Provocateur: Pamela Geller Garland Texas $10k cartoon attack

[outsider]

False flag?

Hebdo Redux in Garland, Texas? ‘Mohammed Cartoon’ Shooting Reeks of a Staged False Flag: http://21stcenturywire.com/2015/05/04/hebdo-redux-in-garland-texas-moh ammed-cartoon-shooting-reeks-of-staged-false-flag/

'Unreal. This may just be the most obviously scripted and staged-managed event yet.

We’re told that at 7pm CDT local time, two male suspects were shot and killed on Sunday outside of an event at the Curtis Culwell Center in Garland, Texas, a suburb of Dallas, an incident which lasted exactly 15 seconds.

The US media were quick to label this as a “terrorist” incident. In addition to the two dead “terror suspects”, an unarmed security guard, Garland Independent School District employee Bruce Joiner, is said to have been wounded during an ‘exchange of gunfire’ but it’s not yet clear whose gunfire actually hit him.

1-Garland-Shooting-Hebdo
‘FREE SPEECH EVENT’ OR POLITICAL PROVOCATEURING?

The controversial “Muhammad Art Exhibit and Cartoon Contest” was organized by the American Freedom Defense Initiative, led by anti-Islamic media personality Pamela Geller, and featured far-right Dutch politician Geert Wilders, as a keynote speaker. Geller claims to have purposely chosen the venue following the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) gathering who held a “Stand with the Prophet” conference in late January 2015 after the Charlie Hebdo shootings.

SEE ALSO: Garland Shooter Elton Simpson ‘Handled’ By Paid FBI Informant

Geller told FOX News after the incident, the cost of her event was “upwards of $50,000″.

Geller claims that the event was “in support of free speech,” evoking a cry for “solidarity with Charlie Hebdo”, and promised $10,000 for the best Mohammed cartoon. It’s also believed that none of the artists who ‘mailed-in’ their artwork were actually in attendance at Geller’s event. Various internet posts and provocations have been littering the blogosphere for the last 3 months, in an effort to set the stage for Sunday’s manufactured incident.


Staged Drill, False Flag

Incredibly, almost immediately after the suspects drove up to the front of the building and started shooting at a security officer, tweets that seemed to identify them started to surface. The #texasattack hashtag quickly became a trending topic on Twitter.

Garland-Tweet
“Twitter users pointed to a tweet that came out just before the attack. The tweet from @atawaakul, or “Shariah is Light” said, “The bro with me and myself have given bay-ah to Amirul Mu’mineen. May Allah accept us as mujahideen. Make dua” with the hashtag #texasattack. That account has been suspended”, reported USA Today on Sunday (see tweet above).

The media are using this single ‘tweet’ as the case-closer already, calling it “a digital trail”. Excitingly, FOX News referred to this as, “A chilling tweet that could help investigators crack this case.” Other media operatives like CNN’s Ben Ferguson, proceeded to drive home the narrative that this was an Islamic “terror” attack.

“An account belonging to someone calling himself Abu Hussain Al Britani, at @_abuHu55ain, tweeted, “Allahu Akbar!!!!! 2 of our brothers just opened fire at the Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.) art exhibition in texas! #texasattack.” The account was also suspended.”

Note how the tweet reads, “opened fire” and not “killed by police”, as if Abu Hussain Al Britani was there giving a play-by-play of an event that only lasted 15 seconds. This sloppy social media work indicates that we are witnessing a completely staged event here.
Another tweet, for good measure: “Another account, claimed to be that of Abu Hamza Al-habashi, a “Citizen & Soldier of Islamic State”, tweeted “Allahu Akber The 2 Brothers attained shahdah in Texas.”

USA Today then inserted this familiar talking point to round-out the basic “Twitter” narrative: “Al-Qaeda and ISIS have shown a deft ability to use the Internet, particularly YouTube and social media, to spread their message and recruit followers around the globe.”
According to Garland’s Mayor, Douglas Athas, and other media reports, a ‘SWAT Team’ was put into place BEFORE the event because of “safety concerns”.

