08Mar2014: Malaysian MH370 airliner hacked then 'disappears'

[TonyGosling]

Wonder why these articles disappeared?
Like #MH370
Perhaps the truth is being systematically exterminated?
Was this a military operation?
https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/465557/Malaysian-plane-20-on-boar d-worked-for-ELECTRONIC-WARFARE-and-radar-defence-company

Missing, believed hacked: Who has means & motive to take a plane full of people?
Me 4 wks after #MH370 'disappeared'

Malaysia MH370: Who has means & motive to take a plane full of people?
Published time: 4 Apr, 2014 11:18
https://www.rt.com/op-edge/lost-airliner-malaysia-nato-china-365/

Enough in the way of misstatements, contradictions and other evidence has emerged from the developing story of ‘lost’ Malaysian Airlines flight 370 to form a case for its disappearance being orchestrated by the West's Military Industrial Complex.

The initial possibility that the airliner ‘crashed into the sea and disappeared’ is fading away. The 'Bermuda Triangle' scenario of bewildering disappearances will not wash in the modern world.

With the benefit of hindsight, that Caribbean 'mystery' popularized in the 1970s now looks to have been rolled out to a credulous press and public as a convenient cover story for skullduggery in CIA and related drug-running operations by sea and air between Florida markets and South American cocaine producers.

Military secrets are not for civilian TV news
The Malaysian government does not have the most sophisticated satellite and radar surveillance systems and it took several days for them to admit that they had indeed tracked MH370 back in a westerly direction across the Malay Peninsula.

From that last point of contact on, the Malaysian authorities have been entirely reliant on 'help' from countries with powerful military radar systems and, more importantly, the top of the technocratic food chain, satellites.

And there we are faced with a dilemma. Does the military alliance that controls these systems see Malaysia as an ally? Are they willing to reveal the peacetime capabilities of their systems to a foreign power? Ultimately do they have the technical capability to 'hack' an airliner's controls and disable avionics, even steer the plane rendering the pilot? If they can do that do they want to release that information to the world?

There seem to be two main theories emerging as to why, and by far the simplest is the demonstrated by hacker Hugo Teso who is also a commercial pilot. At the 'Hack in the Box' conference in April 2013, Teso demonstrated the ability to change speed, altitude and direction of a virtual airplane by sending radio signals to its flight-management system. He has also developed an Android app which demonstrates the vulnerability of modern computer-controlled airliners and business jets called PlaneSploit.

The US has several airbases around the Indian Ocean and South China Sea from which they operate the most advanced electronic warfare gadgetry in the world. Both from specialist warships and electronic warfare pods and installations on a variety of aircraft from the lumbering AWACS battle control planes to fighter jets.

Australian Navy ship HMAS Toowoomba is seen from the Japan Coast Guard Gulfstream V aircraft as it flies over the southern Indian Ocean as they look for debris from missing Malaysian Airlines flight MH370 April 1, 2014. (Reuters)

Former scientific adviser to the UK Home Office Dr. Sally Leivesley was quoted by London’s Sunday Express on March 16 as saying, “hackers could change the plane’s speed, altitude and direction by sending radio signals to its flight management system. It could then be landed or made to crash by remote control.” She floated the possibility that this could be the world’s first cyber-hijack.

But Malaysia is a relatively low-tech country and not in a position to know for sure whether this happened or not. Codes of humility in the region also mitigate against the Malaysian authorities being prepared to admit they are out of their depth and lose face.

The second is that MH370’s pilot was simply called by the military on a frequency not being recorded by Air Traffic Control and told something along the lines of, “Vietnamese and other unspecified airspace is suddenly unsafe to fly in due to a military incident so please change frequency and follow instructions to a distant airstrip where we can put you down safely." The was followed by something like, "Please do not inform passengers as this may alarm them.” The pilot would then be likely to simply comply and passengers may never know that anything was wrong. So if one of these is the means, what about the motive?

The geopolitics of Malaysia & China
With a constant stream of invasions and interventions and by constantly ratcheting up the arms race ever since the Second World War the USA has marked itself out, as US writer William Blum puts it, as the ‘Rogue State’ of the modern era. As a once great superpower's economy disintegrates, US behavior in world affairs with illegal 'adventures' into Iraq, Libya etc. is becoming shameless. They believe with a bit of 'soft power' news management to their domestic populations they can get away with anything.

Europe has been almost fully co-opted under US domination over decades by multinational corporations, IMF loans and the NATO military alliance. They appear to be forming a single market under the proposed Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) too now, which will weld EU and the Euro Currency to the Dollar in what will effectively be one country.

Both China and Malaysia are independently strong and that rankles in Washington. Malaysia refuses to do what it is told by the IMF and China is staunchly independent of the US 'vision' for the world in a way that has proved impossible for nations like Britain or, most recently, Ukraine to be.

One week after MH370 disappeared, China refused to back a US resolution at the UN Security Council condemning the Russian referendum in Crimea. Post-coup NATO is already signing co-operation deals with Kiev’s junta, the new ‘allies’ of the ‘free’ West, who have placed neo-Nazis in many of the nation’s key security and policing posts.

The deaths of 80 or so police and protesters in Kiev may simply have been an extension of NATO’s 1970s and 1980s ‘Operation Gladio’. In this top secret operation, exposed in a 1992 BBC Timewatch series, NATO armed fascist ‘irregulars’ took the role of terrorists and murdered countless innocent European civilians. The atrocities were blamed on leftist groups and ultimately the Soviet Union and Gladio was exposed by parliamentary enquiries in Italy, Belgium and Switzerland. Like the February 22 coup in Kiev, similar killing of protesters and police/army before the coup attempt happened in Venezuela and, more recently, Syria.

A Taiwanese volunteer assisting relatives of passengers on board Malaysia Airlines MH370 cries as she prays for the passengers at the Lido Hotel in Beijing April 1, 2014. (Reuters)

In this context the kidnapping of 239 passengers and crew could be just another example of NATO Intelligence’s disregard for human life, seeing people as pawns in a much more important geopolitical ‘game’.

The NATO countries’ answer to economic disaster, just like in the run-up to World Wars I and II, is aggression and war. As we saw with the leaked phone call in Turkey last week they are even prepared to stage events to justify an attack on an innocent neighbor. The fact that we are now in the nuclear age seems to have passed them by, but one imagines they believe, as US Strategic Air Command General Curtis LeMay said after the Cuban missile crisis of 1962 that, "...at any point the Soviet Union could have been obliterated without more than expectable losses on our side."

Both China and Malaysia have been set against each other to a certain extent in a 'blame game' and severely humiliated over the loss of MH370. Some may see this as ‘payback time’ for making bad decisions at the UNSC, suiting the all-powerful IMF as well as their affiliated, if twisted, and increasingly belligerent NATO military alliance very well.

Psychological warfare – news management
First on Thursday, March 13, came Rolls Royce’s surprise announcement that the Boeing 777’s two Trent engines had been running for five or so hours after the plane was ‘lost’. Then on Tuesday, March 18, came reports from a small Maldives newspaper 'Haveeru' that half a dozen islanders had first heard and then seen a ‘jumbo jet’ flying very low. To quote the paper: “They said that it was a white aircraft, with red stripes across it – which is what the Malaysia Airlines flights typically look like, and it was heading in a southerly direction.”

Both these stories were greeted in the international press by an avalanche of denials from government, military and other ‘expert’ sources, none of whom could possibly have known whether or not the Rolls Royce or the Maldives Islanders were correct or not. This massive and instantaneous reaction is the clear signature of an Information Operations campaign to stop publication and broadcasting of those stories to the world’s public and it largely worked.

In the case of Rolls Royce, a retraction was even extracted from the engine manufacturers which the next day was forgotten, because the evidence Rolls Royce had was so robust and watertight. Far fewer individuals are killed, so the military argue, by the use of lies to win over a population than with guns, bombs and tanks. Quite right they are too.

But what happens when journalists who are better at telling the truth than they are at lying are surreptitiously assassinated, as is widely believed to be the case with Rolling Stone journalist Michael Hastings? He had told the truth about US Afghan General Stanley McChrystal and got him sacked from the top post.

Hastings was about to expose the new head of the CIA director John Brennan who is an advocate for using US Army Information Operations (I-Ops) Psychological Warfare cells against domestic US journalists and politicians. It’s widely believed, including by former White House cyber-security adviser Richard Clarke said that Michael’s Mercedes was ‘consistent with a car cyber attack’, or hacked. Accelerated to breakneck speed then steered into a tree where it exploded and he died.

An artwork conveying well-wishes for the passengers and crew of the missing Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370 is seen at a viewing gallery in Kuala Lumpur International Airport March 19, 2014. (Reuters)

With MH370 we have two clear examples of hard evidence where military style 'news management' or information warfare' appears to be the only explanation for cascades of malicious news stories spreading at the speed of light around the worlds news-wires designed to kill what may well be the truth stone dead.

Similarities to the 9/11 attacks and Britain's role
The bizarre zigzag routes followed by MH370 are exactly the sort of flight path demonstrated during the September 11 attacks. On 9/11 we saw the same mysterious switching off, whether remotely or by the pilots, of transponders which should have been reporting the planes’ speed, altitude and position to air traffic control. If anything, the 777 is even more liable to cyber hijacking than the 767s involved in the 9/11 attacks. It was the first production aircraft to have no controls by which the pilot has direct influence over any part of the aircraft. It's all via the flight management system.

Britain’s role too has not been entirely as an honest broker. Private military connected firm Inmarsat have given impressive looking maps instructing rescuers where to search, but consistently failed to reveal the raw data which, they say, led to those conclusions. The UK Air Accident Investigation Branch too has given expert advice without fleshing out the full reasons for its conclusions.

On the other hand, Rolls Royce is the star of the piece, exposing an enormous flaw in the initial ‘lost plane’ theory: that MH370 flew on for over five hours. Airliners in trouble simply do not fly on for five hours and then plunge into the sea.

In the land where, as of last week, friends and family are prohibited from sending Bibles to their loved ones in prison, nothing in the way of barbarism from our real leaders across the Atlantic, now entirely contemptuous of the world and citizenry they are supposed to serve, would surprise me.

[TonyGosling]

Best graphic so far above
Here's more

[TonyGosling]

(4) Emirates head Tim Clark tells Spiegel that MH370 was hijacked, warns "others would like to bury" the truth
http://mailstar.net/bulletins/150315-b2427-MH370.rtf
http://www.spiegel.de/international/business/mh370-emirates-head-has-d oubts-about-investigation-a-996212.html

