Daniel Hopsicker Exposed

[Ally]

DANIEL HOPSICKER IS THE GOVERNMENT MOLE MESSIAH OF 911 TRUTH DAMAGE CONTROL

I haven't written about 911 before in this blog. So let me state what I believe has already been proved by the physical, scientific, testimonial -- repressed -- evidence: the US Government pulled off the 911 tragedy to further its own goals of reshaping the global power grid in favor of their interests. It's the greatest crime ever perpetrated.

And the genius elements of the Government who were charged with the 911 task certainly anticipated that their would be a 911 truth movement. They, more than any of us, knew that they had a very small window under which they could remain safe from public scientific media scrutiny. They knew they could whitewash 911 for a couple of years, but eventually the massive truth would come down on them in this information age. After all, you can't effectively spin things like "scale" and "physics" let alone eyewitness reports.

The stakes were just too huge to ignore the ability of truth to come to the fore. So the Government prepared their antidotes well in advance of 911. This is the Citizenspook take and the following attack on Daniel Hopsicker's credibility is intended to expose his reporting on 911 as a black psy op of damage control. And I must applaud the intelligence involved with this operation. It was planned before 911. It's first strike came in September 2001 and it has continued to grow under the excellent handling of an incredibly talented group of operatives charged with taking the sting out of the real 911 truth movement.

Let me warn you, the following argument, while simple to grasp, must not be judged until the punchline at the very end. Thank you for your patience while reading this.

Last week I became aware of Daniel Hopsicker's recent article regarding the intricate web connecting Mohammad Atta with a local Venice, Florida convenience store owner by the name of Makram Chams. Atta hung out at Chams' convenience store many times before 911. Hopsicker originally wrote about this connection back in 2005. Last week a new development tied Chams to Titan Corporation:

"San Diego defense contractor Titan Corporation, already implicated in the fraudulent bankruptcy of a shadowy St. Petersburg FL company which owned the DC9 "Cocaine One" flight busted in Mexico, employed a Lebanese contractor who assisted Mohamed Atta and other terrorist hijackers in Venice, Florida."

From Hopsicker's Mad Cow report. http://www.madcowprod.com/05172006.html

I was fascinated by Hopsicker's articles which make a very convincing case that the CIA was involved in assisting the so called 911 hijackers obtain flight training.

SOME OF YOU MAY BE FAMILIAR WITH THIS SERIES OF ARTICLES AND MAY BE SCRATCHING YOUR HEAD ASKING -- WHY WOULD SOMEBODY IMPLICATE THE CIA IF THEY WERE A GOVERNMENT MOLE MESSIAH OF 911 TRUTH DAMAGE CONTROL?

And I have to admit, while reading Hopsicker's report, my first concept was to simply copy it word for word, supply a link and credit the man for being a brave patriot. But the very last section of his report left me bewildered:

"But you won't find much about any of this on the innumerable websites of the '9.11 Truth Movement.' Most seem to be utterly fascinated currently with speculation about materials which might have been secreted inside the Twin Towers which could have made them collapse.

They used to utterly fascinated with proving that no plane hit the Pentagon. Before that there were utterly fascinated with the idea that the planes were flown by remote control. And on and on."

[The grammar mistakes and emphasis are his, not mine.]

Red flags fell from the heavens on the Citizenspook bs detector. How could anybody as smart and savvy as Hopsicker be so "certain" that the twin towers were not laced with explosives? How could anybody with even half a brain look at the Pentagon footage and not have serious questions about what hit the Pentagon? You must have questions if you have a brain at all. We're not all going to agree on what we saw. But we must have questions.

So what gives?

