G4S exposé: Olympics 'wide open' for false flag or terrorism

[Andrew.]

With a different video.

[Andrew.]

.


Call Of Duty Olympics - PART 1


Link

[Caz]

Curiously, the largest uranium mine in the world, in Australia, is called 'Olympic Dam'.

[TonyGosling]

Ed Miliband's G4S nightmare over party conference security
http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/politics/2012/07/eds-g4s-security -party-conference?
Published 25 July 2012 - By Kevin Maguire Published 25 July 2012

Ed Miliband may have left himself exposed after demanding that G4S, winner of Olympic gold for corporate incompetence, be suspended from bidding for public contracts. The name of the firm hired to provide security at this autumn’s Labour conference? G4S. Should Ed Mili hear the snap of rubber gloves being pulled on for a strip search after he’s called out of the line, he should take it personally.
David Cameron will be shedding no tears this summer for Bob Diamond. Indeed, I hear the Prime Spinner chuckled when the shamed former Barclays boss proved Diamonds aren’t for ever. The PM has the prodigious memory of an elephant and the thin skin of a butterfly wing. He recalls, I’m told, an occasion when Diamond treated him like a failed bond dealer in front of officials during a No 10 summit. He who laughs last, etc.
The Tory infantryman Tobias Ellwood, on the other hand, has a suspect memory. The one-time Royal Green Jackets captain was overheard expressing pride in troops parading under Big Ben. Hmm . . . the Bournemouth blusterer led the campaign to rename the Clock Tower the Elizabeth Tower in honour of Her Maj. Capt Ellwood’s failure to use the correct designation suggests it’ll never catch on.
The sad death at 57 of Marsha Singh, four months after he resigned in Bradford West, prompted a Labour snout to mutter that the ex-MP’s passing proved Harriet Harman wrong. Bradford’s by-election brought the third coming of “Gorgeous George” Galloway after he showed no Respect to Labour’s candidate, Imran Hussain. Harperson had questioned Singh’s retirement on grounds of ill-health, suggesting it smacked of an old-fashioned fix to deliver the seat to Hussain after she failed to secure a women-only shortlist. The end of Singh, a kindly man, settles that.
Disbelief, too, at Labour HQ that Alun Michael, who wants to be police commissioner of South Wales, is claiming that it would’ve been a fix to use a wimmin-only list to select a replacement in his seat of Cardiff South and Penarth. Michael was the beneficiary of the mother of all Millbank fixes that foisted him on an unwelcoming electorate as the first first minister of Wales. By happy coincidence, the Labour standardbearer selected for the looming byelection, Stephen Doughty, was championed by Michael. No stitch-up there, then.
The Labour warhorse David Winnick has been asking why Cameron is accompanied by armed detectives in secure parts of the House of Commons restricted to MPs. The PM may be more wary of right-whingers than we appreciated.
The parliamentary pop group MP4 is printing T-shirts for a tour of the Labour, Con and SNP conferences. No Lib Dem gig? The Labour guitarist Kevin Brennan replied it was cancelled due to lack of principles. Ouch!

[TonyGosling]

Here is a view of the botched contract from an academic. Ilan Oshri of the School of Business and Economics at Loughborough University talks here about bad management on both customer and supplier sides and questionable integrity on the supplier side.

Professor Ilan Ohsri says:

"The fiasco we have seen with G4S is a result of bad management on both sides, the UK Government as the client and G4S as the vendor.

"The Government should have set clear milestones and a monitoring system to help it detect challenges over time. Instead, the Government has treated executing this contract as 'one fewer matter to worry about' by outsourcing security to G4S.

"This is not how outsourcing should be carried out on the client side. G4S did not practice outsourcing as they should have.

"Holding up information about challenges they faced to recruit security personnel from their client raises questions about the integrity of this vendor. Clients should be wary of such vendors before trusting public safety or their business line in their hands."

http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/inside-outsourcing/2012/07/g4s-fia sco-was-bad-management-on-both-sides-and-integrity-of-supplier-questio ned.html?

[Disco_Destroyer]

remember back to when prison ferrying was privatized? Group Four lost several inmates!

