Jo Cox murdered: 'Put Britain First'? Labour remain MP

[Whitehall_Bin_Men]

Far right terror
And or Psychological Operation
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/06/16/labour-mp-jo-cox-shot-in-le eds-witnesses-report

[Whitehall_Bin_Men]

Jo Cox chairs the all-party parliamentary group for Friends of Syria, and was vocal in making the case for military action in the country last autumn, on humanitarian grounds.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/jun/16/labour-mp-jo-cox-shot- in-west-yorkshire

[Whitehall_Bin_Men]

ALL REFERENDUM CAMPAIGNING HAS BEEN SUSPENDED

Eyewitnesses say man & woman both incapacitated on the floor where attack took place, man was dragged away into a shop doorway

Weapon sawn off shotgun!?

Saying it's the first sitting MP killed since Nigel Jones incident 1992
But what about this poor chap Stephen Milligan in 1994
http://www.911forum.org.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=22428

[Whitehall_Bin_Men]

Awarded in 2009 by the Davos World Economic Forum WEF as a member of 'young global leaders'

She was a 'global justice campaigner' who was strongly pro Syria intervention


So, WEF Young Global Leaders

Shortlisted YGL candidates are reviewed by Heidrick & Struggles, recognised as one of the world's leading executive search and leadership consulting firms

David M. Rubenstein, Co-Founder and Co-Chief Executive Officer, The Carlyle Group 1970, graduate (Hons), Duke Univ.;
1973, graduate, Univ. of Chicago Law School.
1973-75, with Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison;
1977-81, Deputy Domestic Policy Adviser to the President of the US;
1982-87, Partner, Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge, Washington. Chairman, John F Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, Duke Univ.; President, Economic Club of Washington;
Regent, Smithsonian;
Vice-Chair, Council on Foreign Relations, Brookings, Lincoln Center;
Trustee, Johns Hopkins, Univ. of Chicago, Memorial Sloan Kettering, Institute for Advanced Study.

[TonyGosling]

'Apparently' was ex army?
He came from Fieldhead, an area immediately above Birstall. Theres a big council estate there & it is well known for being a rough area.

'He wouldn't hurt a fly' says brother of alleged MP killer
The half-brother of the alleged killer of Jo Cox has told ITV News he was "shocked" by the MP's death and said his half-brother "wouldn't hurt a fly".
http://www.itv.com/news/update/2016-06-16/he-wouldnt-hurt-a-fly-says-b rother-of-alleged-mp-killer/
Duane St Louis said he last saw his brother Tommy Mair around three weeks ago, and wanted to "send his condolences" to her family.
He described Mair as having "never been in trouble in his life, he's not like that, he wouldn't hurt a fly".
He said he'd spoken to Mair's mother and she is "shocked and can't understand what has happened", adding he wasn't aware of Mair having anything to do with guns or knives and asked if his brother was racist he said "no chance".

[TonyGosling]

Grimsby EU referendum debates cancelled after shock fatal ...
Grimsby Telegraph-4 hours ago
http://www.grimsbytelegraph.co.uk/grimsby-eu-referendum-debates-cancel led-after-shock-fatal-shooting-and-stabbing-of-mp-in-yorkshire/story-2 9409803-detail/story.html

​Bristol Post and Ovo Energy referendum hustings cancelled after...
Bristol West's Labour MP and remain representative, Thangam Debbonaire, was scheduled to debate with Monmouth's Conservative MP and leave advocate, David Davies.
http://www.bristolpost.co.uk/8203-bristol-post-and-ovo-energy-referend um-hustings-cancelled-after-jo-cox-mp-shooting/story-29410227-detail/s tory.html

University of Kent cancels EU referendum debate after shooting of Yorkshire MP Jo Cox
http://www.kentnews.co.uk/news/university_of_kent_cancels_eu_referendu m_debate_after_shooting_of_yorkshire_mp_jo_cox_1_4580983

​Question Time and This Week cancelled by BBC following the tragic death of Jo Cox MP
http://www.digitalspy.com/tv/news/a798096/question-time-and-this-week- cancelled-by-bbc-following-the-tragic-death-of-jo-cox-mp/

[Thomas Tol]

I wonder how SPLC got hold of these documents and how long have they had them?


https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/2016/06/16/alleged-killer-british- mp-was-longtime-supporter-neo-nazi-national-alliance

[TonyGosling]

Haroon Aswat was from nearby Dewsbury

Jo Cox's distraught aide describes how she cradled the dying MP as she uttered her final words
22:40, 17 JUN 2016 UPDATED 22:40, 17 JUN 2016
BY JEREMY ARMSTRONG , LUCY THORNTON , PHIL CARDY
Fazila Aswat also revealed she tried to fight off the killer with her handbag when he returned and twice blasted the victim who was crying out in pain
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/jo-coxs-distraught-aide-describes -8222080

[Whitehall_Bin_Men]

Police had at least 18 hours warning of this attack!!
West Yorkshire Special Branch have seriously let Jo Cox, parliament & her constituents down.
Why did they not react to tighten security after the violent attack on her office???

[TonyGosling]

This article is long on vitriol but has some legitimate criticism of some of the 'good causes' Jo Cox stood for.

[TonyGosling]

Jo Cox murder: Thomas Mair asked for mental health treatment day before MP died
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/06/17/jo-cox-murder-thomas-mair-a sked-for-mental-health-treatment-day/
Harry Yorke Robert Mendick, chief reporter Martin Evans 17 JUNE 2016 • 9:00PM

The man accused of murdering Jo Cox sought help for his mental health problems the night before she was killed - but was told to make an appointment and come back the next day.

Mr Mair, 52, visited an alternative therapy centre in Birstall on Wednesday evening, the night before Mrs Cox was killed, where he explained he wanted treatment for depression.
The owner of the Birstall Wellbeing Centre told Mr Mair to return the next day for an appointment but he never went back.
Mrs Cox was stabbed, shot and killed the same day outside Birstall library, which is about 300 yards from the therapy centre. The centre’s owner Rebecca Walker, 42, told The Telegraph: “He came to the centre looking for alternative therapies for his depression.
“He said he had been suffering from mental health problems for a long time, but said that reflex therapies and others he’d tried in the past hadn’t helped.
“He appeared to be quite a troubled man, didn’t say very much to anyone while he was there.
“I asked him to come back on Thursday to discuss it all and have a drink, but he never came back.
“You think maybe you could stop it, you know if he’d stayed for five more minutes. I guess I couldn’t really have done much though really.”


One neighbour spoke of her surprise at reports that Mr Mair had purchased neo-Nazi books and other materials.

“If you had told me he had turned into Father Christmas I would have been more likely to believe you than him turning out to be a neo-Nazi,” said Diana Peters, 65, who had known Mr Mair for many years.

She said he had taught migrants English at a college in Dewsbury. Other neighbours said they heard him practising with a pellet gun in his garden. They said he was a “calm and polite man” who only got angry when children played in the garden.

Mr Mair had suffered from mental health problems and from epilepsy for some years. He had told a local newspaper in 2010 how volunteering at park near his home on the Fieldhouse estate in Birstall had helped his mental health. “It has done me more good than all the psychotherapy and medication in the world,” he said.

Mr Mair had been referred to by the Pathways day centre for adults with mental health problems. It said it could not comment while a police investigation was ongoing on any treatments Mr Mair was receiving prior to Mrs Cox’s death.

The Telegraph has learnt that Mrs Cox, the week before she died, had raised concerns over the provision of mental health services in her constituency of Batley and Spen.

She had met with Musarrat Khan, a local Labour councillor, who herself had expressed fears that adult mental health services were under-funded at a meeting held at a Methodist Church in Batley on Thursday night.


On the Jo Cox’s Fund internet site, set up by her friends and with the backing of Mr Cox, it states: “We are raising funds to support charities closest to her heart, chosen by her family.”
The charities are: The Royal Voluntary Service, “to support volunteers helping combat loneliness in Jo’s constituency”; HOPE not hate, “who seek to challenge and defeat the politics of hate and extremism within local communities across Britain”; and the White Helmets, for volunteer search and rescue workers in Syria.

