Why is 7/7 so less known that 9/11,more so in this country?

[Kristdime]

I just want to say hi, first post and all that..

But i wanted to ask why is it 7/7 is so less known than 9/11, you can talk to the 'avaerage' person over here and talk to them about 9/11 and they'll say 'yeah that was defo an inside job,no doubt', you mention 7/7 and you get that 'blank disinterested' look lol..

Is it because our media is more strict than over the pond? Is it because 9/11 was 4 years earlier,more time for research? Or purely just a numbers(population) game? Or just a bigger event?

Sorry if the question has been asked before, but it is something that frustrates and puzzles me.

Great work by the way, keep it up 👍

[ian neal]

Hi

I think there are are many reasons

9/11 is/was undoubtedly higher profile and significant than 7/7. 9/11 was the catalyst for the Patriot Act and the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and the whole war of terror, 'you're with us or against us' narrative. 9/11 happened in America

Second is that there are fewer angles (although still many) to question 7/7 compared to 9/11 and fewer presentations of that evidence. Linked to this is that (and of course this is personal opinion) the best, most rigorous and balanced presentations of the evidence are not very high profile.

Namely Nafeez Ahmed's The London Bombings: An Independent Inquiry: ISBN 0-7156-3583-2, 256 pages, Duckworth, 2006. and

the July7 website http://julyseventh.co.uk/ and their video Ludicrous Diversion
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CUl5lxFYd-8

Not surprisingly when the BBC conspiracy files series focused on July 7, the July 7 campaign refused to cooperate for understandable reasons

http://www.julyseventh.co.uk/j7-refuse-bbc-conspiracy-files-offer.html

Instead and predictably the BBC (Mike Rudin) focused prominently on two other 7/7 campaigners when making their 7/7 conspiracy files programme (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rNil0xEcrcY) and strawman arguments

Nick Kollerstrom, author of (2009) Terror on the Tube: Behind the Veil of 7/7, An Investigation, Progressive Press. ISBN 1-61577-007-0
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicholas_Kollerstrom

and

MuabDib/John Hill producer/narrator of 7/7 Ripple Effect
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7PQG5weeHk
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7/7_Ripple_Effect

Then of course there was the decision not to hold a Public Inquiry

Etc, etc

Further background available here

http://www.911forum.org.uk/board/viewforum.php?f=9&topicdays=0&start=0

and here

http://www.911forum.org.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=17444&postdays=0&post order=asc&start=0

[Whitehall_Bin_Men]

As these domestic false flag attacks go on & on & on the private security firms to and private military companies to which they are contracted learn from their mistakes. 7/7 perpetrators learned many lessons from the mistakes of 9/11, also benefiting from internal 'weeding out' over four years questioning, professional sceptical journalists from the mainstream media. So much of this week's international Brussels attacks coverage, for example, has been by young green journalists straight out of media studies degrees. That's no accident. The media corporations have also been becoming ever more concentrated, ownership wise, in fewer and fewer hands.
These attacks by the police state & PMCs are now almost entirely aimed at the media as a vehicle to create 'mass groupthink', an artificial orthodoxy to fill the gap left by decreasing morals and faith-based world views.
We won't get another Building 7, I think you can pretty much count on that.

[Kristdime]

I think that is maybe it then Ian ,just really frustates me, I hope these events awaken people and it's hard to tell if it is, I know I've managed to in my circle of friends, but the masses I don't know, do you guys think people are?

And I agree, each one they seem to make less mistakes and improvements from previous errors are noticeable for sure 😟 .