Missing Plane: Emirates Head Critical of MH 370 Investigation
Interview Conducted by Andreas Spaeth
October 9, 2014
Despite months spent searching for Malaysia Airlines flight MH 370, not a trace has been found.
Why is there still no trace of flight MH 370? In an interview, Sir Tim Clark, head of Emirates Airline, is sharply critical of the
investigation thus far. He believes someone took control of the plane and maintained it until the very end.
Tim Clark has been a senior manager at the airline Emirates since 1985 and has been instrumental in developing it into one of
the world's largest airlines. Today, the 64-year-old is seen as a knowledgeable expert and critic of the aviation industry. His view
of the vanished Malaysian Airlines flight MH 370 is a provocative one. The plane that disappeared was a Boeing 777 and
Emirates operates 127 such aircraft, more than any other airline in the world. [...] {Sydney Morning Herald transcript follows}
(5) SMH Transcript of Emirates head Tim Clark interview with De Spiegel on MH370
http://www.smh.com.au/world/full-transcript-emirates-chief-sir-tim-cla rk-on-mh17-and-mh370-20141121-11rc70.html
Sir Tim Clark believes information is being concealed
Emirates head presses for change to prevent further tragedy
Sydney Morning Herald November 21, 2014
The full transcript of German aviation journalist Andreas Spaeth's interview with Emirates chief Sir Tim Clark.
It's many months later and we know nothing about MH370, having disappeared on March 8, 2014. What can be done?
TIM CLARK: Malaysia Airlines 370 remains one of the great aviation mysteries. Personally I have the concern that we will treat it
like that and move on, and it will go onto National Geographic as one of aviation's great mysteries. We mustn't allow this to
happen. This aeroplane has disappeared without trace. The public and the industry are questioning the lack of information and
the cold hard logic of the disappearance of this and the factors that led to its disappearance. The tracking of the aircraft, its
routing, its altitude oscillations, these were all measurable and explainable in my view. But we seem to have allowed it to go into
this black hole of 'it could be one of aviation's great mysteries'. It can't be left like that, never. We must know what caused that
aeroplane to disappear.
What do you think happened?
CLARK: My own view is that probably control was taken of that aeroplane, the events that happened during the course of its
tracked flight will be anybody's guess of who did what and when. I think we need to know who was on this aeroplane in the
detail that obviously some people do know, we need to know what was in the hold of the aeroplane, in the detail we need to
know, in a transparent manner. And we need to continue to press all those stake holders, that were and are involved in the
analysis, in the assessment of what happened, for more information. Because heading an airline that operates the largest
number of 777s in the world, I have a responsibility of knowing exactly what went on. I do not subscribe to the view that the
aircraft, which is one of the most advanced in the world, has the most advanced avionic and communication platforms, needs to
be improved so that we can introduce some kind of additional tracking system for an aeroplane that should never have been
allowed to enter into a non-trackable situation.
What do you mean by that?3
CLARK: The transponders are under the control of the flight deck. These are tracking devices, aircraft identifiers, that work in
the secondary radar regime. If you turn off that transponder in a secondary radar regime, it causes a disappearance of
that particular aeroplane from the radar screen. That should never be allowed to happen. All secondary and primary radar
should be the same. Irrespective of when the pilot decides to disable the transponder, the aircraft should be able to be tracked.
So the notion by the Malaysians that the disappearance from the secondary radar and then the ability of the military to use
primary radar to track the aeroplane and identify it as 'friendly' – I don't know how they did that - is something we need to look
at very carefully.
What about other ways of monitoring?
CLARK: The other means of constantly monitoring the process of the track of an aircraft is the Aircraft Communication and
Reporting System, ACARS. That is designed primarily for the companies to monitor what the aeroplanes are doing, we use it for
a number of things, but primarily to monitor the aircraft systems and engine performance. So we track from the ground, as
we do at Emirates, every single aircraft and every component of the aircraft and engine of the aircraft at any point of the
planet, and very often we are able to track faults in the systems before the pilots do. It's that good and it's that real time.
How was it possible to disable that?
CLARK: Disabling it is no simple thing, and our pilots are not trained to disable ACARS. There are ways to enter the system
through the multiple menu levels to get through and disable, but to completely disable also requires you to go down below
the main deck into the avionics bay. That requires you to leave the flight deck and go down through a trap door in the
floor to do that. But somehow this thing was disabled, so much so that the ground tracking capability was eliminated.
What should be the consequence?
CLARK: We must find systems to allow ACARS to continue uninterrupted, irrespective of who is controlling the aircraft. So that
is not something somebody can do. If you have that, with the satellite constellations that we have today even in the Southern
Ocean, we still have the capability of monitoring. So you don't have to introduce additional tracking systems. We are told we are
saying that because we don't want to spend money. I have no problem spending and Emirates is one of the first to step out and
ensure that safety is never compromised. But I have to be persuaded that adding additional tracking systems on top of what we
already have is really worthwhile.
So what should be done then?
My recommendation to the aircraft manufacturer group is that they find a way to make disabling of the ACARS system
impossible by the flight deck. And the transponder as well - I'm still struggling to find why a pilot should be able to put the
transponder into standby or off. In my view, that should not be an option. Thirdly, the air traffic control systems should not have
a situation where a non-transponder aircraft without its squawk identifier should not be allowed to turn off and still not be able to
track it. This is absolute stuff of nonsense. Radar is radar, it will pick up metal objects flying at the speed of the size of a 777
without any difficulty. Who took the decision to say: 'If a transponder is off, we can't track it in a secondary radar regime'? Which
apparently most air traffic control systems are in. We must look at that as well. This aircraft in my opinion was under control,
probably until the very end.
But why would they fly down five hours straight towards Antarctica?
If they did! I am saying that every single element of the 'facts' of this particular incident must be challenged and
examined in full transparency, exhausted to the point that there is no other way that we can think of this other than a complete
mystery. We are nowhere near that, there is plenty of information out there, which we need to be far more forthright, transparent
and candid about. All the entities involved like the NTSB, the Malaysians, the Australians, Boeing itself, whatever. They all know
that people like me, and I hope the Malaysians are in this boat, too, will not allow this to go into that box of oblivion. Every single
second of that flight needs to be examined. From the point on its heading in a north-easterly direction where it 'disappeared'
off the screen and made a conscious left turn to go almost due West in controlled flight. There were apparently some
oscillations in altitude from 41.000 to 27.000 feet, then the notion that it turned between existing waypoints on a north-easterly,
then a north-westerly, then a south-westerly heading, where it theoretically then ended up in the Southern Ocean. For which
they couldn't find a trace in 1.7 million square miles of search, nothing, they say.
So you nurture doubts that it actually happened as is said?
When you press questions on this, I sense a degree of belligerence, the more belligerent people become, the more worried I
become. They have used AF447 as an example, where it was two years to track the aircraft, but very shortly after the incident
they found the fin, floating. So we knew that the aircraft had gone in. And yes, there were all sorts of oceanographic issues with
the currents and it took us two years to find. But in this case, there wasn't a seat cushion, and our experience tells us that in
water incidents, where the aircraft has gone down, there is always something. We have not seen a single thing that
suggests categorically that this aircraft is where they say it is, nothing. Apart from this 'handshake', which calls my electronic
engineers to start thinking 'what is all this about?'.
What is their conclusion?
CLARK: They say, even though they disabled satellite communication and the ACARS, it is actually not disabled, it is
still powered up and sends out weak signals that hunt, like you would do with a mobile phone. And therefore it is traceable.
Well, I question this 'handshake' as well. In the Southern Ocean, with a very weak signal, which is intermittent, and they are a
multitude of other aircraft in the same area, I'm not sure about that. Those are the things that need to be challenged. First of all4
let's establish what actually happened. If the industry then believes there is a case to put extra tracking devices on board, we
can look at it. But don't walk down a blind alley. Many people, including at IATA, are going down this path. I don't agree with it.
At which point in the presumed flight path do your doubts start?
CLARK: There hasn't been one overwater incident in the history of civil aviation, apart form Amelia Earhart in 1939, that has not
been at least five or ten percent trackable. This has disappeared. So for me that raises a degree of suspicion, and I'm totally
dissatisfied with what is been coming out of all of this.
Who can change that?
CLARK: I'm not in a position to do it, I'm essentially an airline manager. But I will continue to ask the questions and will make a
nuisance of myself, when others would like to bury it, and we have an obligation to the passengers and crew of MH 370
and their families, whose deep distress you see every day. We have an obligation not to brush this under the carpet, but to
sort it out and do better than we have done.
So the search efforts undertaken so far were not good enough?
CLARK: They will start the search now again in the Southern Ocean, but look at what they had there: The Russians, the
Chinese, the British, the Australians, the Malaysians. They had so many aircraft there that at one point, they had to bring in a
separate aircraft to control their movements, so they didn't bump into each other. And still, nothing. Now, months later, they are
gonna start again, but they couldn't find anything with all these entities before. This is very strange.
What is your gut feeling, will we at some point know more about what actually happened?
I think we will know more if there is full transparency of everything that everybody knows. I do not believe that the information
held by some is on the table. Who actually disabled ACARS, who knew how to do it? If you eliminate the pilot on a suicide
mission, I'm sure you could have put the aircraft in the South China Sea, rather than fly it for seven hours. So if he was on a
suicide mission, he would have done it then. Who then took control of the aircraft? Who then knew how to disable ACARS
and turn the transponder off? That is a huge challenge.
Can you understand that there is still so much disbelief everywhere how this could have ever happened in this time and age?
CLARK: Therein lies this huge question mark in my mind. I know this did not have to happen, there is technology to track these
aircraft and everybody will say that, Boeing or Airbus. That is where the conundrum is of mystery, that is where we must be
more forthright and candid as to what went on, it is not good enough for the Malaysian military to say: "On a prime radar we
identified it as 'friendly'".
The role of the Malaysian military appears to be particularly murky.
CLARK: This is a very busy part of Southeast Asia, the notion that we should not be able to identify if it is friend or foe, or we
can on primary radar and do nothing about it, is bizarre. What would have happened if the aircraft would have turned back to fly
into the Petronas Towers in Kuala Lumpur? But we identified it as "friendly"? Friendly with intent, or friendly without intent? But
what was done? These are the questions that need to be asked of the people and the entities that were involved in all of this.
Full transparency of that will help us to find out what went on.

[TonyGosling]

The REAL Reason Flight 370 Disappeared
Western Journalism
Published on 28 Mar 2014
Video produced by http://www.westernjournalism.com Produced, written, and edited by Kris Zane. Narrated by Tom Hinchey

Link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fzgQwDeP7eM

[TonyGosling]

Malaysian plane: 20 passengers worked for ELECTRONIC WARFARE and MILITARY RADAR firm

A US technology company which had 20 senior staff on board Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370 had just launched a new electronic warfare gadget for military radar systems in the days before the Boeing 777 went missing.

By TED JEORY
PUBLISHED: 08:19, Wed, Mar 19, 2014
http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/465557/Malaysian-plane-20-on-board -worked-for-ELECTRONIC-WARFARE-and-radar-defence-company

DEVELOPMENT Freescale Semiconductor which had 20 workers on MH370 had just launched new radar chips DEVELOPMENT: Freescale Semiconductor which had 20 workers on MH370 had just launched new radar chips [EXPRESS]

Freescale Semiconductor, which makes powerful microchips for industries including defence, released the powerful new products to the American market on March 3.

Five days later, Flight MH370 took off from Kuala Lumpur for Beijing with 239 people on board including 20 working for Freescale.

Twelve were from Malaysia, while eight were Chinese nationals.

Freescale’s spokesman Mitch Haws has said: “These were all people with a lot of experience and technical background and they were very important people.

“It’s definitely a loss for the company.”

Freescale’s shareholders include the Carlyle Group of private equity investors whose past advisers have included ex-US president George Bush Sr and former British Prime Minister John Major.

These were all people with a lot of experience and technical background – they were very important
Freescale Semiconductor
Carlyle’s previous heavyweight clients include the Saudi Binladin Group, the construction firm owned by the family of Osama bin Laden.

The fact that Freescale had so many highly qualified staff on board the Boeing 777 had already prompted wild conspiracy theories about what might have happened.

The company says they were flying to China to improve its consumer products operations, but Freescale’s fresh links to electronic warfare technology is likely to trigger more speculation and deepen the mystery.

freescale semiconductor, malaysian airlines, electronic warfare, flight mh370, radar systems, malaysian plane, carlyle group, osama bin laden, saudi A map of the latest search areas in the southern Indian Ocean today [EPA]

Experts have been baffled how a large passenger jet seems to have flown undetected and possibly beaten military radar systems for up to six hours.

Avoiding radar via “cloaking technology” has long been one of the objectives of the defence industry and Freescale has been active developing chips for military radar.

On its website, the company says its radio frequency products meet the requirements for applications in “avionics, radar, communications, missile guidance, electronic warfare and identification friend or foe”.

Last June it announced it was creating a team of specialists dedicated to producing “radio frequency power products” for the defence industry.

And on March 3, it announced it was releasing 11 of these new gadgets for use in “high frequency, VHF and low-band UHF radar and radio communications”.

The company did not respond to questions from Express Online, including whether any of its missing employees had been working on the defence products.

freescale semiconductor, malaysian airlines, electronic warfare, flight mh370, radar systems, malaysian plane, carlyle group, osama bin laden, saudi bHull University student Yue Wenchao, 26, who is reported to be one of the passengers on board [ENTERPRISE]

It neither provided any responses to the latest bizarre conspiracy theory being widely published on the comments sections of newspaper websites and other internet forums.

The comment reads: “It reads: “Have you pieced together the puzzle of missing flight 370 to Beijing China? If not, here are your missing pieces.

“Patents Patents Patents.

“Four days after the missing flight MH370 a patent is approved by the Patent Office, four of the five Patent holders are Chinese employees of Freescale Semiconductor of Austin TX.

“Patent is divided up on 20 per cent increments to five holders.

“Peidong Wang, Suzhou, China, (20 per cent); Zhijun Chen, Suzhou, China, (20 per cent); Zhihong Cheng, Suzhou, China, (20 per cent); Li Ying, Suzhou, China, (20 per cent); Freescale Semiconductor (20 per cent).

“If a patent holder dies, then the remaining holders equally share the dividends of the deceased if not disputed in a will.

“If four of the five dies, then the remaining one Patent holder gets 100 per cent of the wealth of the patent.

“That remaining live Patent holder is Freescale Semiconductor.”

It adds: “Here is your motive for the missing Beijing plane. As all four Chinese members of the Patent were passengers on the missing plane.

“Patent holders can alter the proceeds legally by passing wealth to their heirs. “However, they cannot do so until the Patent is approved. So when the plane went missing, the patent had not been approved.”

However, the absurd theory does not add up.

Although a Freescale patent does exist under number US8650327, none of the names listed actually appear on the passenger manifest released by the Malaysian authorities.

The search continues for Flight MH370 but speculation surrounding its fate grows by the day.

Some experts believe the plane was hijacked–possibly by the pilots–or that there was a struggle on board which led to a catastrophic decompression.

However, no seat cushions or luggage that would have been expected to float have yet been found in the vast Indian Ocean where it might have crashed.

[TonyGosling]

[Whitehall_Bin_Men]

On the apparent fact that AVM's [Air Vice Marshalls] are politically appointed (in our case M&M appointed):
http://www.pprune.org/8784948-post2542.html

Quote:
As for ATSB, I wonder if Mrdak is brazen enough to choose another RAAF clone who knows their way around Canberra? My guess is yes.
If that be the case Sunny then the next ATsB CC will come from this list (minus the deceased) - List of Royal Australian Air Force air marshals

One of the names on that list who would be a potential candidate would be this guy - Warren Ludwig*1960—
Commander Integrated Area Defence System, Malaysia (2010–14).

If so there would yet again be another fascinating connection to MH370, for it seems that the RAAF has been dancing the tango with Malaysia under the Five Power Defence Arrangements for 43 years and the IADS has always been under the command of a RAAF AVM.