The ‘SWAT Team’ on display for the media looked more like a military unit...

1-Garland-Shooting-SWAT
‘SWAT Team’ member, or contractor?

1-Garland-Shooting
Special Ops paramilitary unit was in position BEFORE the event in Garland.

In addition to this, Garland Police Officer Joe Harn stated to the media that, “The School District hired additional security for this event.”

In what appears to be part of the overarching drill, long after the two “gunman” were allegedly shot and killed, the entire local district around the venue was placed into full lock-down, as bomb squads were brought in apparently due to fears that the dead gunman had explosives hidden in their black sedan car. Officer Harn then notified the media — “The evacuation of all businesses in the area – just in case.” Notice how teams organized abn evacuation, and not “shelter in place” – more evidence that points to a drill.

We’re also told that organizers of the event had spent an additional $10,000 with the Garland Police Department on “advanced security” for their event.

Despite all this, there were no threats made before the event.

The obvious question here for both Mayor Athas and Officer Harn: if authorities felt that the potential danger was so great as to warrant multiple Special Ops teams to be deployed BEFOREHAND, who “secures the perimeter” BEFOREHAND around the venue for this relatively small event of 200 people, then why would they allow the public to be exposed to such risk, and at a public school facility?

In an effort to justify the risk, Mayor Athas began delivering a diatribe to the media about how this risk was acceptable because “we swear to uphold the constitution.”

These theatrics by local authorities point to the high likelihood that this event was staged in advance, or a drill “gone live”.

Strangely, the story is not receiving the wall-to-wall mainstream media coverage one would expect from a “Charlie Hebdo Repeat On US Soil”, considering how Hebdo monopolized global mainstream media coverage for nearly ten straight days earlier this year. Still, certain US media outlets and right-wing talk radio will rotate the usual speculative talking points about terrorist “sleeper cells” and “ISIS in the Homeland”.

Controlled Attendance, Ideal for Staging

In addition to this, the only witnesses to the shooting were police, with both “attackers” allegedly shot dead outside the event, while attendees were under armed guard inside.

Note also that Garland authorities told the media, FOX and CNN on Sunday evening, that all the attendees were from “out of state”, indicating that they had all traveled from outside of Garland, Texas

It’s important to point out that this event was 100% controlled from the onset. All persons in attendance were there by ‘invite only’ and ‘pre-purchased ticket sales’.
CNN-Garland-Blackwater
STAR OF THE SHOW: SWAT leader gives safety lecture to the crowd after “gunmen” are killed outside.

In a perfectly scripted finale for CNN, the SWAT leader delivers a health and safety lecture to the crowd, moving attendees into a “secure auditorium” long after the gunmen are shot. This is yet another indication of drill (or drill ‘gone live’) procedure.

Straight out of central casting, one man in the audience interupts the SWAT leader and asked, “Was the suspects Muslim?” The SWAT leader pauses, and then proceeds to move on. The media then fills in the blanks with the normal program of over-the-top speculation.

As the cameras rolled, attendees began waving flags, and happily singing “God Bless America” for news crews, an image which was then juxtaposed with the SWAT Teams:


As the incident unfolded, Geller’s website posted what was meant to be a shocking warning that ‘jihad has come to America':


“This is a war. This is war on free speech. What are we going to do? Are we going to surrender to these monsters?

Two men with rifles and backpacks attacked police outside our event. A cop was shot; his injuries are not life-threatening, thank God. Please keep him in your prayers.

The bomb squad has been called to the event site to investigate a backpack left at the event site.

The war is here.”

