Note from Nico Haupt of New York 911Truth to 'Plane-Huggers'

[Wokeman]

Dear NIST and the planehuggers,

It appears to me that the investigation on WTC 7 and 9/11 is still
questionable, because there is apparently new footage of a new
'plane' crashing into WTC 7?

Since it wasn't established yet, who was the camera operator for
W-ABC 7 (including a WESCAM set) of the official second hit,
maybe you can shed some new light on their identities or also
about this new clip?

regards,

nico aka ewing2001
truthseeker new york city


9/11: The lost 'plane crash' into WTC7
http://911tvfakery.blogspot.com/
June 3, 2006

[Ally]

[flamesong]

This - http://www.911closeup.com/nico/UUU7c.html - is cartoon evidence, even less reliable than George Galloway's 'United 93' evidence.

WTC7 has become a lynchpin in the 9/11 Truth Movement - unshakable evidence with a confession from Larry Silverstein on video that a barely damaged building with a few small fires was deliberately demolished.

Then nearly five years later, literally out of the blue, comes a handful of very low resolution (200 x 120) gif (255 colours) frames (only three of which show a plane) to propose a 'fifth plane' theory.

This is what they call in the literary world, 'deus ex machina'.

If this is the creation of a 9/11 'truthperson' they should be put in the stocks. If it is the product of a bunch 'on the ropes' perpetrators, I can't wait to see how this pans out. The questions it raises would fell a forrest to print!

[Ally]

Nico casts complete doubt on the four planes allegedly used in the attack, I doubt he's gonna throw his weight behind this new stuff about one hitting WTC7. Appears to me like he's mocking it.

[orestes]

Someone is taking the piss. I don't get the joke.

[Ally]

[Ally]

[flamesong]

[Ally]

You're an honest guy Alf but your prickly attitude got on my tits sometimes.

I'll say it first; potkettleblack.

[Wokeman]

We don't have time for all this acrimony. When I posted Nico's comment, the 'plane huggers' name calling might have been a teeny bit patronising, but I watched Web Fairy's footage over and over again, and the image of the whatever-it-was that hit the Towers did not react like a plane hitting a sold steel building would react: It melted into it like a knife through butter. And planes don't do that. If that image was a fiction, then somebody show me the real one. Therefore if that is not the way planes react, then possibly, possibly, it wasn't a plane. Maybe it was an image of a plane. For now, let's leave it at that. Forget holograms. That's maybe down the line.

[flamesong]

Well thanks for the acknowledgement, Ally, if nothing else I endeavour to be honest - and when I cannot be honest I say nothing.

I only had a few moments to speak to you in Manchester and you seemed like a decent bloke - and trusting enough to give me your phone number beforehand. Unfortunately, I was stressed beyond rational being and was pretty exhausted having been chasing up and down the country for the previous week with a small mountain of equipment.

And whenever I feel that anything I am doing is harmful in any way to what I believe in I back away. There were numerous reasons why I did so last year but one - which I hope people from Kirkby Lonsdale will confirm - was that I felt that certain disagreements I had with certain people and issues was not constructive.

If my attitude seems shít, maybe it is just because that is what I have had to face in almost 25 years of activism - I don't see the point in talking through flowers when the issues are so serious.

Maybe next time we cross paths I won't be stressed out and our disagreements will be history.