Reference from page 84 - The Five Power Defence Arrangements:The Quiet Achiever:
Quote:

The Commander of IADS has always been an Australian Air Vice Marshal
assisted by a deputy who rotates between Malaysia and Singapore.
Reference from the Strategist article - FPDA—not fade away:
Quote:
Unlike the echidna, the FPDA has at least adjusted its gait to move with the times, re-badging IADS from integrated air defence to area defence as far back as 2001. Exercise and interoperability themes have since been broadened from conventional defence to HADR and maritime security. FPDA was not publicly invoked during the search for MH 370, but the disaster has focused an operational spotlight on the need for integrated air surveillance and SAR coordination across Southeast Asia and beyond. The apparent failure to track the airliner as it passed north of Butterworth was not IADS’ finest hour. But the continuing multinational search operation has unquestionably benefited from the institutionalised trust built up between Malaysia and its fellow FPDA members.
This apparent anomaly - although totally missed by most Oz MSM - was not missed by the international MSM nor the TBA.

Example from IBT - MH370: Australia Seems Conspiring to Hide Something, Random Letter Sparks Questions on Au’s Security Radar :
Quote:
...With this, he explained that JORN can search most of the way to India.
"Given this, the only way for the radar not to have detected something like MH370 is for it to be switched off at the time, which raises its own questions."

The most interesting detail the Mr La Franchi pointed out is that Australia, Malaysia, Singapore and the United Kingdom jointly operate the Five Power Defence Arrangement (FPDA) integrated air defence centre based in Malaysia.

He said that Australia had even funded the modernisation of the centre back in 1990. The modernisation entailed for the centre to be able to "recognised air picture" of all of Southeast Asian airspace using feeds from both civil and military radars.

"That centre has a live feed into the Australian Air Defence Ground Environment (ADGE) which underwent extensive modernisation across the 2000s. The FPDA integrated air defence data is fused with data from JORN in the ADGE, with this data available in real time at centres in Adelaide, Canberra and Newcastle," he explained.

With this information at hand, Mr La Franchi could not understand why MH370 was never detected by Australian system.
So could it be AVM Ludwig will soon be retired AVM Ludwig?? Hmm...make a perfect fit for replacing Bea-Cur and would certainly slot in quite nicely with the M&M master plan team (MMMPT) - especially when it comes to the inevitable (unless miraculously found) duck-up of the cover-up of MH370...

MTF...

[Whitehall_Bin_Men]

MH370: Australia Seems Conspiring to Hide Something, Random Letter Sparks Questions on Au’s Security Radar
By Athena Yenko @AringoYenko on May 22 2014 5:17 PM

A random letter from John Williams from Lemon Tree Passage posted to Newcastle Herald's opinion section is now stirring interest from conspiracy theorists.

Mr William's letter said that Australia's security system is capable of tracking MH370 but why this system did not track the plane is such a perplexity.

http://www.ibtimes.com.au/mh370-australia-seems-conspiring-hide-someth ing-random-letter-sparks-questions-aus-security-radar

"REGARDING missing Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370: Australia has a very high-tech, early warning coastal security system formally called the Jindalee Operational Radar Network (JORN).It can track surface craft as well as aircraft the size of a Cessna 182 at 3000 kilometres. If an unidentified aircraft, as suggested, came down our north-west coast, automatic alarms should have activated. If an aircraft the size of Boeing 777 with no identity response got through, what next? Or did it not enter our airspace?"

Curiously, a journalist named Peter La Franchi commented in detail, expressing his opinion that Australia, clearly has a lot more explaining to do, and on a wide number of fronts.

According to Mr La Franchi JORN has a range of at least 12,300km. The capability of this system was shown to journalists, himself included, through the Laverton radar station and the central control station in Adelaide in September 1999. He said Defence had actually demonstrated JORN's capability when the system was utilised by US to test its radar technology as was written in a press release dated July 27 2004. He implied that indeed, with JORN, MH370 should have been detected by Australian radar.


Mr La Franchi explained further that the Laverton, WA radar is aligned as a right angle, with the two array antenna extending from just west of north to due south west and due south east.

"This means this a permanent lobe of the radar facing across the Indian Ocean. The radar can be seen on Google Earth at -28.314032, 122.843153. If the radar is switched on, then the left lobe can only look directly into the Northwest, which is the identical direction the radar must look if it is to monitor the approaches to Australia's island territories. If as Defence has claimed, in statements to a number of media on 17-18 March 2014, that JORN was monitoring the northwest shelf area out to the island territories, then the left lobe was clearly switched on," he explained thoroughly.


With this, he explained that JORN can search most of the way to India.

"Given this, the only way for the radar not to have detected something like MH370 is for it to be switched off at the time, which raises its own questions."

The most interesting detail the Mr La Franchi pointed out is that Australia, Malaysia, Singapore and the United Kingdom jointly operate the Five Power Defence Arrangement (FPDA) integrated air defence centre based in Malaysia.

He said that Australia had even funded the modernisation of the centre back in 1990. The modernisation entailed for the centre to be able to "recognised air picture" of all of Southeast Asian airspace using feeds from both civil and military radars.

"That centre has a live feed into the Australian Air Defence Ground Environment (ADGE) which underwent extensive modernisation across the 2000s. The FPDA integrated air defence data is fused with data from JORN in the ADGE, with this data available in real time at centres in Adelaide, Canberra and Newcastle," he explained.

With this information at hand, Mr La Franchi could not understand why MH370 was never detected by Australian system.

"If the FPDA recognised air defence picture was operating - and it appears from Malaysian media claims that it was - then Australian defence force personnel would have been able to see that same data at the same time."

[Whitehall_Bin_Men]

Tuesday, April 01, 2014
MALAYSIAN AIRLINES MH370 - INSIDE JOB
http://aangirfan.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/malaysian-airlines-mh370-stole n.html?m=1

Philip Wood and Sarah Bajc.

James R reports

Reportedly, Philip Wood, a passenger on MH370, posted a message and photo on a forum, after he disappeared.

http://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread...4494/#27834944



Allegedly, the phone message below was left on March 19th by ‘anonymous’ who later says that his name is ‘Philip Wood’ and he titles his message ‘help’ and goes on to say:

"I have been held hostage by unknown military personnel after my flight was hijacked (blindfolded).

"I work for IBM and I have managed to hide my cellphone in my @ss during the hijack.

"I have been separated from the other passengers and I am in a cell. My name is Philip Wood.

"I think I have been drugged as well and cannot think clearly."

'Help' Message On Internet Saying Plane Was Hijacked?

Reportedly, the photo is completely black; information encoded in the photo viewed by right clicking the file and selecting Properties and then Details, provides access to a number of details about when and where the photo was taken.

These indicate that the photo was taken at a place with almost identical co-ordinates as Diego Garcia.

This could be faked.

One big problem is that Wood's partner Sarah Bajc clearly does not believe it, neither do his family apparently.

[TonyGosling]

By email

[TonyGosling]

MH370: Everything we now know about aviation’s greatest mystery
https://www.independent.co.uk/travel/news-and-advice/mh370-latest-news -malaysia-airlines-missing-plane-final-report-pilot-terrorism-crash-a8 469926.html

SIMON CALDER TRAVEL CORRESPONDENT

The investigators’ last word on the greatest mystery in aviation history appears on page 443 of the MH370 Safety Investigation Report: “The Team is unable to determine the real cause for the disappearance of MH370.”

But they have covered every aspect from the credit-card records of the captain to the species of barnacles found on the aircraft’s flaperon when it washed up on a beach on the island of Reunion.

The 19-strong Malaysian investigation team was supported by national organisations, including the UK Air Accidents Investigation Branch and the Australian Transport Safety Bureau.

The final report is dedicated to “the memory of the 239 passengers and crew missing on MH370”. For their families, friends and colleagues, it at least fills in some of the blanks and rules out some of the speculation about the loss. And for the travelling public, the report makes some intriguing revelations.

What happened to flight MH370?

The Malaysia Airlines (MAS) Boeing 777 was on a routine flight from Kuala Lumpur International Airport (KLIA) to Beijing on 8 March 2014 with 227 passengers and 12 crew on board, commanded by Zaharie Amad Shah, a highly experienced captain. The first officer was Fariq Abdul Hamid, who was on his first Boeing 777 mission without a training captain overseeing him.

At 1.19am, the captain acknowledged an instruction from Malaysian air-traffic controllers with the words: “Good night Malaysian Three Seven Zero.” This was the last recorded radio transmission from MH370. “He did not read back the assigned frequency, which was inconsistent with radio-telephony procedures,” notes the report.

During the handover from Malaysian to Vietnamese air-traffic controllers, the aircraft disappeared.

Analysis of radar and satellite data shows that it suddenly changed course, flew back across peninsula Malaysia, turning south of Penang to the northwest and then towards the southern Indian Ocean.

The plane ultimately ran out of fuel and crashed in the Indian Ocean west of Australia, thousands of miles from its intended destination.

“There is insufficient information to determine if the aircraft broke up in the air or during impact with the ocean,” says the report.

What do we know about the plane’s turn off course?

“The turn would have been carried out with the autopilot disengaged, as it was not possible to achieve a turn time of 2 minutes and 10 seconds (as suggested by recorded data) using autopilot,” says the report.

Why did it “disappear” from radar screens?

The transponder stopped transmitting, “whether with intent or otherwise”.

“Although it cannot be conclusively ruled out that an aircraft or system malfunction was a cause, based on the limited evidence available, it is more likely that the loss of communication prior to the diversion is due to the systems being manually turned off or power interrupted to them.”

MH370 debris - in pictures
MH370 debris
MH370 debris
MH370 debris
MH370 debris

7
show all
“It was found that it was difficult to maintain successful call connectivity above 8,000 ft. However, one brand of phone was able to make a call at 20,000 ft.”

How was the disappearance handled?

Extremely badly, at first. The report catalogues shortcomings and mistakes by air traffic controllers and staff in the airline duty office.

Vietnamese air-traffic controllers failed to question the disappearance for 12 minutes. Had the report been made earlier, ground stations and other aircraft could have begun the search for the missing plane while there was still time to track it.

Staff in the Malaysia Airlines Operation Control Centre reported variously that MH370 was over Cambodian or Vietnamese airspace, neither of which was correct. The false assertions led to early suggestions that the Boeing had landed in Cambodia, raising hopes among relatives of the passengers and crew that they were safe – only to be later dashed.


READ MORE
Investigator says MH370 pilot was likely unconscious as plane crashed
Again, time was wasted in following up these mistaken statements.

Military air-traffic controllers saw the aircraft way out of position, but did nothing “since it was ‘friendly’ and did not pose any threat to national airspace security, integrity and sovereignty”.

There was a long delay before the first “DETRESFA” message, indicating: “There is a reasonable certainty that an aircraft and its occupants are threatened by grave and imminent danger and require immediate assistance.”

Did technical issues cause the disappearance?

Investigators do not rule out a mechanical problem, but consider it highly unlikely: “There is no evidence to suggest that a malfunction had caused the aircraft to divert from its filed flight plan route.

“The aircraft’s maintenance history and events prior to the last flight do not show any issues that could have contributed and resulted in the deviation and subsequent changes in the flight path.

“The analysis of the relevant aircraft systems taking into account the route followed by the aircraft and the height at which it flew, constrained by its performance and range capability, does not suggest a mechanical problem with the aircraft.

“The investigation is unable to determine any plausible aircraft or systems failure mode that would lead to the observed systems deactivation, diversion from the filed flight plan route and the subsequent flight path taken by the aircraft.”

Is it likely someone was at the controls?

Yes, but it is not clear who. Captain Shah was the last person to be heard by air-traffic controllers.

The report notes: “At the time of flight MH370, there were no requirements for an additional crew member in the cockpit in the event when one of two pilots were to leave the cockpit.

"However, in response to flight MH370, MAS has, since introduced this requirement into its safety procedures effective 27 March 2014, a procedure subsequently introduced by other airlines following the GermanWings Flight 9525 accident on 24 March 2015.”

In a very significant phrase, the investigators say: “The Team does not exclude the possibility of intervention by a third party.

“It could not be established whether the aircraft was flown by anyone other than the pilots”.

If not the pilots, who could have flown the plane off course?

A passenger, or a member of cabin crew. The report does not countenance the possibility that there was one or more other people on board besides those on the manifest.

What was the state of mind of the captain and first officer?

On the captain, the report says: “There was no known history of apathy, anxiety, or irritability. There were no significant changes in his lifestyle, interpersonal conflict or family stresses. Similarly, the FO’s ability and professional approach to work was reported to be good.

“There is no evidence to suggest that the PIC [pilot in command, ie captain] and FO [first office] experienced recent changes or difficulties in personal relationships or that there were any conflicts or problems between them.

Potential passenger belongings from MH370





13
show all
“There had been no financial stress or impending insolvency, recent or additional insurance coverage purchased or recent behavioural changes for the crew. The radio-telephony communications … conformed to the routine procedure and no evidence of anxiety or stress was detected in the communications.”

On reports of the captain’s health, the report says: “Scrutiny of his credit card transactions failed to reveal a pattern of regular purchase of over-the-counter medication of any significance, either in local or overseas pharmacies.”

