Commissioner Helric Fredou, second in command of the French Judicial Police in the town of Limoges, was shot dead only hours after the terrorist attack on Charlie Hebdo last Wednesday.
Fredou was part of the team investigating the Charlie Hebdo case. The gunmen who attacked Charlie Hebdo, Saïd and Cherif Kouachi, had received their high school education in the Limousin region around Limoges.
On the evening of the Charlie Hebdo shootings, Fredou dispatched a team of police officials under his jurisdiction to interview the relatives of one of the Charlie Hebdo victims and waited for the return of his team for a debriefing.
Immediately after the police debriefing, he began preparing his report, staying late at police headquarters to write it up. A colleague found him shot dead at 1 a.m. on Thursday morning, and the report he was writing was never found.
Pascal Cayla of the national police union “Alliance” said, “We are all in shock. He was very human and close to people.”
Fredou was 44 years old and single. A native of Limoges, he began his career in 1997 as a police officer at the regional office of the judicial police of Versailles, before returning to Limoges. In 2007, he became commissioner after two years at the school of Saint-Cyr Mont-Dore, before being appointed head of security for the Haute-Vienne department. In September 2010, he began serving as commissioner in the city of Cherbourg, before returning to Limoges in August 2012 to be appointed deputy director of the regional police service.
Police spokesmen claim that it was suicide and that he was shot with his own service revolver. In the initial reports on Fredou’s death, the Limoges police declared, “The reasons for his action are currently unknown.”
Subsequent reports, however, quoted police spokesmen as saying that Fredou was “depressed and close to burnout.” An autopsy was performed at the University Hospital of Limoges confirming the suicide. French police said that no connection could be made to the Charlie Hebdo case.
A year earlier, Fredou himself apparently discovered the third in command of the Limoges Judicial Police dead in similar circumstances. This death was also ruled a suicide.
Unfortunately, it doesn't show a picture of the guy's face.
I've never taken a 'selfie'; I tried once, and dropped my camera, which I'm hoping won't be too expensive to repair. I took the heading from the video - but whatever this guy was doing, he was NOT shot. The seven or eight cops in the middle of the road would NOT have been standing around yacking, if one of their officers (or anyone else, I should hope) was lying injured and/or dying in the gutter yards from them, in full sight.
Do you think this guy is acting, or not? If he is, what the heck is going on? Is that what the French taxpayers pay for, gendarmes who have a kip in the gutter, when presumably there is something important going on (7/8 cops having a conflab in the middle of the road?) _________________ 'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
Mysterious "suicide" of the officer in charge of Charlie Hebdo-Jeannette Bougrab connection
Exclusive. Panamza gathered the disturbing testimony of the family of Helric Fredou, Police Commissioner to prepare a report on the family environment of Charlie Hebdo, and found dead with a bullet in the head a few hours after the attack.
On 01/16/2015 at 10:59
A lead weight in France, a subject of interrogation abroad.
Such is the contrast media about the announcement of the "suicide" of a police officer involved in the investigation into the shooting at the headquarters of Charlie Hebdo.
fredou
The millions of viewers of the show Daily News & Analysis (DNA) of the Indian channel Zee News, as well as 150,000 subscribers YouTube account of the antenna were able to discover what the French have been denied to date: a audiovisual report devoted to a past case ignored by the national media.
Thursday, January 8, local press Limoges (Le Populaire, France Bleu Limousin and France 3) reported the death of a man named Helric Fredou. Aged 44 years, deputy director of the Regional Service of Judicial Police was found dead in his office yesterday, around 1am. He would have shot himself in the head with his service weapon.
helricfredou
The police commissioners union responded through the publication of a statement.
commpol
The next day it was the turn of Paris to discuss the new emphasis, as the local media about the alleged "depression" of Helric Fredou.
"The rotten paper," retorts the deceased's sister
Wednesday, January 14, the day after the funeral of Helric Fredou, Panamza contacted her sister-which prefers to remain non identifiée- to clarify the involvement of the police, vaguely evoked by the regional press in the investigation of the attack Charlie Hebdo. Key excerpts from the telephone exchange:
- "At first, I thought this is not possible, someone gun but not in a movie" sister refuses to believe in the possibility of a murder scary but continues to s' wonder about the exact circumstances of the death of the officer.
- "No let-mail or plate on his desk" Helric Fredou left no letter to explain his actions. Similarly, it did not file its evidence in police plate as sometimes some of his colleagues found suicide.
- "He was a quiet, with a great spirit of discernment according to his trainer" sister has repeatedly stressed the coolness of police -tenu in esteem by his trainer because of its perspicacité- and the fact he was neither violent nor impulsive.
- "They have taken our computers and mobile personal, we took everything we thought it shocked us but this is the procedure we have been told," in the afternoon of January 8, the police searched the home of the deceased, in the presence of his mother and sister before take his computer and his personal smartphone.
.. - "My mom, who was very symbiotic with him, turned against the whole earth: she wants to know how he was killed he has a bandage on his forehead on the side is trepanned because of . at autopsy the back of the skull, there is nothing "informed of the death at about 5 am in the morning, the sister reports having had to insist to access the body of the deceased. It was only late in the day she and her mother were allowed to see the body of Helric Fredou.
- "My brother himself had found two suicide-including one in Melun and told mom 'I never do something like that to you', ie kill me and leave you alone He was not depressed. "in November 2013, Helric Fredou was indeed the officer who discovered the body of his colleague Christophe Rivieccio found dead in the same police station in Limoges.
- "My brother was at home that night and as he was on duty, they called him and he came to the police station around 23:30 ... The day had been very tense as his colleagues ... Police officers were present in the Paris. the evening ... He had to write a report, but there was friction, I do not know what ... he told them he was to pass an urgent phone call and as they saw that it was not , a colleague went for him at his office and discovered dead "Wednesday night, police parties to conduct security checks from a bombing victim's family were debriefed by Helric Fredou. The testimony of his sister brings two disturbing elements: "friction" between the police would have arisen on the report (ultimately never started) to be prepared by Helrou; In this tense situation, the man was found dead a few minutes after telling his colleagues that he had at any price phone someone unidentified.
- "People of Paris took us to explain how it happened" sister points out that executives of the National Police have specifically moved the next day in Limoges and were keen to assure him that it was a suicide.
*******
"Victim family" domiciled around "Châteauroux" -according journalists Limoges- is never explicitly identified in the few articles reporting the death of Helric Fredou.
Curious omission: a simple cross, based on consultation with the local press, be inferred that it is the parents of Jeannette Bougrab activist UMP who now claims to have been the companion of the murdered director of Charlie Hebdo.
Helric Fredou had to write a report about them.
Panamza also contacted the Bougrab family. Wasted effort: from the first seconds, the mother of Jeannette Bougrab (presented today by his daughter as "dying") immediately said: "It is not my business, all that go, bye."
Reminder: Family Stephane Charbonnier alias Charb on Saturday denied any form of "relational engagement" between the former boss Charlie and Jeannette Bougrab. Clémentine Autain close clan Charb, went even further, calling the former Secretary of State Fillon government of "usurping".
One thing is certain at present: the numerous media appearances (TF1, France 2, BFM TV, Canal +, BBC News, MSNBC) Bougrab -a lawyer of the State Council reinstated under a decree of July 11 officially recorded by Manuel Valls and Christiane Taubira- have the same language elements but also against truths.
Example: at first, she told Paris Match have been "three years" with Charb before correcting and indicating that they were now together for "one year".
Another illustration Bougrab claims that her daughter called Charb "daddy". Yet this is what she said on 15 December at the Gala magazine's website.
The absence of father is also a sensitive subject.
"May I have already been asked why she had no father. I told him that we would choose a set and that it would be even better. "
The young woman dreams of getting married one day and she is grateful to his parents not to reproach him for his single life.
That which now appears as the grieving widow Charb (a man who was nevertheless absent from his last birthday party) had already praised the cartoonist -without then specify any connection between them- in his autobiography, released in January 2013. Extract.
book
B7BAc5mCIAIRISj
Stephane Charbonnier and Jeannette Bougrab, 31/12/14
But, in fact: who is Jeannette Bougrab?
bougrabgirard
Jeannette Bougrab and Christophe Girard, dinner of CRIF, 20/03/13
On 11 July 2013, Panamza had devoted a portrait on its increased connection to the anti-Muslim and pro-Israel movement.
