FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist  Chat Chat  UsergroupsUsergroups  CalendarCalendar RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Mitt Romney Originally Planned to be in NYC on 9/11

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7, Covid-1984 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> Stratehy Of Tension, Fake Terror, 9/11 & 7/7 Truth News
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Shoestring
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 25 Jul 2006
Posts: 325

PostPosted: Fri Oct 26, 2012 3:31 pm    Post subject: Mitt Romney Originally Planned to be in NYC on 9/11 Reply with quote

Here is my new blog entry, which describes how Mitt Romney was originally going to be at a public event near the World Trade Center on the morning of September 11, but a late change to his schedule meant the event was postponed and he was elsewhere, away from danger, at the time of the 9/11 attacks.

The original posting, with links to sources, is here:
http://shoestring911.blogspot.co.uk/2012/10/change-of-schedule-saved-m itt-romney.html

Change of Schedule Saved Mitt Romney From Being Near the World Trade Center on 9/11

Mitt Romney, the Republican presidential candidate, was originally going to be at a public event near the World Trade Center on the morning of September 11, 2001, but a late change to his plans meant the event was rescheduled and he was out of harm's way when the 9/11 attacks occurred. Romney is therefore one of a number of prominent individuals known to have avoided danger--and possible death--due to a change to, or a deviation from, their plans for September 11.

Romney was, at that time, the president of the Salt Lake Organizing Committee (SLOC) for the 2002 Winter Olympic Games. He went to Washington, DC, on September 10 to talk to members of Congress about security at the Winter Olympics. [1] The final $12.7 million of federal money needed to cover security for the games had mistakenly been omitted from Congress's budget, and although the Olympics organizers were "confident" the error could be corrected, Romney went to Washington to make sure the money didn't "slip away," according to the Deseret News. [2] As well as meeting with members of Congress on September 10, Romney also met with FBI Director Robert Mueller that day. [3]

ROMNEY WAS SET TO ATTEND EVENT IN BATTERY PARK
Mitt Romney's original plan for the morning of September 11 was to attend what Romney called "an elaborate press conference" in Battery Park, just a few blocks south of the World Trade Center, at which the names of the torchbearers selected to carry the Olympic flame across the United States to Salt Lake City would be announced. Those who would have attended, along with Romney, included other SLOC officials, representatives of the Olympic torch relay sponsors, and a number of torchbearers from the New York area. [4] The event was set to take place at 9:00 a.m., around the time that planes crashed into the Twin Towers. [5]

The original date for the press conference had been set by the SLOC's "public relations people," according to Romney. [6] But a couple of weeks before September 11, the event was rescheduled to take place on September 12 instead of September 11. [7] The reason for this, according to the Philadelphia Inquirer, was that "Romney had extended a series of meetings in Washington with U.S. Congressional leaders." [8] Cindy Gillespie, the vice president of federal relations for the SLOC, had arranged a meeting with House and Senate appropriators at 10:00 a.m. on September 11. Romney has written that on the morning of September 11, therefore, he was with Gillespie in her office in Washington, helping to put the finishing touches on their presentation. [9]

As a result of this late change of plans, Mitt Romney was well away from the WTC at the time of the terrorist attacks there. A spokeswoman later commented that it was "really a blessing" that the date of the SLOC press conference was changed. "We were very fortunate," she said. The Deseret News noted that those set to attend the event in Battery Park "would have been standing near the base of [the] World Trade Center when airplanes slammed into it had SLOC president Mitt Romney's schedule not changed." [10]

BATTERY PARK WAS CAUGHT IN THE DUST CLOUD WHEN THE WTC COLLAPSED
Although it was about half a mile from the World Trade Center, Battery Park was still a dangerous place to be when the Twin Towers collapsed, as has been made clear by people who were there at the time. For example, Lisa Stein, the deputy national editor of U.S. News & World Report, was just north of the park when the South Tower came down at 9:59 a.m. on September 11. She described what it was like there, writing: "All hell broke loose. The air filled with thick smoke and ash. Emergency crews screamed at us to leave. There was a new sense of danger and panic. People rushed to get to the tip of Manhattan." Stein continued: "[T]he smoke was moving so fast I could barely breathe or see. I thought we were going to choke to death. Everyone was drenched in soot and smoke. People covered their faces with their shirts or anything they could find to keep from inhaling ash and smoke." [11]

