Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2012 11:28 am Post subject: G4S exposé: Olympics 'wide open' for false flag or terrorism
US and EU troops in London described as a 'Foreign Invasion'.
Security will be a cowboy affair and nobody seems to give a damn.
That may be playing into the hands of the False Flag Gladio operators...!
My advice is to stay well away from London during the Olympics!!
There are plans for the evacuation of London and 100,000 troops are coming in via Woolwich barracks made up of regular Army, American regular army and European troops.
This could just be a precaution but the public should be made aware of the foreign invasion which is taking place right now. The troops are being held across London in various barracks once they've been through woolwich barracks.
I also have this information confirmed by an army officer who was shocked at all the foreign troops coming into London.
There is also a shipment of what are being described as casket linings, each casket can hold four or five people and 200,000 casket linings have been delivered we believe from America. This could all be precautionary in the event of a major terrorist attack.
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2012 10:19 pm Post subject:
by email
ARE THE LONDON OLYMPICS A TARGET FOR A FALSE-FLAG ATTACK? - Adrian Salbuchi - 14th June 2012
Dear Friends and Colleagues,
Please find below an article that I consider to be very important.
Surprisingly (?), it was rejected by those who “normally” publish my works…
May I ask you kindly help us to spread this information as far and wide as possible.
Thank you and regards,
Adrian Salbuchi (Buenos Aires, Argentina)
_________________________________
‘Are the London Olympics a target for a False-Flag Attack?’
“The two fundamental elements
for a successful Strategy are:
Secrecy and Surprise!”
Juan Domingo Perón
(Argentine President & Statesman)
It might be wise to take a closer look at some unnerving indications that the London Olympics might be the stage for a horrific “False Flag” attack, as part of the Global Power Master’s strategic need to break their present global political and economic deadlock.
“False Flag” attacks happen when a militarily strong Nation stages a controlled and very high profile military or terror attack on its own territory and interests, then immediately blaming it on a target foreign power or entity, using it as an excuse to wage war.
Such events carry their tell-tale signs; their “stigmata” so to speak because, when planned, they must include some sort of “communication or cueing mechanism” so that those in the know can make sure neither they, nor their associates, nor loved ones should happen to be in “the wrong place at the wrong time”.
Is something along these lines on Global Power Master drawing boards for the up-coming London Olympics? The question would surely sound ludicrous, were it not for a May 2010 Report issued by The Rockefeller Foundation (RF) and Global Business Network (GBN) that “predicts” exactly that.
Called “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development” (http://www.gbn.com/consulting/article_details.php?id=101), it carries introductions by RF president Judith Rodin and GBN chairman Peter Schwartz, both members of the powerful New York-based Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) think-tank, a key geopolitical planning node of the Global Power structure embedded deep inside the US.
The Report defines its purpose in rather nondescript terms: “The Rockefeller Foundation and GBN began the scenario process by surfacing a host of driving forces that would affect the future of technology and international development. These forces were generated through both secondary research and in-depth interviews with Foundation staff, Foundation grantees, and external experts”.
Then, they go on to define “the matrix of four very different futures” in store for Mankind:
“(1) Lock-Step: a world of tighter top-down government control and more authoritarian leadership, with limited innovation and growing citizen pushback” (you can almost see them watering at the mouth over this one!).
“(2) Clever Together: A world in which highly coordinated and successful strategies emerge for addressing both urgent and entrenched worldwide issues” (definitely no sign whatsoever that today’s power brokers are doing anything even remotely leading to that!)
“(3) Hack Attack: An economically unstable and shock-prone world in which governments weaken, criminals thrive, and dangerous innovations emerge” (more slurpy Power Elite mouth watering with this one!), and,
“(4) Smart Scramble: An economically depressed world in which individuals and communities develop localized, makeshift solutions to a growing set of problems” (and where the powerless suffer and die, whilst the powerful go into high-tech-security ‘business as usual’ mode…)
When detailing Scenario 3 (Hack Attack), we find the following surprising “scenario building” in this Report: “Devastating shocks like September 11, the Southeast Asian tsunami of 2004, and the 2010 Haiti earthquake had certainly primed the world for sudden disasters. But no one was prepared for a world in which large-scale catastrophes would occur with such breathtaking frequency. The years 2010 to 2020 were dubbed the “doom decade” for good reason: the 2012 Olympic bombing which killed 13,000, was followed closely by an earthquake in Indonesia killing 40,000, a tsunami that almost wiped out Nicaragua, and the onset of the West China Famine, caused by a once-in-a-millennium drought linked to climate change.”
“The 2012 Olympic bombing, which killed 13,000”!?!? What a “scenario”!! …followed by three “natural” disasters” that can probably be artificially triggered by covert technologies such as HAARP and others…
Now, God forbid: but were such a scenario to come true as Rockefeller envisions, it will of course be blamed by the Western governments and its obedient media PsyWar on a grand global “conspiracy” spearheaded by Iran, seconded by Syria, Pakistan and North Korea, applauded by Venezuela, Cuba, facilitated by the Occupy Wall Street, Indignado and Assange movements, and abetted by Russia and China.
A conspiracy to end all conspiracies! …and a hell of an excuse to “smoke them all out”, unleashing the Dogs of War barking in the nervous arsenals of the US, UK, EU and Israel, whilst clamping down on protesters everywhere. It would allow launching a revamped “Global War on Terrorism”, Version 4.1.
The Rockefeller Report then adds, “Not surprisingly, this opening series of deadly asynchronous catastrophes (there were more) put enormous pressure on an already overstressed global economy that had entered the decade still in recession… Most nation-states could no longer afford their locked-in costs, let alone respond to increased citizen demands for more security, more healthcare coverage, more social programs and services, and more infrastructure repair….”
Wow!! Sounds an awful lot like the world the Global Power Masters are already building and imposing on all of us everywhere!
False Flag events require highly complex, covert and labyrinth-like mega-engineering, absolute secrecy and surprise, and solid buffers isolating the on-going government authorities, whose “total innocence” must be fully safeguarded and believable.
Presidents and ministers must be able to go live on radio and TV exclaiming with indignation that their country is a victim of “a day that will live in infamy!”, or maybe stand atop the rubble of collapsed towers and yell, megaphone in hand, “The people that did this will hear from us soon!”.
Yet, make no mistake: those who perpetrate false flags know that – in the long run – the truth comes out. The point here is to make sure that “the long run” is really very, very long. That when global public opinion finally learns the truth, 60, 80, 100 years down the road, the issue is no longer “political”, but rather a mere historical curiosity.
Whether it’s the sinking of the USS Maine in Cuba which served the US to make war on Spain in 1898, or the sinking of the Lusitania in 1915 which dragged the US into World War I, or Pearl Harbor in 1941 which (again!) dragged America into World War II, or the (non-sinking!) of the USS Maddox in the Gulf of Tonkin in ’64, or the USS Liberty in ’67… Just make sure the truth comes out generations later when nobody really cares anymore.
Problems however, started piling up on the Global Power Elite when glaring inconsistencies began surfacing over September 11th and July 5th in London, whilst they are still very political events, and definitely not yet “history”.
That’s when lots and lots of political “damage control” has to be brought to bear, with the entailing political cost.
Have the Global Power Masters learned from past mistakes and perfected their military, political and psychological warfare mechanisms?
Are they in such dire straits that they need to pull a really big one like this on the world, as a means of “escaping forwards”?
Let’s hope it won’t be London… But anyway, let’s stay alert…!
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 10:16 am Post subject:
The Oktoberfest Bombing
Both the conspiratorial mode of behavior of the neo-nazi terror group and its “propaganda by deeds” approach point to earlier manifestations of right-wing terrorism, particularly by neo-fascist groups in Italy. But there is also a German precedent of right-wing terrorism: The bombing of the Munich Oktoberfest in 1980, in which 13 people were killed and 211 wounded.