During the fall of 2014, Bougrab publicly displayed his art of the large gap: this intimate Patrick Buisson (a former journalist of the far right which recorded Nicolas Sarkozy unwittingly and is represented in court by a close Netanyahu) militated in favor of the former head of state.
In previous months, Bougrab had spent most of his time abroad to achieve its documentary aired on December 3 by Canal + and entitled Forbidden school.
Finally, a piece of information here deserves to be particularly emphasized: the first public figure to have discussed a marital relationship is Bougrab Charb and Caroline Fourest.
It was January 8, at dawn on the antenna of France Inter (1'20).
The day before, the day of the attack, Fourest came on the scene in the company of Jeannette Bougrab and Richard Malka (the lawyer of Charlie Hebdo that would have Charb and Bougrab related). Singular trio feature: the same international anchor in Zionist and Islamophobic nebula.
bougrabfourest
Fourest as (first) deposit of good faith to the Bougrab-Charb relationship?
To you, citizen-player, breaking the strange around the French omerta Fredou-Bougrab case.
There is no evidence in that day, to say that the policeman was killed to silence him what he would unexpectedly discovered.
Nevertheless, in view of the shadows on his death in a context of political exploitation of the attack, nothing also allows to evacuate immediately assuming an expeditious murder disguised as suicide "dépresssion" .
Last troubling detail: a man today at the State Summit has publicly expressed no word of compassion about Helric Fredou while he was in regular contact with him in the near past. From 2010 to 2012, the police occupied the central office of Commissioner in Cherbourg. At the same time, the deputy mayor of the coastal town was none other than Bernard Cazeneuve, the current interior minister in charge of the investigation into the attack and discreet member of the pro-Israel movement.
HICHAM HAMZA
This article interested you?
Support the investigative journalism Panamza, the Gazette of subversive info!
Commissioner Helric Fredou, second in command of the French Judicial Police in the town of Limoges, was shot dead only hours after the terrorist attack on Charlie Hebdo last Wednesday.
Fredou was part of the team investigating the Charlie Hebdo case. The gunmen who attacked Charlie Hebdo, Saïd and Cherif Kouachi, had received their high school education in the Limousin region around Limoges.
On the evening of the Charlie Hebdo shootings, Fredou dispatched a team of police officials under his jurisdiction to interview the relatives of one of the Charlie Hebdo victims and waited for the return of his team for a debriefing.
Immediately after the police debriefing, he began preparing his report, staying late at police headquarters to write it up. A colleague found him shot dead at 1 a.m. on Thursday morning, and the report he was writing was never found.
Pascal Cayla of the national police union “Alliance” said, “We are all in shock. He was very human and close to people.”
Fredou was 44 years old and single. A native of Limoges, he began his career in 1997 as a police officer at the regional office of the judicial police of Versailles, before returning to Limoges. In 2007, he became commissioner after two years at the school of Saint-Cyr Mont-Dore, before being appointed head of security for the Haute-Vienne department. In September 2010, he began serving as commissioner in the city of Cherbourg, before returning to Limoges in August 2012 to be appointed deputy director of the regional police service.
Police spokesmen claim that it was suicide and that he was shot with his own service revolver. In the initial reports on Fredou’s death, the Limoges police declared, “The reasons for his action are currently unknown.”
Subsequent reports, however, quoted police spokesmen as saying that Fredou was “depressed and close to burnout.” An autopsy was performed at the University Hospital of Limoges confirming the suicide. French police said that no connection could be made to the Charlie Hebdo case.
A year earlier, Fredou himself apparently discovered the third in command of the Limoges Judicial Police dead in similar circumstances. This death was also ruled a suicide.
Oddly, the French media has buried the story of Fredou’s death. Only three or four articles have appeared in the French press about his death, all from small regional papers and TV except a short piece in Le Parisien. In contrast, dozens of articles have appeared on the subject in the English, German, and Turkish language media, many of which described the circumstances of Fredou’s death as suspicious.
Joined: 30 Jul 2006 Posts: 6060 Location: East London
Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2015 5:01 am Post subject:
Here's another site, which better shows 'the blood that has been put there':
http://smoloko.com/?p=4202
as well as the 'selfie' video. _________________ 'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
If Mossad were behind it a retraction is what you'd expect!
The International Business Times India ran a story suggesting the Israeli spy agency Mossad might have had something to do with it (they have since retracted it).
Lifenews.ru, a Russian publication, claimed that “American ‘curators’ are behind the events in Paris.”
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Posted: Sat Jan 24, 2015 10:59 pm Post subject:
Rubbish response both from police and from ISP.
Police response zero.
ISP response - now backtracking - just a random mistake
TonyGosling wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm back.
Yes my home IP address was blocked from accessing this forum from 11am this morning until 5:30-6pm.
Anyway less about me and more about this attack.
Certainly agree that the highly professional approach of these gunmen who killed the 12 inside te Charlie Hendo magazine.
Immediately indicative of professional army training
And they got in and away from the biggest target in France. Chances are now they may well be dispatched by their handlers?
Very strange the streets seem to have been so clear from the very start. Not sure if the attackers fired into the air before going into the magazine?
Everyone do please record everything. Unfortunately all my TV was taken out yesterday by electrical contractor 'repair men'.
The other major indication this was a Gladio style attack is the fact that French military naval shipping is this week being ordered to join the US 6th Fleet in the Med to counter the Russian Black Sea Fleet in 'combating ISIS'. Bringing a reluctant France into line with NATO policy.
Any doubts amongst the French establishment are being scotched as we speak.
This political (policy) angle to terror attacks is one of the hallmarks of Operation Gladio.
Our guest this week is Swiss historian Dr. Daniele Ganser, author of the seminal book NATO's Secret Armies: Operation GLADIO and Terrorism in Western Europe, who joins us for a fascinating (though at times unsettling) conversation on the subject of Operation GLADIO.
Shortly after WWII a Europe-wide network of secret armies was organised under the aegis of NATO, tasked with providing military and intelligence resistance in the event of a feared Soviet invasion. Modelled on the resistance movements of the war years, many of these "stay behind" units remained faithful to their original mandate. But by the early 1960s - under the pressures of anti-communist politicking and flirtations with the Far Right - some of these groups began to morph into something more sinister, linking up with extreme right-wingers who carried out acts of false-flag terrorism, harassment of left-wing parties and coups d'état.
But was this morphing simply an unforseen consequence of the unaccountability and instability of the network itself? Or was it, at least in part, engineered by the very Anglo-American establishment which gave birth to the project in the first place? And to what extent, therefore, can such acts of terror be seen as manifestations of 'the strategy of tension', carried out by the State against its own citizens for the purposes of control at home and geopolitical gain abroad? (We also discuss: Operation Northwoods, the so-called War on Terror, 9/11 and the recent Charlie Hebdo attacks.)
http://themindrenewed.com/interviews/2015/600-int-70
French intelligence works hand in hand with NATO and other western intelligence agencies, and have been involved in the training of the radical Islamic offshoots of Al Qaeda in attempts to topple Assad, for example. The “Free Syrian Army” has notoriously been armed and funded by Atlanticist power elites since 2012, when the CFR called for more use of Al Qaeda and the FSA, to 2013, when we saw Senator John McCain and others meeting with rebranded Al Qaeda leaders. As we look back on events associated with French and Euro terror, the images converge.
In 1995, Rachid Ramda, a member of radical Islamic organizations predictably titled “Islamic Salvation Front” and the “Armed Islamic Goup”, bombed the French RER subway, killing eight. According to an interview with Liberacion.fr, Ramda described his past involvement with western NGOs and Doctors Without Borders – both classic intelligence covers, casting doubt on the official narrative of Ramda as the typical fundamentalist stage prop of so many mainstream media terror tales. This event recalls the NGO affiliations of the so-called ISIS video victims, as well as Tamerlan Tsarnaev.
