me is that the winner couldn’t be predicted when the battle started, however, had Napoleon showed up earlier and gotten a certain position then it would have been a done deal for England. Napoleon was late that day, and there was a hard battle fought that resulted in an English victory. The war was over, and the Rothschild couriers were dispatched and probably rode with extra urgency. This is the point in the story that Jacob’s history went and focused squarely on Nathan. Nathan arrived at market and all eyes fell on him. The entire market knew that Nathan knew something, and Nathan hung his head low and looked very distraught, he started selling off his holdings in the London Market and then was mass panic. Every investor and banker there dumped everything they could and fast. Rothschild kept in character and had his agents very quietly buy up the dumped and worthless shares. The shares were actually the Bank of England’s version of bonds. The next day Wellington’s courier arrived to announce an English victory. It would have been fresh news to most of England probably resulted in a celebration. There was probably no celebration for the elite even though the news was a surprise to them too. England’s economy, the Bank of England, and a substantial war debt belonged to Nathan Mayer Rothschild. “The deadliest Arrow ever shot” had taken control of a nation and a central bank in 24 hours with a little acting and misdirection. Where the brother’s manipulators or were they social outcome engineers?
IS THAT A CENTRAL BANK IN YOUR PANTS OR ARE YOU JUST HAPPY TO SEE ME?
There are a few very basic facts I notice that people accept about central banks but then forget. Making connections is crucial when it comes to learning about local, national, and global banking corruption. It’s a system of information that appears very complex and is very complex at first until you realize that nearly every banking practice is a scam and it’s quite simple. I asked myself, “Is this a house of cards made up of very easy to understand underhanded?” It is all a house of cards, a huge house of cards that’s been built from a foundation of granite. Everything I’m putting here either builds or aligns with another fact and this information can be used to figure out just about every scandal there is and the first several are facts about a private central bank that never change with location:
There are about 165 privately owned central banks. The banks that are problems and oppressive are not government banks; they privately owned. I’m repeating for a reason here. The most important thing to remember is the word “private.”
A central bank has to have permission to set up in a nation and will get permission to do so from the proper authority figure. If an act, bill, or specific legislation is required, a central bank will express appreciation and sell its version of the economic stability and prosperity it can bring.
A potential central bank will gather as many elite investors as possible for initial start-up capital and to determine the investors that will share ownership of the bank. This is what makes it privately owned.
The central bank operates exactly like a corporation and wears the guise of a bank and this is a justified statement based on evidence. Shares are sold and traded (not publically) and serve a key function when attracting investors. An investor must do a buy in, so only the richest, smartest and most dedicated will own the nation’s money supply. These institutions are lying to the people and themselves by claiming to be banks.
The share count for each investor at anytime will determine the stake (how much control or influence) any member of the quasi bank-corporation has, and that will determine what investor has the highest stake better known as the controlling stake. 51% of the shares is the only way anyone in any company, or central bank, no matter or how big or small can gain the controlling stake and its only time the word CONTROL can ever be used about a private central bank at the national level.
The investor list is completely secret and is never revealed. Rumors fly, people are speculated about, and sometimes one family will get all the credit and get awarded the controlling stake in every single central bank on earth when no hardcore evidence is available.
There is just a few ways to know the identity of an investor. The individual must reveal themselves deliberately or accidentally (slip ups on the national or world’s financial and/or geopolitical stage. This has happened before and always helps to connect the dots. The criminal con man JP Morgan is a prime example of flaunting the control, and Nathan Rothschild revealed himself by accident over the First Bank of the United States and the renewal of its expiring charter and that great info is in the Fed Reserve section.
LET’S EXPAND OUR MINDS on central bank stats and facts:
A recent list published the names of every single privately owned bank operating as a nation’s central bank on Earth. The total number of private central banks was 165.
Iran is on that list. Its shocking information but it means nothing unless we know the investors. Iran is a big believer in not charging interest and its private investors could all be local. In fact, I’m stating right now that I believe that is the case.
This is interesting information that may not even have anything to do with a central bank. In 2006 President Putin completely cleared the war debt that the Russian Federation has had to carry and depend on its citizens to pay and announced he was ceasing all business between the Russian Federation and the Rothschild Family and like GMOs, the Family had to cease commercial interests and leave the country.
I did a basic search on private central banks just to see if there was anything that I was wrong about or that I could add as a little known fact, and there was nothing but the same definition on nearly all the pages and the definition asserts that private central banks are “illegal” institutions. That’s 165 banks with unique rules of law, but I still think these banks are considered illegal by most countries if not all of them. Common sense tells me that any country would reject the idea of foreign interests being in charge of the money supply and laws would have probably been written to prevent it.
The US constitution is very clear that only the Treasury Department can create the nation’s money. Now we can tell people exactly why the Federal Reserve is illegal and tell them the exact location in the Constitution. Federal Reserve supporters have a few ways to challenge this assertion and they’re still wrong because the constitution and can only be amended through a majority vote from congress and a foreign power can never control or dictate US national interests.
That’s it guys! Really there isn’t much to it at all. Everything was related and the very basic central bank functions can be used for to understand or clear any jargon or unnecessary fluff when trying to discern the truth. There is a problem here. Most of the movement believes that the Rothschild family is in control of every single one banks except for 3, and this belief is turned into fact and is becomes irrefutable to most, and there’s a difference between a reasonable belief and fact. I believe, not based on hard evidence, but based on behavior and other factual accounts that Rothschild Family has it fingers in anything that truly matters, and I know that I’ll never see those lists of investors too. Once again, I’m admittedly holding this belief based on no concrete evidence. I want to make that clear before I get attacked or jumped on.