Among the dead was Gundolf Köhler, who was officially declared the “lone assassin”. However, Köhler had connections to various neo-nazi groups. He had participated in paramilitary trainings of the neo-nazi “WSG Hoffmann” group. Another link was to the right-wing extremist Heinz Lembke. When Lembke was arrested – a year after the Munich bombing – he led the police to a total of 33 secret weapons caches in northern Germany, where automatic weapons, large quantities of ammunition, 250 hand grenades, 150 kg of TNT and bazookas were hidden. Shortly thereafter, Lembke committed suicide in prison. The two chief suspects being dead, the case was closed in 1982.
Now, 31 years after Munich Oktoberfest bombing and 29 years after Köhler was officially declared “lone assassin”, the Bavarian State Parliament and the Munich City Council have – both by unanimous vote – demanded that the judicial investigation into Oktoberfest bombing shall be reopened. And, that the evidence of its neo-nazi background, accumulated over the years by journalistic investigators, historians and lawyers of victims of the bombing, be reviewed.
http://www.solon-line.de/2011/12/21/the-neo-nazi-terror-group-nsu-the- 1980-oktoberfest-bombing/
Neo-Nazis 'helped to carry out Munich Olympics massacre' http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/neonazis-helped-to-carr y-out-munich-olympics-massacre-7857360.html
Intelligence files claim Palestinian terrorists were aided by rightwing extremists in Germany
Tony Paterson - Berlin - Monday 18 June 2012
German neo-Nazis helped the Palestinian terrorist organisation Black September to carry out the infamous massacre of 11 Israeli athletes during the 1972 Munich Olympic Games, intelligence files released nearly four decades after the killings revealed yesterday.
Details from a hitherto secret, 2,000-page document on the massacre, held by Germany's Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution, were published by Der Spiegel magazine ahead of the 40th anniversary of the Israeli athletes' deaths this September.
Two Israeli sportsmen died in the initial hostage-taking. Nine more were killed during a bungled rescue attempt by German police at Munich airport in which five terrorists were also shot dead.
Israel has been lobbying for a minute's silence to be observed in memory of the massacre at this summer's Olympic Games in London.
Until now it had been assumed that Black September, which some historians claim was linked to the Palestinian Fatah party – bore sole responsibility for the kidnapping and murders which were carried out in an attempt to secure the release of 234 Palestinians held in Israeli jails.
But according to the newly-released German intelligence file, neo-Nazis also helped to prepare the massacre and planned to carry out further terrorist acts in Germany to avenge the police killing of Palestinians in Munich.
The file showed that Abu Daud, the Palestinian behind the massacre, travelled to Germany to plan the attack in July 1972. He was assisted by Willi Pohl, a known German neo-Nazi. It was not clear whether other neo-Nazis were also involved.
The documents cited police in Dortmund who kept Daud under surveillance. They said he met Pohl several times and that the neo-Nazi boasted to his employers about his contacts with a radical wing of the Palestine Liberation Organisation.
Der Spiegel said the police report was widely circulated, but there was no evidence the intelligence services made any attempt to find or arrest Daud. The Palestinian was apparently able to prepare his plan to attack the Munich Olympic village undetected, the magazine reported.
The files revealed that Pohl put Daud in touch with an expert in counterfeiting passports and other official documents, and acted as his personal chauffeur. Pohl, who has since renounced terrorism and neo-Nazi activity, is now a crime writer who has assumed a new name. He told Der Spiegel: "I drove Abu Daud all over Germany and he held meetings with Palestinians in various cities."
He claimed he was linked to the Munich massacre "without knowing it".
The documents showed Pohl was later involved in a plan by Palestinian activists to carry out a series of kidnappings at Cologne cathedral and town halls across Germany, which were meant to avenge the deaths of Palestinians shot dead by police after the Munich massacre. Pohl was ordered to carry out the attacks by Abu Jihad, then the deputy of PLO leader Yasser Arafat. But he was arrested in Munich in October 1972.
Police found he had hand grenades, firearms and a threatening letter from Black September addressed to a judge who was preparing to bring charges against Palestinians involved in the Munich massacre. The documents also suggested Pohl helped to procure weapons that may have been used in the Munich massacre itself. _________________ www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org www.rethink911.org www.patriotsquestion911.com www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org www.mediafor911truth.org www.pilotsfor911truth.org www.mp911truth.org www.ae911truth.org www.rl911truth.org www.stj911.org www.v911t.org www.thisweek.org.uk www.abolishwar.org.uk www.elementary.org.uk www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149 http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 10:46 pm Post subject:
G4S security undercover: London Olympics is wide open to terror or false flag http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2012/06/497362.html
Friday Drivetime | 22.06.2012 20:50 | Workfare | Analysis | Indymedia | Policing | World
Exclusive interview with investigative journalist Lee Hazledean who is training undercover as a security guard for the London olympics with private security firm G4S. The olympics start in 4 weeks time.
Lee Hazledean is a filmmaker and investigative TV journalist. He has also been involved in major stories on the IRA and how British Army infiltrated the organisation and carried out false flag operations. He has managed to get undercover as part of the security team at the 2012 Olympics with G4S. He has found there is a media black out on all major news outlets to do with the Olympics unless the story is broken in a news paper or foreign news agency it’s unlikely to see the light of day. Security training and officers are so appaling that the safety and security of the London 2012 Olympics are in jeopardy. A few example’s: The security training is woefully inadequate run by a training company called Contemporary International. Lee has been assigned to work in a PSA (Pedestrian Screening Area) the main security for the stadiums. During an exercise he was asked to pose as a would-be terrorist and managed to get knives, guns and IED’s through security screening on every occasion and every exercise. The X-Ray operators have only two days of training, they aren’t trained properly and miss the most obvious prohibited items gun’s, knives, IED’s, ammunition etc. Bag and physical searchers again are missing dangerous weapons, trainees can’t use vital security equipment like the HHMD (Hand Held Metal detectors) they can’t even communicate properly with the public on a basic level. Worryingly the ‘Rapiscan’ walk through metal detectors don’t work properly and aren’t sensitive enough to pick up large knives, ammunition and other metallic threats. He was told that they would be set to go off only after 50 people have walked through to limit queuing time and to get spectators into the venue. So a Terrorist if they basically queued up would probably get through wearing a suicide vest. G4S are dragging the job centres to recruit the long term unemployed for security officers regardless of how suitable they are for the role. In classes there are drug deals going down, people can’t speak any English whatsoever and others who find people with disabilities offensive and are constantly making disabled jokes. People with no security experience are being rushed through training for their SIA licenses. People who haven’t even completed their SIA licenses yet are being picked to be Team Leaders over highly trained security officers, ex soldiers and ex police. Being a team leader is an important role as the first and last line of defence. Lee is concerned that weapons or worse will be getting into the games. However, what’s more disturbing is that uniforms are already going missing or being stolen from the uniform distribution centre/training facility. The training facility is an accurate mock-up of the actual security measures at the Olympic venues. Lee has witnessed several people taking photos on their mobile phones in the training facility and whilst they have been a few people caught by trainers most aren’t noticed. Even when they are caught they are just told to delete the photos and they continue on the training. We know that terrorists take surveillance photos to gain intelligence. Contemporary International claim that they have mobile phone ‘jammers’ in the facility, however trainers admitted to Lee that there were no ‘jammers’ at all, it was a verbal deterrent. The training facility is a non sporting Olympic venue and a terrorist target. Therefore G4S can’t even secure a school let alone the Olympic Venues.
Also there are plans for the evacuation of London G4S are going to be at the forefront, as well as 100,000 troops coming in via Woolwich barracks made up of regular British Forces, American regular army and European troops. Lee was not told why there would be any need for an evacuation of the whole of London, they just said it was to be a “defining moment in the history of London”. This could just be a precaution but the public should be made aware of the foreign invasion which is taking place right now. The troops are being held across London in various barracks once they’ve been through Woolwich barracks. I also have this information confirmed by an army doctor who was shocked at all the foreign troops coming into London. There is also a shipment of what are being described as casket linings, each casket can hold four or five people and 200,000 casket linings have been delivered we believe from America. This could all be precautionary in the event of a major terrorist attack. Also we were shown videos of drones attacking targets in Afghanistan and were told that drones will be patrolling the sky’s over London during the Olympics carrying out surveillance and search and destroy missions if necessary. Lee believes there is something fundamentally wrong with how the security for the Olympics is being implemented by G4S. With exactly 4 weeks to go until the games Lee feels he needs to expose the inadequate security in place in the hope that it can be improved so that the London 2012 Olympics can be a safe environment for spectators and Athletes alike, and not a cause for national and international embarrassment for Great Britain.