In 2004, we saw a similar media fiasco with the agitprop style provocation from the caricatures of Mohammed in Dutch filmmaker Theo van Gogh’s “Submission: Part I,” which led to van Gogh’s retaliatory death. A violent standoff ensued, with a terror cell in The Hague. Then, from 2005-2010 we saw Danish papers create a soap opera scandal with numerous mockings of Mohammed in the Jyllands-Posten paper. We are also reminded of the dubious association of the “Mohammed” film the western establishment attempted to link to the Benghazi incident that curiously occurred on the anniversary of 9/11 in 2012.....
In summary, we find that Euro terror, and in particular, terror events involving in some tangential way connected to France bear all the same patterns and Atlanticist black op power bloc operations that have been at work since the Cold War and Gladio. As new details emerge, a clearer picture can be painted about the new siege, but I feel confident we can expect all the same villains and cast of characters that come to play in the vaudeville variety show that is the global war on terror. The strategy of tension plan of the neocon establishment has long argued for a “clash of civilizations” between the “Judeo-Christian” nations and Islamic civilization to destabilize and remake the Middle East on the long march to the British Fabian great game of global technocratic government.
http://jaysanalysis.com/2015/01/08/the-french-connection-false-flags-a nd-the-charlie-hebdo-incident/ _________________ www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org www.rethink911.org www.patriotsquestion911.com www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org www.mediafor911truth.org www.pilotsfor911truth.org www.mp911truth.org www.ae911truth.org www.rl911truth.org www.stj911.org www.v911t.org www.thisweek.org.uk www.abolishwar.org.uk www.elementary.org.uk www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149 http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
The hysteria surrounding the Paris caricature publications and subsequent terrorist atrocities is an engineered confrontation for geo-political goals, having nothing to do with freedom of speech and everything to do with derailing peace efforts in Europe, says Nikolai Starikov, writer on geo-politics and international finance, who also proposed concrete steps for de-escalation.
In the weeks preceding the Paris terrorist atrocity:
1. The French Parliament voted to recognize Palestine as a state.
2. Hollande called for the lifting of Sanctions against Russia.
3. Hollande was preparing a peace deal for Ukraine, to be signed in Astana on 15th January 2015.
Starikov says: “there is no such thing as Islamic terrorism. What exists is an instrument in the hands of Western intelligence agencies, with which they act in various theaters. ... It is not an independent structure, fighting against the West. It is an instrument in the hands of the West.”
On the economic dimension: “the type of economy which was built by the West is suffocating from the colossal government debt. If the West fails to spark a major war, fails to destroy Russia and China, their life will become unequivocally worse. And for that they need someone to blame.”
Additional tags:
Ukraine, Russia, EU, European Union, Astana, Volnovaha, Volnovakha, Donbas, Donbass, Donets Basin, Donetsk, Donezk, Doneck, Lugansk, Luhansk, Crimea, World War 3, World War Three, Third World War, USA US attack invade Russia Ukraine, Orange Revolution, Euromaidan, Patriotic Maidan, Bolotnaya, sanctions, colour color revolution, Evgeni Evgeny Fedorov Fyodorov Feodorov, Echo Moskvy, Poznavatelnoe, infowars, Voice of America, raintv, Grani, Vineyard Saker, Benjamin Fulford, Voltaire, Global Research,
Украина, Россия, Франция, ДНР, ЛНР, ЕС, Евросоюз, Париж, Астана, Донецк, Донецьк, Донбасс, Донбасс, донецкая донецька область, марш единства, ПВО, Евромайдан, Євромайдан, патриотический Майдан, Оранжевая революция, Болотная, анти-террористическая операция, санкции, цветная революция, Евгений Федоров, Евгений Фёдоров, Эхо Москвы, Познавательное, Познавательноетв.рф, Радио Свобода, Новая Газета, Дождь, Грани, Балобан, English, eng sub, 2014, 2015, _________________ --
'Suppression of truth, human spirit and the holy chord of justice never works long-term. Something the suppressors never get.' David Southwell
http://aangirfan.blogspot.com http://aanirfan.blogspot.com
Martin Van Creveld: Let me quote General Moshe Dayan: "Israel must be like a mad dog, too dangerous to bother."
Martin Van Creveld: I'll quote Henry Kissinger: "In campaigns like this the antiterror forces lose, because they don't win, and the rebels win by not losing."
Charlie Hebdo - The Hidden Agenda Exposed [UPDATED 1-20-15]
17.Jan.2015 | SCGSCG
http://stormcloudsgathering.com/charlie-hebdo-cover-up
We don't have to speculate as to how this event is going to be used. It has already started.
To download the files mentioned in this video click here (French direct download), (English direct download), (French torrent)
Whatever you believe actually happened in Paris, one thing is very clear: the powers that be are going to try to use this event to expand wars, intensify domestic surveillance, and legislate away more of our rights.
This is not speculation. They have already started in France, in the U.K. (see this document), at the E.U. level, in the United States and they are going to attempt to push this on a global scale (also see this). All nicely coordinated to ride the wave of outrage that followed the attacks.
If you want a glimpse at just how far they want to take this, look at France. They're already dealing out serious prison sentences for those caught saying anything that could be interpreted as supporting terrorism. Does questioning the official story count as supporting terrorism? Where do you draw the line? Who decides?
Oh, so you don't actually have to support terrorism. Just disagreeing is enough.
Humanity, do you really want to learn this lesson the hard way, again?
They are playing you people: Problem, Reaction, Solution. It's the oldest trick in the book.
With so much riding on this story, obviously there are those who have a vested interest in preventing evidence which contradicts the official narrative from reaching the public.
On January 10th we uploaded a video entitled "Charlie Hebdo Shootings - Censored Video". Within 24 hours it had over a million views. Then the video was age restricted and removed from listings in spite of the fact that it depicted no blood, no gore, no graphic violence of any kind. It did, however, challenge the official narrative of the event. In spite of being age restricted the video continued to grow and added another million views.
We uploaded a French translation of this same video on January 12th. Within one day, the French version was taken down completely. Not age restricted, not blocked in some countries, completely deleted from the site. Again, this video showed no blood or gore whatsoever. In fact it didn't even show actual murder.
We're not going to show that footage again here. We're not going to give them any excuse to block this video. However if you enter the following url into your browser http://stormcloudsgathering.com/charlie-hebdo-cover-up) you will find a download link to the original files. Watch it and come to your own conclusions.
Of course, there is much more at stake here than our little video, or even the attacks themselves. The internet as a whole poses a threat to the ruling class, because in its current form ideas cannot be fully controlled. The internet in its current form makes it very hard for them to hide their corruption, their wars of aggression, and their covert operations, and that makes it hard to govern. They intend to change that (for your security of course).
Funny isn't it, 17 people people get killed in France, supposedly over a question of free speech, and the first thing that governments of the world want to do is use that event to take away free speech on the internet.
It's also funny that these same governments expressed no outrage whatsoever as the United States military killed hundreds of thousands of civilians in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen and elsewhere.
Apparently it's not murder if you use a drone or a guided missile. Apparently it's not terrorism if women and children are killed by soldiers and government bureaucrats. No, it's only murder when politicians and the corporate media tell you it's murder, and if they get their way, they'll be able to take down any website, video or social media account that dares contradict them.
There's one question on many of your minds right now. What can we do? How can we fight back?
Well, first of all, stop waiting for instructions. Do what you can. Use the talent you have. Get creative. Remember necessity is the mother of invention. If each and every one of you just did what you could without worrying about whether or not you would succeed, that would be enough.
And remember, these politicians don't have any real power. They just have your obedience. Even their enforcement arms, the police and the military, are really just structured obedience.
Withdraw that obedience and it's game over.
Update 1-20-2015
Reuters: Ex-UK spy chief calls for a new "accord" between tech companies and spy agencies to prevent terrorist attacks. Nothing should be off limits to the NSA or the GCHQ. In other words privacy would be made illegal. _________________ --
'Suppression of truth, human spirit and the holy chord of justice never works long-term. Something the suppressors never get.' David Southwell
http://aangirfan.blogspot.com http://aanirfan.blogspot.com
Martin Van Creveld: Let me quote General Moshe Dayan: "Israel must be like a mad dog, too dangerous to bother."
Martin Van Creveld: I'll quote Henry Kissinger: "In campaigns like this the antiterror forces lose, because they don't win, and the rebels win by not losing."
http://stormcloudsgathering.com/charlie-hebdo-cover-up
We don't have to speculate as to how this event is going to be used. It has already started.
