Out of Iraq? Don't Hold Your Breath

[conspiracy analyst]

Obama appears to want to repeat the glories of the Vietnam withdrawal when they were hanging from helicopters....


Out of Iraq? Don't Hold Your Breath
William Rivers Pitt

t r u t h o u t, May 15, 2010

President Obama will not get the United States out of Iraq in his
first term. If he wins a second term, it is highly unlikely he will
get us out of Iraq before he finally leaves office.

Print that out and tack it to your wall. Six years from now, it will
still be hanging there, yellow and curled, but entirely correct. We're
not going anywhere.

Yeah, yeah, I know, the word from the White House ever since Obama
first began to campaign has been that we'll be out of Iraq by 2011.
That was the promise, oft-repeated, and I'm here to tell you that it's
a load of bull. Iraq is the 51st state, now and forever, so praise the
Lord and pass the taxpayer-funded ammunition, amen.

The reasons for this grim truth are myriad, and most recently have to
do with another frenzy of violence and bloodshed in that ravaged,
raped nation. A parliamentary election on March 7 failed to deliver
majority control to either of the two major factions - one controlled
by former Prime Minister Iyad Allawi, the other by current Prime
Minister Nouri al-Maliki - and the resulting power struggle has
spilled into the streets. Again.

On Monday, more than 100 people were killed and 300 injured after a
series of bombings and assassinations rippled across Iraq. In total,
it appears there were more than 60 attacks; Baghdad, Mosul, Hilla, and
other cities were rent by explosions and gunfire which, according to
the power players, had a decidedly political edge. Matters have gotten
so dangerous there that Allawi was compelled to lash out at his own
government (such as it is) for sitting on their hands while people are
getting killed:

Allawi says he is under constant threat and that the government is
doing little to help protect him. "We live every single day under a
threat that we are going to be assassinated," he says. "I ask for
support from the government, as an ex-Prime Minister ... Nobody cares
a damn." Asked to specify what kind of support he has asked for,
Allawi says, "Cars, communication gear, these bomb-detection, anti-
detonator things ... These cost a lot of money. It's not free of
charge. We need the government to protect us as they protect others.
But this is not happening. I have to go to personal friends to donate
a car, an armored car. It's ridiculous."

Allawi is particularly furious that the impasse has allowed other
rivals to whittle away at contested seats with a campaign of "de-
Baathification" - that is, purging politicians with ties to Saddam
Hussein's ousted Baath Party. "This smearing campaign was something
unbelievable: the Baath Party is coming back to power, Saddam Hussein
is coming out of his grave and things of this nonsense," he says.
(Allawi's party crosses sectarian lines, while al-Maliki's is
predominantly Shi'ite.)

The violence didn't end on Monday. On Tuesday, two bombs went off in
Mosul, one targeting the Iraqi police force and the other targeting an
Iraqi military patrol. A suicide car bomb went off at a police
checkpoint in Falluja, and hundreds of students tried to storm a local
Parliament building in the Kurdish region of Iraq after the abduction
and killing of a Kurdish journalist.

This would all be disgusting by itself, but is made more so by the
fact that these events have become so morbidly predictable. Advocates
of the war, along with a herd of "professional" pundits, would argue
that things are far better in Iraq than they used to be. Those
unfortunate souls who have spent the first half of this week sweeping
guts and eyeballs off the sidewalks, however, would probably beg to
differ.

Which brings us to why we're not leaving. According to The Associated
Press:

U.S. commanders, worried about increased violence in the wake of
Iraq's inconclusive elections, are now reconsidering the pace of a
major troop pullout this summer, U.S. officials said Tuesday. The
withdrawal of the first major wave of troops is expected to be delayed
by about a month, the officials said. Waiting much longer could
endanger President Barack Obama's goal of reducing the force level
from 92,000 to 50,000 troops by Aug. 31.

More than two months after parliamentary elections, the Iraqis
have still not formed a new government, and militants aiming to
exploit the void have carried out attacks like Monday's bombings and
shootings that killed at least 119 people - the country's bloodiest
day of 2010.

The threat has prompted military officials to look at keeping as
many troops on the ground for as long as possible without missing the
Aug. 31 deadline. A security agreement between the two nations
requires American troops to be out of Iraq by the end of 2011.

In Baghdad and Washington, U.S. officials say they remain
committed to the deadline, which Mr. Obama has said he would extend
only if Iraq's security deteriorates. Getting out of Iraq quickly and
responsibly was among Mr. Obama's top campaign promises in 2008.
Extending the deadline could be politically risky back home - but so
could anarchy and a bloodbath following a hasty retreat.

Two senior administration officials said the White House is
closely watching to see if the Aug. 31 date needs to be pushed back -
if only to ensure that enough security forces are in place to prevent
or respond to militant attacks. Both spoke on condition of anonymity
because of the sensitivity of the administration's internal
discussions.

Already, the violence, fueled by Iraq's political instability,
will likely postpone the start of what the top U.S. commander in Iraq,
Army Gen. Ray Odierno, has called the withdrawal "waterfall" - sending
home large numbers of troops in a very swift period.

Read between the lines of that carefully-worded report, and the
reality of the situation becomes all too clear. We made such an
incredible mess in Iraq that continued violence is a brass-bound
guarantee. Every act of violence gives more fuel to those who argue
for staying. It's a perfect circle, and it is not going to stop.

George W. Bush and his merry men got us into Iraq with the absolute
intention of staying there forever. We've built a bunch of massive
bases for exactly that purpose. Most people consider the Bush
administration to be an abject failure, but in this they succeeded
beyond even the wildest expectations. The companies that continue to
rake in cash from our expenditures in that war are going to be
building golden statues of Bush for a long time to come.

Whether President Obama is a prisoner of this situation, or is
actively continuing the policy, is entirely irrelevant at this point.
He may hate this war, or he may love it, but at the end of the day, he
will continue in the manner of his predecessor.

We're there, and unless this country erupts in a frenzy of furious
protest and civil disobedience, we're staying. Even that may not make
the nut, but it would be awfully nice to see this country shake itself
out of its stupor and do what needs to be done.