What about reports that the captain practised manoeuvres on a flight simulator at home?

Simulator equipment was taken from Captain Shah’s home shortly after the disappearance, and analysed.

“There were seven ‘manually programmed’ waypoint coordinates, that when connected together, will create a flight path from KLIA to an area south of the Indian Ocean through the Andaman Sea.” But a forensic report concluded “there were no unusual activities other than game-related flight simulations”.

Could the plane have been flown remotely?

No. In 2003, Boeing took out a “Patent on Remote Control Take-over of Aircraft”, designed to foil hijack attempts. “The ‘uninterruptible’ autopilot envisioned by the patent could be activated, either by pilots, on-board sensors or remotely via radio or satellite links by the airline or government agencies if there were attempts to forcibly gain control of the cockpit.

“This system once activated would disallow pilot inputs and prevent anyone on-board from interrupting the automatic takeover. Thus, the personnel on-board could not be forced into carrying out the demands of any unauthorised person(s).”

But the aircraft maker told investigators: “Boeing has confirmed that it has not implemented the patented system or any other technology to remotely pilot a commercial aircraft and is not aware of any Boeing commercial aircraft that has incorporated such technology.”

The report concludes; “There is no evidence to support the belief that control of the aircraft 9M-MRO (operating as MH370) could have been or was taken over remotely as the technology was not implemented on commercial aircraft.”

Could it have been a terror attack?

The word “terror” is not even mentioned in the report, but it notes “no traces of explosion were found” on two pieces of debris that are almost certainly from the cabin interior.

What about the suggestion of a cargo fire?

This theory is based on the fact that mangosteen fruits and lithium batteries were stored in the same cargo compartment, and “could have got into contact with the batteries and produced hazardous fumes or in a worst case scenario caused a short circuit and/or fire”.

But tests showed “the two items tested could not be the cause in the disappearance of MH370”.

Is there any other information in the report?

Yes. The report reveals that the first officer’s mobile phone was in contact with a ground station on the island of Penang. “The signal ‘hit’ however did not record any communication except to confirm that it was in the ‘on’ mode.” A plane was sent up to 24,000 feet to see how mobile phones perform at altitude.

One cabin crew member was missing. “To efficiently carry out the duties that include in-flight customer services including serving passenger meals, MAS had established the need to carry 11 cabin crew members.

“MH370 however departed with only 10 cabin crew members, 1 less than the normal compliment. MAS was then facing acute shortage of cabin crew resulting in flights departing with under-strength crew complements from the numbers normally required on many of their aircraft operations in the past year.”

The investigators do not ascribe particular significance to either of these aspects.

What recommendations does the report make?

Mainly about keeping track of planes: “The disappearance of MH370 and the search effort are unprecedented in commercial aviation history. Improvements must be undertaken to ensure that this type of event is identified as soon as possible, and mechanisms are in place to track an aircraft that is not following its filed flight plan for any reason.

“In this technological epoch, the international aviation community needs to provide assurance to the travelling public that the location of current-generation commercial aircraft is always known. It is unacceptable to do otherwise.”

Will we ever find out what happened?

Two extensive underwater searches have failed to find any trace of MH370. It may be that advances in underwater drone technology allow a much lower-cost, larger-scale search of the sea floor to be carried out.

“This Report will necessarily be limited by a significant lack of evidence,” concede the investigators, pointing out: “The aircraft’s Flight Data Recorder (FDR) and Cockpit Voice Recorder (CVR) have not yet been located.”

The aircraft was equipped with two crash-protected recorders, both of which are designed to be protected against immersion in sea water to a depth of 20.000 feet. In the case of Air France flight 447, which crashed in the Atlantic, the recorders were invaluable in piecing together events that led to the tragedy.

The FDR records 1,300 parameters from the most recent 25 hours of flight; it could reveal the controls that were commanded during the final flight of the Boeing 777. The CVR records sounds on the flight deck, but may be limited to the last two hours of the flight, rather than containing evidence of what happened when the fateful first turn was made.

If and when the main wreckage is located, it could also provide clues about who was on the flight deck, as well as evidence such as whether the oxygen masks were deployed – from which investigators could then begin to ​piece together an answer to the mystery of MH370

[TonyGosling]

MH370 investigators say they can't rule out 'unlawful interference' as final report leaves relatives disappointed
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/07/30/disappointment-relatives-l ong-awaited-investigation-mh370-proves/

30 JULY 2018 • 2:19PM
Follow
Investigators released a report on missing Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 on Monday, saying the Boeing 777's controls were likely deliberately manipulated to take it off course but they were not able to determine who was responsible.

The 495-page report draws no conclusion about what happened aboard the plane that vanished with 239 people on board en route to Beijing from Kuala Lumpur on March 8, 2014, leaving one of the world's greatest aviation mysteries unsolved.

"The answer can only be conclusive if the wreckage is found," Kok Soo Chon, head of the MH370 safety investigation team, told reporters.

On May 29, Malaysia called off a three-month search by US firm Ocean Infinity, which spanned 112,000 sq km (43,243 sq miles) in the southern Indian Ocean and ended with no significant findings.

It was the second major search after Australia, China and Malaysia ended a fruitless A$200 million (£112.06 million) search across an area of 120,000 sq km (46,332 sq miles) last year.

Sarah Nor, the mother of Norliakmar Hamid, a passenger on missing Malaysia Airlines flight MH370, cries as she arrives for the final investigation report
Sarah Nor, the mother of Norliakmar Hamid, a passenger on missing Malaysia Airlines flight MH370, cries as she arrives for the final investigation report CREDIT: MOHD RASFAN/ AFP
Malaysian and international investigators have been looking into why the jet veered thousands of miles off course from its scheduled route before eventually plunging into the Indian Ocean.

The last communication from the plane was from the Captain Zaharie Ahmad Shah who signed off with “Good night, Malaysian three seven zero”, as the plane left the Malaysian airspace and later turned off course.

A 440-page final report by the Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) last year showed that Zaharie had flown a route on his home flight simulator six weeks earlier that was "initially similar" to the one actually taken by MH370.

The Malaysian police previously concluded there were no unusual activity on the home simulator.

Kok said the investigators examined the history of the pilot and the first officer, and they were satisfied with their background and training and mental health.

"We are not of the opinion it could have been an event committed by the pilots," he said, but added they were not ruling out any possibility since the in-air turn back was done manually and the systems in the plane were also manually turned off.

"We cannot exclude that there was an unlawful interference by a third party," Kok said.

He added all the passengers of the 15 countries had their backgrounds checked by their respective countries and all came back with a clean bill of health.

Conspiracy theories

The inability to locate MH370's crash site has fuelled conspiracy theories and online debates over the last four years.

Theories range from mechanical error or a remote-controlled crash, to more bizarre explanations like alien abduction and a Russian plot.

Kok said they looked into each theory and rumour raised on social media.

"We had over 60 allegations...we removed them one-by-one and saw what remained behind," Kok said.

[TonyGosling]

Malaysian plane: 20 passengers worked for ELECTRONIC WARFARE and MILITARY RADAR firm

A US technology company which had 20 senior staff on board Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370 had just launched a new electronic warfare gadget for military radar systems in the days before the Boeing 777 went missing.

By TED JEORY - PUBLISHED: 08:19, Wed, Mar 19, 2014
https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/465557/Malaysian-plane-20-on-boar d-worked-for-ELECTRONIC-WARFARE-and-radar-defence-company

DEVELOPMENT Freescale Semiconductor which had 20 workers on MH370 had just launched new radar chips DEVELOPMENT: Freescale Semiconductor which had 20 workers on MH370 had just launched new radar chips [EXPRESS]

Freescale Semiconductor, which makes powerful microchips for industries including defence, released the powerful new products to the American market on March 3.

Five days later, Flight MH370 took off from Kuala Lumpur for Beijing with 239 people on board including 20 working for Freescale.

Twelve were from Malaysia, while eight were Chinese nationals.

Freescale’s spokesman Mitch Haws has said: “These were all people with a lot of experience and technical background and they were very important people.

“It’s definitely a loss for the company.”

Freescale’s shareholders include the Carlyle Group of private equity investors whose past advisers have included ex-US president George Bush Sr and former British Prime Minister John Major.

These were all people with a lot of experience and technical background – they were very important

Carlyle’s previous heavyweight clients include the Saudi Binladin Group, the construction firm owned by the family of Osama bin Laden.

The fact that Freescale had so many highly qualified staff on board the Boeing 777 had already prompted wild conspiracy theories about what might have happened.

The company says they were flying to China to improve its consumer products operations, but Freescale’s fresh links to electronic warfare technology is likely to trigger more speculation and deepen the mystery.

Experts have been baffled how a large passenger jet seems to have flown undetected and possibly beaten military radar systems for up to six hours.

Avoiding radar via “cloaking technology” has long been one of the objectives of the defence industry and Freescale has been active developing chips for military radar.

On its website, the company says its radio frequency products meet the requirements for applications in “avionics, radar, communications, missile guidance, electronic warfare and identification friend or foe”.

Last June it announced it was creating a team of specialists dedicated to producing “radio frequency power products” for the defence industry.

And on March 3, it announced it was releasing 11 of these new gadgets for use in “high frequency, VHF and low-band UHF radar and radio communications”.

The company did not respond to questions from Express Online, including whether any of its missing employees had been working on the defence products.

University student Yue Wenchao, 26, who is reported to be one of the passengers on board [ENTERPRISE]

It neither provided any responses to the latest bizarre conspiracy theory being widely published on the comments sections of newspaper websites and other internet forums.

The comment reads: “It reads: “Have you pieced together the puzzle of missing flight 370 to Beijing China? If not, here are your missing pieces.

“Patents Patents Patents.

“Four days after the missing flight MH370 a patent is approved by the Patent Office, four of the five Patent holders are Chinese employees of Freescale Semiconductor of Austin TX.

“Patent is divided up on 20 per cent increments to five holders.

“Peidong Wang, Suzhou, China, (20 per cent); Zhijun Chen, Suzhou, China, (20 per cent); Zhihong Cheng, Suzhou, China, (20 per cent); Li Ying, Suzhou, China, (20 per cent); Freescale Semiconductor (20 per cent).

“If a patent holder dies, then the remaining holders equally share the dividends of the deceased if not disputed in a will.

“If four of the five dies, then the remaining one Patent holder gets 100 per cent of the wealth of the patent.

“That remaining live Patent holder is Freescale Semiconductor.”

It adds: “Here is your motive for the missing Beijing plane. As all four Chinese members of the Patent were passengers on the missing plane.

“Patent holders can alter the proceeds legally by passing wealth to their heirs. “However, they cannot do so until the Patent is approved. So when the plane went missing, the patent had not been approved.”

However, the absurd theory does not add up.

Although a Freescale patent does exist under number US8650327, none of the names listed actually appear on the passenger manifest released by the Malaysian authorities.

The search continues for Flight MH370 but speculation surrounding its fate grows by the day.

Some experts believe the plane was hijacked–possibly by the pilots–or that there was a struggle on board which led to a catastrophic decompression.

However, no seat cushions or luggage that would have been expected to float have yet been found in the vast Indian Ocean where it might have crashed.


RELATED ARTICLES
Malaysia missing plane latest: Now even Malaysian Airlines ground crew face probe
Malaysia Airlines missing plane latest: Co-pilot transmitted final words from the jet
Missing MH 370: Chinese relatives of passengers threaten to go on hunger strike
UK university student among passengers aboard missing Malaysian plane
Bomb could have been concealed in cargo of fruit on missing Malaysia Airlines plane

freescale semiconductor, malaysian airlines, electronic warfare, flight mh370, radar systems, malaysian plane, carlyle group, osama bin laden, saudi bHull

[TonyGosling]

Flight MH370 Is At Diego Garcia - Here's The Proof

Link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QpxN1tlqDeg
Montagraph
Published on 23 Mar 2014
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCRVno4GDsO4Fs2lLAHGKfkQ

[TonyGosling]

Flight MH370 Is At Diego Garcia

Link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ImMqLjYiT64
In this previously unseen clip from our TRUTH interviews, comedian/activist/author DICK GREGORY shares his thoughts on Captain Phillips and the Somali Pirates as well as the Malaysian Airlines Flight 370, which went missing in March, 2014. Look for our 1 hour special, DICK GREGORY: MORE TRUTH only on Reelblack TV. Camera: Daryl DeBrest. Special thanks: Lillian Gregory, The Rrazz Room. Follow Baba Dick @IAmDickGregory A Reelblack exclusive.


Malaysian plane: 20 passengers worked for ELECTRONIC WARFARE and MILITARY RADAR firm
A US technology company which had 20 senior staff on board Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370 had just launched a new electronic warfare gadget for military radar systems in the days before the Boeing 777 went missing.
By TED JEORY - PUBLISHED: 08:19, Wed, Mar 19, 2014
https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/465557/Malaysian-plane-20-on-boar d-worked-for-ELECTRONIC-WARFARE-and-radar-defence-company

DEVELOPMENT Freescale Semiconductor which had 20 workers on MH370 had just launched new radar chips DEVELOPMENT: Freescale Semiconductor which had 20 workers on MH370 had just launched new radar chips [EXPRESS]

[TonyGosling]

Coincidence? Rothschild Inherits Freescale Semiconductor Patent - result of engineers deaths on flight MH-370 (worth a read)
Published on January 1, 2016
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/coincidence-rothschild-inherits-freesca le-patent-bryan/

Bryan Lambert

Maybe a huge coincidence that has provided an enormous windfall to the Rothschilds who love hoarding money irrespective who may be hurt.