To download the files mentioned in this video click here (French direct download), (English direct download), (French torrent)
Whatever you believe actually happened in Paris, one thing is very clear: the powers that be are going to try to use this event to expand wars, intensify domestic surveillance, and legislate away more of our rights.
This is not speculation. They have already started in France, in the U.K. (see this document), at the E.U. level, in the United States and they are going to attempt to push this on a global scale (also see this). All nicely coordinated to ride the wave of outrage that followed the attacks.
If you want a glimpse at just how far they want to take this, look at France. They're already dealing out serious prison sentences for those caught saying anything that could be interpreted as supporting terrorism. Does questioning the official story count as supporting terrorism? Where do you draw the line? Who decides?
Oh, so you don't actually have to support terrorism. Just disagreeing is enough.
Humanity, do you really want to learn this lesson the hard way, again?
They are playing you people: Problem, Reaction, Solution. It's the oldest trick in the book.
With so much riding on this story, obviously there are those who have a vested interest in preventing evidence which contradicts the official narrative from reaching the public.
On January 10th we uploaded a video entitled "Charlie Hebdo Shootings - Censored Video". Within 24 hours it had over a million views. Then the video was age restricted and removed from listings in spite of the fact that it depicted no blood, no gore, no graphic violence of any kind. It did, however, challenge the official narrative of the event. In spite of being age restricted the video continued to grow and added another million views.
We uploaded a French translation of this same video on January 12th. Within one day, the French version was taken down completely. Not age restricted, not blocked in some countries, completely deleted from the site. Again, this video showed no blood or gore whatsoever. In fact it didn't even show actual murder.
We're not going to show that footage again here. We're not going to give them any excuse to block this video. However if you enter the following url into your browser http://stormcloudsgathering.com/charlie-hebdo-cover-up) you will find a download link to the original files. Watch it and come to your own conclusions.
Of course, there is much more at stake here than our little video, or even the attacks themselves. The internet as a whole poses a threat to the ruling class, because in its current form ideas cannot be fully controlled. The internet in its current form makes it very hard for them to hide their corruption, their wars of aggression, and their covert operations, and that makes it hard to govern. They intend to change that (for your security of course).
Funny isn't it, 17 people people get killed in France, supposedly over a question of free speech, and the first thing that governments of the world want to do is use that event to take away free speech on the internet.
It's also funny that these same governments expressed no outrage whatsoever as the United States military killed hundreds of thousands of civilians in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen and elsewhere.
Apparently it's not murder if you use a drone or a guided missile. Apparently it's not terrorism if women and children are killed by soldiers and government bureaucrats. No, it's only murder when politicians and the corporate media tell you it's murder, and if they get their way, they'll be able to take down any website, video or social media account that dares contradict them.
There's one question on many of your minds right now. What can we do? How can we fight back?
Well, first of all, stop waiting for instructions. Do what you can. Use the talent you have. Get creative. Remember necessity is the mother of invention. If each and every one of you just did what you could without worrying about whether or not you would succeed, that would be enough.
And remember, these politicians don't have any real power. They just have your obedience. Even their enforcement arms, the police and the military, are really just structured obedience.
Withdraw that obedience and it's game over.
Update 1-20-2015
Reuters: Ex-UK spy chief calls for a new "accord" between tech companies and spy agencies to prevent terrorist attacks. Nothing should be off limits to the NSA or the GCHQ. In other words privacy would be made illegal. _________________ --
'Suppression of truth, human spirit and the holy chord of justice never works long-term. Something the suppressors never get.' David Southwell
http://aangirfan.blogspot.com http://aanirfan.blogspot.com
Martin Van Creveld: Let me quote General Moshe Dayan: "Israel must be like a mad dog, too dangerous to bother."
Martin Van Creveld: I'll quote Henry Kissinger: "In campaigns like this the antiterror forces lose, because they don't win, and the rebels win by not losing."
'....Closely associated with several influential figures of the French Zionist movement (especially David, Benjamin, and Eric de Rothschild, as well as Patrick Drahi, head of the Israeli channel i24news) and longtime financial supporter of Nicolas Sarkozy, Laurent Dassault cultivates, alongside his family ties in Israel, intimate relations with formidable local businessmen (including Stef Wertheimer) and many leading figures of the ruling class in Tel Aviv, including the extreme right.
Dassault is a director of an investment fund run by Edouard Cukierman (also spokesman for the Israeli army) alongside Roger Cukierman (President of CRIF) and Yair Shamir. Member of an ultra-nationalist Israeli party, the latter, son of former prime minister and Mossad agent Yitzhak Shamir, recently resigned from Netanyahu government because of a corruption scandal involving officials of his group. The journal Intelligence Online has this former high-ranking military officer as the “Dassault’s Israeli lobbyist in Israel.” A funny detail: the extreme right party, headed by Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman, recently garnered attention by promoting Charlie Hebdo in the streets of Tel Aviv.
In November, Laurent Dassault co-hosted, together with Gilles-William Goldnadel and Claude Goasguen, a ceremony honoring General Pierre Bénouville, a man celebrated in Zionist circles for violating DeGualle’s 1967 arms embargo against Israel.
No surprise: In 2008, the Israeli daily Haaretz published an article about Dessault, that zealous promoter of Bénouville. According to the journalist Ora Coren, Laurent Dassault “sees himself as continuing” the work of his grandfather, Marcel Dassault, who “at the birth of the state, armed Israel with its first aircraft.”
To sum up: At the origin of this video – filmed, oddly enough, without apparent fear of being hit by a stray bullet – in which one of the Charlie Hebdo attackers (who would soon flee in the direction of a Parisian establishment used by the Israeli army) declaims, with his left index finger pointed towards the sky, that he had “avenged the Prophet” – is a mysterious anonymous Pole, blurred by the television media, who vanishes without a trace – having been employed by a long-standing family enterprise of Laurent Dassault, ultra-Zionist multimillionaire connected to the military and radical wing of the Tel Aviv regime. And as the Israeli channel i24news was the first in the world to “reveal” the double French-Algerian nationality of the perpetrators of the attack, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu wasted no time politically exploiting an “terrorist and Islamist” event which he himself had described in rough outline, and insisted was immanent, back on August 7th.
Are these and other emerging facts just bizarre coincidences? Or are they gradually-gathered pieces of a complex puzzle?
In any case, the story of Janek irresistibly evokes that of another immigrant worker: Pavel Hlava Czech.
Accompanied by his employer Mike Cohen (both in the picture above), the man claimed to have accidentally filmed (like the Naudet brothers) the two plane crashes into the World Trade Center on September 11th 2001. And like Geoffroy Sciard, Cohen would later criticized his worker – who has likewise evaporated into thin air – for having sold his pictures to the media.
To date, only one thing is certain: the terrace with white edges from which Janek supposedly captured his video has disappeared.
Panamza has obtained images – filmed on January 24th – showing the condition of the worksite, began last summer and obviously finished.
Surprise, surprise: The installation that permitted the comfortable filming of the terrorists’ thunderous departure – here filmed from the best angle – no longer exists.
What appeared to be a terrace turns out to be a simple gray roof.' _________________ 'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Posted: Fri Feb 13, 2015 12:00 am Post subject:
Hollande: Russia sanctions should be lifted now 'if progress'
5th January - http://www.dw.de/hollande-russia-sanctions-should-be-lifted-now-if-pro gress/a-18170733
Francois Hollande has called for Western sanctions against Russia to be lifted if there were signs of progress in ending the Ukraine crisis. He's expected to join Chancellor Merkel at upcoming talks in Kazakhstan.
French President Francois Hollande
"I think the sanctions must stop now. They must be lifted if there is progress. If there is no progress the sanctions will remain," the French president Hollande said during an interview with the France Inter radio station on Monday.
Hollande said he was hopeful such progress could be made at international talks between Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko in Astana, the capital of Kazakhstan, on January 15. Hollande and German Chancellor Angela Merkel are also expected to attend the gathering, which is part of an attempt to kick start the peace talks and find a lasting solution to the conflict in eastern Ukraine.
Hollande said Europe should keep lines of communication open with Putin.
"It has been costly for him...Mr Putin does not want to annex eastern Ukraine," said Hollande. "What he wants is for Ukraine not to fall into the NATO camp."