My first impulse was to do a Google news search and see if this story was hitting the Google "news" search engine? Unless you're in China, anything will show up in the Google "web" search engine, but for a write up to hit the Google "news" search engine, it must have some clout. Many huge blogs do not show up in Google's "news" search, but sure enough Hopsicker's fledgling blog reports from -- http://MADCOWPROD.com -- do show up in the Google news search. http://news.google.com/nwshp?hl=en&t...sicker%20chams

This, by itself, does not prove anything. But it led me to have a look further into Hopsicker's background. Was this guy some unknown the main stream media could label "conspiracy theorist"? I was curious because anybody classifiable as such usually does not show up in the Google search engine.

I then learned that Hopsicker comes form the main stream media. He's one of their very own. Daniel Hopsicker was a producer at Wall Street Week for PBS, he's the former executive producer of the NBC show Global Business, and he's been an investigative reporter for NBC News.

Very interesting.

Somewhere in time, Hopsicker's beat turned from finance to Government involvement in drug smuggling. Again, this would -- at first glance -- appear to make him legit. And that is exactly what those reports were intended to do. His so called exposes on the Clinton Bush crime families' involvement with the Mena airstrip -- Barry & 'the Boys' : The CIA, the Mob and America's Secret History was published when?--- anybody? anybody? Bueller? Anybody? you guessed it -- Septemebr 2001. Gee wiz, just in time to get him legit for his coming mission. Then in 2004 he published Welcome to Terrorland : Mohamed Atta & the 9-11 Cover-up in Florida .

Hopsicker's role in Government 911 truth damage control is to appear as if he's a staunch Government/CIA critic. It's hard to attack a guy for being in league with the Devil when he's one of the most extreme critics of the Devil, right? And if Hopsicker had simply kept his mouth shut about the rest of the 911 truth movement we'd never know he was a mole. So why is Hopsicker going out of his way to mock the rest of the 911 truth movement? If he'd just kept his mouth shut and avoided attacking the rest of the 911 truth movement -- a movement which gravely concerns those responsible -- then Hopsicker's credibility would be virtually unassailable.

But Hopsicker could not keep his mouth shut because it's his purpose in this grand game to use his long planned "911 truth credibility" as a bastion of destruction for the "other
911 truth movement which is not sanctioned by the Government.

HOPSICKER IS A DAMAGE CONTROL MOLE MESSIAH FOR THE GOVERNMENT.

At this very moment in time they are getting him ready for the major talk show circuit.

They are grooming him as the atom bomb to destroy the 911 truth movement and the seeds of this destruction were sewed in an article written by Hopsicker for Onlinejournal.com back on November 7, 2001. Before I get into the evidence, let me state with authority what Hopsicker's role unequivocally is:

DANIEL HOPSICKER'S REPORTING ON ATTA, CHAMS, TITAN, GOSS AND THE FLIGHT TRAINING ACTIVITIES NEAR VENICE FLORIDA WILL EXPOSE A CIA OPERATION WHICH AIDED THE SO CALLED 911 TERRORISTS IN A BUNGLED CIA ATTEMPT TO INFILTRATE AL QUEDA.

The key word being "bungled". The CIA will become the fall guy and will be implicated in a cover up of epic proportions. The story will unfurl as follows:

THE CIA ATTEMPTED TO INFILTRATE AL QUEDA USING DRUGS AND MAFIA CONNECTIONS AS COVER BUT THE CIA BLACK OP WENT VERY WRONG AND ENABLED THE HIJCAKERS TO PULL OFF 911 WITH THE UNWITTING HELP OF THE CIA.

That's it. And it partially explains the "alleged" infighting between government spy divisions. As it plays out, you will be told about the CIA attempting to control information and stop the world from knowing about its "bungled" attempt to infiltrate Al Queda. This will be the sanctioned story which will spread throughout the main stream media in the coming months and it will also be the nutron bomb intended to destroy the genuine 911 truth movement.

Do I have proof for this theory? Of course. All you have to do is go back to November 7, 2001 and read what Hopsicker wrote for onlinejournal.com in his article titled:

WAS THE CIA RUNNING A TERRORIST FLIGHT SCHOOL?