The disappearance of four members of a patent semiconductor traveling on Malaysia Airlines MH370 makes the famous billionaire Jacob Rothschild as the sole owner of the important patent.

The mystery surrounding the Malaysian Airlines MH-370 is growing as each day passes with more mysterious silence shadowing the disappearance of the airline. More and more conspiracy theories are beginning to boom on the internet. One of the conspiracies one is the Freescale Semiconductor’s ARM microcontroller ‘KL-03? which is a new improvised version of an older microcontroller KL-02. This crazy story about how Illuminati Rothschild exploited the airlines to gain full Patent Rights of an incredible KL-03 micro-chip is going haywire across the internet especially when it’s involving Jacob Rothschild as the evil master plotter.

A US technology company which had 20 senior staff on board Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370 had just launched a new electronic warfare gadget for military radar systems in the days before the Boeing 777 went missing.

Freescale Semiconductor has been developing microprocessors, sensors and other technology for the past 50 years. The technology it creates is commonly referred to as embedded processors, which according to the firm are “stand-alone semiconductors that perform dedicated computing functions in electronic systems”.

Freescale semi-conductor new technology -


Why were so many Freescale employees traveling together? What were their jobs. Were they on a mission and if so what was this mission? Can these employees be the cause of the disappearance of this plane? Could the plane have been then hijacked and these people kidnapped? Did these employees hold valuable information, did they have any valuable cargo with them? Did they know company and technological secrets? With all the might of technology why cant this plane be located? Where is this plane where are these people?”



The 20 Freescale employees, among 239 people on flight MH370, were mostly engineers and other experts working to make the company’s chip facilities in Tianjin, China, and Kuala Lumpur more efficient, said Mitch Haws, vice president, global communications and investor relations.

“These were people with a lot of experience and technical background and they were very important people,” Haws said. “It’s definitely a loss for the company.”

In Malaysia, Freescale’s modern operations facility that manufactures and tests integrated circuits (IC) is based in Petaling Jaya.

Based on information obtained from Freescale’s website, the facility began operations in 1972 covering an eight hectare site and is specifically designed for the manufacturing and testing of microprocessors, digital signal processors and integrated radio frequency circuits.

[Whitehall_Bin_Men]

https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/1179575/mh370-news-malaysia-airli nes-missing-plane-conspiracy-theory-air-traffic-CAPTIO

[Whitehall_Bin_Men]

https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/1179575/mh370-news-malaysia-airli nes-missing-plane-conspiracy-theory-air-traffic-CAPTIO

[Whitehall_Bin_Men]

MH370 announcement: Harrowing new theory to be revealed - ‘Were they misled?’

https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/1179575/mh370-news-malaysia-airli nes-missing-plane-conspiracy-theory-air-traffic-CAPTIO

MH370 investigators are preparing to announce a new theory of what really happened to the Malaysia Airlines plane, which remains missing five years after disappearing off radar.
By LUKE HAWKER
PUBLISHED: 15:45, Wed, Sep 18, 2019 | UPDATED: 17:16, Wed, Sep 18, 2019
6
MH370: Expert says plane disappearance was NOT an accident
Play Video

On March 8, 2014, Malaysia Airlines' scheduled international flight from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing disappeared with 239 people, including the crew on board. At 6pm today, a group of aviation experts will reveal a new MH370 theory at an event in Brussels. Jean-Luc Marchand; Jean-Marc Garot and Argiris Kamoulakos will unveil new details at the event titled: ‘Flight MH370: was air traffic control deliberately misled?’

RELATED ARTICLES

MH370: How investigators were ‘silenced and arrested’ in Malaysia

MH370 bombshell: How surprise debris discovery helps pinpoint search
The Royal Aeronautical Society, who are hosting the event, said the group would present a “plausible trajectory” for the missing plane.

ADVERTISING

inRead invented by Teads
The society’s preview said: “Three members of the CAPTIO Team will be in Brussels to present their views on the disappearance of MH370: Jean-Luc Marchand; Jean-Marc Garot and Argiris Kamoulakos.

PROMOTED STORY
The One Thing Windows Users Should Do Before Turning Off Their Computer
(SecuritySavers.org)
“They are engineers who have used information gleaned from official reports, radar and satellite data, publications from the scientific community and evidence derived from debris recovered to posit theories about what could have happened.

mh370 news
On March 8, 2014 the Malaysia Airlines flight from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing disappeared (Image: GETTY [Stock])
“They will illustrate a plausible trajectory that might have taken advantage of the shortcomings in civil and military air traffic control – and the antiquated air/ground communication systems in particular.

“People in command of the flight – the pilots? hijackers? – would have been able to fly practically undetected.

“One thing is known from the Inmarsat communication watchdog data: the flight ended in the Indian Ocean.

“The three CAPTIO members will present the latest results from their analyses, following on the presentation they made to the RAeS Paris Branch on 9 October 2018.”

DON'T MISS

MH370 news: Pilot 'wiped suspicious data' on home flight simulator [VIDEO]
MH370 shock: Anonymous mechanic admits 'lapse in memory’ over oxygen [ANALYSIS]
MH370: Does 'secret' clue prove co-pilot made distress call? [INSIGHT]

MH370

The MH370 flight vanished with 239 people, including the crew on board (Image: GETTY [stock])
RELATED ARTICLES

MH370 shock theory: Plane was controlled by 'machines not people!'

MH370 shock theory: Plane ‘stalled in mid-air as crew panicked'
The official search led by the Governments of Australia, Malaysia and China ended in January 2017.

Investigators were unable to reach a definitive conclusion as to what might have happened during its final moments.

A private search by Ocean Infinity signed by Malaysia began a year later in January 2018.

The team had searched more than 37,000 square miles (96,000 square kilometres) of the Indian ocean but the hunt came to an end just five months later.

[TonyGosling]

Malaysian plane: 20 passengers worked for ELECTRONIC WARFARE and MILITARY RADAR firm
https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/465557/Malaysian-plane-20-on-boar d-worked-for-ELECTRONIC-WARFARE-and-radar-defence-company

A US technology company which had 20 senior staff on board Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370 had just launched a new electronic warfare gadget for military radar systems in the days before the Boeing 777 went missing.
By TED JEORY
PUBLISHED: 08:19, Wed, Mar 19, 2014


DEVELOPMENT Freescale Semiconductor which had 20 workers on MH370 had just launched new radar chipsDEVELOPMENT: Freescale Semiconductor which had 20 workers on MH370 had just launched new radar chips [EXPRESS]

Freescale Semiconductor, which makes powerful microchips for industries including defence, released the powerful new products to the American market on March 3.

Five days later, Flight MH370 took off from Kuala Lumpur for Beijing with 239 people on board including 20 working for Freescale.

Twelve were from Malaysia, while eight were Chinese nationals.

Freescale’s spokesman Mitch Haws has said: “These were all people with a lot of experience and technical background and they were very important people.

“It’s definitely a loss for the company.”

PROMOTED STORY
The One Thing Windows Users Should Do Before Turning Off Their Computer
(SecuritySavers.org)
Freescale’s shareholders include the Carlyle Group of private equity investors whose past advisers have included ex-US president George Bush Sr and former British Prime Minister John Major.

These were all people with a lot of experience and technical background – they were very important

Freescale Semiconductor

Carlyle’s previous heavyweight clients include the Saudi Binladin Group, the construction firm owned by the family of Osama bin Laden.

The fact that Freescale had so many highly qualified staff on board the Boeing 777 had already prompted wild conspiracy theories about what might have happened.

The company says they were flying to China to improve its consumer products operations, but Freescale’s fresh links to electronic warfare technology is likely to trigger more speculation and deepen the mystery.

freescale semiconductor, malaysian airlines, electronic warfare, flight mh370, radar systems, malaysian plane, carlyle group, osama bin laden, saudiA map of the latest search areas in the southern Indian Ocean today [EPA]

Experts have been baffled how a large passenger jet seems to have flown undetected and possibly beaten military radar systems for up to six hours.

Avoiding radar via “cloaking technology” has long been one of the objectives of the defence industry and Freescale has been active developing chips for military radar.

On its website, the company says its radio frequency products meet the requirements for applications in “avionics, radar, communications, missile guidance, electronic warfare and identification friend or foe”.

Last June it announced it was creating a team of specialists dedicated to producing “radio frequency power products” for the defence industry.

And on March 3, it announced it was releasing 11 of these new gadgets for use in “high frequency, VHF and low-band UHF radar and radio communications”.

The company did not respond to questions from Express Online, including whether any of its missing employees had been working on the defence products.

freescale semiconductor, malaysian airlines, electronic warfare, flight mh370, radar systems, malaysian plane, carlyle group, osama bin laden, saudi bHull University student Yue Wenchao, 26, who is reported to be one of the passengers on board [ENTERPRISE]

It neither provided any responses to the latest bizarre conspiracy theory being widely published on the comments sections of newspaper websites and other internet forums.

The comment reads: “It reads: “Have you pieced together the puzzle of missing flight 370 to Beijing China? If not, here are your missing pieces.

“Patents Patents Patents.

“Four days after the missing flight MH370 a patent is approved by the Patent Office, four of the five Patent holders are Chinese employees of Freescale Semiconductor of Austin TX.

“Patent is divided up on 20 per cent increments to five holders.

“Peidong Wang, Suzhou, China, (20 per cent); Zhijun Chen, Suzhou, China, (20 per cent); Zhihong Cheng, Suzhou, China, (20 per cent); Li Ying, Suzhou, China, (20 per cent); Freescale Semiconductor (20 per cent).

“If a patent holder dies, then the remaining holders equally share the dividends of the deceased if not disputed in a will.

“If four of the five dies, then the remaining one Patent holder gets 100 per cent of the wealth of the patent.

“That remaining live Patent holder is Freescale Semiconductor.”

It adds: “Here is your motive for the missing Beijing plane. As all four Chinese members of the Patent were passengers on the missing plane.

“Patent holders can alter the proceeds legally by passing wealth to their heirs. “However, they cannot do so until the Patent is approved. So when the plane went missing, the patent had not been approved.”

RELATED ARTICLES
Malaysia missing plane latest: Now even Malaysian Airlines ground crew face probe
Malaysia Airlines missing plane latest: Co-pilot transmitted final words from the jet
Missing MH 370: Chinese relatives of passengers threaten to go on hunger strike
UK university student among passengers aboard missing Malaysian plane
Bomb could have been concealed in cargo of fruit on missing Malaysia Airlines plane


However, the absurd theory does not add up.

Although a Freescale patent does exist under number US8650327, none of the names listed actually appear on the passenger manifest released by the Malaysian authorities.

The search continues for Flight MH370 but speculation surrounding its fate grows by the day.

Some experts believe the plane was hijacked–possibly by the pilots–or that there was a struggle on board which led to a catastrophic decompression.

However, no seat cushions or luggage that would have been expected to float have yet been found in the vast Indian Ocean where it might have crashed.

[outsider]

'The existence of the Boeing Uninterruptible Autopilot':
https://www.fliegerfaust.com/airplane-hacking-2511031752.html
'The existence of the Boeing Uninterruptible Autopilot
Four other flights were "electronically tampered" with including the following flights...
Click Like to Follow Fliegerfaust Facebook page to get the News ASAP / Share to share this post now.


“at least 108 Boeing airliners were in service that had been modified with QRS11 GyroChips (electronic hijack) and "something more sinister". There was no interest from any quarter. On January 1, 2007, Adam Air 574 was vaporized in Indonesia in a manner exactly like Field McConnell had relayed as a threat."

“During pendency of my warning to the FAA, ALPA, FBI, DoD and NoRAD, the following flights have been lost consistent with Field McConnell's warnings:

Adam Air 574 – 1 January, 2007 Indonesia
Kenya Airways 507 – 5 May, 2007 Kenya
Colgan Air 3407 – 12 February, 2009 Buffalo, New York
Air France 447 – 1 June, 2009 enroute from Rio to Paris
Four other flights were "electronically tampered" with including the following flights:

British Airways 38 London Heathrow
Turkish Airlines 1951 Amsterdam Holland
Northwest 188 Minneapolis
Northwest 253 Detroit"
Field McConnell was born on October 2, 1949 at Harris Hospital, Fort Worth, Tarrant County, Texas in 1949 to a career United States Air Force B29 bomber pilot and aircraft commander, Glenn McConnell, and a WWII United States Army nurse.

