Noam Chomsky 'exposed' as 'Chief Gatekeeper'

[blackbear]

Chomsky: It Doesn't Matter
Even If There Was A
Conspiracy Behind 911
By Jeffrey Blankfort
jablankfort@earthlink.net

I don't usually send videos to my list but this short clip of Noam Chomsky being interviewed re 9-11 is very revealing in which he says, referring to what critics of the official narrative allege, "what does it matter even if it was true, it wouldn't be significant?" He then refers back to the assassination of JFK in which he still insists that the assassin was Oswald, with the nonsensical comment that "people get killed all the time."

Add to this his routine dismissal of the role of the Jewish lobby in shaping US Middle East policy and it is easy to understand why he is known as the "Chief Gatekeeper."

Will he debate anyone on these issues? Of course, not. He prefers opponents like Alan Dershowitz who is guaranteed not to raise any important issues that Chomsky cannot counter. In this 4 minute clip, he speaks about coincidences that can't be explained but it would be nice if he would explain how it was that the 8000 page Patriot Act was already written, printed, and ready to be sent to Congress immediately after 9-11 when, before the event, there would have been no chance of its passage. Another coincidence?

http://youtube.com/watch?v=LoDqDvbgeXM

William Rodriguez...........thousands of jews didn't turn up for work.......

"The mullahs + William blasting 9/11 truth across the world could have finally lit the touch-paper to the long-planned bombing campaign against Iran."........My Arse.!

[Newspeak International]

Chomsky is waffling so much not a fact has been addressed.

I used to rate him not so long ago.

Waffling Gatekeeper extrordininaire to be sure.

[antidisestablishmentarian]

[blackbear]

Hello antidisestablishmentarian

William said that to me after the 9/11 (Jimmy Walters) event in Manchester town hall.

Concentrate on the present day holocaust against the black moustaches.

[uselesseater]

How typical!



This is the response I usually get from most lefties and communists, a majority of whom probably regard Chomsky as a demi-god.

So Chomsky thinks it's unimportant that 9/11 was an inside job?

He would probably say the same thing if you pointed out that he works for the NWO. I would imagine his flock of slavish followers would say the same. These individuials have as much interest in affecting change as a mechanic does in fixing your car twice as quick and at half the cost. These pathetic deniers are mearly posturing IMHO and they make me sick. They probably even think the Guardian is a trustworthy paper

[sr4470]

Indeed, MIT is a defense contractor (in that it provides technology and research capability for the US military).

[TonyGosling]

What a mean, impatient waste of time and energy and how counterproductive having a go at Chomsky. No his readers don't worship him, they appreciate the massive contibution he's made to analysis of capitalism, and corporate media in particular.
It was Chomsky that dug out the quote:

[outsider]

[prole art threat]

[Beezlebush]

Seasons Greetings!
It is only right and fitting to remind the reader to TAKE NOTHING AT FACE VALUE written on the subject of 911 - be it by my humble self, by any of the more established, purportedly reputable 'voices' from the deep, dark recesses of this forum - or even by Chomsky out there in The World. However, to perhaps help validate my view that 911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB, those who have not already done so could do worse than start by Googling the following: 'PNAC', 'Rebuilding America's Defences', 'Cheney Middle East Oil Maps'. You could go to www.Youtube.com website to access and watch films like '911 Press for truth', and '911 Mysteries'. You might spend some time on internet links reached from sites like www.globalresearch.ca or www.911blogger.com. You may even choose to read books such as 'The New Pearl Harbour' by David Ray Griffin',' Crossing the Rubicon' by Michael Ruppert and 'The War on Truth' by Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed. I did. I would request only that you CAREFULLY research the ownership and cross check the validity and providence of any information you read before accepting it as true. RESEARCH FOR YOURSELF as though your grandkids life and freedom depended on it?? Reach your own conclusions, not someone else's!! Peace to all for 2007.

[prole art threat]

[Beezlebush]

Seasons Greetings - Yes Really!
It is only right and fitting to remind the reader to TAKE NOTHING AT FACE VALUE written on the subject of 911 - be it by my humble self, by any of the more established, purportedly reputable 'voices' from the deep, dark recesses of this forum - or even by Chomsky out there in The World. However, to perhaps help validate my view that 911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB, those who have not already done so could do worse than start by Googling the following: 'PNAC', 'Rebuilding America's Defences', 'Cheney Middle East Oil Maps'. You could go to www.Youtube.com website to access and watch films like '911 Press for truth', and '911 Mysteries'. You might spend some time on internet links reached from sites like www.globalresearch.ca or www.911blogger.com. You may even choose to read books such as 'The New Pearl Harbour' by David Ray Griffin',' Crossing the Rubicon' by Michael Ruppert and 'The War on Truth' by Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed. I did. I would request only that you CAREFULLY research the ownership and cross check the validity and providence of any information you read before accepting it as true. RESEARCH FOR YOURSELF as though your grandkids life and freedom depended on it?? Reach your own conclusions, not someone else's!! Peace to all for 2007.

[commanderson]

[Snowygrouch]

You ought to put a sock in it unless you can contribute something non-divisive.

Mind you thats why youre here isnt it?

[PaulStott]

[sr4470]

Leftist gatekeeper. Not the only significant one.

[gareth]

anyone read barrie zwickers chapter on 'the shame of noam chomsky and the gatekeepers of the left' from his book 'towers of deception'?

probably the best analysis and critique of chomsky i've encountered. well worth checking out!

[sr4470]

[gareth]

[sr4470]

[TonyGosling]

[John White]

[John White]

[iro]

[gareth]

[Dogsmilk]

[uselesseater]

Critisising Chomsky shouldn't be devisive in any way seeing as he is clearly not interested in the truth about 9/11. The fact that some people should find it divisive only hilights the wrong assumption that 9/11 truth is in any way Left leaning or Socialist. We really need to get away from such lables and systems that have been handed down to us by the PTB.

Chomskys stance on 9/11 doesn't really bother or surprise me. My problem with him is that he supports most if not all of the goals of the New World Order. He focuses on the symptoms while acively directing attention away from the real issues such as Money Creation and refers to the CFR, Bilderberg, Trilateral groups as 'nothing organisations'

I think the 9/11 truth movement is in deep * if we haven't woken up to problem reaction solution and the fact that Globalists control both sides.

'Evil Imperialist Capitalist America' cannot possibly construct a New World Order. They are being used to create the problem to which the public will react and then call for the solution of the New World Order which Chomsky advocates.

So it's not that I am persicuting Chomsky for not speaking out on 9/11 as I wouldn't expect anything else although, when the time comes I'm sure he'll be only too willing to offer us the solutions to the problems that the lie of 9/11 has caused.

My problem is that he is clearly in the employ of the establishment.

I do find his comments that 'it doesn't matter if 9/11 was an inside job' disgusting though. Interestingly this is the denial angle I get from most seasoned leftists after you have convinced them out of one form of denial.

[uselesseater]

[gareth]

is peak oil a scam?

is there a definitive study or do i have to rely on your conjecture. conjecture that doesn't even come close to answering the question

[uselesseater]

I'm sorry I can't direct you to anything more concrete. Try Greg Palasts new book.