Laurie Penny takes a look at G4S, the scandal-embroiled "private security firm" (they're not technical mercenaries because the "security" people who work from them are usually born in the same territories in which they operate) that is the world's second-largest private employer, after WalMart. The company is providing 10,000 "security contractors" to the London Olympics, like these people, who think that it's illegal to take pictures from public land. G4S has lots of juicy contracts around the world, like supplying security to private prisons in the West Bank where children are held. They're also the proud inventors of "carpet karaoke," a technique used at private asylum-seeker detention centres, which is a fancy way for "stuffing a deportee's face towards the floor to contain them."
What difference does it make if the men and women in uniform patrolling the world's streets and prison corridors are employed by nation states or private firms? It makes every difference. A for-profit company is not subject to the same processes of accountability and investigation as an army or police force which is meant, at least in theory, to serve the public. Impartial legality is still worth something as an assumed role of the state – and the notion of a private, for-profit police and security force poisons the very idea.
The state still has a legal monopoly on violence, but it is now prepared to auction that monopoly to anyone with a turnover of billions and a jolly branding strategy. The colossal surveillance and security operation turning London into a temporary fortress this summer is chilling enough without the knowledge that state powers are being outsourced to a company whose theme tune features the line: "The enemy prowls, wanting to attack, but we're on to the wall, we've got your back." If that made any sense at all, I doubt it would be more reassuring.
Two German MEPs - Franziska Brantner and Michael Theurer - have asked foreign affairs chief Catherine Ashton why she hired security firm G4S to protect EU embassies in Libya when it did not have permission to operate there, in violation of tender rules.
http://euobserver.com/1016/116697?
maybe the truth is not the Olympics but the fear of dignitaries attending the Olympics, thats face it they are exposed by their heinous crimes _________________ 'Come and see the violence inherent in the system.
Help, help, I'm being repressed!'
“The more you tighten your grip, the more Star Systems will slip through your fingers.”
Note: The original YouTube video was first marked to private and now is unlisted. We will soon be re publishing the interview onto YouTube and will put the video in this article. Stay tuned.
Thankfully there are at least two other places that you can listen to it, here and here.
During an episode of BCFM’s Friday Drivetime host Tony Gosling interviewed an apparent undercover journalist who appeared on the show under the psudonym, “Lee Hazledean” and exposed a wide array of stunning facts in regards to the security run up to the 2012 London Olympics.
The whistleblower, who claimed to be a well known journalist for a London TV Show, revealed that he had infiltrated the notorious private security company G4S which is currently running security in the lead up to the Olympics.
Some of the more stunning accusations made include lax security procedures that have possibly left the Olympics open to a terror attack, a plan for the full scale evacuation of the entire city of London, and the purchase of 200,000 casket linings that are currently on standby.
Hazledean also claimed that G4S employees consider the public scum of the earth and routinely brag that they are above police control.
“In fact, I was asked to be a would-be terrorist on the final training day and I was given a knife, a gun and an IED, and on all three occasions throughout the day I got through the metal detector and I also got through the x-ray machine scanner,”
During his training he was asked to carry weapons through screening and was able to get them all past security on every occasion.
Tony Gosling put together a huge description for the interview which can be read below:
The 2012 London olympics start in 4 weeks time. Exclusive interview with investigative journalist Lee Hazledean who is training undercover as a security guard for the London olympics with private security firm G4S. Lee is a filmmaker and investigative TV journalist. He has also been involved in major stories on the IRA and how British Army infiltrated the organisation and carried out false flag operations. He has managed to get undercover as part of the security team at the 2012 Olympics with G4S.
He has found there is a media black out on all major news outlets to do with the Olympics unless the story is broken in a news paper or foreign news agency it’s unlikely to see the light of day. Security training and officers are so appaling that the safety and security of the London 2012 Olympics are in jeopardy.
A few example’s: The security training is woefully inadequate run by a training company called Contemporary International. Lee has been assigned to work in a PSA (Pedestrian Screening Area) the main security for the stadiums. During an exercise he was asked to pose as a would-be terrorist and managed to get knives, guns and IED’s through security screening on every occasion and every exercise.
The X-Ray operators have only two days of training, they aren’t trained properly and miss the most obvious prohibited items gun’s, knives, IED’s, ammunition etc. Bag and physical searchers again are missing dangerous weapons, trainees can’t use vital security equipment like the HHMD (Hand Held Metal detectors) they can’t even communicate properly with the public on a basic level.
Worryingly the ‘Rapiscan’ walk through metal detectors don’t work properly and aren’t sensitive enough to pick up large knives, ammunition and other metallic threats. He was told that they would be set to go off only after 50 people have walked through to limit queuing time and to get spectators into the venue. So a Terrorist if they basically queued up would probably get through wearing a suicide vest.
G4S are dragging the job centres to recruit the long term unemployed for security officers regardless of how suitable they are for the role. In classes there are drug deals going down, people can’t speak any English whatsoever and others who find people with disabilities offensive and are constantly making disabled jokes. People with no security experience are being rushed through training for their SIA licenses.
People who haven’t even completed their SIA licenses yet are being picked to be Team Leaders over highly trained security officers, ex soldiers and ex police. Being a team leader is an important role as the first and last line of defence. Lee is concerned that weapons or worse will be getting into the games.
However, what’s more disturbing is that uniforms are already going missing or being stolen from the uniform distribution centre/training facility. The training facility is an accurate mock-up of the actual security measures at the Olympic venues.
Lee has witnessed several people taking photos on their mobile phones in the training facility and whilst they have been a few people caught by trainers most aren’t noticed. Even when they are caught they are just told to delete the photos and they continue on the training. We know that terrorists take surveillance photos to gain intelligence.
Contemporary International claim that they have mobile phone ‘jammers’ in the facility, however trainers admitted to Lee that there were no ‘jammers’ at all, it was a verbal deterrent. The training facility is a non sporting Olympic venue and a terrorist target. Therefore G4S can’t even secure a school let alone the Olympic Venues.
Also there are plans for the evacuation of London, G4S are going to be at the forefront, as well as 100,000 troops coming in via Woolwich barracks made up of regular British Forces, American regular army and European troops.
Lee was not told why there would be any need for an evacuation of the whole of London, they just said it was to be a “defining moment in the history of London”. This could just be a precaution but the public should be made aware of the foreign invasion which is taking place right now.
The troops are being held across London in various barracks once they’ve been through Woolwich. Lee also had this information confirmed by an army doctor who was shocked at all the foreign troops coming into London. There is also a shipment of what are being described as casket linings, each casket can hold four or five people and 200,000 casket linings have been delivered we believe from America.
This could all be precautionary in the event of a major terrorist attack. Also we were shown videos of drones attacking targets in Afghanistan and were told that drones will be patrolling the sky’s over London during the Olympics carrying out surveillance and search and destroy missions if necessary.
Lee believes there is something fundamentally wrong with how the security for the Olympics is being implemented by G4S. With exactly 4 weeks to go until the games Lee feels he needs to expose the inadequate security in place in the hope that it can be improved so that the London 2012 Olympics can be a safe environment for spectators and Athletes alike, and not a cause for national and international embarrassment for Great Britain.
Perhaps the most startling points made in the over 40 minute long interview is the fact that at the same time that G4s is running completely lax security procedures, at least 100,000 military troops, including American and other European nations on top of Great Britain, are there and the plans for an evacuation have been put on the table.
“A lot of UN troops being posted in and around London,”
How Hazledean found out about the plans for an evacuation was absolutely stunning as he literally claimed that most of the time in training was spent on the evacuation plans rather than the Olympics themselves!
“The security guards used for the Olympics will be at the forefront of getting the public out of London.”
“They seem quite serious about it, they’ve spent a lot of time on this.”