I AM “FED” UP WITH THIS CENTRAL BANK ACTING LIKE A DIVA AND SHOVING HER “CONTROLLING” BOYFRIEND, NATHAN IN MY FACE CONSTANTLY. SHE WASN’T HIS FIRST!
Aside, from writing the story of Nathan and Jacob (which I’ve read for years and have memorized) this section was my favorite to write (I didn’t know as much as I thought I did). It was a lot of fun to timeline this info and I attempted to establish obvious patterns while trying to showcase a few patriots. This section will reveal a couple of Americans that displayed fearless heroism from start to finish in their lives. The number of anti-central bank role models may be a short list but it grants a little hope. There is no one of any note that isn’t waving one of the two banners of oppression, but there is hope that a true leader will emerge someday. The Federal Reserve is a main talking point of the movement, but few know about the events that prompted its creation and even fewer know about the Fed’s predecessors.
Thomas Jefferson Vs Alexander Hamilton
Thomas Jefferson is really the poster boy for central bank hatred. He wrote about the dangers of a private central bank, theorized about the short and long-term effects of them, and he spoke out against them on constant basis. When he gave these speeches I’m sure he would have never thought that in the year 2013 that what he warned about came true. He was so on the mark that sometimes when I read things of his it will hit me as being more prophetic than cautionary. Jefferson’s main American opposition was Alexander Hamilton who was an important figure in US Treasury history (the very 1st Secretary of Treasury and just happened to be the first bad one too), and he was pushing overly hard for the fledging US to pick up a central bank right away. Hamilton’s pitch for the Institution centered on it being used to stabilize and improve the country’s credit score. I think that’s very weak justification (all reasons to have a central bank are poor ones). It’s frequently speculated that Hamilton was a Rothschild agent. I tend to believe he was an agent because he appears desperate even in textbooks. Its weak speculation but there’s something to be said about how Nathan Rothschild operates and I’m quite sure there were agents that were sent or bought off on American soil and in the government.
Showdown at the 1st Session of Congress
Jefferson’s warnings and protests did not fall on deaf ears and he was joined by James Madison, another big name in American history. Jefferson and Madison were recognized as the leadership of the opposition that fought this corrupt and illegal institution and went head on smashing Hamilton’s proposed credit myth that was being peddled. Time was rolling by and the time had come to settle this political battle and have some peace for a few months. The year was 1790 and the signing of central bank charter was the main focus for all in attendance. Each side of the debate was heard out by Congress, and the best point all day was made by Madison when he simply pointed out that a privately owned central bank was unconstitutional and therefore illegal (that truly was the bottom line). That was a great day because the very first defeat of central banking in America occurred in 1790 at the 1st Session of Congress. In 1790, most people shared the thought that a private central bank would allow for outside control and corruption and would generally increase federal power, and back then, distrusting a powerful central government was in fashion (now you are demonized and possibly called a terrorist), and the opinion that the central bank would be nothing but bad for the young and promising United States was in fashion with Congress too. What a difference a year made!...
Only 3 countries left w/o ROTHSCHILD Central Bank!
The Rothschild family is slowly but surely having their Central banks established in every country of this world, giving them incredible amount of wealth and power.
In the year of 2000 there were seven countries without a Rothschild owned Central Bank:
Afghanistan
Iraq
Sudan
Libya
Cuba
North Korea
Iran
It is not a coincidence that these country, which are listed above were and are still being under attack by the western media, since one of the main reasons these countries have been under attack in the first place is because they do not have a Rothschild owned Central Bank yet. The first step in having a Central Bank establish in a country is to get them to accept an outrageous loans, which puts the country in debt of the Central Bank and under the control of the Rothschilds. If the country does not accept the loan, the leader of this particular country will be assassinated and a Rothschild aligned leader will be put into the position, and if the assassination does not work, the country will be invaded and have a Central Bank established with force all under the name of terrorism.
Rothschild owned Central Bank:
Central banks are illegally created private banks that are owned by the Rothschild banking family. The family has been around for more than 230 years and has slithered its way into each country on this planet, threatened every world leader and their governments and cabinets with physical and economic death and destruction, and then emplaced their own people in these central banks to control and manage each country’s pocketbook. Worse, the Rothschilds also control the machinations of each government at the macro level, not concerning themselves with the daily vicissitudes of our individual personal lives. Except when we get too far out of line.
The only countries left in 2003 without a Central Bank owned by the Rothschild Family were:
Sudan
Libya
Cuba
North Korea
Iran
The Attacks of September 11th were an inside job to invade Afghanistan and Iraq to then establish a Central Bank in those countries.
The only countries left in 2011 without a Central Bank owned by the Rothschild Family are:
Cuba
North Korea
Iran
After the instigated protests and riots in the Arab countries the Rothschild finally paved their way into establishing Central Banks, and getting rid of many leaders, which put them into more power.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
, his sister Alice (1847-1922), James Armand de Rothschild (1878-1957) and his wife Dorothy, and the current head of the family, Jacob, 4th Lord Rothschild. The Windmill Hill archive also holds papers relating to the Palestine Jewish Colonisation Association, founded by Baron Edmond de Rothschild in 1924 to settle displaced Jews in self-supporting agricultural communities.