[outsider]

[TonyGosling]

Olympic Security and the Limits of Debate
The Editors, 27 July 2012
http://www.newsunspun.org/article/olympic-security-and-the-limits-of-d ebate?
'Our instructions from government are absolutely clear', explained Home Office security and counter-terrorism head Charles Farr to the BBC's Gordon Corera. '[O]f course the priority must be to save and protect life, but our priority should also be to keep the Games running. The Games go on'.
The need to secure the Olympic stadium and to ensure the safety of games-goers is, naturally, a priority for an event of this magnitude. However, in the lengths we are willing to go to for this security, it seems an assumption that anything goes. Should we perhaps pause for thought before we surrender certain civil liberties in the name of security? Discussing the surface-to-air missiles placed on residential buildings in East London, a BBC reporter embodied what seems to be an official principal of the Olympic project when it comes to public concern over the impact of such measures: 'people are just going to have to make allowances'.
Avoiding the implications of the terrorist threat
Why is it felt that the London Olympics requires such a level of military protection? And what form should the defensive measures take? Neither question is up for debate in the mainstream news, despite very relevant, recent, historical evidence to inform the former.
Gordon Corera, BBC News Security correspondent, writes: 'The shadow of terrorism has hung over the Games for a reason. The day after London won its Olympic bid on 6 July 2005, suicide bombers struck the city.' Referencing the connection between the terrorist attack then and the need to protect now, the underlying reasons were still not explored. Shortly after the bombings, the BBC News website published the text from the videotape made by one of the bombers. 'Your democratically elected governments continuously perpetuate atrocities against my people all over the world', he told the camera. This was undoubtedly a reference primarily to the UK's involvement in the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq. A clear evidential link is shown here between British foreign policy and the last terrorist attacks on London, yet no BBC journalists have so much as drawn a connection between the continued British occupation of Afghanistan and the installation, now, of such a high level of security for the Olympics; not once is reference made to the British occupation of Afghanistan in any BBC coverage of Olympic security.
A large part of the reason for this disconnect may itself lie in the nature of the war reporting on Afghanistan, which most journalists seem to conform to, the underlying premise of which is that the occupation is sustained due to the benign intentions of the British government to assist the people of Afghanistan in nation-building, establishing democracy, and the ‘transition’ of control from NATO to Afghan forces. The mainstream media’s portrayal of the motivations behind terrorist attacks on western countries has not advanced far past the vacuous sentiments expressed by George Bush in 2001: ‘They hate our freedom, our liberty, our way of life’, and in Tony Blair’s address as Britain launched its attack on Iraq in 2003: ‘Both [Iraq and terrorist groups] hate our way of life, our freedom, our democracy’; journalists make little effort to explore the possible reasons behind the attitude of extremist groups towards the west.
To venture in to this issue would fly in the face of the grounding assumption that the west only acts in good faith with its military adventures – an unacceptable premise to challenge in the news.
G4S – Framing the issue around incompetence
G4S has received much scrutiny in the media following its failure to provide sufficient security for the Olympic Games and the resulting inquiry by the home affairs select committee. Coverage has discussed the ‘humiliating shambles’ (as put by G4S chief executive, Nick Buckles, in an attempt to salvage his career) of G4S’s inability to fulfil its contract.
What has not prompted such outrage in parliament, and in the media, is the company’s record of involvement in human rights abuses. In June, Laurie Penny wrote in the Independent of the ‘potentially lethal techniques they said were being used to restrain asylum-seekers’ and the G4S ‘security at jails for Palestinian prisoners, including child detainees’, but this has received little mention elsewhere in the media.
A ‘G4S profile’ by the BBC discusses the ‘conduct of G4S’s security staff’, mentioning the death of Angolan asylum seeker, Jimmy Mubenga, while being deported from the UK by G4S in 2010. It is eye-opening that the BBC only fleetingly discusses this (G4S subsequently lost its contract and the case has otherwise not been drawn upon in BBC coverage of G4S), but, along with the rest of the UK media, has devoted such time to the business failures of the company. Such a record by the company awarded the Olympic contract and now bidding for prison contracts, receives hardly a whisper in the media. To contrast this with the outrage G4S faces when unable to deliver on its contract, it is clear where priorities lie.
Jim Naughtie, on the Today programme, said of Tony Blair, Gordon Brown and David Cameron: ‘They all know what it [the Olympics] means’. It is used as ‘an advertisement for this country and to show the world what we can do’. The media’s approach diverges little from that of consecutive governments, playing a significant role in creating just such an ‘advertisement’.
The issue of the militarisation and securitisation of East London is depoliticised for consumption in the news. Offering context to the need for such a high level of security, or discussing the practices of the private firm we trust with its provision, would no doubt create alternative narratives about the impact and legacy of the London Olympics.