[TonyGosling]

No mention of this in the news coverage of Jo Cox's murder

Euro vote will go ahead despite Lindh murder
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/sweden/1441308/Euro-v ote-will-go-ahead-despite-Lindh-murder.html
By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard in Stockholm and Julian Isherwood12:01AM BST 12 Sep 2003
Vowing not to let a "madman" derail Swedish democracy, the country's political leaders agreed yesterday to press ahead with Sunday's euro referendum despite the murder of Anna Lindh, the foreign minister.
Mrs Lindh, the leading light and symbol of the Yes campaign, died early yesterday from knife wounds to the liver, stomach, and chest after doctors at Karolinska hospital battled all night to stop the bleeding.
Shocked and grieving Swedes gathered silently in huge numbers to lay red roses at the foreign ministry and the Nordiska Kompaniet department store, where she was attacked on Wednesday afternoon by a "heavy set" and "dishevelled" man while shopping with a friend.
In keeping with Sweden's down-to-earth style of politics, Mrs Lindh used public transport and did not have bodyguards. Her murder brought back traumatic memories of the mystery killing of Olof Palme, the prime minister shot as he was out strolling with his wife in 1986.
Goran Persson, Sweden's prime minister, said her death was terrible loss. "Social Democracy has lost one of its most gifted politicians. Sweden has lost its face towards the world."
Related Articles
Swedes turn against euro 10 Sep 2003
Swedish pro-euro minister stabbed 11 Sep 2003
Anna Lindh 12 Sep 2003
Swedes mourn champion of a 'special little nation' 12 Sep 2003
Alf Svensson, the Christian Democrat leader, said: "The grief, anger and despair the murder of Anna Lindh evokes is indescribable. What should not happen has happened once again."
Sweden's security police were in disarray yesterday after the murder.
In the hunt for her killer, Stockholm police, reinforced by other forces, threw a cordon around the capital. Security services at ports and airports were on high alert.
As criticism mounted, the security police accepted its mistakes and was quick to apologise. "We have failed in our duty," said Kurt Malmström, chief of intelligence and security police. "Such an event cannot be allowed to happen to someone under our protection."
He said a decision not to provide Mrs Lindh with a bodyguard had been an error of judgment, even though she was opposed to tight security.
"She did not have a bodyguard as there was no indication of a threat against her," said Staffan Kjellerborg, a security police spokesman.
"The evaluation was that there was no immediate threat to her."
Minutes after the attack, Stockholm police stopped an underground train to search for the attacker and eventually found the murder weapon and a discarded camouflage jacket.
Fifty shop video cameras were being studied to identify her attacker.
Although the motive of the attack remains unclear, it has raised widespread criticism of the security forces for a relaxed attitude to security, particularly on the eve of the September 11 anniversary, and only three days before the culmination of a heated debate on a referendum on membership of the euro zone.
Recent speeches by Mrs Lindh in which she strongly urged Swedes to vote in favour were seen as controversial, angering even senior members of her Social Democratic Party in the anti-euro camp for what were seen as personal attacks.
Following the murder in 1986 of Olof Palme, the then prime minister, it was decided to evaluate regularly the "threat picture" of senior ministers and to advise on whether they should have bodyguards.
But politicians retained the right to refuse bodyguards and are said to have done so regularly.
Tributes poured in from foreign leaders, who remembered her as a tireless advocate for human rights and the "conscience" of the European Union's close-knit club of foreign ministers.
Jack Straw, the Foreign Secretary, deplored the murder, describing her as "someone full of life who represented something wonderful in Sweden and Europe".
The key leaders from both the No and Yes sides agreed at an emergency meeting that it was out of the question to cancel the referendum, although all active campaigning has stopped.
Peter Eriksson, the leader of the anti-euro Green Party leader, said it was of "the utmost necessity" to go ahead with the vote.
The European Commission flew the EU flag at half-mast and held a minute's silence at the Breydel headquarters.

[Shoestring]

The name of Clarke Rothwell, who claimed that Tommy Mair shouted "Britain first" before attacking Jo Cox, appears on a membership and contacts list of the British National Party that was published by WikiLeaks in 2009.

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/06/17/britain-first-eyewitness-bn p-member-list/
'Britain First' Shout Eyewitness on BNP Membership List

By Virginia Hale
Breitbart News, 17 Jun 2016

The eyewitness who insists Jo Cox’s killer shouted “Britain First” before murdering the MP was on the leaked British Nationalist Party (BNP) membership and contacts list. Britain First and the BNP are known to be openly hostile toward one another.

As a result of eyewitness Clarke Rothwell’s claims, the media have been quick to link the Labour MP’s murder to Britain First, a hard line nationalist group. Much of the press has also linked the killing to Britain’s European Union (EU) referendum, and Germany’s Chancellor Merkel has claimed the Leave campaign is to blame for the murder, for using “radical” language.

Mr Rothwell, who witnessed the brutal attack on the mother of two, told BBC Newsnight: “The words I heard [Cox’s attacker] say were Britain first, or put Britain first,

“I can’t say exactly what it was but definitely Britain first is what he said, what he was shouting. He shouted it at least twice.”

Gas fitter Mr Rothwell, who was working near to the murder scene yesterday, appears on the leaked BNP membership and contacts list. Britain First was founded as a splinter group of the now effectively defunct, far right BNP and there is known hostility between the two groups. ...

Contd. at http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/06/17/britain-first-eyewitness-bn p-member-list/

[TonyGosling]

I'll not be surprised if there's a big, noisy security/terror scare just pre-referendum that's best dealt with by the UK being in the #EU.

— Charlie Skelton (@deYook) May 31, 2016

@deYook Perhaps, but an attack by the villian du jour - islam counter productive, probably far right will be framed.

— Liberty Campaign (@readyforliberty) June 6, 2016

@readyforliberty @deYook Jesus, how much foresight you two have got going on.

— Benjamin Barton (@ThisWeekInBen) June 17, 2016

@ThisWeekInBen @deYook Thanks Ben, sadly predictable. Sympathy to her family. I hope Brexit sees through it.

— Liberty Campaign (@readyforliberty) June 17, 2016

Cox Witness Says No One Shouted Britain First
Friday 17th June 2016

A sign in a shop by the spot Jo Cox was killed states the claims that the gunman shouted "Britain First" are untrue.

Birstall sign


The message in the landerette's window says: "Please note, I did not tackle the gunman. And no one shouted Britain First at any time."

LBC's reporter in Birstall Bethan Davies spoke to Ahmed Tahir, the owner, who insisted he has not spoken to anyone who heard that phrase.

And Mr Tahir admitted he was worried for his safety after reports named him for making to original claim.

[TonyGosling]

JO COX FALSE FLAG CONSPIRACY
http://aanirfan.blogspot.co.uk/2016/06/mysterious-death-of-jo-cox-mp.h tml

Jo Cox was rescued by a Dead Man?

More here: BRENDAN COX

The message in the landerette's window says: "Please note, I did not tackle the gunman. And no one shouted Britain First at any time."

LBC's reporter in Birstall Bethan Davies spoke to Ahmed Tahir, the owner, who insisted he has not spoken to anyone who heard that phrase.

Cox Witness Says No One Shouted Britain First | LBC.



Above we see the alleged killer Thomas Mair, with moles on his face.



Above we see the man alleged to be Thomas Mair, but he has no moles on his face.



It looks as though someone is trying to discredit Thomas Mair, who is a supporter of Brexit.

...

Despite such tragedy, the case for Brexit remains strong.



Do you remember the CHARLESTON CHURCH - FALSE FLAG CONSPIRACY involving Dylann Roof?



Above we see Dylann Roof, the gentle Christian.

Dylann Roof



Above we see that Dylann has no moles on his face.



Above we see the person alleged to be Dylann Roof, a person with obvious moles.



Above we see Dyllan Roof with no moles.

Game of Thrones used a body double for Lena Headey.

The Game of Thrones' visual effects team composited Lena Headey's facial expressions onto the body of Rebecca Van Cleave to create the finished scene.

Read more: http://www.digitalspy.



Which is which?



Above, we see the original photo.



Above, we see the one apparently photoshopped by the CIA and its friends?