"What we want is that he respects the territorial integrity of Ukraine. What we want is that he does not support the separatists," he added.
Damaging sanctions
The European Union and the United States imposed sanctions on Russia over its annexation of Crimea early last year and its alleged role in the Ukraine crisis. The government in Kyiv has long accused Moscow of supporting separatists in the country's east, a charge Russia denies. More than 4,600 people have died in the conflict since fighting broke out between Ukrainian forces and pro-Russian separatists in April 2014.
The sanctions have put a strain on the Russian economy, and sent the ruble crashing by some 40 percent against the dollar late last year.
Germany's deputy chancellor, Sigmar Gabriel, has warned against destabilizing Russia with harsh sanctions, saying it is not in the interest of Europe or Germany.
"The goal was never to push Russia politically and economically into chaos," Gabriel said in an interview the Bild am Sonntag newspaper. _________________ www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org www.rethink911.org www.patriotsquestion911.com www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org www.mediafor911truth.org www.pilotsfor911truth.org www.mp911truth.org www.ae911truth.org www.rl911truth.org www.stj911.org www.v911t.org www.thisweek.org.uk www.abolishwar.org.uk www.elementary.org.uk www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149 http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Posted: Fri Feb 13, 2015 12:01 am Post subject:
THIS STORY
TWO DAYS BEFORE
THE BANG!
Hollande: Russia sanctions should be lifted now 'if progress'
Monday 5th January - http://www.dw.de/hollande-russia-sanctions-should-be-lifted-now-if-pro gress/a-18170733
Francois Hollande has called for Western sanctions against Russia to be lifted if there were signs of progress in ending the Ukraine crisis. He's expected to join Chancellor Merkel at upcoming talks in Kazakhstan.
French President Francois Hollande
"I think the sanctions must stop now. They must be lifted if there is progress. If there is no progress the sanctions will remain," the French president Hollande said during an interview with the France Inter radio station on Monday.
Hollande said he was hopeful such progress could be made at international talks between Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko in Astana, the capital of Kazakhstan, on January 15. Hollande and German Chancellor Angela Merkel are also expected to attend the gathering, which is part of an attempt to kick start the peace talks and find a lasting solution to the conflict in eastern Ukraine.
Hollande said Europe should keep lines of communication open with Putin.
"It has been costly for him...Mr Putin does not want to annex eastern Ukraine," said Hollande. "What he wants is for Ukraine not to fall into the NATO camp."
"What we want is that he respects the territorial integrity of Ukraine. What we want is that he does not support the separatists," he added.
Damaging sanctions
The European Union and the United States imposed sanctions on Russia over its annexation of Crimea early last year and its alleged role in the Ukraine crisis. The government in Kyiv has long accused Moscow of supporting separatists in the country's east, a charge Russia denies. More than 4,600 people have died in the conflict since fighting broke out between Ukrainian forces and pro-Russian separatists in April 2014.
The sanctions have put a strain on the Russian economy, and sent the ruble crashing by some 40 percent against the dollar late last year.
Germany's deputy chancellor, Sigmar Gabriel, has warned against destabilizing Russia with harsh sanctions, saying it is not in the interest of Europe or Germany.
"The goal was never to push Russia politically and economically into chaos," Gabriel said in an interview the Bild am Sonntag newspaper. _________________ www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org www.rethink911.org www.patriotsquestion911.com www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org www.mediafor911truth.org www.pilotsfor911truth.org www.mp911truth.org www.ae911truth.org www.rl911truth.org www.stj911.org www.v911t.org www.thisweek.org.uk www.abolishwar.org.uk www.elementary.org.uk www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149 http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Notice someone in the picture has apparently been removed? Who’s hand is sticking out from under Hollande’s right arm? And who’s hand is under Netanyahu’s left arm? It’s a small point, but does seem to show that the pic was a PR stunt. And what is Hollande looking at in such an odd way, and in a different direction to everybody else, as though someone was talking to him?
'Enjoy this week’s False Flag Weekly News – before it gets banned!
The first country to ban us will probably be France, where Prime Minister François Hollande recently attacked me by name, while also calling for removing “conspiracy theories” (i.e., truthful reporting) from the internet:
The President of France orders you not to buy this book
The President of France orders you not to buy this book
“[Anti-Semitism] maintains conspiracy theories that spread without limits. Conspiracy theories that have, in the past, led to the worst…[The] answer is to realize that conspiracy theories are disseminated through the Internet and social networks. Moreover, we must remember that it is words that have in the past prepared extermination. We need to act at the European level, and even internationally, so that a legal framework can be defined, and so that Internet platforms that manage social networks are held to account and that sanctions be imposed for failure to enforce.” (source)
Hollande’s suggestion that “conspiracy theories” will be banned “at the European level, and even internationally” means that if he’s right, you may not be able to watch False Flag Weekly News much longer.
Actually, for all I know, we may already be banned in France. According to RINF.com:
“Earlier this week, the Interior Minister of France — with no court review or adversarial process — ordered five websites to not only be blocked in France, but that anyone who visits any of the sites get redirected to a scary looking government website, saying:
You are being redirected to this official website since your computer was about to connect with a page that provokes terrorist acts or condones terrorism publicly.”
Along with his statement calling for outlawing “conspiracy theories” Hollande issued a diatribe attacking me personally, alongside four other “leading conspiracist intellectuals.”
Why are the French authorities so angry with me?
They are freaking out about the new book I am about to publish, We Are NOT Charlie Hebdo: Free Thinkers Question the French 9/11.
The book has intellectual respectability and thus crossover potential and the ability to reach and influence people who matter. And it includes more than enough information for any reasonable reader to conclude that the Charlie Hebdo affair, like most of the other spectacular “Islamic terror attacks,” was a false flag operation.
In former times, books banned in the USA, like Ulysses and Naked Lunch, were printed in France and smuggled across the Atlantic. Will We Are NOT Charlie Hebdo have to be printed in North America and smuggled into France? Or will Hollande get his way and convince the US to revoke whatever is left of the First Amendment and ban it here too?
charlie-back-coverHollande’s moves are just the latest in a series of trial balloons aimed at outlawing “conspiracy theories.” The initial impetus came from Obama’s former Information Czar Cass Sunstein, who argued that some day it may be necessary to ban “conspiracy theories,” but in the meantime governments should just “cognitively infiltrate” conspiracy movements and “disable the purveyors of conspiracy theories.”
Today, Western governments are already working overtime to “disable” truth-tellers. Check out Snowden’s leaked document exposing the war on alternative media:
Snowden: ‘Training Guide’ for GCHQ, NSA Agents Infiltrating and Disrupting Alternative Media Online
Another trial balloon came from UK PM David Cameron, who said that people like me are “nonviolent extremists” comparable to ISIS who need to be eradicated using all means at the government’s disposal.
Thanks, David, I love you too!
Ironically, it seems the Charlie Hebdo PR campaign, which was supposedly about defending free speech, has triggered the biggest crackdown on free speech in French history…a crackdown that is threatening to go global.
So if you actually do support free speech, please go to http://wearenotcharliehebdo.blogspot.com and purchase an advance copy of We Are NOT Charlie Hebdo: Free Thinkers Question the French 9/11. As David Ray Griffin says, it’s a “breakthrough” book. Buy it while you can – and deliver a symbolic middle finger to François Hollande and the other state terrorists who “hate our freedoms.” _________________ 'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
Review chooses Cynthia McKinney's chapter as the best:
'....The Single Chapter to Read if You Don’t Read Any Others Award, for these reviewers, goes to former U.S. Congresswoman and courageous Truth and human rights activist Cynthia McKinney.
McKinney offers a very helpful theoretical framework. She envisions the world’s diverse campaigns against Deep State deception as parts of a unitary “global truth movement,” a “complex adaptive system” essential at this moment in history.
“Unmasking the Deep State,” she adds, “is the best way to thwart its accelerating merger with the Public State—a circumstance that could render the political process and the operation of the Public State irrelevant.”
McKinney also earns a Special Mention for Best Metaphor. After referring to the multi-pronged and successful campaign to unseat her after she served six Congressional terms with distinction she writes:
“Most of the current crop of Congresspersons know from my example that the Deep State is riddled with landmines of self-protection. Best to say nothing, do nothing, and know nothing—for any motion at all could set off a deadly device.”