[outsider]

I wonder what precautions the 'Authorities' have made re a mortar attack?:

http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/m120.htm


http://articles.janes.com/articles/Janes-Infantry-Weapons/82-mm-mortar -bombs-Russian-Federation.html


http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ground/m224.htm

Not that I am not completely aware that any attack on the UK Olympics will, if it occurs, be perpetrated by the NWO as the a**oles who gave us 9/11;7/7;USS Liberty; Lavon Affair (nice way of putting it, no?); Bali Bombing; Spanish train bombings; 2 'Bush' Election Thefts; 'Gitmo', Abu Ghraib, Bagram, 'Extraordinary Rendition', Drone Assassinations and so forth.

To say nothing of an attack on the 'nuclear fuel' rail transfers just north of the area, which could be hit with devastating consequences for London (perhaps they will be shelved, or perhaps even permanently prohiibited)?
I'm sure if they were prohibited, that would be one really lasting 'Legacy' from the 'Games' that will be appreciated by Londoners.

[outsider]

Olympics tries to go 'cashless': (a la Nick Rockefeller prediction to Aaron Russo):
http://www.psfk.com/2012/07/cashless-payments-olympics.html

They may have screwed up this time, but what the Banksters and other NWO bozo's want, they tend to get, so they seem to be rolling ahead on all fronts.
J. C. Penney are also attempting to go cashless by 2014.

[TonyGosling]

Must be because the banks can easily press a computer key to make up money out of nowhere ... but are running out of cash

[outsider]

It's rather odd they haven't advertised their free burial plans; come to the Olympics, get to share a free 'Casket Liner'!
The price of funerals these days (and, like everything else, rising) I should think people would jump at the offer (well, maybe even 'Sheeple' aren't that stupid!).

[TonyGosling]

At a talk given at the Holiday Inn, Camden Lock, on the Wednesday evening before the Olympics began undercover reporter Ben Fellows and radio journalist Tony Gosling give their accounts of the alternative media story that was the prelude to thousands of military personnel and police being drafted in to take over from private security firm G4S. Ben describes conditions a month before the olympics with his security training being a total shambles and as he says himself - all a terrorist needed to do to get into the olympics was to join the queue.
Tony Gosling then goes on to scope out the mainstream media landscape in Britain puncturing that illusion that we have a free press in the UK and also to look at the wider context, the financial crisis, impending war in the Middle East and the decent of the benchmark BBC into dumbed down trivia over the last 25 years since Victor Rothschild asked Marmaduke Hussey to sack the BBC's last truly independent Director General Alasdair Milne. http://radio4all.net/​index.php/program/61831

[Andrew.]

Part quote only:

[Andrew.]

[outsider]

[Andrew.]

[TonyGosling]

Methinks the lady dost protest too much...
The Guilt Tripper actually has a psycho's mind.
Do they really expect anyone to believe these crocodile tears still??

Munich families attack International Olympic Committee president at memorial event
Olympic Committee only interested in power, money, politics, claims widow of murdered Israeli athlete.
By Anshel Pfeffer | 00:50 07.08.12 | 2 Tweet
The International Olympic Committee (IOC) and its president Jacques Rogge were severely criticized last night at an event commemorating the Munich Eleven. Rogge sat through the event as he was attacked.
http://www.haaretz.com/news/sports/munich-families-attack-internationa l-olympic-committee-president-at-memorial-event.premium-1.456421

[Andrew.]

[fish5133]

friend of mine signed up for a job with G4S- got his id clearance badge but was never asked to go anywhere, others he knew were given uniforms and still were not assigned anywhere.

[Andrew.]

.



At least some got it right IMHO, with it "Security" just taking our rights away (and designed to do so, like in a Nazi/Stazi state).