South Carolina Church Shooting: Were Photos of Dylann digitally altered?


Fake.

The CIA published a rambling racist manifesto, in which 'Dylann Roof' declared his hatred for blacks, reportedly.

The author is believed to be a right-wing Rhodesian working for the CIA.



This is Anders Breivik with the big ears and big nose.

He was a liberal.



This is Breivik's double, who was one of the shooters in Norway.

He has a sharp nose and no earlobes.


Anna Lindh, Swedish foreign minister and supporter of the Palestinian cause, who was assassinated in Stockholm.

In 2003, four days before the Swedish referendum on joining the Eurozone, Anna Lindh, a pro-Euro Swedish MP, was stabbed to death in a public place.

The man later convicted of the killing claimed to have no idea why he had acted as he had.

Many people predicted that the death would have a massive effect on the results.

In the end it did not, and Sweden voted to stay out.

Anna Lindh & Jo Cox | OffGuardian



Jo Cox's husband is Brendan Cox (above), who once worked as an adviser to former Prime Minister Gordon Brown.

In 2015, Brendan Cox left Save The Children after various women's complaints of 'inappropriate behaviour'.

Save The Children executive quits after complaints of 'inappropriate behaviour'.

Brendan Cox was chief strategist at Save The Children.

SAVE THE CHILDREN - FRONT FOR CIA? / CHARITIES RUN BY THE SPIES? /
CHARITIES, ORGIES AND SPOOKS

...

Above we see a FAKE shooting in Paris.

Jo Cox studied at the London School of Economics,[7] which has been a recruiting ground for spies.

She once worked for Oxfam, said to be a front for MI6.

...

Above we see Corrine Sawers, daughter of the former boss of MI6 Sir John Sawers, singing an anti-Brexit song.

MI6 wants Britain to remain in the EU.

...

Above we apparently see some police cars involved in the Jo Cox incident.

...

Jo Cox was supposedly 'an enemy of Israel', although she supported Israeli policy on toppling Assad.

The main result of her 'death' is that the EU referendum campaigning has been suspended

On 16 June 2016, the British Labour lawmaker Jo Cox died after a shooting attack / Labour Friend of Palestine Jo Cox slain.


Jo Cox

Did the alleged killer, Tommy Mair, shout "Britain First"?

Britain First is a right wing organisation run by Paul Golding.


Tommy Mair

Tommy Mair "was shouting Britain First when he was doing it," said 38-year-old Graeme Howard.

Clarke Rothwell, who runs a cafe near the murder scene, added: "He was shouting 'put Britain first'. He shouted it about two or three times."


Part of the Jo Cox incident.

Jo Cox had been a high profile campaigner for the rights of Syrian refugees and was fighting to force the Government to take in more asylum seekers."

Jo Cox dead: Labour MP fatally shot and stabbed outside constituency surgery in Birstall, West Yorkshire | Crime ....



Tweet by Charlie Skelton on 31 May 2016:

"I'll not be surprised if there's a big, noisy security/terror scare just pre-referendum..."


Jo Cox, née Leadbeater

Jewish community expresses shock and sadness at killing of Jo Cox

[TonyGosling]

Jo Cox False Flag Hoax PsyOp - EU referendum fixed

Link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B35puc__6h0

[ian neal]

[Whitehall_Bin_Men]

Kremlin: Assassins Who Killed British MP Jo Cox And Targeted Donald Trump Tied To UK Military, CIA?
Top News 27 June 2016
http://www.awdnews.com/top-news/assassins-who-killed-british-mp-jo-cox -and-targeted-donald-trump-tied-to-uk-military,-cia

...However, this report explains, once arriving in Britain, CIA operative Sanchez traveled to Lincolnshire, England, accompanied by Secret Intelligence Service (MI6) operatives, where he entered a hospital facility known as the Lincolnshire Partnership.
The Lincolnshire Partnership hospital, this report states, has long been known to the SVR as it is the British militaries and intelligence services main facility for treating severely mentally impaired soldiers and spies, and operates under the supervision of the Defence Medical Services (DMS).
And in a patient record count during the time of CIA operative Sanchez’s April 2015 visit there, this report says, both Thomas Mair and Michael Sandford were listed as “high security” patients—but, and most strangely, Sandford was released into the custody of CIA operative Sanchez and was flown back to Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst and put under the medical supervision of the 87th Medical Group....

Kremlin: Assassins Who Killed British MP Jo Cox And Targeted Donald Trump Tied To UK Military, CIA?
Top News 27 June 2016
http://www.awdnews.com/top-news/assassins-who-killed-british-mp-jo-cox -and-targeted-donald-trump-tied-to-uk-military,-cia

A new Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) report circulating in the Kremlin today is raising serious questions relating to last weeks assassination of British Member of Parliament Jo Cox and the attempted assassination of Donald Trump as both the hit men involved in these plots have been traced to the same British Military mental hospital.

According to this report, on 16 June, British Labor Party MP Jo Cox was assassinated by Thomas Mair in Birstall, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom, and a little more than 48 hours later, on 18 June, Michael Sandford attempted to assassinate US presidential candidate Donald Trump in Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.

Important to note about the political environment both of these assassination plots were operating within, this report continues, was that in MP Cox’s death the debate ahead of this weeks Brexit vote in the UK was able to be stalled, while in the US, the candidacy of Donald Trump for president has sent chills through the entire American elite governing system.

The SVR’s interest in both Mair and Sandford, this report explains, was elevated last year to a high level due to their interaction with a Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) clandestine services operative named Lawrence Sanchez whose Federation surveillance records showed him taking a US Air Force flight from McGuire Field at Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst, New Jersey, to RAF Lakenheath, United Kingdom in April, 2015.

Though US public records state CIA operative Sanchez retried from this spy agency in 2004, this report notes, SVR records show him continuing to work for the CIA as late as 2012 when he was dismissed from his oversight of spying operations for the New York City Police Department where he had set up the United States most successful counter intelligence units combating Islamic inspired terrorism.

From 2012 to the present, this report continues, CIA operative Sanchez has worked within the 87th Medical Group at Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst on projects involving various US Air Force bioenvironmental engineering projects—and when he traveled to Britain in early 2015, it was in that capacity SVR analysts were believing he did so.

However, this report explains, once arriving in Britain, CIA operative Sanchez traveled to Lincolnshire, England, accompanied by Secret Intelligence Service (MI6) operatives, where he entered a hospital facility known as the Lincolnshire Partnership.

The Lincolnshire Partnership hospital, this report states, has long been known to the SVR as it is the British militaries and intelligence services main facility for treating severely mentally impaired soldiers and spies, and operates under the supervision of the Defence Medical Services (DMS).

And in a patient record count during the time of CIA operative Sanchez’s April 2015 visit there, this report says, both Thomas Mair and Michael Sandford were listed as “high security” patients—but, and most strangely, Sandford was released into the custody of CIA operative Sanchez and was flown back to Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst and put under the medical supervision of the 87th Medical Group.

As neither Thomas Mair or Michael Sandford were previously known to the SVR, this report continues, their names were “electronically associated” with CIA operative Sanchez—and whose SVR computer file noted an alert on 16 June when Thomas Mair assassinated MP Jo Cox.

Once this 16 June alert on CIA operative Sanchez was analyzed by the SVR, this report says, an already established protocol was enacted to notify various British and American intelligence agencies requesting “guidance and assistance”—and that SVR analysts in this report credit with saving the life of Donald Trump.

In the SVR making this bold assertion that their actions had saved the life of Donald Trump, this report explains, was due to the United States Secret Service (USSS), on 17 June, changing their protection of Donald Trump to “snap-snap-snap” wherein just prior to his making any public appearance, both local police forces and government agents protecting his life are suddenly, and without notice, completely changed with entirely different personal.

US news reports about Donald Trump’s attempted assassination by Michael Sandford, also, support this SVR assertion by noting that his assassin had planned to use a gun to kill Trump from a local police guard he believed would have his weapon unsecured and that we would be able to quickly grab, fire at least two shots at Trump, and in return be killed by Secret Service agents.

