Posted: Wed Apr 21, 2010 12:02 pm Post subject: The most compelling no planer yet?
This video is what I've been waiting for and have to say its quite compelling, I do however also see the importance of sticking to a rigid science based provable evidence scenario
If this went to court they'd just claim the original tape had been tampered with
I think the trouble is, we simply don't know what images were tampered with and what weren't which makes finding a conclusion almost impossible. NBB goes from strength to strength in my opinion as does the dustification process claims.
Joined: 30 Nov 2006 Posts: 575 Location: the eyevolution
Posted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 12:01 pm Post subject:
This has been addressed before and completely debunked.
The second video posted is yet another laughable attempt at trotting out the same old kcollobs.
The first clip shown is clearly in slow motion. Compare the explosion patterns of the two clips.
The explosion begins in the first clip at 49 seconds by the video's own timing...
Six seconds later by the video's own timing...
Now compare that with the second clip...explosion begins at 1:15 by the video's own timing....
Then TWO seconds later....
Therefore...because in the first clip, the explosion patterns takes 6 seconds to reach the same level as the explosion in the second clip which takes 2 seconds to reach the same level as the explosion in the first clip, it is a watertight fact that the first clip has been slowed down.
The only thing to ask about the video is...
A) Have the makers of the video deliberately slowed down the video to create yet another bogus NPT video.
B) Have they unknowingly used a slow motion clip and their tiny little minds have not noticed.
Either way, it is beyond belief how many of the NPT crowd fall for this garbage time and time and time and time and time and time again.
The next clip-overlay comparison which mindblowingly forgets to account for differences in perspective is so laughable that an analysis is undesirable in favour of an IQ test for the video maker.
Joined: 30 Nov 2006 Posts: 575 Location: the eyevolution
Posted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 1:00 pm Post subject:
By the way, the video faker is looking for the plane in the wrong place when he makes the hilarious blunder in the perspective free clip-overlay as seen here.
[/URL]
If it were a true overlay comparison, then where are the tops of the buildings that have clearly been cut off? Like the pyramid topped one missing a chunk to the right of the towers?
Why is it missing?...drum roll...bbbbrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr....because the clips are from different perspectives and any overlay of the two is bound to bring up anomalies - (cymbal crash)
The second clip in the video suggests the plane should be here...
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
[/URL]