Some of these stories by activists and journalists have been kept low key.

[TonyGosling]

Ridiculous.
Will they get paid?

[Andrew.]

[Andrew.]

[TonyGosling]

Have another think about this Andrew.
The army were brought in at the eleventh hour.
The British Army have themselves been involved in False Flag Terrorism so know how it works. Like most organisations, eg the police, they are not all bad, but a mixture of good and bad people.
Do you think they would take kindly to someone trying that trick on them?
Successful false flags rely mainly on two elements as I see it... suprise and credulity.
The whole idea of the False Flag and Self-Immolation Gulf of Tonkin type attack is going past its 'shelf life'.

You think it's not significant then that the Israeli President had to cancel his visit to London after being told he could not stay overnight in the Olympic park?

[Andrew.]

[TonyGosling]

Here's Ben's article - as spiked by Dominic Ponsford at The Press Gazette

An Undercover Olympian Odyssey with G4S
19 July 2012 - By Ben Fellows aka. Lee Hazledean
In 2009 whilst athletes from all over the world trained hard for their Olympic dream I began my Olympic training by gaining a Security Industry Authority license. After an intensive five day course, an exam and a criminal records bureau check I was rewarded with a blue badge which included my photograph and I was all set to begin work gaining experience in the security industry.
My plan was to join G4S as a Security Officer and investigate claims that the company cut corners, treated their staff appalling even killed people through negligence. I was actually quite sceptical whilst I prepared to go undercover ­ after all this was the Olympic Games. I was certain everything that G4S did would be by the book with every "i" dotted and every "t" crossed. More often than not you can join a company or organisation as an investigative journalist and not find a single incident of wrong doing and it can be a complete waste of time. Especially when nobody has asked you to go undercover you are simply following a hunch and hoping that somebody in a news organisation will be interested in running the story once you've completed your research.
At this point I should point out that when you go undercover as a journalist immense pressure builds on you from the very beginning. The experience is intense to say the least because at any moment you could be discovered. A few years ago I was doing a story about illegal farm workers run by the Polish mafia. Within a few hours of going undercover my equipment was found, I was held captive for several hours only to escape and take refuge in a nearby ditch waiting for my contact to arrive and pick me up which of they did twelve hours later. So I knew in order to join G4S I actually had to be a really good security officer in order to remain calm and to be able to do my two jobs, that of a journalist and that of a security officer.
Within a few short weeks of gaining my SIA license I was providing security for such celebrities as Jay Z, Thandie Newton, Lindsay Lohan, Kelly Rowland, Alicia Keys, Kevin Spacey, George Clooney, Mickey Rourke, Lily Allen, Kate Moss, Tom Jones, Pink Floyd to name but a few. I was able to gain access to extremely prestigious events such as Jemima Kahn's "Hoping Foundation" raising money for Palestinian refugees at her home Kiddington Hall. One of the highlights of 2010 was when I worked the Cartier International Polo event attended by HRH Prince of Wales, where I was in charge of a large team of security personnel. I worked hard building up my C.V working at Heaven nightclub in London, running a team of two hundred stewards at the Notting Hill Carnival and being head of security for the Turkish Presidential Sate visit at the Royal Institute of British Architects liaising with Royal protection officers at Scotland Yard. I was such a good security officer I even had regular clients and over a three year period, working part time I built my C.V and reputation up to be someone of impeccable manners and professionalism.
So on the 26th January after seeing that G4S recruitment had began for the London 2012 Olympics I travelled down to the Stratford Training Centre - a disused secondary school in Pitchford Street and joined a very long queue of other Olympic hopefuls.
The interview process was like a cattle market with people being herded from room to room. After filling out my C.V, references and giving the virtues of my character on the G4S intranet site I had officially applied for a role in the Olympics. The next stage was an interview and as I sat waiting for my turn I mentally reminded myself of some of my key security jobs and rehearsed the typical "Why I want a role as a security officer" question at the Olympics which they were bound to ask. My turn rolled round and a very professionally polite woman led me down a corridor to a room with cubicles set up. I was asked by the interviewer to smell what was in three cups which were sat at the back of the cubical. So I walked over and sniffed…I realised that one smelled like orange albeit a chemical smell, the second like lemonade and the other had nothing in so therefore smelt of nothing unless we were to include the paper cup smell, which we evidently weren't. I was then invited to sit down and she showed me a number and asked me to say what number I was seeing. The first number was a 1, the second an 8 and the third was a squiggly line that resembled a number seven. So I told her that the final number wasn't a number and she agreed. After a very quick sight test I was told that I had passed the interview and I should go and wait in the other room. A few moments later I was told that I could go home and wait for an email.