Other US news reports contained in this SVR report note that the assassin of MP Jo Cox, Thomas Mair, was a “loner who needed treatment for mental illness”, and that Trump’s would be assassin, Michael Sandford, had been diagnosed with Asperger’s Syndrome (a form of autism) and in past attempted suicide.

This report concludes by noting that Trump’s would be assassin, Michael Sandford, appears to have been more highly trained than Thomas Mair as his unlimited source of funds to remain undetected in the US for so long, plus his availability to vehicles, airline travel, and expensive, and extended, hotel stays, show all of the tradecraft CIA master spy Sanchez has taught other operatives under his control, almost all of whom are known to the SVR—and whose CIA tactics to control them are well know too. (click on image below to see CIA documents)

[Whitehall_Bin_Men]

Their names were “electronically associated” with CIA operative Sanchez—and whose SVR computer file noted an alert on 16 June when Thomas Mair assassinated MP Jo Cox.

http://victuruslibertas.com/2016/06/abel-danger-anonymous-post-both-tr ump-and-jo-coxs-hitmen-were-patients-at-same-uk-military-medical-hospi tal/

Michael Sandford, appears to have been more highly trained than Thomas Mair as his unlimited source of funds to remain undetected in the US for so long, plus his availability to vehicles, airline travel, and expensive, and extended, hotel stays, show all of the tradecraft CIA master spy Sanchez has taught other operatives under his control.

Below is a link to a scanned CIA document on creating mind controlled assassins

https://therearenosunglasses.wordpress.com/2010/11/03/cia-document-sca n-on-creating-mind-controlled-assassins/

For more on the story, go here http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index2060.htm

We will continue to dig into to these stories and report

[Wakeymedia]

Brexit Playlist with excellent points made by Tony Benn, Tariq Ali, Bernard Connolly and more . . .

Link - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HJWxsRCHOKc&list=PLuqtzLIQ8c2T7XtJkoObl LUSCB8RL9PC_

[outsider]

Petition:
'DO NOT GIVE 2016 NOBEL PEACE PRIZE TO SYRIAN WHITE HELMETS':
https://www.change.org/p/nobel-prize-do-not-give-2016-nobel-peace-priz e-to-syrian-white-helmets?recruiter=36326166&utm_source=share_petition &utm_medium=copylink

[TonyGosling]

Douglas says:
June 17, 2016 at 10:04 am
At the risk of being slammed for this comment, I am finding it very difficult to believe that Mr. Mair is responsible for the assassination of Jo Cox MP. Something is just not right here and people are rushing to judgement.

Questions?
Who would want Britain first put in the frame as they have no connections to the Leave Campaign?
Why is the politically charged word ‘hate’ being used at such an early stage in the various comments and tributes to Jo Cox?
Why was the tweet that drew attention to the alleged shout of ‘Britain First’ deleted almost immediately after it was tweeted?
Why did the Eurocrat send his politically biased message of condolence so early in the day?
Why did the BBC in their 10pm News broadcast exclusively lead with this man Clarke Rothwell as one who definitely heard Britain First?
Even before the BBC, why was Channel 4 News and Sky News itching to report the alleged ‘Britain First’ comment?
Why did Hillary Clinton call this assassination “a violent act of political intolerance” Where did Hillary Clinton get her information from?
It would be fair to investigate the possibility of malice aforethought being played out before our eyes by the establishment, but one thing we can be sure of; there may even be an Islamic hand at work. What we must all ensure that the ‘spin’ and subliminal messages being sent out over the airwaves and in the media does not interfere with the message of Leave Campaign, as clearly and ultimately, this is what it is intended or even perhaps designed to do.

Let’s not condemn this man until we know what the real agenda is, as this man seems incapable of commiting such an horrific and heinous crime.

http://heavy.com/news/2016/06/tommy-mair-jo-cox-shooting-suspect-name- britain-first-brexit-eu-jeremy-corbyn-husband-brendan/

[outsider]

[TonyGosling]

PART 1 OF 4 - Exit From Brexit, The Jo Cox Departure

Link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zxXcYsC8aIM

This film follows Richard D. Hall’s investigation into the alleged murder of MP Jo Cox which happened on June 16th 2016. Following on from his initial findings presented in a lecture in April 2018, he has searched further for evidence and presents it here for the first time. The film proves beyond reasonable doubt that the official version of events is wholly untrue. Richard presents compelling evidence that the man blamed for the attack was a patsy and played no part in any murder, if indeed there was a murder. The film looks at all the CCTV evidence, witness testimony and physical evidence. Also featured are interviews with witnesses who have been kept out of mainstream media and were not asked to take part in the trial. The film suggests a plausible motive for a highly organised plot to remove Jo Cox from her position of MP. Her departure occurred just one week before the UK Brexit referendum and the film explains why this may have happened.
This film contains extensive analysis by statement analyst Peter Hyatt.

PART 2 OF 4 - Exit From Brexit, The Jo Cox Departure

Link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ayVtnCimME

PART 3 OF 4 - Exit From Brexit, The Jo Cox Departure

Link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0RcwbnihMsE

PART 4 OF 4 - Exit From Brexit, The Jo Cox Departure

Link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EC2ViwDZUs4

[TonyGosling]

Jo Cox, Her Assassination, the White Helmets, “Humanitarianism,” and Regime Change
It is no coincidence that some of the world’s most ardent imperialists are behind the cynical exploitation of one heinous murder — of British MP Jo Cox — to enable global mass-murder as well as human trafficking under the pretext of “ethical” and “humanitarian” intervention.

by Vanessa Beeley and Whitney Webb
https://www.mintpressnews.com/jo-cox-assassination-white-helmets-human itarianism-regime-change/246646/

July 30th, 2018

By Vanessa Beeley and Whitney Webb Whitney Webb
12 Comments


Just over two years ago, the senseless and savage murder of British Labour Party MP Jo Cox stunned Britain and much of the world. After her death, families, friends and colleagues pledged that her memory would live on, thanks in part to the memorial funds posthumously set up in her honor.

Among those memorial funds, the Jo Cox Fund is by far the most notable, having greatly surpassed its £1.5 million ($1.97 million) fundraising goal. That money, according to the fund’s GoFundMe page, was divided among three organizations that had been “close to her [Cox’s] heart:” the Royal Voluntary Service, Hope Not Hate, and the White Helmets of Syria, with funds raised in excess of that goal being used to establish the Jo Cox Foundation.

Though Jo Cox was undeniably a vocal supporter of all three of those causes, the past two years have revealed a concerted effort on the part of powerful interests, including globalist billionaires and prominent figures of the Western political elite, to exploit Cox’s death for the purpose of furthering the long-standing Western agenda of effecting regime change in Syria.






These figures – George Soros, Bill Gates and the Clintons among them – have used their influence and their vast resources of capital in order not only to help enact the “humanitarian” regime change model in Syria, but to shield from criticism their assets in the country, including suspected child traffickers profiting from the misery of Syrian children.

The crux of this effort centers around the controversial “humanitarian” group that fraudulently calls itself the Syrian Civil Defense, better known as the White Helmets, whose ties to both terrorist elements within the Syrian opposition and Western governments pushing for Syrian regime change have been well-documented.

Through their receipt of money raised from the Jo Cox Fund and the group’s well-publicized efforts aimed at commemorating Cox’s death, the murdered MP’s posthumous and saint-like reputation has been instrumental in shielding the group from legitimate criticisms both within the U.K. and beyond, preventing genuinely independent inquiries into the group’s dubious activities in Syria and its documented receipt of over £38.4 million ($50.3 million) in U.K. government funds.

This is Part I of a three-part series on the life and legacy of Jo Cox, focusing on the establishment of the Jo Cox Fund 24 hours after her dreadful murder on June 16, 2016 — a fund that designated among its causes the multi-million-dollar government-financed White Helmets, whose primary purpose has been to escalate unlawful NATO state-proxy and direct military intervention in Syria. We focus on the originators of this fund and the extent to which they influence Western policy on Syria and elsewhere. It is no coincidence that some of the world’s most ardent imperialists are behind the cynical exploitation of one heinous murder to enable global mass-murder as well as human trafficking under the pretext of “ethical” and “humanitarian” intervention.