On top of that, the whistleblower claimed that security uniforms are openly going missing which could easily be used by either real terrorists or, more likely, by rogue western intelligence agents bent on carrying out a false flag to bring in a full scale world government style police state.
“They’re not training them properly…it’s quite open to a terrorist attack very easily and I don’t say that lightly,”
It was also claimed that employees of G4S have also been filmed taking pictures of secure areas and were just verbally reprimanded rather than further interrogated as to why they are taking pictures in a known secure area.
These revelations correlate with claims throughout the last year that a major false flag will take place sometime during the 2012 London Olympics.
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2012 10:14 pm Post subject:
Despite attempts at public reassurance from MI5 Director General Jonathan Evans and Channel 4 News Security Correspondant Simon Israel all is definitely not well at G4S. Week two of Lee Hazledean’s reports undercover at the London Olympics private security firm G4S. G4S are talking about ‘brand screening’ the spectators despite publicly saying it will not happen. Ian Horseman Sewell, MD Global Events has said they will not brand screen. However during Lee’s training he was specifically told that if someone turned up in say a tee shirt from a company who wasn’t sponsoring the Olympics then he would need to tell them to take off their tee shirt and turn it inside out, get changed into another or go home and change, as a condition of entry. If they turned the tee-shirt back the right way once inside the venue Lee was told they would be ejected from the Olympics. Lee’s been told that certain people called Internationally Protected People cannot be screened? IPP’s are anybody that LOCOG say they are! Surely everyone should get screened and treated fairly. This directly builds in room for a false flag operation. There is a sinister implication with non-British international firm G4S running the Metropolitan police force which of course is their ultimate aim as the New World Order security outfit of choice. Like the Nazi Gestapo who supplanted the German police in the 1930s. Why have we allowed G4S to increase their contract from £86m to a staggering £284m and they still want more. There has been no proper oversight whatever by our politicians so why not? How do you evacuate the Olympic stadium? How do you evacuate the Olympic park? G4S trainers told Lee about evacuating London but not discussed what the emergency procedures are for evacuating any Stadium in the event of an emergency. It is almost as though they want chaos. Remember Hillsborough Britain’s worst sporting disaster. Lee has had no training to do with how to screen people with physical disabilities. This is the Olympics and Para-Olympics and at no point has G4S, LOCOG or Contemporary International even discussed screening people with disabilities and how not to offend and strip those individuals of their dignity. How do you screen someone in a wheel chair? Lee has had no emergency medical training. The queues are going to be massive and if someone collapses the security officers won’t know what to do. They are relying again on a St John’s ambulance or paramedics hopefully standing right on scene. All security should have at least a first person first aid training which takes just one day.
http://bcfm.org.uk/2012/06/29/17/friday-drivetime-77/18961
Lee Hazledean on the Alex Jones show
Is The Olympics The Next 9/11? Whistleblower Speaks Out!
In a letter to their foreign intelligence colleagues at the BND in early 1973, BfV intelligence agents concluded that there was "no evidence" that German left-wing extremists had supported the Palestinian terrorists.
But that was not the case with Pohl and Abramowski, the German neo-Nazis. Less than two months before the massacre, police in the western city of Dortmund sent a telex to the BfV containing information of potential interest to the intelligence agency. The subject line read: "Presumed conspiratorial activity by Palestinian terrorists." The telex discussed Willi Pohl and his relationship with Mohammed Daoud, whose nom de guerre was Abu Daoud, the mastermind of the Munich attack.
Could the massacre have been prevented if the BfV, but also the state offices of criminal investigation in Düsseldorf and Munich and the BKA, had properly assessed the importance of the telex?
Today Willi Pohl is a successful author of crime fiction who writes under a different name. He convincingly renounced terrorism and violence decades ago and even wrote a novel about it. Pohl has also written the script for many a northern German episode of the popular crime show "Tatort." Now 68, he only agreed to speak with SPIEGEL on the condition that he would not be pictured in the article.
In the summer of 1972 Pohl, born in the region of the Soviet Union formerly known as East Prussia, was a wiry 28-year-old blond man from a poor background with several convictions for grand theft under his belt. He had also stolen money from his employer, who, as a result, felt motivated to tell the police that Pohl supported the radical wing of the PLO and had met with a man of "Arab appearance" who was staying at the Römischer Kaiser Hotel in Dortmund. The police quickly learned that a man named Saad Walli was staying at the hotel. Saad Walli was an alias for Abu Daoud.
In the now-released documents, there is no indication that the state offices of criminal investigation, the BKA or the BfV, which had all been notified by the Dortmund police, did anything to find the suspicious Walli. As a result, according to the documents, Abu Daoud, a.k.a. Saad Walli, was able to stay, unchallenged, at the Eden Hotel Wolff in Munich before and during the attack, meeting with the militants in his hotel room and calling his associates in Libya and Tunisia from there.
TonyGosling wrote:
The Oktoberfest Bombing
Both the conspiratorial mode of behavior of the neo-nazi terror group and its “propaganda by deeds” approach point to earlier manifestations of right-wing terrorism, particularly by neo-fascist groups in Italy. But there is also a German precedent of right-wing terrorism: The bombing of the Munich Oktoberfest in 1980, in which 13 people were killed and 211 wounded.
Among the dead was Gundolf Köhler, who was officially declared the “lone assassin”. However, Köhler had connections to various neo-nazi groups. He had participated in paramilitary trainings of the neo-nazi “WSG Hoffmann” group. Another link was to the right-wing extremist Heinz Lembke. When Lembke was arrested – a year after the Munich bombing – he led the police to a total of 33 secret weapons caches in northern Germany, where automatic weapons, large quantities of ammunition, 250 hand grenades, 150 kg of TNT and bazookas were hidden. Shortly thereafter, Lembke committed suicide in prison. The two chief suspects being dead, the case was closed in 1982.
Now, 31 years after Munich Oktoberfest bombing and 29 years after Köhler was officially declared “lone assassin”, the Bavarian State Parliament and the Munich City Council have – both by unanimous vote – demanded that the judicial investigation into Oktoberfest bombing shall be reopened. And, that the evidence of its neo-nazi background, accumulated over the years by journalistic investigators, historians and lawyers of victims of the bombing, be reviewed.
http://www.solon-line.de/2011/12/21/the-neo-nazi-terror-group-nsu-the- 1980-oktoberfest-bombing/
Neo-Nazis 'helped to carry out Munich Olympics massacre' http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/neonazis-helped-to-carr y-out-munich-olympics-massacre-7857360.html
Intelligence files claim Palestinian terrorists were aided by rightwing extremists in Germany
Tony Paterson - Berlin - Monday 18 June 2012
German neo-Nazis helped the Palestinian terrorist organisation Black September to carry out the infamous massacre of 11 Israeli athletes during the 1972 Munich Olympic Games, intelligence files released nearly four decades after the killings revealed yesterday.
Details from a hitherto secret, 2,000-page document on the massacre, held by Germany's Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution, were published by Der Spiegel magazine ahead of the 40th anniversary of the Israeli athletes' deaths this September.
Two Israeli sportsmen died in the initial hostage-taking. Nine more were killed during a bungled rescue attempt by German police at Munich airport in which five terrorists were also shot dead.
Israel has been lobbying for a minute's silence to be observed in memory of the massacre at this summer's Olympic Games in London.
Until now it had been assumed that Black September, which some historians claim was linked to the Palestinian Fatah party – bore sole responsibility for the kidnapping and murders which were carried out in an attempt to secure the release of 234 Palestinians held in Israeli jails.
But according to the newly-released German intelligence file, neo-Nazis also helped to prepare the massacre and planned to carry out further terrorist acts in Germany to avenge the police killing of Palestinians in Munich.
The file showed that Abu Daud, the Palestinian behind the massacre, travelled to Germany to plan the attack in July 1972. He was assisted by Willi Pohl, a known German neo-Nazi. It was not clear whether other neo-Nazis were also involved.
The documents cited police in Dortmund who kept Daud under surveillance. They said he met Pohl several times and that the neo-Nazi boasted to his employers about his contacts with a radical wing of the Palestine Liberation Organisation.