On the 16th February 2012 I received an email informing me that I was someone who they had identified, probably by my keen sense of smell because it certainly wasn't all the experience I had amassed on my C.V, who could work in their screener stream as they put it. Great I was in. On the 22nd of March I received a further email inviting me to my first two days of security training on the 3rd April entitled Skills For Security and 11th April Rapiscan Equipment Training which I was later to find out meant X-Ray operator Training.
On the first day of security training I rocked up to the Pitchford St secondary school to be met by G4S staff on the gate. After not having my bag searched or email read I walked straight through the security gate and into the non sporting Olympic venue. During the first day I was told that training was to consist of power point presentations with an automated voice to be supervised by ex-military personnel employed by Contemporary International, a G4S subcontractor. It became clear that training was to be very basic and for the first day we were told in mind numbing detail about the Olympic mascots and history of the Olympics, that there were 30 venues, 26 Olympic sports, 10.8 million tickets sold, 24,000 security personel, a television audience of 4 billion and if there was a bomb, it had ben factored into the system already which we came to understand meant already built into the stadium.
We were also told that there was an evacuation plan of London in place and that our job, should the circumstances arise, would be to assist the general public to leave London. Our trainer also went on to say that of the many terrorists trying to kill us all, thieves, journalists, protestors and muppets of the general public he was most concerned about us...the wannabe security personel. He felt that we were the most dangerous threat to the games as he felt that half the room was probably filled with terrorists wanting to train as security.
My fellow trainees were mainly from Asian and various African communities the majority of which didn't speak English and had no idea why they were there. There was one Polish man who in pigeon English proclaimed that he had been made a team leader and hadn't even passed his SIA license yet. This didn't go down to well with the ex Devonshire Police officer who hadn't been ear marked to be a team or group leader. When the trainer asked if anyone had a problem searching people with disabilities more than three quarters of the class raised their hand. A few African candidates found the idea completely offensive and the African contingent of the class descended into a debate about how disabled people had offending God in a previous life in order to end up disabled in this life; and that ended day one.
Day two consisted of another power point presentation this time about understanding the X-ray machine. I was with completely different people from the first day but still a few still managed to fall asleep. The presentation was a bombardment of information about the various colour coding of the materials the X-ray machine operator is faced with on the screen. Everyday objects became indescribable as the X-Ray operator has a matter of seconds to decide whether or not an object is a weapon, an IED, a prohibited/illegal item or a household object. To say that I found the presentation confusing was an understatement and by the end of the day I was sitting at a computer watching items flash up on the screen for thirty seconds and trying to make sensible decisions about each group of items but in truth I couldn't tell an IED apart from a IPOD. In fact it was like being taught Russian in a day and then expected to have a conversation with a fluent Russian speaker by the end of that day. I passed that section of the day and would be an X-ray operator in the pedestrian screening area. We were later told by a trainer that the programme on the computer wasn't actually working properly but it didn't seem to matter according the trainers.
I then heard nothing until I received an email on the 21st May inviting me to two more days of training on the 11th and 12th of June.
On the 11th of June we sat in the main hall of the school and listened to the trainers Nick and Tanya talk about how big the Olympic games set up was again. They talked about having 200,000 casket linings which I was to latter learn were plastic coffins that could fit up to four people in them, again we were told of the a plan to evacuate London and our involvement. They showed us a video of drone attacks in Afghanistan and told us that drones would be flying over the Olympics. I found this part particularly distasteful as we were subjected to seeing people being killed.
During the break one of the candidates was trying to sell drugs to the rest of the class. He saw me see what he was doing and came over and showed me a plastic bag of marijuana in his bag. Later Nick one of the trainer saw him during the class showing somebody else, the smell was pungent in the room, Nick the trainer simply looked at him and asked if he'd wait and do that in the break. I was gobsmacked but the trainer didn't care about anything other getting through the power point presentations for that day.