Who was Jo Cox?
Prior to her untimely and tragic death, Jo Cox was a “tireless advocate” for the Syrian opposition following the 2011 outbreak of the Syrian conflict, even going so far as to promote Western military intervention to depose Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. Indeed, Cox consistently called for the U.K. to unilaterally establish a “no fly zone” in Syria with U.S. support and argued that the U.K. military could achieve an “ethical solution” to the Syrian conflict by intervening in the war in order to “compel” the Syrian government to negotiate.

Cox was deeply connected to the Fabian Society, the claimed representative of “modern Labour” in the U.K. This society has certainly furthered U.K. imperialist politics, which included the “patriotic funding of war machines,” according to author Dr. P. Wilkinson, who analyzed the impact of Jeremy Corbyn’s election as Labour Party leader in 2015 upon the Blairite factions within the party. While the Fabian Society can lay claim to some good work on child poverty, as an example, more recently it has been instrumental in the expansion of Global Britain’s economic and military interests.

In pursuit of U.K./NATO military intervention, Cox vocally denounced Assad and — throughout her short career in Parliament — had maintained that the Syrian president had “helped nurture ISIS [Daesh] and been its main recruiting sergeant.” She had also asserted that the Syrian government had killed seven times more civilians than the infamous terror group and the hundreds of other militant, extremist groups and foreign mercenaries in Syria at the behest of their backers among NATO member states and Gulf States with Israel as their hospital wing, treating armed militants, including Nusra Front in Israeli medical centres.

Cox’s precarious positioning of facts upon a mountain of misleading information has been discredited over time, as the Syrian Arab Army and its allies have waged a successful and authentic “war on terror” inside Syria and on its borders. All such wild accusations and Coxian theories have been eroded with each liberation of occupied Syrian territory and reintegration of armed militants into Syrian society via the Russian-brokered Amnesty and Reconciliation agreements.

Cox failed to pinpoint the U.K. Government’s involvement in the bankrolling of the various extremist and terrorist factions that invaded Syria from 2011 onwards. Armed militants, who have committed all manner of atrocities against the Syrian people, Cox claimed to defend. Cox, like so many regime-change promoters, had never been to Syria. She relied upon the narratives emerging from Syria produced by the U.K. FCO (Foreign and Commonwealth Office)-manufactured and financed White Helmets and a number of other U.K. state-funded entities on the ground in Syria. The U.K. Government was engineering a shadow state inside the borders of a sovereign nation and Cox supported this blatant violation of international law either deliberately or unwittingly.

Despite all evidence to the contrary, Cox claimed that Syria was not another Iraq. This is a familiar mantra often repeated by those who support the regime change war in Syria and one that is verifiably false. It appears that Cox had never perused the Bush/Blair communications revealed in the Chilcot report that demonstrated the progression from Iraq to Iran and Syria in the U.K./U.S. drive towards hegemony in the region. Syria was in Bush’s crosshairs, as described in a TIME article, as far back as 2006 but this was overlooked by Cox. Tony Blair must have been proud of the efforts made by Cox to expand “Global Britain’s” interests inside Syria:

Bush Blair Secret Iran Iraq Syria
Above is a presentation slide showing just one of the Bush/Blair communiques as revealed by the Chilcot report. Blair suggests offering Syria and Iran a “chance at a different relationship,” one that would be soured by President Assad’s refusal to comply with the conditions of that “different relationship” — conditions included favoring the Qatar/Turkey oil pipeline preferred by the U.S. coalition. Assad said “no,” and he said “no” to abandoning his allies in the region or reneging on his commitment to the Palestinian cause. In 2002, Blair had even included an honorary knighthood in his early sweeteners to persuade Assad to embrace the “different relationship.” Blair soon changed tack when it was recognized that Syria would not abandon its principles so easily. Plan B, which was regime change, was put into effect.

Cox voted against the proposed bombing of Syria in 2015, not because she thought it was a bad idea but because she wanted David Cameron’s government to go further and send British troops into Syria to save the “moderates.”

In October 2015, Cox co-wrote an article with Andrew Mitchell, former Conservative Secretary of State for International Development (2010-12) and Libya war-hawk. The article was published in The Guardian, whose record on manufacturing consent for U.K. state “humanitarian” intervention is legendary. The title said it all – “British Forces could help achieve an ethical solution in Syria” (emphasis added).

Cox and Mitchell argued that Syria was this generation’s moral test, its “responsibility.” With little regard for the reality on the ground in Syria, Cox and Mitchell merged the threat of international terrorism with the perceived threat from the Syrian government and Syrian Arab Army. The Labour and Tory MPs laser-focused on the refugee “crisis.” No context was provided, only emotional humanitarian flag-waving that ignored the fact that the refugee crisis was actually caused by a far greater percentage of non-Syrian refugees driven from Libya, Central Africa, Afghanistan and Iraq by previous NATO “ethical interventions.” Cox and Mitchell erased the U.K. government’s criminal record under international law with customary virtue-signalling.

…[T]here is nothing ethical about standing to one side when civilians are being murdered and maimed. There was no excuse in Bosnia, nor Rwanda and there isn’t now.”

Like so many neocons, Cox fundamentally argued that the only pathway to peace was the removal of Assad and victory for the “rebels.” They gave little or no consideration to the reality that this would inevitably lead to the rise of violent sectarianism under an alleged “moderate” Islamist governance, which would plunge Syria into the same terrorist vacuum that Libya has been dealing with since NATO’s “ethical solution” reduced that prosperous sovereign nation down to a failed state.

Even after Cox’s untimely death, her colleagues insisted that her “legacy” should be Britain going to war in Syria. Just prior to her death, Cox had been working on a paper entitled “The Cost of Doing Nothing.” Posthumously this paper was completed by Tory MP Tom Tugendhat, ex-military chair of the Foreign Affairs committee, and Alison McGovern, a Blairite MP who was elected chair of the all-party parliamentary group “Friends of Syria,” founded and previously chaired by Jo Cox.

According to a report by journalist and academic Paul Dixon, “the report was due to be published on the day of the Chilcot inquiry on 6 July 2016, to counter growing British scepticism about foreign military interventions.” Tugendhat, in particular, had argued (in a 2015 paper entitled “Clearing the Fog of Law”) against the human-rights laws that, in his opinion, curtailed and restricted British military action, he argued that “judicial imperialism should urgently be reversed.”

In an article written for the Telegraph, Tugendhat stated that “his friend” Jo Cox would “never want Britain to withdraw from the world — we must be ready to intervene.” A jingoistic argument was deployed by Tugendhat to justify British imperialism:

We wanted to show that Britain’s history of intervention, military and otherwise, is common to both our political traditions and has been an integral part of our foreign and national security policy for over two hundred years.”

During her life, Cox had been an advocate of war to bring peace in Syria. Furthermore, as this article series will show, her monstrous murder has been weaponized and politicized by the neocon war hawks in British politics in order to further the imperialist ambitions of the U.K. government in Syria and beyond. Significant media coverage, for instance, has been given to Cox’s “compassion,” but little coverage has been given to her pro-interventionist policies — which she often promoted in apparent ignorance of reality and historical context. The use of the “humanitarian” pretext to promote war is hardly a new concept, but the sudden and shocking death of Jo Cox has been exploited in order to elevate it and shield it from honest criticism. Indeed, one could argue that to criticize Jo Cox posthumously is akin to questioning a “Saint.” Who could find fault with her campaign against “genocide,” her pleas for safe havens for refugees, her apolitical stance on the world’s “inhumanity?”

Nevertheless, despite the possibility of being labeled insensitive and cynical, the question that should be asked is who determines the meaning of the terms so liberally used by Cox and her colleagues? What are the implications of this humanitarian hyperbole for U.K. government policy? Indeed, in the past, misplaced or even misleading “compassion” has been used to encourage us not only to betray the principles of international law but also to justify the escalation of armed conflict that has brought only greater inhumanity.

