Fulford - important but not quite right

[insidejob]

Fulford is on to something but I think he’s compromised with one set of the Illuminati.

Clearly, some of what Fulford says is misleading.
• He says the SARS outbreak was Rockefeller inspired depopulation of China. This is believable. But why has it take so long for the Chinese to react (by getting in touch with him)?
• Is it really believable that it is Taiwan-based secret societies who are going up against Rockefeller and not the Chinese state?
• Is it believable that there are a 1,000 or more Ninja-trained, white special forces operatives who could kill David Rockefeller at the drop of a hat?

I think he correctly says that Rockefeller is under threat from one section of the elite, he is sending the Rockefeller criminals a warning, but it’s not really the people he fingers.

I think there is a world-wide grouping of elites who are opposed to the Rockefeller, more war and bomb Iran agenda. These may include China, Russia but also Iran, Syria and Venezuela. They have a loose “understanding” with elites in the West – this doesn’t preclude rivalry. The Westerners include senior intelligence operatives, senior military people and, politicians. They are not necessarily against the super-elite ultimate aim, they are against the means. They believe that Rockefeller’s plan may lead to heavy resistance from the populace and bring disaster for them. It is this grouping that Fulford is consciously or unconsciously in alliance with. And Chinese secret societies may very well be part of this loose alliance.

Opposition to Rockefeller plans among the elite is clear. This is why Colin Powell talks about the ‘neo-crazies’. This is why Brzezinski, in desperation, went before the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee and virtually said that Bush was planning a major US false flag as an excuse to bomb Iran. This is why a good many senior US figures have been forced to retire and get sacked. This is why the retired US military chiefs before the last US election, talked about disobeying orders and demanded Rumsfeld’s sacking.

The most recent example of this is Brown versus Bush. Clearly, Brown laid down the law to Bush when they met. Brown wants to play down the ‘war on terror’. He wants to reduce the numbers of soldiers in Iraq. He is a bit more open in his opposition to Neo-Con pet projects like Guantanamo Bay. Perhaps, the real split occurred when the US and Israel failed in their attack on Lebanon. This is when Brown, plus apparently, Prince Charles, started their coup against Neo-Con Blair.

Yet, in the US, the main global warming politician is Al Gore, who said he won’t run for President. The other leading contenders all give the impression that they would happily bomb Iran.

Fulford is probably right when he says that one criminal clique want to use the global warming hoax to achieve their ends while the D Rockefeller and Bush, Israeli, Neo-Con wing wants to use the war on terror. The war on terror crowd, for instance, are getting into all sorts of problems with Pakistan. Musharraf has told them to go swing when they asked him for help with bombing Iran. So, the upset Neo-Cons are engaged in an attempt to oust him. They are so desperate that they are threatening military strikes on Pakistan. But in doing so they are upsetting a whole load of elite Pakistanis who are loyally behind the Al Qaida myth to create the war on terror myth.

So, as Fulford says, there are differences between some European-based Rothschilds and one part of the US-based Rockefellers. But Fulford has effectively decided to throw in his lot with the anti-Rockefeller alliance.

But does this mean that there won’t be a false flag and an attack on Iran? Clearly, the US have their military in place, they have developed powers to suspend the US constitution and there’s still talk of bombing Iran. To stop Iran attack, the US Congress may well have to impeach Cheney.

[John White]

I feel we have to be mindful that fulford himself is NOT a "player": just a messenger, with an ancestral score to settle, quite possibly part of why he was selected to be that messenger (assuming that much holds up): so hes really not in a position to know how much of his message is information or disinformation, and we are in the position of sticking it all on the backburner, keeping our eyes and minds open and seeing what we shall see...

To that end, interesting POV's insidejob

[Thermate911]

http://benjaminfulford.typepad.com/benjaminfulford/2010/08/beware-of-a ttempts-to-start-infighting-amongst-truth-seekers-who-share-the-common -goal-of-the-greatest-good-for-the-greatest.html

Hmm, this should resonate here, whatever his agenda:-

[Thermate911]

Another wake up from 'Our man in Bauerland':-