Nick our trainer said that we would have to wear our uniforms to and from from work as there were no facilities to change. I made the point that we'd be an easy target for terrorists to identify us, follow us home and use our families as pressure in order for us to help them. The trainer basically agreed and told me not to ask so many questions and to “be the robot” he illustrated this point by pretending to be a robot from the 1980's making everyone laugh.
Tanya told us at this point that we were all going to be involved in “a defining moment in the history of London” which would take place after the games. I asked whether she meant the Para-Olympics. She said no but again we'd all be involved and at that point she made everyone in the room applaude. Nick, the trainer, looked at me again and pretended to be the robot! During the afternoon we were quickly shown how to search someone with our hands and then using the wand. We were then split into groups of two to practise. Most people just had a laugh and joked around the hall waving the wand around. There was no attempt to actually teach anybody how to do it properly. I saw several people taking pictures on their mobile phones of the students, equipment, hall and trainers. The trainers specifically told us repeatedly not to use our phones or take pictures as they considered this a security risk. In fact Nick told us that there were “jammers” in the room and even though it would allow you to take a picture, send a text or maybe even make a phone call in a week your phone would shut down permanently. I queried this point with Nick and he admitted that there were no “jammers” and that it was merely a verbal deterrent. Both Nick and Tanya saw someone taking pictures and all they did was ask that person to delete the pictures on his phone which he did and then continued with the training.
In the afternoon there was another opportunity to do some more X-ray training which was even more confusing and didn't allay my fears about being responsible for spotting prohibited or illegal items let alone potential IEDs or weapons. On the computer screen everything looked like a weapon or nothing looked liked a weapon it was a surreal experience. During the entire day I had other candidates asking me whether I'd been selected to be a team leader, I heard stories of people collecting uniforms that they weren't entitled too; in fact throughout the day several trainers appeared to ask us if we'd seen certain people carrying away uniforms. Some candidates told me that they had been given the wrong accreditation passes, uniforms that didn't fit, X-ray operators panicking and asking whether I could do it, people were constantly complaining and worrying. By the end of the day I felt utterly exhausted with worry.
The next day I went back to find that we had an assessment. The trainers took us in small groups through into another room and watched as we conducted a search of a person and a bag. We also had to answer a few simple questions regarding sponsors and whether we could allow someone wearing a Coca-Cola T-shirt in or a Pepsi T-shirt into the games. During the bag search we were in groups of three with trainers standing in front of us. I saw a trainee just hold the bag and not search it. After the trainer said “it's all right mate I know what you mean” I remarked that I was glad that he knew what he meant because I didn't. I was just told to mind my own business. Later I found out from Dan another trainer that they had a no fail policy on candidates regardless of how bad they were or whether or or not they can converse in English. Everyone was to be passed.
During the afternoon we had been moved into the main pedestrian screening area in what was the quad of the school. A giant “bomb proof” tent had been erected and it was an accurate mock-up of where we would be working. Again I saw more people taking pictures of the area, trainers and students on their mobile phones. I was asked to be a would be terrorist and was given a gun to take through the X-Ray machine. We all had to play members of the public as well as security officers throughout the day. So I put the gun in my bag before putting my bag in a tray and sending it through the X-ray machine. I noticed the X-ray operator was not even looking at the screen as my bag including the gun went though. I informed the trainer of what had happened and he gave me a knife which in placed in my belt under my t-shirt, I still had the gun in my bag. My bag went through the X-ray machine unnoticed again this time with a different X-ray operator and I walked through the Walk Through Metal Detector (WTMD) without it going off. Again I informed the trainer that the WTMD had failed to go off he then gave me some keys to put in my pocket. Again the WTMD failed to go off and another X-ray operator failed to spot the gun in my bag or knife in my belt. Eventually the WTMD did go off but only after the trainer gave me his mobile phone. He remarked that these metal detectors “were nonsense”.