See the video of the Geller’s ‘Art Contest

Pam Geller as also been accused of working as a media agent for the Israeli Lobby. Geller’s husband Robert Spencer is also the co-founder of the reactionary anti-Islamic organization, Stop Islamization of America (SIOA). Note that Geller is extremely well-funded and has already pulled off a number of high-profile anti-Islamic publicity stunts in the US. In the fall of 2014, Geller paid $100,000 for a series of ads to run on the MTA again. They linked Islam to the Islamic State, Hamas, Adolf Hitler, and the beheading of James Foley; the MTA is legally required to run the ads, but objected to it at first, prompting a lawsuit by Geller.[87] RT.com opined, “Islamophobic Hitler ads appear on San Francisco buses.”[88] In April 2015, the MTA banned these ads.[89] (Source: Wiki)

Immediately after the shooting incident took place, tweets began appearing from familiar media operatives, including Islamophobic ‘national security organization’ calling itself ‘Act For America’, headed by anti-Islamic, pro-Israeli activist, Brigitte Gabriel (a.k.a. Nour Semaan, Brigitte Tudor)[2]. Gabriel’s ‘activist’ profile is almost identical to Geller’s. Gabriel posted this convenient ‘Jihadist taking credit’ tweet at around 10pm CDT Dallas local time. Also conveniently, the Twitter account of terror mascot “AbuHussainAlBritani”(@_AbuHu55ain) was magically erased at the time of the event. This helped to open the social media end of this staged event...'

'Texas shooting: FBI had monitored gunman Elton Simpson since 2006':
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/may/05/elton-simpson-fbi-had-m onitored-texas-gunman-since-2006?CMP=EMCNEWEML6619I2

[TonyGosling]

More innocent dupes murdered - the Nazification of America continues....

Event organizer offers no apology after thwarted attack in Texas
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/event-organizer-offers-no-apolo gy-after-thwarted-attack-in-texas/2015/05/04/f0926fb4-f28e-11e4-84a6-6 d7c67c50db0_story.html

From staging a Texas competition to draw the prophet Muhammed to the protests against the so-called 9/11 mosque, Pamela Geller has led anti-Muslim campaigns for years. So who is she? (Jorge Ribas/The Washington Post)
By Sandhya Somashekhar May 4
Pamela Geller, the woman behind the Texas cartoon contest attacked by two gunmen late Sunday, knew what she was doing when she staged the controversial event featuring irreverent depictions of the prophet Muhammad in Garland, Tex.

The Dallas suburb had hosted a pro-Muslim conference in January, about the time Islamist terrorists killed a dozen journalists with the satirical French publication Charlie Hebdo. Geller, a blogger and fierce critic of what she calls the “Islamization” of America, wanted to make a statement.

So she sponsored the Jihad Watch Muhammad Art Exhibit and Cartoon Contest in the same exhibition hall as the earlier conference. She and her associates invited 200 people and hired 40 heavily armed off-duty police officers and security guards to protect them.


And then they unveiled the pictures: A drawing of Muhammad on a unicycle. A picture of the prophet with a beard of snakes. An angry Muhammad wearing a turban, holding a sword and yelling: “You can’t draw me!” — a reference to the fact that depicting the prophet is considered blasphemous by many Muslims.

If the contest was intended as bait, it worked. Police say two men drove 1,000 miles from Phoenix, shot at a police car outside the event and were quickly killed by one of the hired guards. The shooting has been condemned by Muslim leaders, and Geller, too, has come under fire for staging an event many viewed as purposely provocative.

“Pamela Geller has every right to hold this event. And she should be able to do that — as ugly as others, including me, think it is — without facing any type of violence,” said Heidi Beirich of the Southern Poverty Law Center, which has Geller on a list of extremists.

Still, “I think decent people would say: ‘Why would you need to do that?’ ” Beirich said.

In an interview Monday on CNN, Geller defended the cartoon contest, the latest in a series of her incendiary campaigns against Muslims in America.

“My event was about freedom of speech, period,” she told host Alisyn Camerota. “We need to have this conversation, and the fact that we have to spend upward of $50,000 on security speaks to how dangerous and how in trouble freedom of speech is in the country.”

That “those that were going to be slaughtered” by the gunmen are being maligned by critics “speaks to how morally inverted this conversation is,” she continued.


In an interview with The Washington Post, Geller said she and her fellow organizers were “prepared for violence” this past weekend. In tweets immediately after the shooting, Geller appeared almost gleeful that she had been right.