Brian Gregorek was also in Battery Park when the South Tower came down. When the "plume of soot and ashes" from the collapse "worked its way toward Battery Park," he and many others reportedly "huddled on the ground, pulling their shirts over their faces so they could breathe." Gregorek has recalled: "When I peeked out, I couldn't see two feet in front of my face. People were being trampled. I was terrified; all I could think of was, 'How do I get out of here?'" Gregorek added: "I was praying, thinking of my family and friends. I didn't really know how much danger I was in, but I prepared myself for death." [12]

Romney and the other people set to attend the SLOC press conference avoided this terrifying scene because their event was moved back a day, to accommodate Romney's schedule. Furthermore, had the press conference taken place on September 11, as originally planned, it is possible that Romney or others at the event would have headed toward the World Trade Center after the planes hit the Twin Towers, to see what was happening. Had they done so, they could have been in particular danger when the towers collapsed.

In fact, even though the press conference had been rescheduled, one of Romney's colleagues, SLOC spokeswoman Caroline Shaw, was supposed to be in Battery Park at 9:00 a.m. on September 11 to prepare for the following day's event. But, fortunately, she was in the lobby of her hotel when the attacks occurred and came to no harm. [13]

OTHER PEOPLE AVOIDED BEING AT THE WTC ON SEPTEMBER 11 DUE TO A CHANGE OF PLANS
Other prominent individuals, besides Mitt Romney, are known to have avoided the chaos--and the possibility of being killed--when the Twin Towers were attacked and subsequently collapsed on September 11, because of changes to, or deviations from, their original plans.

For example, Jim Pierce, a cousin of then-President George W. Bush, should have been at a business conference on the 105th floor of the South Tower. But on September 10, it was decided that the meeting would take place in a different building, reportedly because the number of people scheduled to attend it "had outgrown the conference room" in the South Tower. [14] And Larry Silverstein, the WTC leaseholder, should have been at work on the 88th floor of the North Tower at the time of the attacks, but, instead, he was at home. Reportedly, this was because his wife had insisted that he go to an appointment with his dermatologist that morning. [15]

Sarah Ferguson, the former wife of Britain's Prince Andrew, should have been on the 101st floor of the North Tower for a meeting at 8:45 a.m. on September 11--a minute before the plane hit the tower. However, according to ABC News, she "was running late" and so she arrived at the door of the tower "seconds after the first plane hit." Her car then "sped off to safety." [16] And pop star Michael Jackson was supposed to be at a meeting at the top of one of the WTC towers that morning, but missed it because, he said, he'd overslept. [17]

It is plausible that some people changed their plans, or deviated from their schedule, and thereby avoided being at, or near, the World Trade Center when the 9/11 attacks occurred simply as a result of luck. However, investigators should determine whether any of these cases of apparent good fortune were due to something more sinister.

Could some people have changed their plans, or made sure they were running late, because they were advised to do so by individuals who had foreknowledge of the 9/11 attacks and therefore knew it would be dangerous to be in the vicinity of the WTC on the morning of September 11? If anyone did indeed know in advance what was going to happen, this would imply that the terrorist attacks could, and should, have been prevented.

NOTES
[1] Mitt Romney, "Mitt Romney Delivers Remarks to the National Guard Association Conference." Romney for President, September 11, 2012.
[2] Derek Jensen, "SLOC Aims to Cinch Fed $$$." Deseret News, September 10, 2001.
[3] John Meyer, "SLOC Chief Expects Changes: Security Will be 'Re-evaluated.'" Denver Post, September 12, 2001.
[4] Jo-Ann Barnas, "Olympic Flame Sputters in Wake of Attack." Detroit Free Press, September 11, 2001; Dennis Romboy, "Delay Keeps SLOC From Harm." Deseret News, September 12, 2001; Lisa Riley Roche, "Training of Games Volunteers to Go on as Scheduled." Deseret News, September 13, 2001; Mitt Romney, Turnaround: Crisis, Leadership, and the Olympic Games. Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, 2004, p. 301.
[5] Bob Ford, "Security Needs Intensify for Salt Lake Winter Games." Philadelphia Inquirer, September 16, 2001.
[6] Mitt Romney, Turnaround, p. 301.
[7] Dennis Romboy, "Delay Keeps SLOC From Harm."
[8] Bob Ford, "Security Needs Intensify for Salt Lake Winter Games."
[9] Mitt Romney, Turnaround, pp. 301-302.
[10] Dennis Romboy, "Delay Keeps SLOC From Harm."
[11] Lisa Stein, "On 9/11, a Smoky Sprint to Safety and 'Flesh in the Street.'" U.S. News & World Report, September 14, 2001.
[12] Ted Meixell, "Former Lafayette Football Player Reprioritizes After New York Attack." Allentown Morning Call, September 19, 2001.
[13] Dennis Romboy and Lisa Riley Roche, "SLOC Cancels NY Torch Event." Deseret News, September 11, 2001; Lisa Riley Roche, "Training of Games Volunteers to Go on as Scheduled."
[14] "President's Cousin Escaped Death Thanks to Schedule Change." Ananova, September 18, 2001; Barbara Bush, Reflections: Life After the White House. New York: Scribner, 2003, p. 388.
[15] Tom McGeveran, "Mike Sees City Taking Control at Ground Zero." New York Observer, March 17, 2003; Robert Kolker, "Who Wants to Move to Ground Zero?" New York, May 21, 2005. See also "The WTC Leaseholder and His Associates That Cheated Death on 9/11: Was it Coincidence or Did Someone Have Foreknowledge of the Attacks?" Shoestring 9/11, May 28, 2010.
[16] "Fergie Just Missed WTC Attack." ABC News, September 16, 2001; "Andrew's Fear for Fergie on 9/11." Metro, September 11, 2006.
[17] Jermaine Jackson, You Are Not Alone: Michael, Through a Brother's Eyes. New York: Touchstone, 2011, p. 355; "Michael Jackson Saved by 9/11 Lie-in." The Sun, September 16, 2011.