This speaks volumes to the suppression and manipulation of legislators in the “free Western democracies.” _________________ 'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2015 3:04 pm Post subject: Re: Assault on Paris Charlie Hebdo magazine - dozens dead
For the record...
I reported both the issue of the spammer and the more serious deliberate cyberattack on this forum that took place the lunchtime of the Charlie Hebdo attack to the police.
Also the latter to the support people at our Internet Service Provider Greennet.
After a few days they told me it was a 'random' problem with their own security software... which I don't believe for a minute!
Whitehall_Bin_Men wrote:
Coordinated cyber attack blocking Tony Gosling's home IP address from accessing this forum
http://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/uk-911-truth
'New information, published by the Croatian daily Slobodna Dalmacija, alleges that the French state was responsible for the attacks which occurred in Paris in January and November 2015. Either the French authorities had previously infiltrated the groups which perpetrated these attacks, and chose not to intervene to prevent them, or else they were directly implicated in the organisation of the attacks. In any case, it remains to be determined who made these decisions, and whether or not he was acting on behalf of the Republic.
According to the official version, the attacks of January and November 2015 in Paris were sponsored by Al-Qaïda in the Arab Peninsula (AQAP) —for the execution of the editors of Charlie-Hebdo— and by Daesh for all the others. The authorities have admitted that the Charlie-Hebdo attack was coordinated with the attack against the supermarket at the Porte de Vincennes, although, according to them, AQAP and Daesh are enemies. They also admitted that doubt persists concerning the claim that Amedy Coulibaly was a member of Daesh.
Reuters revealed that the weapons used in the attacks came from the factory of Crvena Zastava, situated in Kragujevac (Serbia) [1]. Both Associated Press and the Palm Beach Post believed that one of the Serbian pistols had been transported by Century International Arms, a Florida firm linked to the CIA [2], although the Press Agency – but not the Post – has since retracted the claim [3].
According to the Croatian daily Slobodna Dalmacija, the weapons used in the January attack against the supermarket, and others used during the attack in November, came from the Serbian manufacturer Crvena Zastava, and were moved to France by the same dealer, Claude Hermant [4].
Our readers will remember that in 1998, the Réseau Voltaire uncovered the surprising activities of the security contingent of the Front National, the Département Protection Sécurité (DPS). This unit had been compiling a list of personalities and had scouted their homes – apparently a small group of individuals within the DPS were preparing certain illicit activities. After a long period of complicated negotiations, we managed to obtain the creation of a Parliamentary Commission of Enquiry to investigate these facts [5]. The elements that we provided for the Assemblée Nationale, specifically concerning the double mission of members of the DPS - for the Front National in France and for the organisation of coups d’état in Africa - were quickly blocked by the Secret-Défense [6]. However, this information provoked a crisis and division within the Front National, so that finally, no-one was available to answer the allegations. Two years later, in 2001, one of the ex-members of the DPS, Claude Hermant, (mentioned above), admitted to the French daily Libération the existence of the « Action » structure within the DPS [7].
Here’s a reminder of our work between 1998 and 1999. We had established that in 1972, the « Front National pour l’Unité Française » had been created in secret by Jacques Foccart, then responsible for Affaires Africaines et Malgaches at the Élysée, by request of President Georges Pompidou. The FN was led from the beginning by Jean-Marie Le Pen, who had played an important rôle in Charles de Gaulle’s ascension to power in 1958, before turning against him [8], and by François Duprat, who had engaged with Bob Denard in the support of Moïse Tchombé in Katanga. Also, we had shown that in 1984, François Mitterrand and Guy Penne, Jacques Foccart’s successor at the Élysée, had used secret Republican funds to finance the electoral campaign of the Front National in the European elections. We thus arrived at the conclusion that the FN was, and had always been, not so much a political party with the desire to exercise power, but a structure necessary to the Élysée, which it used first of all to control personalities of the extreme right wing, then to introduce them into the national political landscape.
Concerning the DPS, we have shown that it was directed at the time by Bernard Courcelles, also the bodyguard for Anne Pingeot, François Mitterrand’s mistress, and by Gérard Le Vert. The DPS included a secret group of about 60 men, all of whom were linked to the secret services, and were mobilised whenever necessary to carry out secret missions, mainly in Africa. This is the group to which Claude Hermant belonged. The true directorate of the DPS was not the Front National, but the Ministry for Defence, with the DPSD, a secret service with almost the same name, whose mission was the protection of the armed forces.............' _________________ 'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
The attack occurred in 2009, but the alleged 'sensitivity' of the case meant 6 of the attackers were only jailed last Friday, 18th March 2016, whilst many of the assailants fled to Israel to escape justice:
'PARIS - Six Jewish vigilantes were jailed in Paris on Friday over a "savage gang attack" targeting attendees at a fundraising event for Gaza in 2009.
The defendants used iron bars, baseball bats and bike chains in the onslaught, in which they deliberately targeted anybody who looked like a Muslim.
Among their victims was a 22-year-old singer who suffered a "lynching" by the 20-strong mob who chanted ‘Death to Arabs’ and ‘Long live Israel!’
All were leading members of the Jewish Defence League (JDL), a notorious vigilante group that is outlawed in both America and Israel because of its links with terrorism.
Despite this, the JDL is allowed to demonstrate openly in France, and its yellow and black clenched fist flags are regularly seen at events across the country.
A court in the French capital heard how all six had beaten up Hatem Essabbak and Mustapha Belkhir outside a Paris theatre in April 2009.
The case is considered one of the most sensitive in recent legal history, because of the way it illustrates how the Israel-Palestine conflict has been exported to the streets of major French cities.
No less than five examining judges were involved in the Paris enquiry, with four resigning one after the other because of the intense pressure.
The six men found guilty of carrying out aggravated violent assaults were Jason Tibi, Rudy Lalou, Azar Cohen, Maxime Schaffier, Yoia Bensimou, and Yoni Sulman.
Other JDL gang members are said to have fled to Israel to avoid prosecution, while Tibi has admitted serving in the Israeli army while waiting for his case to come to court. At least two of those convicted today have since fled to Israel.
A damning verdict reads: "The facts of this case illustrate how the violence was aggravated by victims being targeted because of their race and religion."
Dominique Cochain, Essabbak’s barrister, said: "Normally, this type of case is dealt with within three months. It has to be said that this is a very sensitive issue."
Essabbak, a 22-year-old singer at the time, was with his girlfriend outside the Adyar Theatre, close to the Eiffel Tower, on Sunday 12 April, 2009.
Both were taking part in Our Talents for Gaza – a showbiz event raising money for the surviving families of more than 1,400 Palestinians, including 400 children, killed by Israeli forces during an offensive a few weeks before.
Essabbak was surrounded by the JDL men who used iron bars, bats, bike chains, crash helmets and fists in the "unprovoked lynching," the court heard.
Essabbak said: "I was repeatedly hit in the face, around the head, and on both legs. I then fell to the ground, and was hit again around the head. They carried on until they saw I wasn’t moving. My life stopped on 12 April, 2009."
Mustapha Belkhir went to help Essabbak and was also badly beaten up. Both men ended up in hospital.
Witnesses heard the attackers shouting: "Have this, it’s for Gaza, you dirty Arab," and "Us Jews are going to f*** you, you dirty race".
Most of the JDL members had their faces covered, but their mobile phones were later traced to the scene of the attack.
Tibi – who was described in court as the leader of the group – at first denied any knowledge of the attacks, but admitted taking part when confronted with evidence.
Tibi and and Sulman received two-year sentences, while the others were handed sentences of between nine months and a year.
Beyond the theatre attack, 27-year-old Tibi has a previous prison conviction for smashing up a Palestinian book shop in Paris, and has been filmed fighting in Marseille.
Ms Cochain told the court: "The evidence is that Mr Tibi has not changed. Videos on Google show that in 2011 he disrupted a pro-Palestine meeting in the 14th arrondissement of Paris, accompanied by JDL members, and wanted to stop debate.
"They were shouting slogans like ‘F*** Palestine’. He was also in Marseille in June 2011 to protest against the Gaza flotilla taking supplies to the blockaded Palestinian territory. His face was covered in blood and he was saying ‘I’m here to protest’, ‘Israel will live, Israel will vanquish’."
