IEEE Ethics Symposium Publishes 9/11 Truth Paper

[outsider]

IEEE Ethics Symposium Publishes 9/11 Truth Paper:
http://www.scientistsfor911truth.org/

'Collaborative Effort Between Scientists and Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth

In a collaborative effort, John D. Wyndham of Scientists for 9/11 Truth, and Wayne Coste and Michael Smith, both members of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth as well as members of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), have published a joint paper that was presented at the 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Ethics in Engineering, Science and Technology. The IEEE is the largest "professional association for the advancement of technology" in the world with almost half a million members.The title of the paper is Ethics and the Official Reports about the Destruction of the World Trade Center Twin Towers (WTC1 and WTC2) on 9/11: A Case Study.

The development of this paper over a three month period was supported by a number of individuals who are members of one, the other, or both of these 9/11 Truth organizations. These individuals are David Chandler, Jonathan Cole, Frank Legge, A. Hamid Mumin, Daniel Noel, Gregg Roberts, and Thomas Spellman. The paper was presented during a poster session at the symposium held in Chicago, May 23 -24, and attended by two of the authors, Wayne Coste and Michael Smith. View the paper and the poster by clicking the foregoing links.

Michael Smith and Wayne Coste

Michael Smith and Wayne Coste at the Symposium

Deficiencies in NIST's WTC1/2 Reports

Many researchers, some of whom are quoted in the paper's extensive list of references, have pointed out the deficiencies in the reports by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) on the Twin Towers' destructions. The emphasis in the present IEEE paper is on the ethical lapses by NIST. These lapses include a number of failures such as; failure to study the actual destructions and their aftermaths; failure to follow the guidelines established by the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA); failure to consider the consequences to public health; and failure to provide the most essential theory. NIST did not follow the scientific method in many important ways, and did not seek adequate review by independent engineers and scientists. The paper shows that these failures "go far beyond any reasonable excuse for their occurrence" and amount to a falsified and fraudulent investigation on NIST's part.

The IEEE Ethics Symposium Process

Throughout the entire process of abstract and paper submissions, and the actual presentation in Chicago, the authors were treated cordially by the symposium's organizers and those who attended the conference. Initially, authors were asked to submit abstracts. The authors submitted abstracts for two different papers, one on World Trade Center Building 7 (WTC7) and the other on the Twin Towers (WTC1/2). The abstract for the paper on WTC1/2 was reviewed by three anonymous reviewers and accepted for paper submission. The paper itself was presented at the symposium and published by IEEE without further review.

The paper is copyrighted by IEEE. However, according to IEEE guidelines for authors, authors are "free to post the accepted version of their articles on their personal Web sites or those of their employers." Accordingly, this paper and poster can be viewed here at the links cited above in this article, or in the Papers section on this website. The paper can also be purchased on the IEEE Xplore website ($31 for non-members, $13 for members).'


GREAT NEWS! I got wind of it through the 'Reinvestigate9/11' newsletter.
We now have two 'Peer Reviewed' 9/11 Truth papers!

[outsider]

A&E reach 2,500 members:

'Yesterday, we reached 2,500 Architects & Engineers! From the bottom of my heart, I thank you for making this achievement possible.

Milestones like this are an important part of the information war we’re fighting. Most people who learn about us understand that 2,500 constitutes a remarkably large number of professionals who have studied the evidence and put their names on the line.

So store it away for the next time you’re discussing 9/11 with someone: AE911Truth now represents 2,500 architects and engineers. You can also get the message out today by watching and sharing our Facebook post.


ONWARD TO 3,000


Now we must set our sights even higher. Given the recent uptick in new petition signers, our next goal is to reach 3,000 signatories by the September 11th Anniversary — and then to grow by 100 a month after that.

The AIA National Convention in May is our next major opportunity to storm ahead. Like last year, we’re sponsoring a powerful resolution that calls upon the AIA to support a new WTC 7 investigation (see page 36). A strong showing at the convention will allow us to gain as many as 250 new petition signers.

Will you make a donation in honor of our 2,500-milestone and help send us to the convention? So far we’ve raised $5K of our $20K campaign budget.

Here’s what your donation will help cover:
•A 10’ x 10’ expo booth plus accessories, which costs us over $5,000;

•Travel and lodging for our staff and a handful of AIA members, all of whom will participate in our on-the-floor educational efforts;

•5,000 campaign brochures (about half of them will be mailed to 2,300 local, regional, and national AIA leaders; the other half will be handed out at the convention), 2,000 DVDs of 9/11: Explosive Evidence — Experts Speak Out, and an online landing page for the resolution.

Thanks again for helping us reach the 2,500-milestone. We couldn’t have done it without you.

In humble gratitude,

Richard Gage, AIA
Founder/CEO
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth


Richard Ggage will be speaking to a Reinvestigate 9/11 Public Meeting in London on Saturday May 7th; full details will be put on our Forum Calendar shortly.