Der Spiegel said the police report was widely circulated, but there was no evidence the intelligence services made any attempt to find or arrest Daud. The Palestinian was apparently able to prepare his plan to attack the Munich Olympic village undetected, the magazine reported.
The files revealed that Pohl put Daud in touch with an expert in counterfeiting passports and other official documents, and acted as his personal chauffeur. Pohl, who has since renounced terrorism and neo-Nazi activity, is now a crime writer who has assumed a new name. He told Der Spiegel: "I drove Abu Daud all over Germany and he held meetings with Palestinians in various cities."
He claimed he was linked to the Munich massacre "without knowing it".
The documents showed Pohl was later involved in a plan by Palestinian activists to carry out a series of kidnappings at Cologne cathedral and town halls across Germany, which were meant to avenge the deaths of Palestinians shot dead by police after the Munich massacre. Pohl was ordered to carry out the attacks by Abu Jihad, then the deputy of PLO leader Yasser Arafat. But he was arrested in Munich in October 1972.
Police found he had hand grenades, firearms and a threatening letter from Black September addressed to a judge who was preparing to bring charges against Palestinians involved in the Munich massacre. The documents also suggested Pohl helped to procure weapons that may have been used in the Munich massacre itself.
excerpts from: Jeremy Hunt: Olympic silence is none of my business
by Jessica Elgot, Jewish Chronicle, 28 June 2012
Quote:
Jeremy Hunt, the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, has refused to back calls from the US Senate and the Australian, Canadian and German governments for a minute’s silence at the 2012 London Olympics to remember the 11 Israelis murdered in Munich in 1972. [...]
Two separate memorial events are planned this summer for the Munich athletes. One is organised by the Israeli Olympic Committee on August 6, which Israeli President Shimon Peres, Lord Coe and Mr Hunt are expected to attend, and the other, organised by the Zionist Federation a month later, will mark the anniversary of the massacre.
A memorial plaque will be unveiled on July 22 in one of the Olympic boroughs, organised by Martin Sugarman and Linda Kelly. [...]
Pressure has been mounting on the IOC [International Olympic Committee] and London 2012 after an international campaign and petition, co-ordinated by a New York-based Jewish Community Centre, attracted more than 80,000 signatures. [...]
Last month the IOC rejected an official request from Israel to allow a minute’s silence at the July 27 opening ceremony of the London Games. [...]
More than 50 British MPs, led by Tory Bob Blackman, have signed an early day motion calling for a minute’s silence.
This week, the German Bundestag backed the silence. About 100 Australian MPs — including Prime Minister Julia Gillard and Opposition leader Tony Abbott — did the same and stood in silence as a mark of respect.
Two weeks ago Canada’s parliament passed a unanimous resolution supporting a silence.
In the US Senate, the same move was made this week and last week the London Assembly and Shadow Olympics Minister Tessa Jowell joined the call.
Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
Monday, July 2, 2012
The undercover journalist who blew the whistle on G4S, the security company responsible for the 2012 Olympics, along with shocking plans for an evacuation of London, has revealed his identity following fears for his safety.
‘Lee Hazledean’ – the whistleblower who exposed how he had infiltrated G4S as an employee and uncovered how security preparations for the Olympics were so poor that they were inviting a terrorist attack, has revealed himself to be Ben Fellows, an acclaimed director who has worked with Stanley Kubrick. Fellows has also appeared in numerous popular television and theatre shows.
Fellows made the decision to reveal his identity, after having gone under a pseudonym for the purposes of radio interviews conducted over the last week, because of fears over his safety.
“With all sincerity I’m now afraid that I might be in physical danger from G4S,” Fellows told Infowars, adding that he feared the mainstream media was about to launch a character assassination campaign. “My only protection is to go public…. I have done nothing wrong and I stand by everything that I have said,” added Fellows.
Fellows also revealed that Andy Davies, Channel 4 News Home Affairs Correspondent, demanded that he retract statements made during a radio interview with BCFM’s Friday Drivetime in which Fellows said of Davies, “I sent him an email, I called, he wasn’t interested and he said there’s a media blackout on this kind of story, that nobody would be interested in running it.”
In a telephone conversation provided to Infowars, Davies claims that he never read Fellows’ original email and that the two never had a conversation about the issue.
“I emailed Andy Davies on the 13th of June and pitched the story to him, he then called me back and we talked,” claims Fellows, who is now going public to offset his concern that his name may have been privately passed to G4S.
Fellows’ revelations about how he infiltrated G4S and what he discovered were nothing less than astounding. However, the mainstream media chose to run a whitewash, focusing instead on relatively tame security lapses and ignoring Fellows’ story altogether, despite the fact that it had already gone viral in the alternative media.
During his time working for G4S over the past several months, Fellows learned of numerous disturbing developments.
A d v e r t i s e m e n t
- Fellows was able to get the job of a security officer via a simple application process. No background checks were carried out and his personal references were not checked.
- Fellows was successful in taking guns, knives and explosives through both metal detectors and body scanners on numerous occasions during dummy runs.
- Fellows was told that metal detectors and body scanners would be deactivated at peak times in order to get crowds into the Olympic venue quicker.
- Fellows was also informed that 200,000 casket linings that can hold four dead bodies each have been shipped into London in preparation for the Games.
- Thousands of foreign troops under the auspices of the United Nations have also been brought into London.
- Plans for an evacuation of London in the aftermath of a deadly terrorist attack have been discussed at great length. G4S employees were briefed on the evacuation plan to a greater extent than the time spent on training them to conduct security screening.
- G4S security staff have been caught doing drug deals while in training with no retribution. Uniforms have also been handed out to unauthorized personnel as well as uniforms being stolen. G4S staff have also been caught taking photographs on their cellphones of secure locations.
- Fellows was told that Predator drones of the type used in Afghanistan and Yemen would be circling London during the Olympics.
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Posted: Tue Jul 03, 2012 9:12 pm Post subject:
another angle on this
Confirmation for Team Vulcan – Does London Go Boom?
WHO WILL WIN “BEST NUCLEAR EXPLOSION” AT LONDON’S 2012 OLYMPICS?
Will Mushroom Clouds Make the Best Olympics Ever?
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/07/02/confirmation-for-team-vulcan-d oes-london-go-boom/
Neither Gordon nor myself nor anybody on the team was happy with where the Intel took us on Vulcan, but we told it as it was. Like all intelligence analysi, it was not set in stone and was subject to modification in the light of fresh evidence. If your original conclusion was right however, fresh evidence tends to support it.
It’s always nice to find that somebody has come to much the same conclusion as you but entirely independently, although you have to be wary of loopback. You do the analysis…somebody passes it on without your name being attached to it, ie. claims the credit, and then someone else says ‘yes, I heard that’.
Unbeknown to either Gordon or myself an enterprising journalist went undercover inside one of the companies responsible for the security of the Olympic site and found out about a contingency plan to evacuate the whole of London.
This is not an easy thing to do, as you will find out if you ever try to drive out of London on the Friday afternoon of a Bank Holiday weekend.
You don’t evacuate an entire city for a suicide bomber. He also came across huge orders for ‘casket bags’ – basically a large body bag, with room for up to five people, or ex-people.
It seems somebody in officialdom thought they might have to cater for up to 1,000,000 fatalities, again not your ordinary common or garden suicide bombing.
The story has gone viral on the Net and you may not be reading about it for the first time. I had never heard of the journalist or his nom de plume and so far as I know he was unaware of the lines along which Team Vulcan were thinking.
The first he heard about it seems to have been when the good folk down at TruNews in sunny Orlando (I rolled thru there in February on AMTRAK’s Silver Meteor) put my name to him live on air.
As presently advised this journalist seems to have been onto something, indeed it looks like an outstanding piece of journalism in which he can take great pride. Maybe I shall come back on this site in a few weeks’ time and revise my opinion, bit I don’t think so. _________________ www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org www.rethink911.org www.patriotsquestion911.com www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org www.mediafor911truth.org www.pilotsfor911truth.org www.mp911truth.org www.ae911truth.org www.rl911truth.org www.stj911.org www.v911t.org www.thisweek.org.uk www.abolishwar.org.uk www.elementary.org.uk www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149 http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XfcTeU9wP10
An undercover reporter infiltrates the London 2012 Olympic security firm G4S (Group 4 Securicor) where he is made painfully aware of gaping 'open-goal' security holes.