In the case of Syria, such pro-interventionist “humanitarians” have largely promoted policies that have only deepened the suffering for the vast majority of Syrian people. What diplomatic efforts have been deployed? What rational, Syria-centric, political resolution has been proposed for discussion? What respect has there been for the self-determination of the Syrian people?White Helmets No Fly ZoneAs an example, both Cox and the White Helmets were committed advocates of a No-Fly Zone over Syria — the White Helmets still are, of course. Despite the very real risk of escalating tensions with Russia, which intervened at the request of the Syrian government in September 2015, Cox argued strongly, in 2015, for a No-Fly Zone, defying even possible UN vetoes:

This is not about escalating a conflict directly to take on Russia. This is about a deterrence effect to stop the Syrian regime targeting their own civilians.”

A “No-Fly Zone” is recognized by many acclaimed journalists and analysts as nothing less than a “declaration of war.” Even Hillary Clinton, neocon warhawk extraordinaire, conceded the certainty that a No-Fly Zone would kill more Syrian civilians:

To have a no-fly zone you have to take out all of the air defenses, many of which are located in populated areas. So our missiles, even if they are standoff missiles so we’re not putting our pilots at risk — you’re going to kill a lot of Syrians.”

The precedent of Libya stands as a horrifying example of the death and destruction that is a consequence of such a policy, yet Cox was willing to endorse such wholesale devastation, which would inevitably affect more innocent lives in Syria and further fragment an already destabilized nation. Notably, she did so by promoting “humanitarianism,” despite the clearly inhuman consequences of such a policy.

Furthermore, Cox campaigned tirelessly for refugee rights. However, she did not highlight the British Government’s role in creating the refugee crisis in Syria by financing, promoting and equipping the “moderate” opposition that drove civilians from their homes and into refugee status. Neither did she highlight the British government’s role in NATO-member-state interventions that further exacerbated the refugee crisis in countries like Libya, Afghanistan, Iraq and Central Africa.

Beyond the conflict itself, Syrians have endured almost eight years of crippling economic sanctions, sanctions that were imposed by the U.K. and its allies in the U.S. regime-change coalition. As history has shown time and again, sanctions never damage a target government but instead wind up punishing the innocent people who resist any kind of foreign meddling in their sovereign affairs. These particular sanctions have decimated the Syrian state medical sector, by destroying hospitals and reducing the nation’s ability to treat its population for all manner of chronic illness and to counter the trauma of an externally waged war. Why did Jo Cox never argue that these sanctions should be lifted, if she truly cared for the plight of the Syrian people? Indeed, why were the solutions she supported largely policies that — in practice — would deepen and prolong the conflict, and why did she invoke the well-being of the Syrian people to promote them?



Jo Cox and the White Helmets
Beyond her public calls for intervention, Cox also founded and co-chaired the all-party parliamentary group (APPG) “Friends of Syria” from 2015 until her death a year later. She was again partnered in this endeavor by Andrew Mitchell, who was also co-chair of the APPG.

During that time, Cox hosted several events on behalf of the group, many of them promoting pro-regime-change speakers from groups like the European Council on Foreign Relations and the National Coalition for Syrian Revolution and Opposition Forces. More recent events hosted by the group have included speakers from the U.S. think-tank Atlantic Council, largely funded by U.S. weapons manufacturers; and the filmmakers of the second Oscar-nominated White Helmets documentary, Last Men in Aleppo, a revisionist project that attempted to erase from public consciousness the existence of Nusra Front and over 50 other extremist groups that occupied East Aleppo for almost five years.

Watch | Channel 4 tribute to Jo Cox, honoring the White Helmets as “impartial, neutral rescuers”



In promoting the White Helmets, the “Friends of Syria” group was following Cox’s lead, as Cox herself was a vocal supporter of the group and was instrumental in getting the group nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize in 2016. Indeed, a few months before her death, Cox had written a “heartfelt” letter to the Nobel Prize committee, asserting that “in the most dangerous place on earth these unarmed volunteers [of the White Helmets] risk their lives to help anyone in need regardless of religion or politics.”

Cox’s promotion of the White Helmets to win the Nobel Peace Prize gained the support of several notable celebrities – George Clooney and Daniel Craig, among others – as well as 20 other British MPs. The group was eventually nominated for the prize as a result, but failed to muster enough support to win the award, which instead went to Colombian President Juan Manuel Santos for the FARC peace deal.

Thus, the inclusion of the White Helmets as beneficiaries of the Jo Cox Fund is certainly in keeping with the Syria policy and narratives that Cox had promoted during her time as a public figure. However, what stands out is not only the extent to which the Jo Cox Fund has been posthumously exploited to continue funding the White Helmets. What is perhaps more striking is the history of the fund’s originators and their deep connections to some of the world’s most powerful individuals and influential “philanthropic” organizations.



Instant exploitation
Within five days of Cox’s murder, the White Helmets PR agency, Syria Campaign, had produced another in a long line of slick marketing campaigns. This time they announced “8 Reasons why Syrians will never forget Jo Cox.” Those eight reasons tied in perfectly with the U.K./U.S. Coalition “regime change” agenda. They included calls for “real action” to protect the Syrian “people;” not seeing Syria as Iraq; the root cause of killing and extremism in Syria is…. Assad; breaking the ubiquitous sieges (those allegedly created by Assad, not by the extremist factions, naturally); welcoming refugees; lobbying the UN to support unlawful intervention; and ensuring that U.K. foreign policy objectives of toppling the elected Syrian government are not allowed to fall from the parliamentary agenda.

What a perfect example of exploitation of a dramatic and shocking event by an organization established by a Syrian-in-exile oil baron, Ayman Asfari who has also provided financial backing to the Conservative Party in the U.K. Almost £ 700,000 since 2009. Asfari is a member of the Leaders Group, an “elite circle of donors” who are regularly invited to lunch with Tory Party influencers in return for £50,000 per year. Asfari is under investigation by the Serious Fraud Squad (SFO) in the UK on allegations of extensive bribery and corruption in the oil and gas industry for the last three years, according to the Electoral Commission.

British MP Wafic Saïd left, Former Prime Minister David Cameron, center , and Ayman Asfari, right. Photo | Saïd Foundation
British MP Wafic Saïd left, former Prime Minister David Cameron, center, and Ayman Asfari, right. Photo | Saïd Foundation

Asfari is another elite mover and shaker whose influence over the view of the Syria conflict landscape packaged and presented in the West is considerable, particularly within sectors that will influence UK Government policy or support it.

Andrew Mitchell, perhaps best known in the U.K. for the “plebgate” saga, has systematically used Cox’s untouchable status to counter public concern over the true role of the White Helmets in Syria and their status as a “complete propaganda construct,” as described by eminent journalist and documentary filmmaker John Pilger.

The ever-increasing evidence of the White Helmets’ allegiance to Nusra Front (Al Qaeda in Syria) and a plethora of other equally brutal extremist groups; their participation in sectarian, extra-judicial executions by the “moderate” armed groups; and their lobbying for war in Congress, the UN and in Parliament are dismissed with the broad brush of Jo Cox’s living endorsement of this very British organization. Cox’s death has been exploited to render any investigation into the White Helmets an inhumane practice. In life and apparently even in death, Cox was and is an integral part of the White Helmet protection cartel.

The seamless transition from Jo Cox to a number of her acolytes and colleagues who have carried her interventionist baton forward has been remarkable. Following glowing tributes from global luminaries — such as former U.S. President, and drone warfare advocate, Barack Obama — significant others have moved into pole position to ensure the longevity of Cox’s policies.

Sara Brown, wife of former U.K. Prime Minister Gordon Brown, stepped up to praise the “female” White Helmets who appeared miraculously, shortly after criticism that the group was a sectarian, extremist and fundamental organization that would do nothing to further women’s rights in Syria. At the same time as Brendan Cox (Jo’s husband) was special advisor to Gordon Brown (2009-11), Jo Cox had helped Sara Brown to establish the Maternal Mortality Campaign, which aimed to raise awareness of babies dying needlessly in pregnancy and childbirth.

Move forward to 2017 and the creation of the Jo Cox-inspired centrist campaign group “More United,” which crowdfunds to support “progressive” election candidates across all parties in the U.K. According to Bess Mayhew, chief executive of More United:

We are doing something unheard of in British politics: we want people across the political spectrum to agree and unite around the values we share. We have supporters, we have money, we have a long-term plan, and we’re mobilising a digital disruption of the politics of the status quo.”