_________________
http://www.shoestring911.blogspot.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
scienceplease 2
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 06 Apr 2009
Posts: 1702

PostPosted: Fri Oct 26, 2012 3:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Stunning stuff, shoestring. And most timely...

And of course, Tony Blair was fortunate too...

Quote:
Did Tony Blair Use The Timing Of 9/11 For Political Gain?</h1>
<p>
Tony Blair hated giving speeches to the Trade Union Congress. Especially in 2001, the unions were ready for strikes and expected to boo him off stage. They were angry at executive pay and privatisation of the public health service. In the afternoon of 9/11, since the UK is 5 hours ahead of the USA, the attack arrived just before he was to make the worst received speech of his life. The USA was "surprised" but the UK and other countries intelligence agencies had been warning for months and years beforehand. Had Tony Blair used this intelligence and the timing of 9/11, for political gain?

(more below)

<hr>The TUC holds a yearly event where the major politicians including Prime Ministers and MPs set out their policies. http://www.tuc.org.uk/ The TUC basically bankrolls the Labour Party that Tony Blair led since the 1997 election landslide victory. Power to the people? Not a bit of it...

It is widely known and widely reported that "Oxbridge"-educated, Tony Blair (TB) hated giving speeches to the Trade Union Congress(TUC).

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/blair-to-face-tuc-fury-o ver-privatisation-666790.html
<i>
"...Unions have prepared a raft of highly critical motions for the annual conference. The Labour leader looks certain to face his stormiest TUC since he came to office, with attacks expected on his public-private plans, weak parental rights and proposals to charge for employment tribunals. The extent of the opposition Mr Blair faces became clear as the final agenda for the conference was published yesterday, with 15 critical motions from Britain's biggest unions on "privatisation" alone."</i>

So the TUC agenda was set on 23rd August 2001.... including the time of his speech.

On September 10th, 2001, it was not looking good for TB.
<hr>
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/world_at_one/1535356.stm
<i>"Ministers are moving to head off a union revolt at the opening of what is set to be Tony Blair's most difficult TUC conference since becoming Labour leader... There is talk of strike action... In the light of union complaints about huge pay-offs to failed executives, Foreign Secretary Jack Straw calls for greater corporate responsibility in global businesses. Tomorrow the Prime Minister will be addressing the TUC face to face."</i>
<hr>
All the talk even in left-leaning newspapers such as the Guardian, was that TB was to receive a pasting from the TUC...
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2001/sep/10/politicalnews.uk
<i><b>"Will it all end in tears?</b>
Probably... The unions, uniquely, appear to have public backing for their opposition - the question is what concession, or even clarity, they can obtain from Mr Blair before resorting to strikes." </i>
<hr>
On the morning of September 10th, Patricia Hewitt, the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry and Minister for Women and Equality, addressed the TUC and received "death by silence".
http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2001/sep/10/conferences
<i><b>
"Silence greets Hewitt speech</b> Patricia Hewitt, the secretary of state for trade and industry, was met by a stony silence as she delivered her keynote address to the TUC conference today.
Ms Hewitt, who spoke for little more than 15 minutes, received only muted applause following a speech which offered workers some protection of their rights if transferred to the private sector."</i>
<hr>
The morning of 9/11... the Guardian was expecting "anger" from the TUC because of TB's "genuine indifference"...
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2001/sep/11/tradeunions.labour
<i>
"You can hardly miss the fact that Tony Blair feels an aggrieved man... But his comments - or lack of them - about multinationals and about boardroom greed are another matter altogether. The prime minister can blame no one but himself for the anger which many will rightly feel about his apparently genuine indifference." </i>
<hr>
Do you think he was indifferent to this challenge because he knew something bigger was coming along?

