live shots of twin towers exploding with no planes..

[mason-free party]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n44lnriv3eg

you can't have it both ways...unless its a fantasy film

[James C]

This is a fantasy film. Nice editing but that's about it.

No-plane theory is hogwash. Always has been, always will be.

[marky 54]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DmRWNucPmCM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9z2z75LWMwU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J0Ko29SL1Bk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=51z7PuxS3zw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UhXioCl5AjU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I4gvfNtzcBw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kq6Y4vasVbI

i had a look for some planes and theres a few angles i remember but cannot find anymore.

so why did the original video ignore these angles? is the video implying there was simply no clips showing planes? its no wonder when the ones that show planes are all avoided, and there are more clips than just these ive linked, i just cannot be bothered to sit around all day looking for them all.

no planes may be true but please don't mislead to convince people.

[Reflecter]

Mason,

Do you support the Jersey Girls and the victims families that are interested in a further investigation into the events of 9/11?

[mason-free party]

[Reflecter]

So how unreal is their investigation? Who among such investigations is a Shill?

[marky 54]

this thread has nothing to do with 'real' investigastion work what so ever.
its just a youtube clip thats been put together with selective angles, whilst ignoring any angle with a plane in it.

anyone could make the same video but paint the opposite picture just by showing the plane clips but ignoring the ones with no plane in it.

what does this prove exactly? because it aint research or proof of anything for or against planes.

if the clip had of took into consideration every angle including ones with planes in im sure it would of ended up at:

angles 30
explosions 15
planes 15

or there abouts give or take a few in favour of which ever you think.

[chek]