Jim
Moderate Poster
Joined: 24 Jul 2005
Posts: 294
Location: London
|
 Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 11:44 pm Post subject: Bomb blast details |
 |
|
1. If the blast was on top of the floor, then scorch marks would have been evident on floor covering. All that's there is blood, glass, and other debris, but no burn marks.
2. Concentrate on the hole, and the metal stucture going across it. Evidence shows that the structure has been bent and twisted to the side. That suggests that there was something on top of it to bore the brunt of the blast (the floor), and the manner in which it was twisted, the device was placed between the side of the carriage and the metal structure.
3. If the device was placed on the floor, then the metal structure would have been bent towards the floor, and NOT to the side as it evidently is in the picture.
4. As you can see, the floor is mainly bent towards the ground. That's because the bottom skin of the floor and also the insulation has been removed by the blast, weakening the top layer.
5. At the top left and the top center of the picture, you can see a vertical strut which is brown in colour. That is part of the framework of the train. Again, if the device was close to and had a direct blast path towards that structure, then that would have also been damaged and twisted. The sides of the train are only aluminium sheeting, and are even known to blow off and split from a secondary blast, so its not surprising that they are not there.
6. The other furniture in the carriage has been burnt, as a result of the blast. That is understandable. What is also evident is the fact of the actual structure of it is still intact. If the device (estimated 10 lbs) was placed so close and had a direct blast path, then it would have been completely demolished.
Source: http://www.davidicke.com/icke/headlines.php |
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