As one of the nation’s fiercest online critics of Islam, Geller, a housewife from Long Island, has long embraced her role as a provocateur. Her inflammatory rhetoric has landed her organizations, the American Freedom Defense Initiative and Stop Islamization of America, on a list of “hate groups” maintained by the Southern Poverty Law Center.

On her blog and in interviews, Geller has accused President Obama of being beholden to “Islamic overlords,” according to the center. She was a leading opponent of a mosque planned for construction near Ground Zero in Lower Manhattan.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/event-organizer-offers-no-apolo gy-after-thwarted-attack-in-texas/2015/05/04/f0926fb4-f28e-11e4-84a6-6 d7c67c50db0_story.html

[TonyGosling]

This really is Nazi Germany now folks

Mohammed cartoon event group pushes religious envelope
AFP
May 4, 2015 7:13 AM
http://news.yahoo.com/mohammed-cartoon-event-group-pushes-religious-en velope-111324813.html

US anti-Islam activists Pamela Geller (L) and Robert Spencer chat ahead of an anti-Islam demonstration in Stockholm, on August 4, 2012

Washington (AFP) - The group behind the Prophet Mohammed cartoon event in Texas where police killed two gunmen Sunday has a history of making provocative statements about Islam that it says are aimed at defending "freedom" and critics see as antagonizing Muslims.

FBI probed Texas gunman 'over jihadist sympathies' AFP
Everything we know about the attack at the Muhammad Art Exhibit anti-Islam event in Texas Vox.com
Too soon to say if IS group behind Texas attack: US AFP
CAIR Condemns Attack on Anti-Islam Event in Texas PR Newswire
In Attack on Texas Muhammad Cartoon Event, Echoes of ‘Charlie Hebdo’ Takepart.com
The American Freedom Defense Initiative (AFDI), led by provocative activist Pamela Geller, offered a $10,000 prize in a competition to draw a cartoon of the Prophet Mohammed.

Depicting the Prophet Mohammed is seen as offensive by many Muslims. Such satirical images have prompted violence in the past including in Paris this year when 12 people were gunned down by Islamists at the satirical weekly Charlie Hebdo.

Two gunmen who have yet to be identified were killed by police outside the event after opening fire on a security guard.

AFDI supporters say the event was meant to protect the freedom of speech in the United States, which they say is eroding due to violent threats by radicals against people who draw the Prophet Mohammed.

"This is not an anti-Muslim or hate fest or anything like that, it's absurd to even think that way," said group supporter and activist Tom Trento in a video filmed at the competition in Garland, Texas near Dallas.

The group knows its events can provoke a violent response so it prepares a large security presence at its gatherings.

"This is a First Amendment event," Trento said referring to the amendment to the US Constitution that protects speech.

But others aren't so sure.

The Southern Poverty Law Center lists the AFDI as an "Active Anti-Muslim Group." Advertisements the AFDI has taken out in cities around the US in recent years have drawn ire.

The US capital's mass transit authority said it was is legally powerless to ban anti-Islamic adv …
"Islamic Jew-hatred: It's in the Quran. Two-thirds of all US aid goes to Islamic countries. Stop racism. End all aid to Islamic countries," read an ad the group paid for in the US capital last year that drew criticism from an American Islamic group.

A US lawmaker called for a boycott of public transit in Washington after another ad paid for by the group in 2012 denounced "the savage" in Muslim countries.

The ads went up in San Francisco and New York reading "In any war between the civilized man and the savage, support the civilized man. Support Israel. Defeat Jihad."

US representative Mike Honda described the ad as "hate speech" and activists in New York spray painted over the ads.

Despite the criticism, Geller said her group is not condemning all Muslims, just those that partake in violence.

"The ad mentions jihad. It is asking people to oppose those who commit jihad attacks against innocent civilians, and those who celebrate the attackers as heroes," she said.

Geller has at times described her goal as stopping "Islamization" of the US and ending "depredations of Islamic supremacism."