The JDL is regularly involved in attacks on pro-Palestine activists, politicians, journalists and other perceived enemies across France.
There have been numerous calls to ban the JDL in France, with Interior Minister Bernard Cazeneuve condemning their behaviour as "excessive".'
Imagine how quickly a trial would have ensued, much more draconian sentences would have been imposed, and what massive world-wide media coverage there would have been, if it were Muslims attacking a Jewish fund raising event instead. There would have been no issue of 'sensitivity' then! _________________ 'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
Officially three police officers were killed and were honored by president Hollande in a State funeral on January 13. The ceremony was held at the Paris prefecture de Police. The French president and prime minister Manuel Valls met with members of the families. A fourth policeman assigned to the Charlie Hebdo investigation “committed suicide.” His death was barely acknowledged, presented as a “fait divers” with no relationship to the Charlie Hebdo police operation.
The three police officers were posthumously awarded the Légion d’honneur.
French municipal Police officers watch the French president pays tribute to the police officers.
Paris Police officers at Ceremony Photograph: Gonzalo Fuentes/Reuters
Lieutenant Franck Brinsolaro, 49, was a protection officer assigned by Paris police to ensure the security of Charlie Hebdo’s Charb. With the exception of Brinsolara who was shot on the premises of Charlie Hebdo, the official and media reports regarding the deaths of the three other policemen are shrouded in contradictions.
Ahmed Merhabet, 40, according to official statements was shot at point blank by one of the gunmen on the street close to Charlie Hebdo’s office.
Police trainee officer Clarissa Jean-Philippe, 26, an unarmed traffic policewoman in Montrouge, in south Paris, was “gunned down by a man wearing body armour and using an automatic assault rifle.”
A fourth policeman Commissaire Helric Fredou –who had been officially assigned to the Charlie Hebdo investigation– allegedly committed suicide in his office at police headquarters in Limoges on Wednesday evening. He was discovered with a bullet in his head at 1am on Thursday morning. Fredou although involved in the Charlie Hebdo investigation, was not honored by the French government alongside his three colleagues.
Mystery surrounds the death of Ahmed Merhabet and Helric Fredou. The circumstances of the death of Clarissa Jean Philippe remain unclear.
Ahmed Merhabet
According to official reports, Ahmed Merhabet was shot in the head at close range with an automatic weapon in the street of Charlie Hebdo’s office. The official report is refuted by video evidence. The shot fired from an AK47 visibly did not hit his head. If it had, there would have been blood all over the pavement.
An AK-47 bullet fired from close range would … have done something pretty dramatic to that policeman’s head. And if the video is real – and there doesn’t seem much doubt that it is – it clearly shows nothing significant happened to his head either as or after the bullet was fired. (Jonathan Cook, What the Charlie Hebdo Execution video Really Shows, Global Research, January 13, 2014)
Analysis of the video suggests that Merhabet may have been killed, but under different circumstances and possibly in another location.
While the video footage aired on network TV has since been removed, the French authorities as well as the media have stuck to their fake story: Merhabet was shot to the head in the street close to Charlie Hebdo’s office .
Commissaire Helric Fredou: “The Forgotten Policeman”
Fredou was part of the official investigation. His passing –while participating in the Charlie Hebdo investigation– has barely been acknowledged. His death in Limoges, South-West France is shrouded in mystery. He allegedly committed suicide within hours of a police debriefing and the preparation of his police report.
His body was found at 1am on Thursday morning with a bullet in his head. He allegedly committed suicide.
Fredou’s funeral was held privately in Limoges on the same day (Tuesday) as that of the other three policemen.
The official story is that he was depressed and had suffered from a burnout following a meeting with relatives of one of the victims. There are no details as to who these relatives are and where they are living, in the region of Limoges (Haute Vienne) or in Paris (400 km. from Limoges).
What the reports fail to mention is that the Kouachi brothers had spent their high-school years in the Limoges region and that Commissaire Ferou’s police investigation was in all probability related to gathering information within the region on the Kouali brothers including their whereabouts.
”An autopsy was performed at the University Hospital of Limoges, “confirming the suicide” . The French media decided or was instructed not to cover the incident.
Commissaire Ferou committed suicide in his workplace, in his office at the police station.
Did he commit suicide? Was he incited to commit suicide?
Or was he an “honest Cop” executed on orders of France’s judicial police?
Has his report been released?
These are issues for France’s journalists to address. It’s called investigative reporting. Or is it outright media censorship? (Michel Chossudovsky, Police Commissioner Involved in Charlie Hebdo Investigation “Commits Suicide”. Total News Blackout, Global Research, January 11, 2014)
Author’s note: since the publication of my first article on the death of Commissaire Helric Fredou (January 11, 2015, quoted above) an article published on eutimes.net entitled French Police Commissioner Suicided After Attempting To Issue Murder Warrant Against President Obama has been circulated on the internet. This article is sheer disinformation. It is intended to create confusion and discredit independent news and analysis concerning this important issue.
With regard to Police trainee officer Clarissa Jean-Philippe, the press reports initially stated that she was shot by an unidentified gunman on Thursday. She was later reported to have been shot down, without concrete evidence, by Ahmedi Coulibaly. Clarissa Jean-Philippe was not in any way connected to the police operation.
Coulibaly was depicted as a Muslim fanatic in a video in which the insignia of the Islamic State is portrayed.
The media reports are full of contradictions focussing on an unknown jogger who was shot at by Coulibaly on Wednesday January 7.
Amedy Coulibaly began his terror rampage a day earlier than previously thought by shooting a jogger and planting a car bomb, … (Daily Mail) .
On Thursday, he was said to have killed traffic policewoman Clarissa Jean Philippe, and on Friday he was allegedly involved in the killing of four hostages Yoav Hattab, Yohan Cohen, Philippe Braham, and Francois-Michel Saada at a kosher grocery store at Porte de Vincennes. He was, according to media and police reports, shot dead by policemen “after” he had killed the four Jewish hostages.
While Coulibaly was, according to reports, not directly involved in the shooting at Charlie Hebdo on Wednesday, he was heralded by the media as the spokesperson of the Islamic State (ISIL), which ironically is covertly supported by US-NATO as well as the French Republic.
According to the Daily Mail:
The killer, who was shot dead by police after murdering four hostages in a Jewish shop on Friday, was thought to have struck first when he killed an unarmed policewoman last Thursday.
But now Paris prosecutors think he was responsible for seriously injuring a jogger in a suburb of the capital on January 7, the same day gunmen killed 12 during the Charlie Hebdo massacre.
A ‘martyrdom video’ of the fanatic, apparently filmed midway through the wave of terror attacks, appeared online yesterday. In it he urges Western Muslims to wage war against ‘enemies of Islam’.
Terrorist Amedy Coulibaly recorded a chilling 'suicide' video, in which he is seen seated in front of a flag used by Islamic State jihadists as well as an automatic rifle propped against the wall
Terrorist Amedy Coulibaly recorded a chilling ‘suicide’ video, in which he is seen seated in front of a flag used by Islamic State jihadists as well as an automatic rifle propped against the wall
In the slickly edited footage, the 32-year-old pledges allegiance to the Islamic State and its self-proclaimed Caliph, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi
The footage claims Coulibaly planted a bomb under a car on a Paris street, seemingly referring to an explosion on Wednesday night that authorities had not linked to the terror attacks.
Prosecutors said that tests on shell cases from the jogger shooting linked them to the weapon used at the kosher supermarket two days later.
French security forces also released details of a cache of weapons, including automatic rifles and explosives, found at Coulibaly’s last address, an an apartment in Gentilly, on the outskirts of Paris.
The narrative and video have the appearances of being staged: support of the Islamic State, weapons from the Islamic State, lest we forget the Islamic State is supported and funded by the US, Britain, France and Israel.
It is worth noting that Coulibaly who -according to reports– was shot dead at the kosher grocery store at Vincennes on January 9, had been invited in 2009 to a meeting at the Elysée Palace with former president Nicolas Sarkozy.
Coulibaly had a criminal record. Several years prior to the 2009 meeting with Sarkozy, Coulibaly had been on the radar of French police and intelligence. The stated purpose of his meeting was to discuss employment creation and poverty alleviation.