Crowdfunding for “ethical” intervention-approved candidates who will ensure the protection of Global Britain’s imperialist road map and all its associated constructs, including the White Helmets.

With the Jo Cox Fund, public sentiment has been harnessed and monetized for the benefit of establishment elite “charity” schemes that effectively fund the assets who are enabling a violent regime-change war that has been waged for almost eight years inside Syria.



The billionaires behind the Jo Cox Fund
The Jo Cox Fund was set up, only 24 hours after the MP’s death, by four of Cox’s “friends” in London , who said they had set up the fundraiser in “close collaboration” with Cox’s husband, Brendan Cox. Cox’s “friends” that co-founded the fund are as follows, along with the organizational affiliations they freely provided on the fund’s page: Nick Grono (CEO, The Freedom Fund), Tim Dixon (MD, Purpose), Mabel van Oranje (Chair, Girls Not Brides), and Gemma Mortensen (Chief Global Officer, Change.org). Two of those four, Nick Grono and Mabel van Oranje, would go on to serve on the board of the Jo Cox Foundation.

However, these four figures — upon closer examination — are clearly much more than just four grieving friends of the late MP who just happen to also serve prominent roles on well-known non-governmental organizations and charities. In reality, all four are deeply connected to some of the most powerful interests in the world, many with nefarious agendas, that have long sought to hijack NGOs and other humanitarian organizations and weaponize them in the service of major political goals, including regime change targeting “rogue states.”

Of the four founders of the Jo Cox Fund, there is perhaps no one that epitomizes these types of connections more than Mabel van Oranje, nee Wisse Smit. Though often touted as a human-rights advocate for her role in organizations like Girls Not Brides and War Child Netherlands, a closer examination of van Oranje’s history reveals not only deep connections to some of the world’s most powerful people but also past connections to previous Western-backed regime-change operations.

Nick Grono, left, Mabel van Oranje, second left, and Tim Dixon, right stand on stage with others during a Jox Cox commemoration at Trafalgar Square in London. Alastair Grant | AP
Nick Grono, left, Mabel van Oranje, second left, and Tim Dixon, right stand on stage with others at a Jox Cox commemoration at Trafalgar Square in London. Alastair Grant | AP

Van Oranje and Cox were both “recognized” by the World Economic Forum (WEF). Cox was honored posthumously as a WEF Young Global Leader while van Oranje was named a WEF Global Leader for Tomorrow in 2003 and listed among its Young Global Leaders in 2005. The overlap of mutual award ceremonies among the organizations and individual players who form the ever-expanding imperialist network are brought into sharp relief by this examination of the Jo Cox Fund and those who breathed life into it. Certainly, there are very few globalist entities that epitomize the well-heeled financial, economic and corporate mafia sectors more than the WEF.

However, van Oranje is much more notable among the soft-power complex elite — not for her role at Girls Not Brides nor other NGOs — but for co-founding the European Council on Foreign Relations, a globalist pan-European think-tank whose members are a mix of EU politicians and top figures in the European media. However, the ECFR is more than just a think-tank, given that it is essentially an extension of one powerful and controversial billionaire, George Soros, whose Open Society Foundation was largely responsible for providing the ECFR’s initial funding.

The Soros connection only deepens as one examines van Oranje’s past. Indeed, van Oranje was the director of EU Affairs of Soros’ Open Society Institute (OSI) beginning in 1997 until 2002, when she became International Advocacy Director for the Open Society Institute’s branch in London. Notably, George Soros is one of the chief funders behind the most prominent NGOs and other “humanitarian” organizations that have consistently promoted Western military intervention in the Syrian conflict.

Furthermore, van Oranje’s private life makes her connections to some of the world’s leading globalists even more clear. In 2004, while working for the OSI, Mabel Martine Wisse Smit (maiden name) married the late Prince Fiso of the Netherlands, son of Queen Beatrix — a regular Bilderberg attendee — and the grandson of Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands – the German-born Dutch royal who co-founded the Bilderberg Group in 1954.

Yet, of van Oranje’s innumerable connections to powerful billionaires and the global elite, her most striking connection — in the context of Syria at least — was perhaps one of her first. In 1993, van Oranje — at the age of 25 and just out of university — founded the European Action Council for Peace in the Balkans and served as its CEO until 1997, when she left to join Soro’s OSI.

Despite its name appearing to advocate for “peace” in the Balkans, the group van Oranje founded was instead stocked with powerful U.S. political figures who advocated for anything but peace in the Balkan states. For instance, some of the members of the group’s executive council included Zbigniew Brzezinski, National Security Advisor under former U.S. President Jimmy Carter; Frank Carlucci, Deputy CIA Director under Carter and National Security Advisor and Deputy Secretary of Defense under former U.S. President Ronald Reagan; Max Kampleman, head of Reagan’s nuclear weapons team; and Jeanne Kirkpatrick, Reagan’s ambassador to the United Nations.

Other key members and influencers working within the upper echelons of van Oranje’s council include Morton Abramowitz, former U.S. ambassador to Turkey and board member of Human Rights Watch, and Aryeh Neier, co-founder of Human Rights Watch (HRW) in 1978 and long-time president of Soros’ OSI. Human Rights Watch is a prominent NGO that uses its “humanitarian” exterior to push pro-intervention agendas that are promoted by the governments and billionaires who fund and support it. For instance, HRW was awarded $100m to expand its global presence over a 10 year period by Soros and his associated organizations in 2010, and has formed a critical part of the “humanitarian” pro-military intervention lobby since the 1990s. HRW also has close ties to U.S. intelligence and is one of the many CIA outreach agents designed to provide, yet again, cover for the Pentagon’s military fist inside the velvet glove of “humanitarian” concerns.

Infographic Syria Soros
Infographic produced by Professor Tim Anderson, a long-time peace activist and author of The Dirty War on Syria.

How van Oranje was able to furnish her newly founded action council with such powerful figures, particularly just after finishing her senior year of college only months prior, is a testament to the strength of her connections, even before she began work for Soros’ elite power-protectionist group or became a member of the Dutch royal family.

Unsurprisingly, the European Action Council for Peace in the Balkans issued a call in 1995, under van Oranje’s leadership, for “an end to the arms embargo against Bosnia, the withdrawal of the UN forces from Bosnia and an effective NATO air campaign.”

Despite being an alleged “council for peace,” the van Oranje-led group demanded that any “air campaign” be both “strategic and sustained,” not “pinprick strikes.” In other words, this group called for an intense, brutal and long-lasting bombing campaign of the country, much like the type of bombing campaign promoted for use in Syria by groups like Crisis Action — with members such as van Oranje and Mortensen of the Jo Cox Fund, as well as Jo Cox herself before her death. At the time, the van Oranje-chaired group on the Balkan conflict had also asserted that “a failure to act will be disastrous for the people of Bosnia, for the U.S., and for our vital interests in Europe” — the familiar clarion call to war in the interests of a “national security” under no threat from the country in the crosshairs.



Nick Grono and the Clintons
Van Oranje is hardly the only Jo Cox Fund co-founder with a well-heeled foothold in the elite camp. Nick Grono, another co-founder of the fund, had worked with Jo Cox at an anti-slavery NGO, the Freedom Fund. Grono, who was appointed the group’s CEO in January of 2014, had also previously served in key posts at the NGO Walk Free, also aimed at ending modern-day slavery. Grono had also been Deputy President and Chief Operating Officer at the cutting edge “conflict resolution and prevention” cartel commonly known as the International Crisis Group (ICG).

Nick Grono greets Pope Francis in 2013. Photo | Freedom Fund
Nick Grono greets Pope Francis in 2013. Photo | Freedom Fund

The ICG board is comprised of a cadre of well-known elites such as Frank Giustra, the longtime philanthropic partner of Bill Clinton and the Clinton Foundation; Carl Bildt; Emma Bonino; former NATO Chief Wesley Clark; George Soros; Alexander Soros — the list is extensive of those who are immensely influential in the globalist circles. Furthermore, the funding for ICG is paid by the United States government through the United States Institute of Peace (USIP) and grants made on behalf of the U.S. Congress to foreign political organizations. Other Western countries, like the Netherlands, also contribute. Notably, Mabel van Oranje is also a past member of ICG. Once encased in such a gilded cage, it is easy to build upon such connections and to expand, as a philanthrocapitalist, into the most lucrative areas of humanitarian need.