In September last year AFDI caused a stir when it launched a $100,000 ad campaign in New York that featured a picture of US journalist James Foley moments before he was killed by extremists in Syria.

The image was pulled after protest from the journalist's family.

[TonyGosling]

Garland Shooting Event Revised – Shining a Spotlight on FBI’s Role Before Attack
MAY 17, 2015 BY SHAWN HELTON 1 COMMENT
Shawn Helton
21st Century Wire
http://21stcenturywire.com/2015/05/17/garland-shooting-event-revised-s hining-a-spotlight-on-fbis-role-before-attack/

According to official reports over the last week, key details concerning the shooting outside the Curtis Culwell Center in Garland, Texas – have suddenly changed…

This past May 3rd, it was reported that two gunmen opened fire outside of a cartoon ‘art’ exhibition and “free speech contest” featuring images of the Prophet Muhammad in Garland, Texas.

Incredibly, government scribes have change their official story line this week, with investigators now saying that the two named suspects, Elton Simpson and Nadir Hamid Soofi were shot dead, but not by a single traffic officer as was originally stated by authorities, by by heavily armed SWAT Team officers.

This latest change radically differs from what the Garland Police Department had originally released shortly after the incident occurred.

The crime scene revision adds intrigue to the story surrounding the ‘unnamed officer’ initially believed to have shot both suspects, as he was confidently declared a “hero,” following the incident.

Why would the Garland Police declare such a dramatically different description of the events, after displaying so much adulation for the unnamed officer and his apparent actions?

Initially, Garland police spokesman Joe Harn had stated that the traffic officer who requested not to be identified, was at the event as part of a heavy security detail prior to the drawing contest, as described in this early NBC Dallas affiliate report:

“Harn added that off-duty officers work events at the Culwell Center every weekend, but that organizers paid the department around $10,000 for additional security that included agents with the ATF and FBI, security officers from the school district, off-duty police officers as well as SWAT officers and the bomb squad.”

We see a clearer picture emerging regarding Harn’s account of the heavy security presence and are offered a small window into the financial component related to the highly orchestrated exhibition as mentioned here at 21WIRE:

“Officer Harn then notified the media — “The evacuation of all businesses in the area – just in case.” Notice how teams organized an evacuation, and not “shelter in place” – more evidence that points to a drill.”


‘Secrets in Garland?’ – What really happened during the apparent 15 second incident at the Curtis Culwell Center in Garland, Texas. (Photo link trbimg.com)

Additionally, as we previously reported at 21WIRE shortly after the story first broke, the main suspect named in the incident, Elton Simpson, had been under the watchful eye of the FBI for nearly a decade and was in close contact with an undercover informant during that time. The following is an excerpt from that report, which also discloses that Simpson served 3 years probation after being arrested by the FBI in 2010 making a ‘false statement’ concerning an alleged attempt to join serving only 15 days in jail:

“Elton Simpson, was already under surveillance by the FBI and was even the subject of a terror investigation. More importantly, we can also confirm Simpson was being handled by an FBI informant. Court papers filed in Arizona name the FBI undercover informant as Mr. Daba Deng, a Kenyan and who, from 2007, was paid $132,000 by the FBI to “become friends with Mr. Simpson”, and who appears to have groomed Simpson through a local mosque, and helped to develop Simpson’s ideas about “jihad”.”

The same report outlined the relationship Nadir Hamid Soofi, the apparent ‘second’ shooter had with Simpson and likely with authorities:

“Elton Simpson’s roommate and that they both shared an apartment in Phoenix, Arizona, and also attended the same mosque – the Islamic Center of North Phoenix. Is it not safe to assume then, that FBI informant Deng also knew and was interacting with Soofi as well?”