I was also given a fake IED to put in my bag and again I sailed through security. The trainer suggested to the security person watching me walk through the metal detector that I should be searched. He did and failed to find the knife, he then wanded me with the hand held metal detector and again he failed to find the knife. The operator had failed to turn on the hand held metal detector on. On every occasion throughout the day I along with everyone else I witnessed allowed IEDs, guns and knives through their PSA.
The trainers told us that 350 members of the public an hour would have to pass through our PSA in order to get them into the park. I said that was impossible as we would never be able to search that number of people in that amount of time. I was told that during peak times the Walk Through Metal Detectors would be switch off and in off peak times it would only go off once every fifty people regardless of whether they were carrying anything metallic. By the end of the day we had all been would be terrorists, members of the public and had individually had only around five minutes training on the actual X-ray machine looking at bags moving through the machine. At the end of the day we were informed that we were the best group that day and we were told to give ourselves a round of applause.
I was so appalled at the level of incompetence of my fellow candidates and the standard of training that I made the decision that I would break the story early instead of staying in the Olympics. With four weeks to go until the games I felt that once the story broke LOCOG would have chance to sort out the problem.
On June 13th I contacted Andy Davies Home Affairs Correspondent at Channel 4/ITN by email and a few hours later he called me back to discuss my brief email. I had dealt with Andy on other stories in the past about once a year for the past two years. On one occasion he helped me track down an old colleague who I needed some advice from. When Andy Davies called me back he informed me that Channel 4 News had a policy of not reporting negative stories about the Olympics and that there was a press blackout across the media and so he wouldn't be interested in doing this story on the Olympics. I found him quite rude and obnoxious and not the usually the friendly person who I had previously dealt with. I also emailed a number of other colleagues with the story and again I didn't get a response which was very strange.
On June 19th or thereabouts I saw Tony Gosling being interviewed on Russia Today regarding the Olympics so I decided to email him. Tony did get back to me and booked me to appear on his Friday Drive Time Show on the 22.06.2012.
On the 1st of July or thereabouts Andy Davies called me to ask me to retract my story as I had mentioned on the radio what he had told me on the telephone. When I didn't agree to retract my story which included me speaking to him at Channel 4 /ITNnews. I refused. I felt that Andy Davies would now reveal to G4S my identity as during the Tony Gosling interview I had appeared as Lee Hazledean to protect who I was with G4S as at that time I was still undercover.
Once my interview on Tony Gosling's radio show had gone out I was contacted by Tom Pettifor of the Daily Mirror who interviewed me on the telephone and then we met a few days later in Greenwich for a formal interview. He seemed excited when he left, even though he made no promises about running the story he was confident that it would run especially as I would put my face to the photograph. I felt that I would be protected if I went public with my Identity which of course I did on the Lou Collins Radio Show and the Alex Jones Radio Show on Infowars.
After meeting with Tom he sent me an email the next day stating that his editor wouldn't run the story. I was also contacted by Gareth Furby BBC London Correspondent who began to arrange an interview before he too backed out. I was then contacted by John Ward at the Daily Star with the same results.
On July 12th Louise Collins rang me to ask if I had appeared on SKY News anonymously as her listeners had felt that it was me going back undercover. I explained that I didn't know what she was talking about. She forwarded me that article which was a transcript of what had appeared on SKY News. Even though it was apparently a trainer from G4S being interviewed I felt that what he was saying sounded very much like me and that the story had been lifted in part from interviews on Infowars. There were a few minor details changed but the overall sense by me and anyone who had interviewed me were that they were my words and I felt it was perhaps SKY attempting to do damage control for G4S attempting to take the wind out of my sails so to speak as I was appearing on worldwide alternative media. However, the mainstream has failed to recognise that it was myself along with Tony Gosling who broke this story on the 22nd of June.
Today being 19th July 2012 I am receiving emails almost every hour from G4S asking me to confirm that I will be turning up for work for the Olympics......

[TonyGosling]

The Ben Fellows Radio Show with guest Patrick Henningsen

http://21stcenturywire.com/2012/10/03/the-ben-fellows-radio-show-with- guest-patrick-henningsen/

[insidejob]

There were lots of warnings from the Truth Movement about a series false flag at the Olympics. Some people warned their family and left London.

We were wrong.

Why were we so wrong?

Do we have any explanations about why this false flag didn't take place?

[TonyGosling]

Simple that one.
The British Army took over the site with 3 weeks to go.