Exposed! The 9/11 TV Movie. September Clues

[Disco_Destroyer]

Exposed! The 9/11 TV Movie.


Link

[TonyGosling]

I'm not sure if there is any problem with this film.
This comprehensive analysis of the 9/11 broadcasts shows how the mainstream media actively participated in the 9/11 false-flag operation aimed at generating public support for illegal wars. This media deception has effectively fooled the World for too long. Please watch with an open mind and make your own conclusions.

Link

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6407548186293238834

[GodSaveTheTeam]

This is too weird. Something's going on here and I dont mean in S.C.

Do you realise the wider research of the people behind the film states that no one died on 9/11 and that the survivors & victim's family members are computer generated or actors?

They call them "vicsims".

Weirdly, I've been engaged in a little spat over on another forum about this very film over the last couple of days. He is, as with most Cluesers very abusive and ignores any counter evidence...now where have I seen that before?

I was challenged to look at this....



...and give it my best shot.

(cue sound of a gun being cocked)

Here goes...ready....

This was my reply.

First of all, look at the impact points within the two clips. Notice how in the "side on" clip the explosion is bigger than the end on clip at the end of the gif. This is not a true comparison to begin with.

But anyhoo...

Below we see a still from the beginning of your gif.



The plane is just barely visible, under the arrow, just disappearing behind the building...

Next we shall put a straight line over it, toward the towers to sort of pencil in the line your arrow makes....



Notice how the line I've included touches the barely visible plane just disappearing behind the first building it goes behind...

Next, without moving the line, we shall see a second still from your gif...further along the planes flight path....



Notice how the plane has now dipped under the line... not that straight afterall?

Next comes a third still from your gif.



The plane is now further back up towards the line. Almost touching again.

Now here comes the big one.

Notice how, on your gif you've included an inset of another shot of the towers. From a cmpletely different angle, a different shot and therefore a completely different perspective. Well, that's just really kind of you because it gives me and everyone else here (who live in the real 3d world you've managed to escape from) a useful device...



Yes! Another straight line...now I dont know about you but I dont remember the WTC Towers being described as "New York's answer to Piza"

Ask Shack if you dont get this reference(he lives in Italy:icon_biggrin:)

So, in order for the picture to be 2 dimensionally correct we have to do one vital thing. Yes...:clap: well done...straighten the towers....

I cant do that though unfortunately. I dont have the software so why dont you straighten the towers yourself because you seem like quite a seasoned video editor...and then lets have a look at the flight path then shall we....

Remember to keep the useful inset that you provided as a marker. It will help us see that the towers are straight and not leaning like in your original gif. Also why not use the picture with the black line on it? This will help us see the new flight path angle.

Also, remember, different perspectives mean different perceived angles...like this for example...


Link


------------------end of reply (needless to say the above was completely ignored!!!)

The point is September Clues states that comparing the flight paths proves the clips are fakes which it categorically does not do.

I do not know if there were real planes or not but I am willing to admit that. I did not see them with my own eyes so I do not know.

But does the film admit that? No. Do you think the filmaker will correct some of the provably false and misleading so called evidence in his film?

Do you realise that on the September Clues website it states that asking for the film to be revised and errors corrected is as follows...

...."3. - Start nitpicking on ‘errors’ and ‘inaccuracies’ in September Clues. Accuse its author of "failing to address the errors”. Finally, launch all-out attacks on his work and persona to generate confusion and controversy. Motto : “Divide and conquer”.

So if you disagree with the film you're an agent?

Sound familiar?

So I guess this means you'll be deleting the 9/11 Truth Controversies thread then Tony and reinstating every single thread therein back into "9/11 Truth News"?

Talk about an about turn.

[Thermate911]

isn't the 'leaning' just an artefact of using a wide angle lens?

Personally I find all these attempts at explaining the flight paths, both in NYC & DC, somewhat academic, especially as it has since been adequately established that the planes did not bring down the towers.

Global Hawk, Yaeger-style aerobatics, holographics, whatever - rather irrelevant post-Harrit/Jones - mere 'shock and awe'...

Bit of a red herring all round, IMO, though miserably tough for the bona fide victims to be so marginalised, vaporized and 'victimized'... Hmm, where else have we seen such evil methods applied?

[GodSaveTheTeam]

[Thermate911]

No, I am not suggesting anything beyond the possible photographic artefact.

Straight flight path, curved flight path, spiral flight path, no flight path - end result is the same - global hegemony.