Tracking the 19 Hijackers What are they up to now?

[Disco_Destroyer]

Link


http://www.welfarestate.com/911/
The 11th September 2001 Alleged Hijackers

Remember how soon after those attacks that US authorities were very sure that Bin Laden was behind the events of the 11th September? The links were established according to authorities at the time because of links between those alleged to have been the hijackers of those 4 flights, and Bin Ladens Al Qaeda group, but we must be aware that some of those alleged to have been involved in hijacking those 4 flights have turned up alive elsewhere, and yet all the original list of names released by authorities, together with all their photos still appear on the FBI website!

According to the FBIs website, the following people hijacked American Airlines Flight 11:

Satam M A Al Suqami

Waleed M Alshehri - Clearly not involved in any hijacking and suicide missions - Waleed M Alshehri turned up alive and well in Casablanca, Morocco! He is
a pilot with Saudi Arabian Airlines. This man was one of those with supposed links to Al Qaeda according to authorities.

Wail M Alshehri - His father is a Saudi diplomat in Bombay, according to this article a
Saudi diplomat personally spoke to Wail

Mohammed Atta


Abdulaziz Alomari - He works for Saudi Telecom. In September 2001 he was planning
on filing charges against CNN for "not verifying what it airs"!


Now we move to American Airlines Flight 77, these are the alleged hijackers according to the FBIs website:

Khalid Almihdar - There have been suggestions in some newspapers that this man is
still alive


Majed Moqed


Nawaf Alhamzi


Salem Alhamzi - Salem has been interviewed by various newspapers, and is most
certainly alive and well, and works at a petrochemical company.


Hani Hanjour

Now, according to the FBIs website there were 4 alleged hijackers on United Airlines Flight 93:

Saeed Alghamdi - Saeed is another who is very much alive, and flying planes in
Tunisia!

Ahmad Ibrahim A Al Haznawi

Ahmed Alnami - Mr Alnami is another one who has turned up alive. He works in
administration for a Saudi airliner.

Ziad Samir Jarrah


And the last flight, United Airlines Flight 175, those alleged to be "terrorist hijackers according to the FBI were:

Marwan Al Shehhi - Reported to be alive, and living in Morocco!


Fayez Rashid Ahmed Hassan Al Qadi Banihammad


Ahmed Alghamdi - Another alleged hijacker alive according to reports.


Hamza Alghamdi


Mohand Alshehri


As you can see from the above that makes 9 alleged hijackers who are reportedly alive and well! So why do their names and photos still remain on the FBIs website?

[xmasdale]

I believe Ian Henshall in the research for his two books, 911 Revealed, and 911 the New Evidence (due to be published shortly), has investigated this evidence very thoroughly and concluded there is not much mileage in it. The people who are alive may simply have the same names as alleged dead terrorists. Alleged terrorists may have been using false names. To be sure you've got the same person you need precisely the same name (usually three names in the case of Muslims), the same date of birth and photographic evidence. I believe Ian discovered there were few if any where such three pieces of evidence were available.

But perhaps he would like to comment on it himself.

[Disco_Destroyer]

This is very true, and this info is easily falsified but it does get people asking questions Just another bulletin off Myspace. This is why I tend to stick to the Physics of the day as anyone can make a paper trail

[TonyGosling]

10. Has the Claim That Some of the “Hijackers” Are Still Alive Been Debunked?

Another problem with the claim that the 19 hijackers were correctly identified on 9/11, or at least a few days later, is that some of the men on the FBI’s final list reportedly turned up alive after 9/11. Although Der Spiegel and the BBC claim to have debunked these reports, I will show this is untrue by examining the case of one of the alleged hijackers, Waleed al-Shehri—who, we saw earlier, was a replacement for Adnan Bukhari, who himself had shown up alive after 9/11.

In spite of the fact that al-Shehri was a replacement, the 9/11 Commission revealed no doubts about his presence on Flight 11, speculating that he and his brother Wail—another replacement—stabbed two of the flight attendants.98 But the Commission certainly should have had doubts.

On September 22, 2001, the BBC published an article by David Bamford entitled “Hijack ‘Suspect’ Alive in Morocco.” It showed that the Waleed al-Shehri identified by the FBI as one of the hijackers was still alive. Explaining why the problem could not be dismissed as a case of mistaken identity, Bamford wrote:

His photograph was released by the FBI, and has been shown in newspapers and on television around the world. That same Mr Al-Shehri has turned up in Morocco, proving clearly that he was not a member of the suicide attack. He told Saudi journalists in Casablanca that . . . he has now been interviewed by the American authorities, who apologised for the misunderstanding.99

The following day, September 23, the BBC published another story, “Hijack ‘Suspects’ Alive and Well.” Discussing several alleged hijackers who had shown up alive, it said of al-Shehri in particular: “He acknowledges that he attended flight training school at Daytona Beach. . . . But, he says, he left the United States in September last year, became a pilot with Saudi Arabian airlines and is currently on a further training course in Morocco.”100

In 2003, an article in Der Spiegel tried to debunk these two BBC stories, characterizing them as “nonsense about surviving terrorists.” It claimed that the reported still-alive hijackers were all cases of mistaken identity, involving men with “coincidentally identical names.” This claim by Der Spiegel depended on its assertion that, at the time of the reports, the FBI had released only a list of names: “The FBI did not release photographs until four days after the cited reports, on September 27th.”101 But that was not true. Bamford’s BBC story of September 22, as we saw, reported that Waleed al-Shehri’s photograph had been “released by the FBI” and “shown in newspapers and on television around the world.”

In 2006, nevertheless, the BBC used the same claim to withdraw its support for its own stories. Steve Herrmann, the editor of the BBC News website, claimed that confusion had arisen because “these were common Arabic and Islamic names.” Accordingly, he said, the BBC had changed its September 23 story in one respect: “Under the FBI picture of Waleed al Shehri we have added the words ‘A man called Waleed Al Shehri…’ to make it as clear as possible that there was confusion over the identity.”102 But Bamford’s BBC story of September 22, which Herrmann failed to mention, had made it “as clear as possible” that there could not have been any confusion.

These attempts by Der Spiegel and the BBC, in which they tried to discredit the reports that Waleed al-Shehri was still alive after 9/11, have been refuted by Jay Kolar, who shows that FBI photographs had been published by Saudi newspapers as early as September 19. Kolar thereby undermines the only argument against Bamford’s assertion, according to which there could have been no possibility of mistaken identity because al-Shehri had seen his published photograph prior to September 22, when Bamford’s story appeared.103

The fact that al-Shehri, along with several other alleged hijackers,104 was alive after 9/11 shows unambiguously that at least some of the men on the FBI’s final list were not on the planes. It would appear that the FBI, after replacing some of its first-round candidates because of their continued existence, decided not to replace any more, in spite of their exhibition of the same defect.

http://davidraygriffin.com/articles/was-america-attacked-by-muslims-on -911/

[ian neal]

This is the BBC's attempt to explain away their own original story about some hijackers still being alive

http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/legacy/theeditors/2006/10/911_conspiracy_th eory_1.html

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/1581063.stm

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/1567815.stm

Loads of terms like 'may', 'possibly' and reported to or believed to be....