"Was the CIA running a covert, or black, operation out of the Venice Airport? Might they have been training pilots for bin Laden in an effort to penetrate his organization that went more-than-just-slightly-horrifically awry?"

"horrfically awry" ---- remember that phrase.

http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache...ct=c lnk&cd=1

The article was only found using the Google cahe option.

Note that Hopsicker isn't, and has never, alleged that the Government "intended" 911 to happen.

He alleges that the Government was involved by accident and this is the distinction between the truth and the reality. If the CIA aided the terrorists by accident while trying to infiltrate them, then, of course, they would try to cover that up. But as the story unfurls, understand that a "bungling keystone cops concept" of the CIA's involvement is a much different animal than a concept which alleges that the Government pulled off 911 with malice aforethought.

Hopsicker's Nov. 2001 article finishes as follows:

"Frankly, we can’t differentiate between terrorism and organized crime and drug dealing," Assistant Attorney General Michael Chertoff told the Senate Banking Committee hearings about the terrorists’ money trail in the aftermath of the Sept 11 disaster.

Terrorist groups have been implicated in the $360 billion a year international narcotics trade, directed by organized crime, says Judge Thierry Cretin of the European Anti-Fraud Office.

As recently as six weeks ago, crime families were being seen as particularly important for terrorist groups involved in the acquisition and transport of arms, like in the case of a Jersey City man, accused of attempting to smuggle Stinger missiles out of the country to Osama bin Laden, who is now reportedly helping federal agents investigating the Sept 11 terrorist attacks.

If the deal he got caught doing was typical, insiders say, it was oil and heroin up front for guns and training.

Oil and heroin upfront for arms and training. Now there’s a story we haven’t heard about yet in the roiling skies above the terrorist flight schools on the Gulf Coast of Florida. "

He's got this concept down -- A CIA BUNGLED ATTEMPT TO INFILTRATE AL QUEDA WENT HORRIFICALLY AWRY RESULTING IN 911 DISASTER AND COVER UP -- since all the way back in November, 2001. And isn't it amazing how the story has continued to blossom for Hopsicker right up until yesterday, May 25, 2006, when he published the following article:

"PORTER GOSS RESIGNATION MYSTERY SOLVED: DC 9 WITH 5.5 TONS OF COCAINE WAS CIA PLANE." http://www.madcowprod.com/05252006.html

This Hopsicker, a regular 911 Nostradamus. He's the Messiah of Government 911 damage control. You heard it here first at Citizenspook.

http://citizenspook.blogspot.com/200...ole.html#links

[brian]

Whatever Hopsickers motives his take on September 11 will in no way destroy the truth movement. Even if the above speculation were correct it would only lead to more publicity and more people asking questions. No doubt it would mean more drivel to be addressed but the evidence is out there and it cant be dissappeared no matter what disinformation it is subjectd to.

[andyb]

I agree with Brian. Whilst we must be aware of disinformation, any information that highlights any sort of cover up and gets mainstream coverage can only be good for the Truth movement. It will only get more people interested in the truth, who will then hopefully start doing all the research that we ourselves have done. As much as we would like to pin the blame on Bush, Cheney, CIA etc our primary objective is to get a full independent enquiry into the events surrounding 9/11. There should be no limits set on this enquiry.

[ian neal]

Agree with above comments.

Does anyone know who citizen spook is?

http://citizenspook.blogspot.com/

[xmasdale]

but Hopsicker may have done damage to the movement in the States particularly by getting them all to fight amongst themselves. I hope that the Chicago conference this weekend will lead to some healing of rifts and a united push for an independent enquiry.

Noel

[Sinclair]

Noel,

I agree.

Will we be represented by IRC & AM at the conference? Do you know?

[TonyGosling]

Disagree Noel,
Hopsicker is not responsible for 'dividing' people.
Just re-watch some of his exemplary films.
And subscribe to everything he does.
http://www.madcowprod.com/blog/clips.html