Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2010 10:16 am Post subject: French Professor sacked over 9/11 'conspiracy theory'
Somewhat old news, but new to me.
French Academic lost his job when he slammed the "official story" of 9/11. He then went to court and won - although his views were still widely condemned by the court
On March 24, 2009, the Paris administrative court ruled in favor of Aymeric Chauprade and suspended the decision of Defence Minister Hervé Morin, saying he had violated a "fundamental freedom".
The fire can not be responsible for the collapse of
buildings with steel structures. While Meridian
Plaza in Philadelphia in 1991, burned nineteen hours
without collapsing towers, North and South would
respectively collapsed after one hour and two
hours of fire is, when Scientific American
(October 2001) states that nothing has ever been built
as solid as the WTC.
The fire has not been so violent that the claims
Commission of Inquiry, since, according to FEMA (the
"Civil Protection" American) kerosene has evaporated
in the explosion. The test certifies that said Cardington
building steel withstands temperatures well
higher than the combustion of kerosene. The Fire
Engineering Magazine, a reference in fire science,
argues that no steel building has ever been destroyed
by fire and the investigation into the WTC was only
"Rude joke".
More troubling still is the mystery of building 7
suddenly disintegrated at 17:30. The "Report on FEMA's
the collapse "cautiously acknowledges that" details
Fire Building 7 and how they
caused the collapse are unknown. Mystery
leads to the strange Larry Silverstein, owner
WTC only since July 24, 2001 and who had
used to replace the maintenance staff and
safety, he ordered the firefighters to "pull" the
Building 7 (which term means a controlled demolition)
But how FDNY, which does
lacked the skilled personnel in the field
controlled demolition, could they put in less
seven hours of explosives in the right places in
building, according to the official, burned, when
know that implosion is seeking at least prepared
two weeks.
Building 7 was not it the control center that would
used in the demolition of the whole?
A few months earlier, the 23rd floor had been renovated
in order to make a command center for
emergencies for mayor of New York. This
Floor that could resist to of circumstances
exceptional, offering an ideal view of all
WTC buildings. In Painful Questions, Eric
Hufschmid notes that the trajectory of two aircraft
Building 7 target seemed as if it emitted
a homing signal.
The thesis of explosives is illustrated by another fact: a
thermal map of the rubble of the WTC provided by NASA
shows that five days after the attacks, the temperature
within the basement of Building 7 and the South Tower
(Where heat remains trapped) was still higher
the melting temperature of steel. Only explosives
carries the temperature to over 1600 ° C
to explain the heat found within the tower rubble.
He's not exactly the first academic to slam the official story. I know several who either think the official story is nonsence or at the very least questionable.
He's not exactly the first academic to slam the official story. I know several who either think the official story is nonsence or at the very least questionable.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