In a Reuters clip on YouTube below, Sharon Soofi, the apparent mother of Nadir tearfully describes how her son has never been violent. Strangely, she didn’t appear to know Nadir’s roommate Elton, even calling him by a different name…



In 21WIRE’s initial report regarding the highly suspicious events in Garland, we once again see how media often ignites a politically charged narrative for the masses:

“USA Today then inserted this familiar talking point to round-out the basic “Twitter” narrative: “Al-Qaeda and ISIS have shown a deft ability to use the Internet, particularly YouTube and social media, to spread their message and recruit followers around the globe.
According to Garland’s Mayor, Douglas Athas, and other media reports, a ‘SWAT Team’ was put into place BEFORE the event because of “safety concerns”.”

The Story in Garland Takes U-turn

The rearranging of information regarding the Garland’s “ISIS” shooting incident were outlined by Garland Police Chief Mitch Bates on Monday, May 11th, stating that the FBI had not contacted his department in the hours before the shooting. Continuing, Bates denied having any prior warning about either of the suspected gunmen – a story which directly contradicts what FBI Director James B. Comey stated at a news conference last week.


‘The Watchful Eye’ – FBI director James B. Comey. (Photo link star.com)

In a May 8th report appearing in the NY Times, we see the extent FBI was actively monitoring Simpson prior to the apparent attack outside a small event in Garland:

“The F.B.I., which investigated Mr. Simpson from 2006 to 2014, reopened its investigation in March when he began to post messages on Twitter about the Islamic State.”

Additionally, the report continues by outlining the level at which the FBI was involved before the cartoon contest:

“Law enforcement officials had recognized that the cartoon contest, staged by anti-Muslim activists in what they called a defense of free speech, might be a target for violence. The F.B.I. set up a command center nearby in Dallas and issued a number of intelligence bulletins about the possibility of trouble, Mr. Comey said.”

“As early as April 23, Mr. Simpson had referred on Twitter to the planned cartoon contest. Mr. Comey declined to say whether agents had seen that post or what specifically had prompted the bureau to warn the Garland police 10 days later about Mr. Simpson.”

According to another excerpt from the NY Times piece from May 11th, the FBI insists it issued a warning prior to the event:

“The F.B.I. director, James B. Comey, told reporters in Washington on Thursday that three hours before the attack, the F.B.I. sent a bulletin to the Garland police warning them that Mr. Simpson might show up at the event.”

If the FBI had followed Simpson for sometime, as outlined above, it seems likely they would have known exactly were the suspected gunmen was – why then, would Garland police state on the record they did not receive a warning?

Additionally, what are we to make of the FBI setting up a command center nearby Garland in Dallas?

Watch this Reuters news clip featuring Mitch Bates of the Garland police discussing the new developments in the Garland shooting case. Decide for yourself if the latest claims in the Garland case create more uncertainty about what happened…




“The identities of the two suspects were not known to us until many hours after the shooting occurred.” – Garland Police Chief Mitch Bates

While the mainstream media has noted the shift in the story between the Garland police force and that of the FBI as a somewhat insignificant detail, the reality is, there is now a glaring change in the official narrative and the case should be examined more closely for its authenticity.


‘Weird Scene’ – This is an aerial view of the car said to have been used by both suspected gunmen in Garland. All of this damage we’re told – happened in just a matter of seconds. (Photo link politicomag.com)

Staged Terror?

Shortly after the incident, many media outlets released a flurry of reports early on May 5th, stating that ISIS had claimed responsibility for the Garland attack via a radio broadcast on its Al Bayan radio station, a story which originated from SITE Intelligence Group.

As we’ve noted numerous times here at 21WIRE, the intelligence monitoring group SITE, has ties to both the CIA and Israeli intelligence. The group has also raised ethical concerns over the years and according to the group’s founder, Rita Katz – they’ve managed to the release terror related material linked to ISIS prior to the group itself.

The staged events in Copenhagen, Paris, and now Garland, repeat the same script, all with intelligence linked gunmen who are allegedly extremists.

And when you consider SITE’s involvement in the Garland story line, linked with that of anti-Islamic media personality Pamela Geller, who is the president of the well-funded organization, the American Freedom Defense Initiative, the organizer of Garland’s Mohammed cartoon event, a polarizing political narrative emerges.