1hr interview, split into 7 parts, to be released asap. More explosive revelations to come.
Parts 1-4 available now. Parts 5-7 to be uploaded Monday 9 July
G4S is the only player in the race to privatise the UK police. This incredibly dangerous course of action began years ago. The majority of police and those who know the issues oppose this growing catastrophe. Many of the wheels and gears are already in place. The Office of Peace Constable must be guarded with our lives and the requirement to be a Special (volunteer) for up to 2 years must be revoked. G4S are not of suitable good character and trustworthiness to play any further role in UK policing. For all their faults we need the Police. If the burden of victimless Acts, Statutes and Byelaws could be lifted from their shoulders then they could keep the peace with full community support. Whilst playing an active part in restoring that community to it's former glory.
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Posted: Tue Jul 10, 2012 7:44 pm Post subject:
by email - suggested letter to Theresa May
by email wrote:
To: "mayt@parliament.uk" <mayt@parliament.uk>
Sent: Monday, 9 July 2012, 21:56
Subject: Extreme concerns over security at the Olympics
Dear Sirs
I am absolutely appalled to discover that a foreign private security firm has been granted full responsibility for all aspects of security within the Olympics complex. Even more appalling than this even, is that it has been widely reported that there are very significant failings and, indeed, gross negligence, or incompetence, within G4S management. I therefore request answers to the following questions as a matter of utmost urgency:
Why does a foreign private security firm have full control of all security within the Olympics complex?
Why is it that the UK police services will have no role to play, or authority, within the complex?
Who was responsible for awarding the Olympics security contract to G4S?
Who conducted the procurement exercise for the Olympics security contract?
Who is responsible for managing the G4S contract?
Has a full audit of G4S activities, operations and procedures been undertaken since they began training recruits at the Olympics complex? If so when and by whom?
Is G4S responsible for the cctv systems within the Olympics complex? If not who is responsible for this?
Thank you for your e-mail of 06/07/2012 about the security of the London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games. I have been asked to reply.
The Government is committed to delivering a safe and secure Games for all, has reviewed the security arrangements and is confident the right plans are in place to deliver this. The UK continually hosts major sporting events, state visits and world summits. The police and emergency services have substantial experience of major events and will bring this to bear, though we will however look at any lessons from recent events.
Our approach to the Games is intelligence-led and risk-based, giving us the flexibility to respond to any changes between now and the Games themselves. Threat levels may change rapidly and therefore the security planning is flexible and resilient. By basing the plans against a SEVERE threat level, higher than the current threat level, we maximise our flexibility against changing circumstances.
The training operation to provide fully trained security personnel for the Games is on track to be delivered in time for Games time operations. Around 24,000 personnel will receive training for Olympic Security roles. This includes private security personnel, volunteers, and military personnel. All security staff will be required to reach a standard agreed level of competency in order to work in a security role at the Games.
All spectators and other people entering venues (once they have been securely locked down) will be subject to a risk-based screening regime. Vehicles and materials will also undergo screening. Screening regimes have been tested to ensure that the regime delivers the required level of effectiveness.
Security of individual venues will be delivered by the London 2012 Organising Committee (LOCOG), G4S as principal security contractor, and the military. The Home Office is vigorously holding these parties to account for successful delivery. This is a huge operation to protect more than 100 different venues and delivering it is a substantial challenge We are satisfied that the Home Office’s assurance process provides robust and effective scrutiny of security planning, and our plans have been thoroughly tested over the past year.
The interview which you refer to raises a wide range of points, and you will understand that we cannot comment on each of these in detail, especially where this raises security considerations or where the point being raised is not clear. For example, security personnel will have a role in evacuating individual venues in an emergency, for example a fire or flood, on the same basis as security and stewarding staff in any major event. The Ministry of Defence (MOD) have also set out the role of the armed forces during the Games, including providing a contingency force to help provide support in the event of a civil emergency, such as a flood.
I can however, confirm that there are no plans to deploy foreign military or police personnel operationally during the 2012 Games. There may be small numbers of foreign police officers providing a liaison function for VIP protection in accordance with normal tried and tested practices. The provision of specialist protection to visiting dignitaries by the UK police is determined by international conventions and is based on an assessment of all the risks.
More generally, you will be aware of the coverage of Olympic security preparations in the wider media. This includes coverage of the role of the armed forces, most prominently during Exercise ‘Olympic Guardian’ over 2nd-10th May, and coverage of the role of G4S as the principal contractor for Games-time security personnel.
The 2012 Games will be a sporting event, not a security event, and the security operation will be in place to allow people to enjoy the Games in safety. We have made it clear that the look of policing for the London 2012 Games will be much as for policing that people in London and across the UK experience everyday. Games security remains a police-led operation and the role of the Armed Forces is not in response to any imminent threat.
Yours sincerely
Richard Worth
TonyGosling wrote:
another email
this time passing the buck to LOCOG
well at least they can't say they didn't know
Quote:
Subject: FW: Your message to Nick Gargan
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 14:58:16 +0100
From: "Hollick Tom" <Tom.Hollick@npia.pnn.police.uk>
To: <tony@cultureshop.org.uk>
Tony
Apologies again for the delay. We have now passed this to LOCOG who are now looking into the issue.
If you have any further queries about it, it would be best to speak to their press office direct. Either 0203 2012 100 or pressoffice@london2012.com
Thanks for raising this
Tom
Tom Hollick
Staff Officer to Chief Executive
CEO Directorate
National Policing Improvement Agency
Address: 1st Floor Fry Building (NW), 2 Marsham Street, London, SW1P 4DF
Telephone: +44 (0) 20 3113 7206
Mobile: 07525233420
Email: Tom.Hollick@npia.pnn.police.uk
Web: www.npia.police.uk
Think of the environment - do you really need to print this email?
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2012 6:00 pm Post subject:
result!
3,500 extra troops will be on duty at the Olympics
Wesley Johnson - Wednesday 11 July 2012
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/3500-extra-troops-will- be-on-duty-at-the-olympics-7936277.html
The military is to provide up to 3,500 extra troops for security duty at the Olympics amid fears that private firm G4S will not be able to supply enough personnel, a Whitehall source said tonight.
The move, just a fortnight before the Games, is potentially a major embarrassment for organisers Locog.
The overall 23,700-strong security force for the Games will include a mix of military, private security guards and at least 3,000 unpaid London 2012 volunteers who will be used at the start of the security process.
A G4S spokeswoman said: "This has been an unprecedented and very complex security recruitment, training and deployment exercise which has been carried out to a tight timescale.
"We have encountered some issues in relation to workforce supply and scheduling over the last couple of weeks, but are resolving these every day and remain committed to providing a security workforce for the start of the London 2012 Games."
She went on: "Our planning with Locog and other security agencies allows for a variety of contingencies which have been reviewed in the build-up to the Games.
"We accept that the Government has decided to overlay additional resources.
"We remain committed to keep London 2012 safe and secure."
Home Secretary Theresa May was forced to defend G4S in the Commons on Monday, saying she was "confident our partners will deliver a safe and secure Games".
More than 100 different venues need to be protected during the Games, she told MPs.
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2012 8:11 pm Post subject:
The issue of venue security has been contentious for organisers and the government in the run-up to the Olympics.
The total number of staff required to guard the Olympic venues more than doubled to 23,700 last December after event organiser Locog wildly underestimated the total required.
Originally, Locog contracted G4S to provide just 2,000 security guards of the 10,000 it thought it would require.
But in December the firm agreed to supply 10,000 of the new total of 23,700 under a new contract reported to be worth £284million.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2172194/3-500-Army-officers-dr afted-protect-Olympics-security-firm-failed-hire-staff.html
BEN FELLOWS Hero WHISTLEBLOWER 2012 OLYMPICS G4s 'Security'!
