| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
xmasdale
Angel - now passed away
Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 1959
Location: South London
|
 Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2010 10:35 am Post subject: 7/7 case now in court - Coroners Act? |
 |
|
I have just received a tip off that there is a legal case currently proceeding through the Royal Courts of Justice in London to decide how an inquest into someone who was killed in the 7/7 bombings should proceed. My informant tells me that the victim's relatives are angry that their QC is talking about “alleged bombers” rather than “bombers” and are trying to get him/her to say the four lads blamed were definitely the bombers. The case started yesterday and continues today Friday 26th Feb.
I have no more details than that - no names, no case name, no court number. It would be good if someone could get to the court to find out more details. I can't go myself due to other engagements.
Noel |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Daniel Elliott
Minor Poster
Joined: 07 Jan 2010
Posts: 74
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2010 11:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
Very interested to see how this plays out. I hope it will at least get tongues wagging and inform a fair amount of people.
Thanks |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
blackbear
Validated Poster
Joined: 08 Aug 2006
Posts: 656
Location: up north
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TonyGosling
Editor
Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 18335
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Thermate911
Angel - now passed away
Joined: 16 Jul 2007
Posts: 1451
Location: UEMS
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 27, 2010 4:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Tony Gosling wrote: | | Multiple connected deaths demand a public enquiry (concurrent inquests) as far as my legal knowledge extends. |
That was before Jack Straw worked his evil on it, I guess?
FWIW:-
| Quote: | The Act contains measures to reform the coroner system. According to the Institute of Legal Executives:
There is provision, carefully circumscribed, for the establishment of a judicial inquiry under the 2005 Inquiries Act to take the place of an inquest, where there is highly sensitive evidence (typically intercept) and it would not be possible to have an Article 2 compliant inquest. These provisions will be used in rare cases only.[2]
The most controversial aspect of the bill are the provisions regarding secret inquests. The provisions had previously been mulled as part of the Counter-Terrorism Act 2008, though ultimately they were dropped before the Counter-Terrorism Bill was finalised. Last minute concessions as the Coroners and Justice Bill passed through parliament included giving the Lord Chief Justice the power to veto any requests for private inquests and also the power to decide who the judge is.[3] |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coroners_and_Justice_Act_2009
yet what he has perpetrated would fill a book, or an ICC court...
It's time we all got back to common law and leave this statutory stuff high and dry above the tideline.
www.fmotl.com or if Veronica is still under attack, www.tpuc.org shows the way forward, imo.
_________________
"We will lead every revolution against us!" - attrib: Theodor Herzl
"Timely Demise to All Oppressors - at their Convenience!" - 'Interesting Times', Terry Pratchett |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Andrew.
Validated Poster
Joined: 27 Nov 2007
Posts: 1518
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 27, 2010 5:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Thermate911 wrote: | | Tony Gosling wrote: | | Multiple connected deaths demand a public enquiry (concurrent inquests) as far as my legal knowledge extends. |
That was before Jack Straw worked his evil on it, I guess?
FWIW:-
| Quote: | The Act contains measures to reform the coroner system. According to the Institute of Legal Executives:
There is provision, carefully circumscribed, for the establishment of a judicial inquiry under the 2005 Inquiries Act to take the place of an inquest, where there is highly sensitive evidence (typically intercept) and it would not be possible to have an Article 2 compliant inquest. These provisions will be used in rare cases only.[2]
The most controversial aspect of the bill are the provisions regarding secret inquests. The provisions had previously been mulled as part of the Counter-Terrorism Act 2008, though ultimately they were dropped before the Counter-Terrorism Bill was finalised. Last minute concessions as the Coroners and Justice Bill passed through parliament included giving the Lord Chief Justice the power to veto any requests for private inquests and also the power to decide who the judge is.[3] |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coroners_and_Justice_Act_2009
yet what he has perpetrated would fill a book, or an ICC court...
It's time we all got back to common law and leave this statutory stuff high and dry above the tideline.
www.fmotl.com or if Veronica is still under attack, www.tpuc.org shows the way forward, imo. |
Thermate please, could you show us a link to the fmtol or tpuc where they have those common Laws, as its very hard to navigate on there sites and I have never been able to find it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TonyGosling
Editor
Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 18335
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