Additionally, when reports suggested that ISIS had somehow orchestrated the apparent attack on “US soil,” in Garland, Texas without any forensic proof. The claims seemed much like the fake “ISIS in Mexico” story, where authorities and the media had to back away from the fuzzy claims in favor of a new meme – one stating that the suspected gunmen Simpson and Soofi were instead inspired by the terror group.

Here’s a recent interview on the Sunday Wire with host Patrick Henningsen along with whistleblower and legal analyst Kurt Haskell, listen as they dissect the highly orchestrated affair in Garland…



In an Associated Press article by Julie Watson entitled, “Doubts raised about Islamic State claim in Texas attack,” brought to light an important aspect of the story – the fact that there was no credible evidence ISIS was directly involved:

“It was unclear whether the group actually directed Sunday’s shooting in the Dallas suburb of Garland or if the two gunmen were inspired by the group to act on their own before they were shot and killed.
Such lone wolf attacks pose a daunting challenge to law enforcement, and Islamic State has a history of claiming responsibility for attacks in which it played no operational role, counterterrorism experts said.”
Continuing the report outlined possible outside links to the case, but had come up empty:

“Federal investigators were looking for links to overseas terror groups, but as of Tuesday afternoon had not disclosed any connection or evidence to back up the group’s claims.”


‘Confusion in Garland’ – An officer looks on at the apparent crime scene. (Photo link cyprus-mail.com)

Down the ISIS Rabbit Hole

On May 11th, the NY Times reported that Simpson tweeted to an account allegedly linked to Junaid Hussain a 20-year-old British hacker, a person with multiple online identities, who authorities also is believe is the cyber hacker TriCk, connected the group TeaMp0isoN.

TeaMp0isoN, as it turns out, was a former blackhat hacker crew from 2008, which has now reemerged as a whitehat computer-security team in 2015 that “specializes in penetration testing,” and other testing for security reasons.

In other words, they’re now a legal hacking group…

Hussain has been simultaneously linked to ISIS and mentioned as a key figure behind the apparent hack of CENTCOM’s Twitter account by a group calling themselves the “Cyber Caliphate.”

If we are to believe that Hussain is working with ISIS and TeaMp0isoN a now ‘whitehat’ group which has also been linked to working alongside Anonymous – wouldn’t that expose the CENTCOM hack as a sham, as it reveals the various connections between government entities and hacking groups now associated with ISIS?

For the record, the same NY Times article above mentions the dodgy claims of the events in Garland being linked to ISIS:

“Mr. Simpson posted, promoting a Twitter account believed to belong to Junaid Hussain, a young computer expert from Birmingham, England, who moved to Syria two years ago to join the Islamic State and has become one of the extremist group’s celebrity hackers.”

“This seemingly routine shout-out is an intriguing clue to the question of whether the gunmen, Mr. Simpson and Nadir Soofi, 34, both of Phoenix, were acting in concert with the Islamic State.”

Over the past week, the public was also told that Hussain was behind an apprent plot to attack London with his presumed wife, 45-year-old Sally Jones, an unemployed mother and former rocker via Twitter.

The very same week, the Daily Mail released a report outlining a recent recruitment campaign by British security services:
“MI5 is launching an ambitious campaign to recruit intelligence officers to convince the thousands of Jihadi extremists it is monitoring to spy for them.
A staggering 700 Britons are thought to be fighting alongside ISIS extremists in Iraq and Syria while an estimated 300 have already returned to the UK.
It will be the responsibility of operational intelligence officers – known as ‘handlers’ – to convince them into providing vital information to the security services instead.
Successful candidates will receive £41,900 salary plus benefits if they pass a nine-step qualification process which starts with an online ‘pre-screening’ and ends with an eight-week ‘foundation agent-handling course’.”

The MI5’s recruit program seemingly goes hand in hand with the rise new terror plots.

The symbiotic relationship between British security services, the FBI and terror schemes unfortunately - is nothing new…