Joined: 30 Jul 2006 Posts: 6060 Location: East London
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2012 11:28 pm Post subject:
As is usual at this time of night (midnight) I am in my cups, so I won't make a post, other than suggesting to others (including Fran and Tony) to pass their info (including video info) on to the 'Stop the Olympic Missile Campaign' (yep, I don't expect much from them, but it will be very interesting to see what response, if any, they give to this 'whistleblower' evidence); whilst sceptical, I must acknowledge previous info being given to Aaron Russo, re 9/11, but there the similarity ends, insofar as Aaron Russo was a very successful businessman, running for Governor of a State; 'Lee' is virtually a nonentity vis-a-vis NWO, unless, of course, he is operating under their instructions. I find his 'testimony' very worrying; but how come he hasn't been interviewed by the Police?
The allegations he makes, if they cannot, not so much be substantiated, as at least be taken seriously, are of such tremendous significance that he should at least be interviewed by the police, and if necessary given a polygraph (lie-detector) test.
Are the police and 'Security Services' unaware of these extremely serious allegations? How is 'Lee' able to trot off these allegations, without getting his 'collar felt'?
Now to the point:
Can someone (other than me, for reasons which I won't dislose at present) please contact (apart from their MP's, or 'Sympa' MP's) the 'Stop the Olympic Missiles' people and pass on the video interviews with 'Lee'.
http://stoptheolympicmissiles.org/ with the video interviews?
If these guys and gals are really interested in protesting about a chimera, the danger of 'missiles' being deployed upon the roof of a building in Bow, let's see what they do with this info!!!
I suspect, sweet FA, but we'll see.
Get to it, folks. _________________ 'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
Last edited by outsider on Thu Jul 12, 2012 5:49 am; edited 1 time in total
Joined: 14 Dec 2005 Posts: 475 Location: North London
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 9:41 pm Post subject: City of London false flag?
I suspect that the Olympic terror threat is a diversion and no attack will take place there.
Some City of London people want turn Stratford City into their fiefdom. Which is why it’s called ‘City’. They want to take over that area and have their workers live there. They’ve got a DLR that will take them from Stratford into the City. They’ll be able to take the Eurostar to the continent. They’ve got an airport. They’ve got their own shopping centre. £22bn of regeneration money is being spent on Stratford City, Canning Town and the Royal Victoria Docks. They could get a lot of insurance by blowing up Stratford City, but I think it’s more likely that they’ll want to keep it.
They’ll also want to restrict the entry of the ‘local yokels’. Thus, we have this hysterical terror threat that demand high security. The Olympics was supposed to be a show for the elite. Or rather, the public was supposed to get used to the idea that there are VIPs who get special treatment in your face.
And for no reason, there was a panic over too few security men and it was decided millions more had to be spent despite no evidence of a terror threat. Where did that idea come from? Why was that decision made? The outcome was that G4S could not deliver and the army is dragged into the Olympics. So, they are tied up at the Olympics and not dealing with a real threat that could take place elsewhere.
But that doesn’t mean there will be no ‘terror attack’. After all, we are being prepared for one. Yet, while everyone is looking at the Olympic Stadium, the attack could take place elsewhere. So, where?
How about the City of London?
At last, it’s become clear that the City and its banks are a criminal enterprise. Libor will lead to police investigations and possible arrests. Therefore, this is a good time to get rid of the evidence and then get everyone to feel sorry for the City. Hence, a City of London false flag perhaps when the whole world is watching – during the 100 metres. Or if the elite are not turning up it could be the opening ceremony.
Joined: 30 Jul 2006 Posts: 6060 Location: East London
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 9:50 pm Post subject:
A Biological, Chemical or Nuclear 'Neutron' bomb attack would of course leave all the infrastructure standing, but could still be an excuse for a large-scale evacuation. _________________ 'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 1959 Location: South London
Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 11:28 am Post subject: Is False Flag attack on Olympics likely?
WILL THERE BE A FALSE FLAG TERROR ATTACK AT THE OLYMPICS?
SIX SIGNS OF FALSE FLAG TERROR
An article called “How to Stop a False Flag Terror Attack” by David Chase lists six signs that a false flag terror event is likely to happen. I have quoted these signs verbatim here so the reader will have to make allowances that Chase was writing for a US audience. After listening to interviews with undercover reporter Ben Fellows (aka Lee Hazeldean) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h8aNnKfOiCc I felt I had enough information to work out how many of the warning signs have been met in the case of the forthcoming London Olympics. http://truthernews.wordpress.com/2012/06/29/how-to-stop-a-false-flag-t error-attack/_
The point of my writing is to examine the likelihood of a false flag attack occurring in the hope that we can prevent it through sufficient publicity. I find the following words of historian Webster Tarpley inspiring: “The point of predicting a terror event is not to say after the fact, look how smart I am. That is despicable. The point of it is to prevent it from happening. Your goal is to be wrong and make yourself wrong. That’s the whole point. To be wrong is to be successful when you’ve identified something serious.”
Each sign of possible preparation for such an attack listed below is followed by my comments in italics. At the end I list further signs that an attack which has happened was indeed a false flag one.
1. News & Propaganda
In order to psychologically prepare the public and military for an upcoming terror attack, propaganda, packaged as news, is filtered through both mainstream and alternative media outlets in the years, months and weeks leading up to a false-flag event. These particular news reports and propaganda may be warnings and signs of future terror events to come.
Much publicity has been given to the possibility of terrorist attacks being planned by Muslims, particularly since 9/11. The erroneous assumption is that only Muslims would orchestrate such attacks and that only Muslims become homicidal fanatics. Britain's history in Ireland would tend to contradict that.
2. Whitepapers & Documents
Scholarly papers, issued by universities, think-tanks and NGOs, predict the who, what, when and where of future false-flag terror attacks. Terror plots are planned with the latest research data available and generally indicate the direction the war of terror is going.
3. Internal Memos
Federal agencies, such as the FBI and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, issue memos reflecting the whitepapers in order to prepare government, military and police for changes in policy and procedures surrounding a terror attack.
I know of no memos from any governmental agencies, but then I wouldn't.
4. Plots & Patsies
Groomed by federal agencies and intelligence services, patsies are arrested for bogus terror plots in the weeks and months leading up to a false-flag terror attack. The arrest of patsies gives both law enforcement and the public the perception that the terror threat is real and allows for mock media show trials once the terror attack has taken place.
In the UK in the weeks immediately preceding the Olympic Games there have been several media reports of our wonderful police service foiling Muslim terrorist conspiracies. Have those arrested been patsies, stooges encouraged to perform acts which would likely get them arrested and which would generate enough evidence to get a court to convict them?
5. Private Security Firms
In order to eliminate threats, maintain control, and tie up any loose ends, private security contractors are hired to monitor and control key locations surrounding false-flag events. Naturally, Blackwater is always a suspect.
In Britain security for the Olympics is being handled by G4Security, the private firm in which reporter Ben Fellows recently had a job which allowed him access to information the powers that be do not want publicised. During training, Fellows says, G4S employees were told to ignore instructions coming from the police. G4S is reportedly the second biggest company in world – staffed by ex-military people (mercenaries?). Similar to Blackwater in the US.
6. Drills, War Games & Military Exercises
Executed just prior to or during a terror attack, drills and war games occur at or near the target location and generally involve military, private contractors, and/or federal, state, and local authorities. Drills and war games provide cover for the attack by diverting local police from the scene by convincing them the attack is just a drill, which usually results in a stand-down. Drills and war games are often repeated for proficiency and classified for secrecy. On September 10, 2001, and September 11, 2001, at least 46 drills and war games were being executed simultaneously.
Residents of London tower blocks were disturbed to discover they had cruise missiles mounted on the roofs of their buildings without their even being consulted. They brought an unsuccessful court case in an attempt to have them removed. The court took the view that since they were tenants rather than owners of the buildings their permission was not needed and that the missiles were necessary to security at the Olympic games. What ever would such missiles be targeted at, the Olympic stadium?
A No Fly Zone over London starts today, Friday 13th July till the end of the Games.
G4S is heavily staffed by former military personnel.