The clocks in Britain are 5 hours ahead of the USA. 9am in NY is 2pm in London. Instead of giving his TUC speech in the morning, like most important speeches both before and since, to allow the sound bites to be broadcast by the midday news bulletin, Blair was scheduled for the afternoon. Of course, by this time, the 9/11 event had occurred in New York. TB, with the cameras already around him (waiting for his political mauling by the unions), was then able to announce his shock at the terrible 9/11 event. So TB did not need to give the speech that was destined to go down like a lead balloon.

So did Tony Blair have preknowledge of 9/11? And did he used this knowledge to avoid his most hated task (giving speeches to the TUC)?

Well the official story has plenty of evidence that the UK did have specific knowledge of 9/11 - far enough in advance to allow the timing of his speech to coincide - well before 23rd August 2001 when the TUC agenda was set.

MI6 warned in both 1998 and 1999 from HUMINT - human intelligence. The same source may have given better details subsequently, although this is not reported...

http://www.propagandamatrix.com/mi6_warned_us_of_al_qaeda_attacks.htm
<i>"MI6 warned the American intelligence services about a plot to hijack aircraft and crash them into buildings two years before the September 11 attacks. Liaison staff at the American embassy in Grosvenor Square in London were passed a secret report by MI6 in 1999 after the intelligence service picked up indications from human intelligence sources (Humint) that Osama Bin Laden’s followers were planning attacks in which civilian aircraft could be used in “unconventional ways”. "</i>
<hr>
Other reports of warnings:

http://s3.amazonaws.com/911timeline/main/foreignwarnings.html

<i>"June 2001: German intelligence warns the CIA, Britain's MI6, and Israel's Mossad that Middle Eastern terrorists are planning to hijack commercial aircraft to use as weapons to attack "American and Israeli symbols, which stand out." A later article quotes unnamed German intelligence sources who state the information was coming from Echelon surveillance technology, and that British intelligence had access to the same warnings. However, there were other informational sources, including specific information and hints given to, but not reported by, Western and Near Eastern news media six months before 9/11. [Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 9/11/01, Washington Post, 9/14/01, Fox News, 5/17/02]

Early August 2001: Britain gives the US another warning about an al-Qaeda attack. The previous British warning was vague as to method, but this warning specifies multiple airplane hijackings. This warning is included in Bush's briefing on August 6. [Sunday Herald, 5/19/02]"</i>
<hr>
While not backed by any other source unfortunately, an apparent attack on the UK was also planned but "failed at the last minute" according to credible witness: a priest that warned of the attacks to Italian politicians. This, at least, supports also the notion that UK could have had exact knowledge of the 9/11 attack.
http://web.archive.org/web/20060405112452/http://zenit.org/english/vis ualizza.phtml?sid=9943
<hr>
So did Tony Blair have pre-knowledge of 9/11? I think the evidence that we know about says "yes". And did he used this knowledge to avoid his most hated task (giving speeches to the TUC)? The timing of conference probably was just coincidence but the agenda, only set on the 23rd August, Blair could decide exactly when he would be available for the speech and so probably, yes he did. Politics and coincidences? They just don't happen!

Did he used the timing of 9/11 for political gain? Well, it arrived with perfect timing and Tony Blair did absolutely benefit from it at the time.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Shoestring
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 25 Jul 2006
Posts: 325

PostPosted: Fri Oct 26, 2012 5:15 pm    Post subject: More info on Mitt Romney ... Reply with quote

Thanks for the good words, scienceplease. I'm glad I got this info out before the U.S. election. I started looking into what Mitt Romney was doing on September 11 after watching John Hankey's new film, Romney Exposed, which mentions that Romney met with the FBI on the day before 9/11. This film includes a lot of other interesting information, so it's well worth watching. It is on YouTube here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s9QA5B6U86s.
_________________
http://www.shoestring911.blogspot.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7, Covid-1984 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> Stratehy Of Tension, Fake Terror, 9/11 & 7/7 Truth News All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You can attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group