What was the relationship of this alleged terrorist to a former head of State? Nobody has bothered in the French media to ask Sarkozy to clarify the nature of his meeting with Coulibaly. _________________ --
'Suppression of truth, human spirit and the holy chord of justice never works long-term. Something the suppressors never get.' David Southwell
http://aangirfan.blogspot.com http://aanirfan.blogspot.com
Martin Van Creveld: Let me quote General Moshe Dayan: "Israel must be like a mad dog, too dangerous to bother."
Martin Van Creveld: I'll quote Henry Kissinger: "In campaigns like this the antiterror forces lose, because they don't win, and the rebels win by not losing."
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Posted: Wed May 24, 2017 10:40 am Post subject:
Informant Claude Hermant implicates French state in Charlie Hebdo attacks
http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2017/05/22/herm-m22.html
By Anthony Torres
22 May 2017
Claude Hermant, a police informant arrested in the case of the January 7, 2015 attack on Charlie Hebdo in Paris, has implicated the French state in the preparation of the attack. Hermant, who allegedly sold weapons used by Amédy Coulibaly and the Kouachi brothers to commit the attacks, is reportedly charging that three gendarme military policemen and two customs officials, as well as organized crime circles, were involved.
The case shatters the official narrative, according to which terror attacks in France, Belgium, and Germany since 2015 have been the work of isolated Islamists.
Hermant’s lawyer, Maxime Moulin, does not dispute the fact that weapons that passed through the hands of his client, who was acting for the customs’ intelligence agency until 2013 and then worked for the gendarmerie, reached Coulibaly. The media and established political parties covered up this fact, together with Hermant’s arrest after the attacks due to his relations with Coulibaly. The interior minister in 2015, Bernard Cazeneuve, even invoked the states secrets privilege in regard to investigations of the relations between Hermant and the Islamists.
Moulin filed a suit with the state prosecutor’s office in Lille on May 2, accusing the interior minister of endangering his client’s life. He stated, “We are demanding the lifting of the states secrets privilege. Things are being hidden, this was the solution that we found to obtain the truth. … We want to have access to this information. We are officially asking that the Interior Ministry lift the states secrets privilege on all contact reports [between the gendarmerie and Claude Hermant]. We want to know what reports were handled, what information was not transmitted, what reports were ignored, and why.”
Moulin said that Hermant had acted purely in the interests of the customs service and of the gendarmerie: “We cannot accept when the gendarmerie ’s work is really borderline. When things work out, they are happy, but when things don’t, they hang you out to dry in the ruins. They can’t abandon a soldier in the field like this.”
According to the daily Libération, Moulin justified his client’s suit by citing “a Médiapart article of March 2017. Claude Hermant had warned the gendarmerie that a convoy with weapons was passing through the tollbooths on the Lille to Paris highway, but the gendarmerie only succeeded in intercepting half of the vehicles. The second convoy, which had been warned that the gendarmes had been alerted, managed to evade them. And those weapons were used by Coulibaly.”
The Voix du Nord daily published a few extracts of emails exchanged between Hermant and a gendarme in November 2014: “Hey Claude, we talked it over with our superiors. … We’re giving you a green light for the two cases you showed us (weapons—[the city of]Charleroi) ...”
These emails suggest that Hermant may have received official approval from some intelligence agency for his actions in the Coulibaly-Kouachi affair. The Voix du Nord encourages its readers to draw their own conclusions: “Suppose you ran across this type of message (of a dozen or so in total), that a gendarme allegedly sent to Claude Hermant on 20 November 2017 at 8:47 a.m., and that a close friend of the accused insists that ‘Claude Hermant has all his bases covered.’”
It is by now quite clear that far broader forces besides a few Islamist networks were involved in the processes that led up to the attacks. The government’s recourse to the states secrets privilege and the deafening silence of the major media has produced a false and one-sided narrative of the attacks, which incites anti-Islamic racism and whitewashes the role of the state and far right.
The state of emergency, imposed after the November 13, 2015 attacks in Paris, is based on this lie, which the capitalist media do not challenge because it is at the heart of official politics in France. The attacks served to justify former President François Hollande’s shift towards relations with far-right forces—with the state of emergency, creating a new ‘national guard’ police agency, the electronic spying law, and legitimizing neo-fascism by inviting National Front leader Marine Le Pen to the Elysée presidential palace.
The 2015 attacks were carried out by Islamist networks known and followed by French intelligence, who were using them as foot soldiers in the NATO war in Syria. The Kouachi brothers, Coulibaly, and the leader of the November 13 attack squad, Abdelhamid Abaaoud, were all known to the intelligence services for their ties to Al Qaeda or the Islamic State (IS) militia.
The Kouachi brothers were closely followed from 2010 to 2015 and considered extremely dangerous due to their direct contacts with leaders of Al Qaeda in the Arabia Peninsula. Chérif Kouachi and Amédy Coulibaly repeatedly visited Djamel Beghal, a member of Al Qaeda in Algeria, who was under house arrest in France.
Abaaoud, a leading IS member well known as the public face of its Facebook recruitment campaign, was allowed to freely travel across Europe to prepare the November 13 attacks.
Salah Abdeslam, one of the survivors of the attack squad, supposedly Europe’s most wanted man, was in fact located in December 2015 by a policeman in the city of Malines. His report was inexplicably lost by his superiors, and police only arrested him in March 2016, a few days before the March 22, 2016 attacks in Brussels.
As for the terrorists who planned those attacks, they were allowed to organize the attacks even after Turkish, Israeli and Russian intelligence had warned their European counterparts of their identity as well as their targets.
Commentary on these various attacks by the media and the established political parties was manipulated in order to terrorize the public and push the political atmosphere further and further to the right.
Hermant’s revelations emerged between the two rounds of the French presidential elections, a few days after the murder of a policeman by IS sympathizer Karim C. The latter had been in prison for attempted murder against policemen in 2001 and was known both to police and counterterrorism officials. According to press reports, he had remained in prison until shortly before the attack and, after leaving prison, he soon began threatening police again.
It is impossible to understand how the security and intelligence services decided to leave such a figure at large, unless it was by a conscious decision, assuming he would commit a crime that would prove politically useful.
The media and the political establishment reacted to the murder of the policeman, Xavier Jugelé, with law-and-order hysteria that cut across rising antiwar and anti-austerity sentiment among youth and workers after the April 7 US strikes in Syria. In this climate, Emmanuel Macron, the preferred candidate of the dominant factions of the ruling class, was falling in the polls as Jean-Luc Mélenchon rose. The attack thus served to shift the political and media atmosphere to the right, stabilizing Macron and the neo-fascist candidate Marine Le Pen in the polls.
The state of emergency is not aimed at the terrorists, but to suspend democratic rights and undertake unpopular policies through repression of opposition, as during the police attacks on last year’s protests against the labor law and the arbitrary searches and seizures in immigrant suburbs. _________________ www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org www.rethink911.org www.patriotsquestion911.com www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org www.mediafor911truth.org www.pilotsfor911truth.org www.mp911truth.org www.ae911truth.org www.rl911truth.org www.stj911.org www.v911t.org www.thisweek.org.uk www.abolishwar.org.uk www.elementary.org.uk www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149 http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
It was in December 2014 that French parliament passed a resolution inviting the french state to recognise Palestine as a state.
French Parliament overwhelmingly agreed on this by 339 against 151.
A few months later came the Paris Charlie Hebdo attacks and the Bataclan, this was just after French home secretary and Zionist manuel Valls (later prime minister) secretly met in Paris with far right Israeli Avigdor Liberman, Israeli FM.
At this time in 2014, Valls declared illegal all protest in support of Palestine suffering the massacres in Gaza from Israeli air raids.
_________________ --
'Suppression of truth, human spirit and the holy chord of justice never works long-term. Something the suppressors never get.' David Southwell
http://aangirfan.blogspot.com http://aanirfan.blogspot.com
Martin Van Creveld: Let me quote General Moshe Dayan: "Israel must be like a mad dog, too dangerous to bother."
Martin Van Creveld: I'll quote Henry Kissinger: "In campaigns like this the antiterror forces lose, because they don't win, and the rebels win by not losing."
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