1950 to 1959, United States Air Force dependant at MacDill AFB, Tampa Florida
1955-56 1st grade, Helen Hill School, Tampa FL
1956-59 grades 2-4, Tinker Elementary, MacDill AFB, Tampa FL father promoted to colonel, reassigned to Westover AFB, Massachusetts, HQ 8th Air Force
1959-61 grades 5-6, South Hadley Elementary, Massachusetts
1961-63 grades 7-8, South Hadley Intermediate, Massachusetts father transferred to Ramey AFB, Puerto Rico
1963-66 grades 9-11, Ramey High School, Ramey AFB, Aguadilla, PR father transferred to Hickam AFB, Hawaii
1966-67 grade 12, Punahou School, Honolulu Hawaii appointed to United States Naval Academy as a Presidential Alternate, reported 28 June, 1967
1967-1971, studied at United States Naval Academy, graduating 9 June, 1971. Commissioned 2nd Lt United States Marine Corps with guarantee of Aviation Military Operational Specialty
July 1971 to February, 1972, attended USMC The Basic School, July 1971 to February, 1972, qualified as 0301, Infantry Platoon Commander
February, 1972 to June, 1972 attended US Naval Aviation Indoctrination and Primary flight training, Naval Air Pensacola, Florida
July, 1972 to December, 1972 attended US Naval Aviation Basic Jet Training, McCain Naval Air Station, Meridian, Mississippi
January, 1973 to June 1973, attended US Naval Aviation Advanced Jet Training, NAS Kingsville, Texas
Designated US Naval Aviator 22 June, 1973
July, 1973 to January, 1974; assigned to VMA-102, VMFA-101, Marine Corps Air Station Yuma, Arizona and USAF C130 Combat Crew Training at Little Rock AFB, Arkansas
February 1974 to October, 1974, assigned to Marine Aerial Refueler Transport Squadron 352, MCAS El Toro, California flying KC130F
October 1974 to May 1977, assigned to US Navy Training Squadron 21, Chase Field Naval Air Station, Beeville Texas. Instructor pilot, TA4J teaching advanced jet training syllabus.
Resigned from United States Marine Corps when recruited by North Dakota Air National Guard, Fargo ND, to fly F4D with 178th Fighter Interceptor Squadron, NDANG.
1978: William Tell, World-wide fighter competition
Hired by North Central Airlines on 2 November, 1978. Flew Convair 580 domestically
North Central merged with Southern Airways to become Republic Airlines July, 1979. Flew DC9, MD80,B727 and CV580 domestically Republic Airlines bought by Northwest Airlines January, 1986. Flew B727, DC10 and A320 domestic and international flights.
1986: William Tell, World-wide fighter competition
North Dakota ANG transitioned from F4 Phantom to F16 Fighting Falcon, 1990
Retired from Air National Guard on 22 June, 1993 with final F16 flight on Pearl Harbor Day, 1992. Refused to serve under William Jefferson Clinton per information given by General Hunter H. Harris IV USAF who had secured my appointment to Annapolis.
On December 10, 2006, Field McConnell reported the illegal modification on Boeing aircraft to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Northwest Airlines, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), NORAD and the USNA Superintendent. Shortly thereafter, Northwest Airlines, compelled by the United States Department of Justice (USDoJ), silenced Field McConnell, due to his inadvertent reopening of a safety issue closed in the June, 2006 settlement of a $615 million settlement paid by Boeing to the United States Department of Justice (USDOJ).

Field McConnell filed Civil Case 3:07-cv-24 at the District Court, District of North Dakota on the 27th of February, 2007. The case is titled 'FIELD MCCONNELL v. ALPA and BOEING'. Boeing admitted on March 3, 2007 the existence of the Boeing Uninterruptible Autopilot. To date, 9 February, 2012, Airline Pilots Association (ALPA) has suppressed this information.

Field McConnell retired March 13, 2007 to preserve his EXPERT WITNESS VALUE in US District Courts. Civil Case 3:07-cv-49 HAWKS CAFE v. GLOBAL GUARDIANS was filed on May Day, May 1, 2007 in District Court, District of North Dakota.

Field McConnell was recruited by Air Astana to fly Airbus A320 as Captain at Almaty and Astana, Kazakhstan serving there from February 6, 2008 until August 6, 2009. Captain Field McConnell flew with Muslim copilots around tall buildings. On December 13, 2008, an aircraft Captain Field McConnell was the captain of was electronically 'tampered with' having no effect on Field McConnell's performance as a highly experienced pilot.

While serving as Airbus Captain in Kazakhstan, Field McConnell filed Civil Case 1:08-1600 (RMC) (Pro Se) September, 2008, MCCONNELL v. ALPA. Civil Case 1:08-1600 (RMC) (Pro Se) was dismissed by Judge Rosemary M. Collyer in January, 2011

During pendency of my warning to the FAA, ALPA, FBI, DoD and NoRAD, the following flights have been lost consistent with Field McConnell's warnings:

Adam Air 574 – 1 January, 2007 Indonesia
Kenya Airways 507 – 5 May, 2007 Kenya
Colgan Air 3407 – 12 February, 2009 Buffalo, New York
Air France 447 – 1 June, 2009 enroute from Rio to Paris
Four other flights were "electronically tampered" with including the following flights:

British Airways 38 London Heathrow
Turkish Airlines 1951 Amsterdam Holland
Northwest 188 Minneapolis
Northwest 253 Detroit
Fargo Forum, called Field McConnell at home early in the after noon of September 11, 2001, the very same day of the attack on New York and the Pentagon in Washington. The reporter from the Fargo Forum talked about forty minutes, then asked if Field McConnell could be photographed for a front page story. The Fargo Forum, a Pullitzer Prize winning daily in Fargo North Dakota, sent a photographer out to Field McConnell's farm which was near Glyndon Minnesota, thirteen miles east of Fargo North Dakota.

Field McConnell still retains that front page of that newspaper; and on page A5 dated September 12, 2001, the headline read: "Our Nation Saw Evil", with a photograph of the rubble at the WTC complex, President George Bush, Osama bin Laden and Field McConnell.

This demonstrated clearly that Field McConnell was sought out as an "expert" on 9-11. The newspaper knew that Field McConnell had flown with and retired from the North Dakota Air National Guard as a Lieutenant Colonel after having flown sixteen years with them in the F4 Phantom and F16 Falcon fighters.

Sadly, Field McConnell's son is tracked and targeted by more cowards, including RADSAT, Iridium, Tomoye, and Boeing corporations, in Quebec and Chicago; and one more, McConnell International LLC. There is no relation, but Field's sister is a principal at McConnell International.

If David Hawkins and Field McConnell can solve 9-11 in five and a half years, what have the Federal Bureau of Investigation and Central Intelligence Agency and the national Security Agency been doing with tax dollars?

The US Intelligence community has been totally inerted by Tomoye in Quebec and McConnell in Washington DC. Interestingly enough, their Washington offices are within one block of each other on same street. Perhaps their cells will be on the same cellblock soon.

Field McConnell's interest has remained very high as his college classmate (USNA '71) was the Captain on American Airlines Flight 77, which was vaporized over the Atlantic forty-five minutes prior to the unmanned aerial vehicle that killed another United States Naval Academy alumni, Captain Gerald 'Fish' DeConto, whose window in Wedge One of the Pentagon the object flew into. Field McConnell felt strongly that the attack on September 11, 2001 was ...

More... http://www.abeldanger.org/field-mcconnell-bio/

The last links leads to 'Site Offline', so I shall try to get it elsewhere.
Sounds extremely interesting!

BLIMEY! Looks like this case is MEGA!
This will take a lot more searching and digesting.

[TonyGosling]

Destination: Diego Garcia?
The two arguably most important articles are from the Daily Express

MH370 shock theory: How data ‘indicates hijackers landed plane on land’
MH370 is believed by official investigators to be at the bottom of the southern Indian Ocean - but one expert has claimed the data actually indicates that it landed on land to the north.
By Abbie Llewelyn
PUBLISHED: 00:06, Sat, Feb 1, 2020
https://www.express.co.uk/news/weird/1236351/mh370-news-malaysia-airli nes-flight-370-missing-plane-hijacker-spt


Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 went missing on March 8, 2014, en route from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing with 239 people on board. The official investigation concluded that that its final resting place was the southern Indian Ocean based on data collected by British satellite telecommunications company Inmarsat. Inmarsat’s satellite 3F1 had been communicating with MH370 during its doomed flight, producing Burst Frequency Offset (BFO) values and Burst Timing Offset (BTO) values.
Related articles

MH370 solved? Expert presented full description of what happened
MH370: How cruel hijackers ‘wanted to be seen’

BTO values are the measure of time taken for the transmission round trip and can be used to calculate the distance between the satellite and the aircraft.

BFO values are a measure of the relative motion of the satellite and the aeroplane.

The seven pingpings that gave Inmarsat this information appeared to indicate that the plane went south, and the last pingring at 12.19am UTC seemed to imply a final position in the southern Indian Ocean.

However, aviation expert Jeff Wise has suggested that hijackers could have spoofed the BFO values, and that based on the BTO values alone, the plane could have flown north instead.

What’s more, there are other indicators that it flew north, such as the fact that the plane slowed down over time, which would be expected as the air got colder.

If the plane flew north, it would have been flying over the vast Asian continent rather than over the ocean.

Most investigators have concluded that the last pingring, the ‘half-handshake’ at 0:19, was a result of the plane rebooting after switching to its fuel reserve.

However, Mr Wise suggested that this could have been the hijackers reconfiguring the plane’s systems for landing.

In his 2015 book ‘The Plane That Wasn’t There’, Mr Wise wrote: “At 0.19 UTC came the seventh pingring, a final burst of radio frequency signal that many have interpreted as the SDU rebooting after the plane’s engines ran out of fuel.

“MH370’s fuel reserves certainly would have been very, very low at this point.

“But I think it’s possible that the hand-handshake at 12.19am might have been the result, not of fuel exhaustion, but of the plane’s hijackers somehow reconfiguring its communication and/or navigation system in preparation for landing.”

If the plane did fly in a northern corridor, instead of a southern one, according to Mr Wise it would have landed in the central Asian country Kazakhstan.

The science journalist also identified a site within that country where this might have been possible – the Yubileyniy airstrip in the Baikonur Cosmodrome.

The Baikonur Cosmodrome is a spaceport that is leased to Russia and was where both Sputnik 1 and the first human spaceflight were launched from.

In 1961, Yuri Gagarin took off from the Baikonur Cosmodrome and became the first man to reach orbit.

The USSR chose this spot for its spaceport for its wide open space and remote location.

Flight MH370: How hijacker could have taken plane explained

The Yubileyniy runway, constructed in the 1970s, is reportedly the only aistrip in the world specifically built for the use of self-landing aircraft.

It is made of specially reinforced concrete, twice as strong as those used in normal runways, and ground to exceptional flatness using special milling machines.

In 1988, an unmanned spacecraft successfully landed at Yubileyny after a 3-hour trip in space.

However, not long after, the USSR fell apart and the project was cancelled.

[outsider]

see
http://911forum.org.uk/board/viewtopic.php?p=179916#179916
ed.

[TonyGosling]

New conspiracy theory claims US Air Force shot down MH370 in a failed bid to intercept it and seize electronic equipment on its way to China
Florence de Changy has been reporting and investigating MH370 since 2014
The plane went missing on March 8, 2014, with the mystery never solved
But the French author argues that the 'mystery' itself is the greatest con of all
In the 400-page book, de Changy argues that current theories are off the mark, and that there has been a combined effort to cover the truth of what happened
Instead, she suggests the plane could have been downed by the US Air Force in an attempt to intercept the plane and confiscate cargo en-route to Beijing
By CHRIS JEWERS FOR MAILONLINE
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9407441/Author-reveals-startl ing-new-theory-missing-Malaysia-Airlines-MH370-jet.html

PUBLISHED: 13:19, 27 March 2021 | UPDATED: 13:18, 28 March 2021

The US was responsible for downing missing flight MH370, which disappeared in 2014 with the loss of all 239 passengers on board, a new book claims.

The American military used electronic jamming technology to make the plane disappear from radar screens before finally shooting it down after a failed bid to re-route it and seize highly-sensitive electronic gear to China.

That’s the startling theory put forward by French journalist Florence de Changy in her new book 'The Disappearing Act: The Impossible Case of MH370'.

De Changy has been reporting and investigating on the missing airline since the mystery dominated news channels for weeks and months after March 2014.

In the 400-page book, the investigative journalist and Far-Eastern correspondent for the French newspaper Le Monde delves into the numerous theories that have been put forward to explain the mystery of what happened to the plane.

But the idea that the case is a mystery, de Changy argues, is a fabrication in and of itself, perpetuated by those responsible and in-the-know about what really happened to the Boeing 777 on March 8, 2014.

Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 was flying from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing when it vanished in 2014. Pictured: The missing aircraft taking off in France in 2011 +13
Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 was flying from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing when it vanished in 2014. Pictured: The missing aircraft taking off in France in 2011

As de Changy writes, 'It was not possible […] for a Boeing 777 to have simply disappeared.' She ironically calls the disappearance 'the greatest mystery in the history of aviation' which, she believes, is its biggest con.

After the writer goes into great detail over 14 chapters dispelling a number of theories that have been put forward - that the plane was hijacked; that the captain had run amok; that there had been a fire on-board; that there was a hypoxia event in the cabin - de Changy puts forward her own hypothesis in the book's epilogue.

Flight MH370, she suggests, was brought down by the United States Air Force after a failed attempt to intercept the plane and seize a shipment of 'electronic equipment' that was en-route to Beijing, and that the US did not want China to have.

