Peter Power 'exercise' by arms firm consultant Reed Elsevier

[Nambo]

Iam new here so excuse me if this has been asked before.
Peter Power on ITN news stated that he had been comissioned to carry out an exercise senario of suicide bombers blowing up the same trains, at the same time, and the same place that it actually happened.

He says that of course he cannot name who asked him to do this "exercise".

Now its pretty obvious that whoever commissioned the "exercise" commissioned the actual act, you havnt got to be Sherlock Holmes to work that out, so, how come niether the Metropolitan Police, the media, or members of parliament in the House of Commons havnt demanded to know who commission Visor Consulting for this event?

Or have they and nobodies told me?

[marek]

I don't think the client has ever been named - Peter Power certainly would not divulge that. But you can go by what their website says:

Visor Consultants have been able to support many domestic and global organisations to prevent chaos in a crisis and increase their overall resilience. Our clients include one of the top seven companies in the USA and key Departments of the UK Government.

http://www.visorconsultants.com/

[Abandoned Ego]

[Abandoned Ego]

[quote="Abandoned Ego"]

[Nambo]

Hi Abandoned Edge, are you saying Guliani has something to do with Visor consultants or that it was he who commissioned the "Exercise"?

I note Peter Power says, "And we chose a scenario - with no assistance - which is based on a terrorist attack because they're very close to, er, a property occupied by Jewish businessmen there in the city, " and that it was a Jewish dignitary who was forewarned not to go out an hour before the bombs went off.

You are right that it isnt rocket science to anybody but the brain-dead, yet most of the people to whom I inform of this issue are quite clearly brain-dead, (too much East-enders and X-Factor), yet, whilst I can see that the Media is totally Zionist controlled, and the upper (and lower) ranks of the police are still Masonic, why has nobody in the Government noticed this and brought it to attention?.

Most of them are more interested in preserving thier careers for sure, but there are a small handfull who have moral fortitude such as Michael Meacher, George Galloway, Norman Baker who asked Tony Blair in the house if he was a Bilderberg, (theres guts for you), and maybe Claire Short.

If I bump into Mr Meacher I might mention this to him.

[Bushwacker]

A transcript of the ITN interview:

POWER: Today we were running an exercise for a company - bearing in mind I'm now in the private sector - and we sat everybody down in the city - 1,000 people involved in the whole organization - but the crisis team. And the most peculiar thing was, we based our scenario on the simultaneous attacks on an underground and mainline station. So we had to suddenly switch an exercise from 'fictiona'l to 'real'. And one of the first things is, get that bureau number, when you have a list of people missing, tell them. And it took a long time -

INTERVIEWER: Just to get this right, you were actually working today on an exercise that envisioned virtually this scenario?

POWER: Almost precisely. I was up to 2 oclock this morning, because it's our job, my own company. Visor Consultants, we specialise in helping people to get their crisis management response. How do you jump from slow time thinking to quick time doing? And we chose a scenario - with no assistance - which is based on a terrorist attack because they're very close to, er, a property occupied by Jewish businessmen there in the city, and there are more American banks in the city than there are in the whole of New York - a logical thing to do. And it, I've still got the hair....

So a number of things arise:
He says "an underground and mainline station" so the targets were not exactly the same.
He says nothing about the terrorist attacks being suicide bombers.
He says it was a company with over 1000 employees, so it was not a government department, nor Giuliani's company.

The assumption that the commissioning company carried out the attacks is quite illogical.

The original AP story was that Netanyahu was warned by Scotland Yard prior to the attacks, not that the warning came from Israel, but AP withdrew the story and Netanyahu denied he had been warned before the attacks.

[Abandoned Ego]

[Abandoned Ego]

Bushwacker,

With respect, that is NOT a transcript of the interview that Power did on Radio 5 live, at around 7.30 pm, on the day of the attacks. The first of a series he did I believe.

Here is that Transcript ;


POWER: At half past nine this morning we were actually running an exercise for a company of over a thousand people in London based on simultaneous bombs going off precisely at the railway stations where it happened this morning, so I still have the hairs on the back of my neck standing up right now.

HOST: To get this quite straight, you were running an exercise to see how you would cope with this and it happened while you were running the exercise?