The Mail Online, internet version of the Daily Mail, carries an article by Ian Drury and Eleanor Harding headlined Olympic ring of steel: SIX missile sites protect games which says there is a major military drill called Olympic Guardian taking place this week beginning Monday 9th July.
OTHER DISTURBING OBSERVATIONS
Other alarming observations have been made, particularly about the shambles G4S are in especially in their recruitment and training procedures at the Olympics. It was only after Ben Fellows' interviews http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h8aNnKfOiCc & http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XfcTeU9wP10&feature=related were on the web that the government decided G4S were not doing their job properly and summoned the army, navy and air force to take over at least some of G4S's duties.
Why doesn't the government or G4S deny that what Fellows is saying is true? Why only since he has spoken out on air has there been a government decision to call in the military to take over security from G4S?
Former government minister Keith Vaz MP, now Chairman of the Home Affairs Select Committee,
said on 12th July: "G4S has let the country down and we have literally had to send in the troops." http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-18813729
The following observations come mainly from Ben Fellows (aka Lee Hazeldean).
G4S SECURITY RECRUITMENT AND TRAINING
There is a very simple recruitment procedure. G4S Did not follow up on Fellows' stated claim to have been a journalist. They did check his sense of smell and his ability to read numbers. They didn't check his references one of which was from a fellow journalist.
He was trained only by power point presentation to frisk people but was given no actual practice in the procedure. He was not given a first aid course. He was told that at peak times metal detectors will be switched off in order to speed up entrance of the public to the stadium.
He was asked to go through a metal detector bearing a large knife & other metal things. The metal detector did not sound the alarm.
He was given a gun, put it in his bag and put the bag through an x-ray baggage handling machine. The machine operator did not notice the gun on the x-ray and allowed him to pass through.
Another whistle-blower, Sarah Hubble, as reported in the Daily Mail on June 2nd, had revealed the paperwork was in a mess with piles of documents lying haphazardly on the floor. She was sacked from G4S for talking to the press.
Security uniforms went missing. Security staff were not allowed to take in cameras or voice recorders. Fellows was searched every day for these.
Fellows says G4S want to win contracts for policing in the UK. They run prisons. In some countries people in their care have died. Many people fear that the government seems determined to privatise everything including policing.
NEWS BLACKOUT
Fellows says Channel 4 told him there was a news blackout on any negative stories about the Olympics. [freedom of speech so long as you don't say anything the Powers That Be don't want known.] Fellows says he gave interviews to both the Daily Mirror and to BBC News. The BBC did not broadcast it and the Mirror did not print it but gave the excuse that this was because Fellows was not a real G4S employee, but a journalist and film maker. So serious undercover journalism which reveal dangers the public need to know about must be stopped?
Why doesn't the government or G4S deny that what Fellows is saying is true? Why only since he has spoken out on air has there been a government decision to call in the military to take over security from G4S?
Fellows maintains that putting missiles on roofs is simply the military putting on a show. [This is just his personal opinion.]
LONDON RESIDENTS PROTEST
A residents' group from east London have put up a blog complaining about the closing of a public footpath:
http://openourtowpath.wordpress.com/ The Lea towpath from Homerton to Bow has been closed from July 3rd (ie 23 days before the Opening Ceremony!) until September 10th as a so-called “security” measure for the Olympics. This is a heavily-used green lane through East London and there can be no rational reason for it to be closed this far ahead of the games, or even during them.
LOCOG [London Organising Committee of the Olympic (and paralympic) Games] and the police claim, despite 6m high electric fences and cameras, that the path is closed for security reasons. This is forcing cyclists onto busy roads, denying local residents access to recreational space and sending out a hypocritical Olympic message.
“DEFINING MOMENT IN HISTORY OF LONDON”
The G4S staff involved at Olympics were told that at the end of the Olympics there's going to be a defining moment in the history of London that “we can all be involved in”. They refused to say what kind of thing this is, simply that it would be something good. This was said during a training session about the evacuation of London. Why would G4S security staff need to be trained in the evacuation of London? Bizarrely Fellows was given no training in the evacuation of the Olympic stadium - only of London.
According to fellows Michael Shipton on True News show said he had been told by a Russian spy that a nuclear weapon had been taken into London up the Thames estuary. It was discovered and then spirited away. [I find this rumour very hard to believe; it is several times hearsay evidence]
PREPARATION FOR 800 000 DEAD
During the training the trainers said they had 200 000 casket linings [Casket linings are a kind of body bag which is subsequently inserted into coffins.] Each casket liner can contain four bodies. So is G4S preparing to deal with 800 000 dead? The stadium's capacity is only 100 000 public and staff.
FOREIGN TROOPS ENTERING BRITAIN
According to an army doctor at Woolwich Barracks speaking to Fellows in January, 100 000 troops would be coming into London via Woolwich Barracks. US, Germany and other countries would be contributing troops. Fellows asked his trainers about this allegation. They replied by asking how he had learnt about it and told him not to talk about it because he was not supposed to know.[Hearsay evidence]
Troops are already being brought into northeast London by helicopter at night. A local resident reports many low flying helicopters at night.
DRUG DEALING
Drug dealing was going on during the training. Fellows was offered hash and pills. One of the trainers noticed drug dealing going on in the training room and asked those doing it to wait for the break so they could do it outside.
PHOTOGRAPHING THE VENUE
Fellows saw trainees taking photos on their mobile phones of places of significance to security. They were reprimanded and told to delete the photos. They replied that they would but no check was made as to whether they had.
INADEQUATE TRAINING
People are being rushed through training without being properly trained. Some don't speak any English but still they passed their their training.
PREDATOR DRONES
During his training Fellows was told that if anything bad happens they should not worry because predator drone aircraft would be summoned. He was shown a video of such drones in action.
POLICE NOT AT ALL INVOLVED
Fellows asked police what their role would be at the Olympics. They replied that the police would not be involved at all.
CONCLUSION
My conclusion from all of the above is that there are plenty of warning signs that a false flag attack may be planned, enough to cause serious worry but not enough to feel certain that is what is happening. Alternatively it could be called off due to the fact that this possibility is getting too much publicity. In that case I shall certainly be dubbed a crazy conspiracy theorist but I shall be delighted London and the world have been spared.
Post-Terror Attack: What To Look For
7. A Terror Script
In order to coordinate a more fluid and uniform response to a terror attack, a terror-script is issued to key governmental agencies and media outlets in advance. On 9/11, the media went off script when both CNN and the BBC reported that WTC # 7 (the 3rd tower) had collapsed 23 minutes before it actually did.
8. Conflicting Reports
As with most terror attacks, there are key initial news reports from officials and eye witnesses at the scene of the terror attack that generally tell a totally different story than the one that is eventually written into the history books. All too often, these reports and witnesses disappear and are never heard from again.
9. Suspect Identified Within 24 Hours
To control the rage garnered by the false-flag terror attack, the perpetrators of the terror event must feed the public a terror scapegoat within 24 hours. The average murder case takes months to solve, but an alleged random act of terror is generally solved within the first 24 hours.
10. Cui Bono-Who Benefits?
The general rule of false-flag terrorism states that the party which benefits the most from an act of terror is most likely the party that planned and executed the attack. The perpetrators of false-flag terror generally attack their own military, embassies, agencies, buildings, officials and events in order to pass themselves off as victims as well as control any public investigation into the crime.
Please circulate this information far and wide.
Noel Glynn (xmasdale@aol.com)
“There was an ocean of darkness and death, but an infinite ocean of light and love, which flowed over the ocean of darkness.” - George Fox, 17th century Quaker.
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Posted: Sat Jul 14, 2012 3:47 pm Post subject:
It's been quite a week on this story.
Thanks for all the efforts of those who've been with us from day one in getting this shocking exposee out to the relevant authorities.
More shocking than anything for me has been the cast iron proof that the mainstream London media is not fit for purpose to tell the biggest, if uncomfortable, story in the land for nearly three weeks until the army kicked them into action.
The editor of the Daily Mirror and the BBC TV Newsroom to my personal knowledge both made conscious decisions not to run it.
I think we can say that we have all significantly reduced the possibility of evil being perpetrated at the London Olympics.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You can attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