In the months that followed the failed mission and downing of the airliner, de Changy says the governments involved in the aftermath - the US, China, Malaysia, Australia, Vietnam, and the UK and France in an investigative capacity - embarked on a campaign of distraction and disinformation to hide the atrocity.

The journalist prefaces her hypothesis by saying that it is based on her seven years of investigations across a number of continents that she recalls in the book, but that it is purely her own theory of what happened to flight MH370.

RELATED ARTICLES
Previous
1
Next

The plane that vanished into thin air: Seven years after...

Search for MH370 should be resumed after new evidence points...

Fresh hopes wreckage of MH370 could be found six years after...

Fresh hope in the search for missing MH370 as suspected...
SHARE THIS ARTICLE
Share
553 shares
From day one, when the plane vanished as it was flying from Kuala Lumpar to Beijing but vanished off the radar, de Changy says she was struck by the incompetence of the Malaysian authorities, by their blatant disregard for truth and obvious desire not to tell anyone anything of importance.

The details of what happened were reconstituted by trial and error, and ‘assembled like a jigsaw puzzle over subsequent weeks, months and years, in the light of information that was released in dribs and drabs, for the most part diluted in an ocean of false or inaccurate data’, she writes.

What is known is that the plane took off from Kuala Lumpar at 12:21 a.m. on Saturday, March 8 2014. It was due to land in Beijing at 6:30 a.m. on the same day. On board the Boeing 777-200ER were 227 passengers and 12 crew.

The plane was last seen on civilian radar at 1:21 a.m., above the ocean where the South China Sea meets the Gulf of Thailand. Its intended flight path should have taken it over the South China Sea and Vietnam.

But officials maintain that the plane was tracked on military radar over the Malacca Strait - a narrow stretch of water between the Malay Peninsula and the Indonesian island of Sumatra - having made a U-turn over Malaysia, instead heading towards the Indian ocean.

At 2:25 a.m., officials say military radar detected what could have been the jetliner, 200 miles north-west of Penang Island, suggesting the plane had turned north towards the Andaman Islands.

The disappearing act: by Florence de Changy. The French reporter has put forward a new theory about what happened to flight MH370 in her new book +13
Florence de Changy has been investigating MH370 since it went missing in 2014 +13
The disappearing act (left) by Florence de Changy (right). The French reporter has put forward a new theory about what happened to flight MH370 in her new book. de Changy has been reporting on and investigating MH370 since it went missing in 2014

What would become the world's most extensive and expensive ever search mission in the history of aviation was launched, which de Changy alleges was completely pointless, and was even carried out to conceal reality.

The journalist posits that when a magician does a trick, one tactic above all is required for it to be successful: Distraction. In the case of MH370, she argues, the distraction was widespread disinformation.

'In the case of MH370, many different means were deployed at the same time,' she writes. 'The advance of truth has been crippled from day one.'

Analysis of the aircraft's movements identified a 23,000 square mile (60,000 square kilometres) search area in the southern India Ocean, approximately 1,200 miles west of Perth, a city in southwest Australia.

Australia assumed charge of the search on March 17, which de Changy claims was thousands of miles away from the location the plane was actually downed.

The operation was ruinously expensive (£103 million) and an abject failure. Nothing was found, not even a seatbelt. ‘When it came to the art of bungling a search operation and providing deliberate or accidental misinformation, Australia ran Malaysia pretty close,’ writes de Changy.

But there was no U-turn, she claims.

+13
Pictured top: A map showing the key moments of flight MH370 on March 8, 2014, as well as its intended flight path over Vietnam on its way to Beijing from Kuala Lumpar. Bottom: A map showing the 'crash sit' in the southern Indian Ocean which led to a huge search +13
Pictured top: A map showing the key moments of flight MH370 on March 8, 2014, as well as its intended flight path over Vietnam on its way to Beijing from Kuala Lumpar. Bottom: A map showing the 'crash sit' in the southern Indian Ocean which led to a huge search

De Changy argues that the simplest explanation - that MH370 crashed in the South China Sea shortly after it was last seen on regional signals - was 'quashed and tampered with in record time', despite corroborating evidence at the time.

This was not helped by 24-hour news coverage of the event, she writes, that perpetuated theories, such as that of two mysterious Iranian passengers with fake passports potentially being behind the disaster.

The Iranian passengers turned out to have bought their forged passports in Thailand. Malaysia Airlines refused, ‘for security reasons’, to explain how travellers with forged passports had been able to buy tickets.

Interpol said they were not known terrorists. Apparently Iranians do this all the time, to avoid being identified at Iranian at airports. The lead went cold, having been the focus of all the news coverage for 48 hours.

The character of the pilot - Pilot Zaharie Ahmad Shah - was also quickly brought into question, with suggestions that the event might have been a murder-suicide. However, De Changy argues that no pilot would know how to make a plane totally vanish in the way that MH370 did.

She also points out that for decades, militaries have been trying to make stealth aircraft that is undetectable to others. It's not that easy, she says. In addition, she says that even if the theory Shah had purposefully crashed the airliner, the 'mystery' of the whereabouts of a huge plane carrying 239 people is still not solved.

Far-Eastern correspondent for Le Monde, Florence de Changy investigates the mystery in a new tome. Pictured: Catherine Gang, whose husband Li Zhi was on Flight MH370 +13
Far-Eastern correspondent for Le Monde, Florence de Changy investigates the mystery in a new tome. Pictured: Catherine Gang, whose husband Li Zhi was on Flight MH370

Chunks of plane started to turn up on beaches across the region. The best hope was a flaperon (what are now called ailerons), which washed up on the shore of Reunion Island near Madagascar. The French, who were investigating as Reunion is one of their departments, said they were ‘almost certain’ it came from MH370.

The Malaysian prime minister announced his certainty that it had come from MH370.

But the flaperon had lost its ID plate, and they are so securely attached it really shouldn’t have done. De Changy found out that ID plates are routinely removed when airport parts are recycled, so the flaperon could have come from any old plane. She thinks it might even have been planted there.

After hundreds of pages of telling the story of her investigation, and debunking the numerous theories put forward as explanations, de Changy offers her hypothesis.

In the Being-777's cargo was 2.5 tonnes of 'poorly documented Motorola electronics equipment,' she says. The author suggests that this belonged to the US, and that China wanted to get their hands on it. Investigating the cargo, de Changy writes that it had not undergone the proper security screening.

At the time, the US - under Barack Obama's administration - was withdrawing troops from Afghanistan. Some believe the mystery cargo to be the remains of a drone downed in Pakistan, or military equipment captured by the Taliban.

Chinese relatives of passengers on the missing Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 take part in a prayer service at the Metro Park Hotel in Beijing, China (file photo) +13
Chinese relatives of passengers on the missing Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 take part in a prayer service at the Metro Park Hotel in Beijing, China (file photo)

De Changy says whatever it was, Beijing - under the new leadership of Xi Jinping at the time - wanted to get its hands of it, and had routed it through Kuala Lumpar to be taken to Beijing on a nigh-time passenger jet.

But when the US caught wind of the plot, de Changy suggests the rival superpower came up with a plan to intercept the cargo, and to force MH370 to land, confiscate the cargo, and send it on its way to Beijing with just a two-hour delay.

At the time, de Changy reports that the US was participating in an air defence operation in the region, and that the plan could be masked as a training operation.

Furthermore, Waypoint IGARI - The 'transfer of control' point, when Malaysia air traffic control hands over to its Vietnamese counterparts on the route being taken by MH370 - is controlled by Singapore, a US ally.

At this point of the flight, de Changy suggests that two US Airborne Early Warning (Awacs) planes could have sandwiched MH370 - from above and below - completely blocking its magnetic field and all communications, rendering it invisible.

At this point, Pilot Zaharie Ahmad Shah would have been ordered by the US to land the plane at a nearby airbase, likely airbase U-Tapao in Thailand, de Changy says.

In this February 23, 2016 file photo, a waiter walks past a mural of flight MH370 in Shah Alam outside Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia +13
In this February 23, 2016 file photo, a waiter walks past a mural of flight MH370 in Shah Alam outside Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

What the planning did not account for, however, was the pilot's refusal to follow such orders, instead perhaps saying he would maintain his course to Beijing until he was told otherwise by Malaysia Airlines.

It's possible that the pilot and co-pilot attempted to take a shortcut to reach Chinese airspace more quickly, de Changy suggests, but their attempt to escape the clutches of the US planes failed.

'The shooting down could have been a blunder,' she writes, 'but it could have also been a last resort to stop the plane and its special cargo from falling into Chinese hands.'

De Changy also says it's a possibility that it was in fact China that struck the plane, reacting to seeing a number of unannounced planes flying into its airspace in a region that is highly volatile.

With its huge navy presence in the region, de Changy says - under the cover of disinformation being spread at the time - the US could have cleared up the crash site while the international search for the plane took place thousands of miles away.

The journalist then details how the US and China responded in the aftermath of the crash, writing how she was struck the uncharacteristic discretion from US officials throughout the crisis, a country that is known for offering support in disasters.

Grace Subathirai Nathan, daughter of Malaysian Airlines flight MH370 passenger Anne Daisy, shows a piece of debris believed to be from flight MH370 during a press conference in Putrajaya in 2018 +13
Grace Subathirai Nathan, daughter of Malaysian Airlines flight MH370 passenger Anne Daisy, shows a piece of debris believed to be from flight MH370 during a press conference in Putrajaya in 2018

She also notes that the US never issued 'the slightest reproach to Malaysian authorities for such a disaster,' which involved a US-made Boeing plane and thee US nationals on board.

It is also no secret, she writes, that the US has extensive satellite coverage in the region, yet no help has been offered in the form of satellite images from the numerous positions the country has above the South China Sea.

Neither has the US been forthcoming with help and resources in the search for the missing plane, de Changy says.

Despite this, she points to records of calls between Barack Obama and Xi Jinping in the aftermath, the details of which were not fully released, and suggests that the pair could have both been in-the-know about what happened to MH370.

But why would China go along with this, with the majority of the passengers being Chinese citizens? In the crisis, de Changy says that China likely saw an opportunity.

Xi Xingping was less than a year into his time as President, and she writes that the leader was faced with a choice: Either expose the US' responsibility for the disaster, or use it to make a deal.

A Boeing 777 flaperon cut down to match the one from flight MH370 found on Reunion island off the coast of Africa in 2015, is lowered into water to discover its drift characteristics by Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation researchers in Tasmania +13
A Boeing 777 flaperon cut down to match the one from flight MH370 found on Reunion island off the coast of Africa in 2015, is lowered into water to discover its drift characteristics by Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation researchers in Tasmania

In the months and years that followed, China begun to aggressively expand in the South China Sea, with the US largely turning a blind eye, offering little resistance.

For example. on May 2, 2014, weeks after the disappearance of MH370, National Offshore Oil Corporation moved its $1 billion oil righ - the Hai Yang Shi You 981 - to a location 17 nautical miles from Triton Island, the southwesternmost island of the disputed Paracel Islands.

'Isn't it ironic that while Australia was attracting the world news headlines, with its claim to be overseeing the largest (bogus) search operation in the history of mankind, China was quietly performing an incomparable more ambitious, more costly and more consequential operation?', de Changy writes.

Other nations have also kept it quiet too, she claims. Malaysia, who bore the brunt of the majority of the criticism in the world's press; Vietnam, whose shores are closest to where de Changy believes the plane came down; France, who own Réunion island where a piece of debris washed ashore on; the UK, whose Air Accidents Investigations Branch established the final crash site of MH370.

All were either knowingly or unknowingly complicit, de Changy claims.

Malaysian Minister of Transport Anthony Loke (centre) looks at the wing flap found on Pemba Island, Tanzania, in 2019 which has been identified a missing part of Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370 +13
Malaysian Minister of Transport Anthony Loke (centre) looks at the wing flap found on Pemba Island, Tanzania, in 2019 which has been identified a missing part of Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370

Why did everyone lie? Because although the Malaysians didn’t actually want the puzzle solved for reasons de Changy explains, they wanted it to be seen to have been solved, so they could forget about it.

France was trying to sell arms to Malaysia, and was happy to oil the wheels. The French report on a mysterious flaperon - that washed up on a far-away shore - was never published.

Malaysia and the US developed a surprisingly close relationship in the months that followed the disappearance, de Changy writes, and by 2016, Vietnam had become America's fastest growing export market.

While the reporter acknowledges - on numerous occasions - that her hypothesis is far-fetched, she stands by her debunking of the other theories that have been put forward, and that the accepted narrative and accusations about the pilot should be widely challenged.

'I have established that MH370 did not U-turn, did not fly over Malaysia and, to cut a long story shot, never crashed in the Southern Indian Ocean. Many more clues point to a covert interception attempt that went terribly wrong, with a fatal accident happening at 2:40 a.m. between Vietnam and China,' she writes.

WHAT HAPPENED TO MH370? SOME OF THE THEORIES INTO THE MYSTERY EXAMINED
Zaharie Ahmad Shah (pictured) was the pilot of the doomed flight
Zaharie Ahmad Shah (pictured) was the pilot of the doomed flight

DID THE PILOT HIJACK HIS OWN PLANE?