POWER: Precisely, and it was about half past nine this morning, we planned this for a company and for obvious reasons I don't want to reveal their name but they're listening and they'll know it. And we had a room full of crisis managers for the first time they'd met and so within five minutes we made a pretty rapid decision that this is the real one and so we went through the correct drills of activating crisis management procedures to jump from slow time to quick time thinking and so on.

http://www.infowars.net/~officia/77/drills/090705prisonplanetterrorexe rcise.html

[mason-free party]

PETER POWER...MY LIAR OF THE YEAR AWARD GOES TO HIM

[Bushwacker]

[Nambo]

I spoke to Mr Meacher to ask him why neither the Met, the media or the house of Commons hadnt demanded to know the clients behind this exercise and was surprised to hear that he was unaware of the Peter Power "exercise"at all, I guess polititions are too busy to know half of whats really going on in the world.
He immeadiatly brought up the "exercises" that took place at 911 saying this is what they do.
He also said that whilst this definately warrents looking into, conspiracy theorists are automatically looked upon as being crazy.
He then asked me if I could provide contact details for Mr Power, I forwarded the links to the Radio and TV interview and also Visors website.

I told him my opion on the Peter Power revelation that I couldnt belive a high ranking met anti-terrorist officer was too dim to put 2 and 2 together and come up with the same conclusion we have, or fail to realise the effect such an admission would have on the thinking public so can only guess that Mr Power wanted to pre-empt any possible whistle blowing from one of the "thousand" participants and to make himself look an innocent by admitting such a thing on national TV.

Iam hoping to hear back from Mr Meacher but have been told by colleages that he has become something of an object of ridicle by the other MPs due to his standing up for truth, this is to be expected I guess, they will try and destroy anybodies carreer who trys to reveal them.

All credit to the guts and moral fortitude of Mr Meacher.

[Belinda]

When did you speak to Meacher Nambo? Is he your MP? That would be useful!

A handful of us met him recently and he was a bit evasive about becoming more involved with our campaign but it would be good to be able to keep the lines of communication open.

Also everything might change if we could arrange some moral support for him in the form of a few more converts to the truth in Parliament.

We should all be working on our MPs as a matter of course - send them Loose Change 2 (6,000,000 downloads - most googled film on the Internet in summer 2006!) and tell them the UK 9/11 Truth movement is really taking off now, new groups are starting all over the country, also in many other countries. If the MP is Labour you can mention Hugo Chavez is thinking to set up a new international inquiry into 9/11 and enlisting support for this from other Latin American leaders. So when are British MPs going to begin to take this issue seriously? Etc.

Politicians are very sensitive to popular trends, they have to be since their power comes (or used to come!) from the people.

[John White]

[Bushwacker]

I suppose everybody does realise this was a "paper" exercise, those involved were all sitting in a room in the City, no one was on the ground?

What purpose could be served by employees of "a company" doing this?

What purpose could be served by Power revealing it?

[Bushwacker]

[John White]

[John White]

http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=-2001897549763616199&q=mind+ the+gap

I went and checked the organisation/operation Q and I'll give Bushkiller credit, his transcript is correct, my bad: still its also pretty clear that it was a joint operation involving crisis managment from several authorities, including London underground. From 11:00 to 13:00

[flamesong]

[Nambo]

[Bushwacker]

[Bushwacker]

[John White]

[Bushwacker]

[alkmyst]

Bushwacker wrote:

[Bushwacker]

[alkmyst]

Bushwacker wrote:

[Bushwacker]

[paul wright]

[Bushwacker]

[Kier]

Hello,

There is no 'evidence' against Peter Power or Visor consultants which suggests they were doing anything more than a training exercise. However, to those who are under the impression that this was simply an exercise on paper, please be aware that this is actually not the case.

Peter Power revealed on July 8th that Visor were also running 'mock broadcasts' on the 7th, simulating those that would be used in the event of a terrorist attack. Mr. Power stated that these broadcasts had been so realistic that they confused people when the genuine reports started coming through.
Curiously, this information was only made available in a small item by a local newspaper in the North West of England.

For a closer look at Peter Power, Visor & mock broadcasts, please see our article here.

Thanks.