Pilot Zaharie Ahmad Shah planned mass murder because of personal problems, locking his co-pilot out of the cockpit, closing down all communications, depressurising the main cabin and then disabling the aircraft so that it continued flying on auto-pilot until it ran out of fuel.

That was the popular theory in the weeks after the plane's disappearance.

His personal problems, rumours in Kuala Lumpur said, included a split with his wife Fizah Khan, and his fury that a relative, opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim, had been given a five-year jail sentence for sodomy shortly before he boarded the plane for the flight to Beijing.

But the pilot's wife angrily denied any personal problems and other family members and his friends said he was a devoted family man and loved his job.

This theory was also the conclusion of the first independent study into the disaster by the New Zealand-based air accident investigator, Ewan Wilson.

Wilson, the founder of Kiwi Airlines and a commercial pilot himself, arrived at the shocking conclusion after considering 'every conceivable alternative scenario'.

However, he has not been able to provide any conclusive evidence to support his theory.

The claims are made in the book 'Goodnight Malaysian 370', which Wilson co-wrote with the New Zealand broadsheet journalist, Geoff Taylor.

It's also been rumoured that Zaharie used a flight simulator at his home to plot a path to a remote island.

However, officials in Kuala Lumpur declared that Malaysian police and the FBI's technical experts had found nothing to suggest he was planning to hijack the flight after closely examining his flight simulator.

And there are also theories that the tragic disappearance may have been a heroic act of sacrifice by the pilot.

Australian aviation enthusiast Michael Gilbert believes the doomed plane caught fire mid-flight, forcing the pilot to plot a course away from heavily populated areas.


IF NOT THE PILOT, WAS THE CO-PILOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MYSTERY?

Co-pilot Fariq Abdul Hamid, 27, again for personal problems, was suspected by rumour-spreaders to have overpowered the pilot and disabled the aircraft, flying it to its doom with crew and passengers unable to get through the locked cockpit door.

Theorists have put forward the suggestion that he was having relationship problems and this was his dramatic way of taking his own life.

But he was engaged to be married to Captain Nadira Ramli, 26, a fellow pilot from another airline, and loved his job. There are no known reasons for him to have taken any fatal action.

There have been a series of outlandish theories about the disappearance of the plane +13
There have been a series of outlandish theories about the disappearance of the plane

Others have suggested that because he was known to have occasionally invited young women into the cockpit during a flight, he had done so this time and something had gone wrong.

Young Jonti Roos said in March that she spent an entire flight in 2011 in the cockpit being entertained by Hamid, who was smoking.

Interest in the co-pilot was renewed when it was revealed he was the last person to communicate from the cockpit after the communication system was cut off.

DID THE RUSSIANS STEAL MH370 AND FLY THE JET TO KAZAKHSTAN

An expert has claimed the missing Malaysia Airlines flight 370 was hijacked on the orders of Vladimir Putin and secretly landed in Kazakhstan.

Jeff Wise, a U.S. science writer who spearheaded CNN's coverage of the Boeing 777-200E, has based his outlandish theory on pings that the plane gave off for seven hours after it went missing, that were recorded by British telecommunications company Inmarsat.

Wise believes that hijackers 'spoofed' the plane's navigation data to make it seem like it went in another direction, but flew it to the Baikonur Cosmodrome, which is leased from Kazakhstan by Russia.

However, Wise admits in New York Magazine that he does not know why Vladimir Putin would want to steal a plane full of people and that his idea is somewhat 'crazy'.

Wise also noted there were three Russian men onboard the flight, two of them Ukrainian passport holders.

Aviation disaster experts analysed satellite data and discovered - like the data recorded by Inmarsat - that the plane flew on for hours after losing contact.

Careful examination of the evidence has revealed that MH370 made three turns after the last radio call, first a turn to the left, then two more, taking the plane west, then south towards Antarctica.

MH370 WAS USED BY TERRORISTS FOR A SUICIDE ATTACK ON THE CHINESE NAVY

This extraordinary claim came from 41-year-old British yachtsman Katherine Tee, from Liverpool, whose initial account of seeing what she thought was a burning plane in the night sky made headlines around the world.

On arrival in Thailand's Phuket after sailing across the Indian Ocean from Cochin, southern India with her husband, she said: 'I could see the outline of the plane - it looked longer than planes usually do.There was what appeared to be black smoke streaming from behind.'

Ms Tee's general description of the time and place was vague and she lost all credibility when she later stated on her blog that she believed MH370 was a kamikaze plane that was aimed at a flotilla of Chinese ships and it was shot down before it could smash into the vessels.

Without solid proof of the satellite data, she wrote on her blog, Saucy Sailoress, the plane she saw was flying at low altitude towards the military convoy she and her husband had seen on recent nights. She added that internet research showed a Chinese flotilla was in the area at the time.

While the debris proved the plane went down in the Indian Ocean, the location of the main underwater wreckage — and its crucial black box data recorders — remains stubbornly elusive. +13
While the debris proved the plane went down in the Indian Ocean, the location of the main underwater wreckage — and its crucial black box data recorders — remains stubbornly elusive.

THE JET LANDED ON THE WATER AND WAS SEEN FLOATING ON THE ANDAMAN SEA

On a flight from Jeddah to Kuala Lumpur that crossed over the Andaman Sea on March 8, Malaysian woman Raja Dalelah, 53, saw what she believed was a plane sitting on the water's surface.

She didn't know about the search that had been started for MH370. She alerted a stewardess who told her to go back to sleep.

'I was shocked to see what looked like the tail and wing of an aircraft on the water,' she said.

It was only when she told her friends on landing in Kuala Lumpur what she had seen that she learned of the missing jet. She had seen the object at about 2.30pm Malaysian time.

She said she had been able to identify several ships and islands before noticing the silver object that she said was a plane.

But her story was laughed off by pilots who said it would have been impossible to have seen part of an aircraft in the water from 35,000ft or seven miles.

Ms Raja filed an official report with police the same day and has kept to her story.

'I know what I saw,' she said.

THE AIRCRAFT SUFFERED A CATASTROPHIC SYSTEMS FAILURE AND CRASH-LANDED ON THE OCEAN

A catastrophic event such as a fire disabling much of the equipment resulted in the pilots turning the plane back towards the Malaysian peninsula in the hope of landing at the nearest airport.

Satellite data, believable or not, suggests the aircraft did make a turn and theorists say there would be no reason for the pilots to change course unless confronted with an emergency.

A fire in a similar Boeing 777 jet parked at Cairo airport in 2011 was found to have been caused by a problem with the first officer's oxygen mask supply tubing.

Stewarts Law, which has litigated in a series of recent air disasters, believes the plane crashed after a fire - similar to the blaze on the Cairo airport runway - broke out in the cockpit.

After an investigation into the Cairo blaze, Egypt's Aircraft Accident Investigation Central Directorate (EAAICD) released their final report which revealed that the fire originated near the first officer's oxygen mask supply tubing.

The cause of the fire could not be conclusively determined, but investigators pinpointed a problem with the cockpit hose used to provide oxygen for the crew in the event of decompression.

Following the 2011 fire, US aircraft owners were instructed to replace the system - it was estimated to cost $2,596 (£1,573) per aircraft. It was not known whether Malaysia Airlines had carried out the change.

If either pilot wanted to crash the plane, why turn it around? So the turn-around suggests they were trying to land as soon as possible because of an emergency.

THE US SHOT DOWN THE AIRCRAFT FEARING A TERROR ATTACK ON DIEGO GARCIA

The Boeing 777 was shot down by the Americans who feared the aircraft had been hijacked and was about to be used to attack the U.S. military base on Diego Garcia atoll in the Indian Ocean. So conspiracy theorists claim.

And former French airline director Marc Dugain said he had been warned by British intelligence that he was taking risks by investigating this angle.

There is no way of checking whether Dugain received such a warning or why he believes the Americans shot down the plane.

But adding to the theory that the aircraft was flown to Diego Garcia, either by the pilot Zaharie or a hijacker, was the claim that on the pilot's home flight simulator was a 'practice' flight to the island.

Professor Glees said: 'The Americans would have no interest in doing anything of the kind and not telling the world.

'In theory, they might wish to shoot down a plane they thought was attacking them but they wouldn't just fire missiles, they'd investigate it first with fighters and would quickly realise that even if it had to be shot down, the world would need to know.'

Mr Rosenschein said: 'The U.S. would not have been able to hide this fact and in any event, if it were true, they would have admitted their action as it would have prevented a successful terrorist action on this occasion and acted as a deterrent for future terrorist attacks.'

[Whitehall_Bin_Men]

Note
No mention of Freescale military electronic warfare work whatever
A cover up should be obvious
Military grade tech someone doesn't want passengers or pilots to know about

[Whitehall_Bin_Men]

My God
Pretty much any aircraft can be brought down and steered remotely like this. Secret. Horrifying.

[Whitehall_Bin_Men]

A US technology company which had 20 senior staff on board Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370 had just launched a new electronic warfare gadget for military radar systems in the days before the Boeing 777 went missing.
By TED JEORY
08:19, Wed, Mar 19, 2014

Freescale Semiconductor launched RADAR gadget 5 days before 20 ...
19 Mar 2014 — Five days later, Flight MH370 took off from Kuala Lumpur for Beijing with 239 people on board including 20 working for Freescale.


URLs and headlines seem to being messed about with
https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/465557/Malaysian-plane-20-on-boar d-worked-for-ELECTRONIC-WARFARE-and-radar-defence-company/amp


DEVELOPMENT Freescale Semiconductor which had 20 workers on MH370 had just launched new radar chips
DEVELOPMENT: Freescale Semiconductor which had 20 workers on MH370 had just launched new radar chips [EXPRESS]

Freescale Semiconductor, which makes powerful microchips for industries including defence, released the powerful new products to the American market on March 3.

Five days later, Flight MH370 took off from Kuala Lumpur for Beijing with 239 people on board including 20 working for Freescale.


Twelve were from Malaysia, while eight were Chinese nationals.

Freescale’s spokesman Mitch Haws has said: “These were all people with a lot of experience and technical background and they were very important people.

“It’s definitely a loss for the company.”

Freescale’s shareholders include the Carlyle Group of private equity investors whose past advisers have included ex-US president George Bush Sr and former British Prime Minister John Major.

ADVERTISEMENT

Carlyle’s previous heavyweight clients include the Saudi Binladin Group, the construction firm owned by the family of Osama bin Laden.

The fact that Freescale had so many highly qualified staff on board the Boeing 777 had already prompted wild conspiracy theories about what might have happened.

The company says they were flying to China to improve its consumer products operations, but Freescale’s fresh links to electronic warfare technology is likely to trigger more speculation and deepen the mystery.

A map of the latest search areas in the southern Indian Ocean today [EPA]

ADVERTISEMENT

Experts have been baffled how a large passenger jet seems to have flown undetected and possibly beaten military radar systems for up to six hours.

Avoiding radar via “cloaking technology” has long been one of the objectives of the defence industry and Freescale has been active developing chips for military radar.

On its website, the company says its radio frequency products meet the requirements for applications in “avionics, radar, communications, missile guidance, electronic warfare and identification friend or foe”.

Last June it announced it was creating a team of specialists dedicated to producing “radio frequency power products” for the defence industry.

And on March 3, it announced it was releasing 11 of these new gadgets for use in “high frequency, VHF and low-band UHF radar and radio communications”.

The company did not respond to questions from Express Online, including whether any of its missing employees had been working on the defence products.


Hull University student Yue Wenchao, 26, who is reported to be one of the passengers on board [ENTERPRISE]

It neither provided any responses to the latest bizarre conspiracy theory being widely published on the comments sections of newspaper websites and other internet forums.

The comment reads: “It reads: “Have you pieced together the puzzle of missing flight 370 to Beijing China? If not, here are your missing pieces.

“Patents Patents Patents.

“Four days after the missing flight MH370 a patent is approved by the Patent Office, four of the five Patent holders are Chinese employees of Freescale Semiconductor of Austin TX.

“Patent is divided up on 20 per cent increments to five holders.

“Peidong Wang, Suzhou, China, (20 per cent); Zhijun Chen, Suzhou, China, (20 per cent); Zhihong Cheng, Suzhou, China, (20 per cent); Li Ying, Suzhou, China, (20 per cent); Freescale Semiconductor (20 per cent).

“If a patent holder dies, then the remaining holders equally share the dividends of the deceased if not disputed in a will.

“If four of the five dies, then the remaining one Patent holder gets 100 per cent of the wealth of the patent.

“That remaining live Patent holder is Freescale Semiconductor.”

It adds: “Here is your motive for the missing Beijing plane. As all four Chinese members of the Patent were passengers on the missing plane.

“Patent holders can alter the proceeds legally by passing wealth to their heirs. “However, they cannot do so until the Patent is approved. So when the plane went missing, the patent had not been approved.”

However, the absurd theory does not add up.

Although a Freescale patent does exist under number US8650327, none of the names listed actually appear on the passenger manifest released by the Malaysian authorities.

ADVERTISEMENT

The search continues for Flight MH370 but speculation surrounding its fate grows by the day.

Some experts believe the plane was hijacked–possibly by the pilots–or that there was a struggle on board which led to a catastrophic decompression.

However, no seat cushions or luggage that would have been expected to float have yet been found in the vast Indian Ocean where it might have crashed.