The Freedom Fund was first announced by former U.S. President Bill Clinton at the 2013 annual Clinton Global Initiative meeting in New York. It was founded with $30 million provided by three “philanthropic” foundations of powerful billionaires and financial interests: Humanity United, a foundation funded by Pierre Omidyar and his wife Pamela; the Legatum Foundation, the development arm of the Legatum group, a global private investment firm connected to mega-banks JP Morgan and Goldman Sachs; and the Minderoo Foundation, the foundation of Australian mining oligarch and the country’s richest man Andrew Forrest and his wife Nicola.

The Freedom Fund was described as an “ambitious seven-year effort to raise and deploy $100 million or more to combat modern-day slavery.” It was Bill Clinton who announced the fund’s creation, stating that “This is a huge deal and we should all support this.” Nick Grono was given the helm early on in the fund’s voyage, serving as its inaugural CEO. It is worth mentioning that the sincerity of Clinton’s enthusiasm for combating slavery and human trafficking is suspect, given that he was a regular visitor on pedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s private jet and has intervened on at least one occasion to protect known child traffickers.

Grono is also on the board of van Oranje-chaired group Girls Not Brides and was the inaugural CEO of the anti-slavery NGO Walk Free, which conveniently interlocks with the anti-slavery movement contained within Freedom Fund. Notably, Tim Dixon, another Jo Cox Fund founder, is co-founder of Purpose Europe, a branch of the Avaaz-fostered behavioral-change experts that market themselves as a “non-profit” while accepting donor contributions from some of the most influential foundations and political “change” drivers, such as Google. According to Cory Morningstar, a pioneer researcher into the NPIC (Not for Profit Industrial Complex):

Where, under the organization Avaaz, the public hasn’t acquiesced to an airstrike on Syria, the New York public relations firm Purpose Inc. has stepped in.”

Tim Dixon, pictured left, co-founded Purpose Europe.
Tim Dixon, pictured left, co-founded Purpose Europe.

Dixon’s connections will be covered in greater depth in Part 2, but it is worth noting here that Dixon also connects into the van Oranje network. Under Dixon’s tutelage and according to his LinkedIn profile, Purpose “incubated” van Oranje’s Walk Free Foundation that is now listed among the high-profile “partners” on the Purpose website.

The flotilla of anti-slavery activists and sponsors who floated Freedom Fund were Humanity Utd, Minderoo, Legatum Foundation who were then joined by the Stardust Fund, the C & A Foundation, and Children’s Investment Fund Foundation (CIFF), which granted $10 million to the Freedom Fund over five years “to scale its anti-slavery work, with a particular focus on tackling the exploitation of children.”

These groups continue to back Freedom Fund, which also receives significant funding from the U.K. government and UBS, the multinational Switzerland-based investment bank.

A seminal paper written by Janie A. Chuang, an American professor of law, highlighted the pitfalls and risks involved in this particular area of philanthrocapitalism, a term Chuang invented in her essay. Chuang argues that “deep financial resources and access to powerful networks” give the philanthrocapitalists tremendous power to “shape the future trajectory of the anti-trafficking movement.” However, Chuang warns that this also gives these soft power moguls the ability to reconfigure and distort the landscape of global anti-trafficking policy-making and to contain it within a very limited power base that will monopolize the “market” and control the outcome.

The more sinister aspect of this overlap is that these capitalist NGO chains depend upon their ability to generate a revenue stream that sustains their positioning at the top of the fundraising pyramid. To what extent is the control they have over sectors of human suffering influenced by their need to meet the pay grade of their directors and board members? To what extent will these foundation-controlled NGOs sacrifice the agendas of their wealthy and powerful sponsors in favor of integrity and genuinely humanitarian objectives? In a nutshell, these anti-trafficking organizations depend upon human trafficking for their success, status and impact in an oversubscribed market.

In the next installment of this series, the role of these NGOs, and the Jo Cox Fund in particular, will be examined as it relates to the Syrian conflict. As described above, many of the very players involved with the Jo Cox Fund and associated NGOs are much involved with the public-relations campaign to elevate and protect groups like the White Helmets and other dubious elements of the Syrian opposition, an effort that has its origin in the NATO intervention in the Balkan states in the 1990s. As will be explored, the current efforts of those groups and individuals within Syria not only act as a cover for Western intervention but also cover the dark side of these “humanitarian” NGOs, particularly their possible involvement in the trafficking of Syrian children.

[TonyGosling]

Jo Cox False Flag Conspiracy Theories Swirl On Twitter As ‘Brexit’ Vote Looms
https://www.ibtimes.com/jo-cox-false-flag-conspiracy-theories-swirl-tw itter-brexit-vote-looms-2383168

By Angelo Young
@angeloyoung_

06/16/16 AT 8:43 PM
Jo Cox Thomas Mair
Floral tributes and candles are placed by a picture of slain Labour MP Jo Cox at a vigil in Parliament square in London on June 16, 2016. Photo: DANIEL LEAL-OLIVAS/AFP/Getty Images
The timing of the cold-blooded murder of liberal British lawmaker Jo Cox, as she was going to a meeting with constituents Thursday, has led to a flurry of social-media chatter claiming Cox’s killing was plotted by forces seeking to sway next week’s referendum in favor of Britain remaining in the European Union.

Cox was stabbed and shot, allegedly by a right-wing loner. But some supporters of a British exit from the EU are spreading a conspiracy theory that the suspect, identified as Thomas Mair, 52, is a patsy of pro-EU forces, and that Cox’s murder is a “false flag” aimed at portraying the British right as unhinged and dangerous.

The Jo Cox killing is a false flag by globalists. They found some mentally ill man to go down as a patsy. https://t.co/YbcjFtmp60

— Mike Cernovich (@Cernovich) June 16, 2016
This view has been widely circulating on social media and underscores the increasingly heated debate over Britain’s future in the EU. Much like American voters who have rallied behind presumptive Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump, supporters of the so-called Brexit tend to be immigrant-wary nationalists who are dissatisfied with establishment politicians.

On Thursday, an Ipsos MORI poll published in London’s Evening Standard showed supporters of a British exit leading opponents, 53 percent to 47 percent. This led some to speculate that Cox’s death was planned to dissuade Brexit supporters.

Mair, who was in custody, is believed to have both mental health issues and right-wing political leanings. Witnesses claim he shouted “Britain First!,” the name of an ultra-right nationalist group, as he attacked Cox in her North-Central England constituency. Cox’s district has a sizable population of British-born and immigrant Muslims with roots in Pakistan and the northeastern Indian state of Gujarat.



Cox, a 41-year-old member of Parliament for the Labour Party, was a former humanitarian worker who was widely regarded as a rising star on Britain’s political left. She also was an advocate for Syrian refugees and was actively advocating for Britain to remain in the EU.

EU assassinated one of their own in a false flag against #brexithttps://t.co/G8lm7fQ5J9

— Hunk Space (@domainfag) June 16, 2016
On Thursday, countless posts were circulating on Twitter and Facebook suggesting Cox was sacrificed by pro-EU forces. In most cases the posts don’t specifically name the architects accused of allegedly recruiting someone to kill Cox. Also in most cases, no alleged conspirators are named and in some they’re simply called members of the “left wing” or “Globalists” or the “anti-Brexit” movement. One post even accused the Bilderberg Group, the alliance of global business and political figures that is a common target of left-wing and right-wing conspiracy theories, of orchestrating the murder.

RELATED STORIES
Slaying Of British MP: Related To Brexit Vote?
British MP Jo Cox Dead After Being Stabbed, Shot
Clearly it’s easy to find just about any theory being promoted on social media, and the number of people condemning the Jo Cox “false flag” conspiracy were outnumbering the posts supporting the theory. But the dialogue shows just how divided Britons are with just seven days before the momentous Brexit referendum.

Obvious that Jo Cox was killed as a false flag. Perfect excuse to suspend the campaign. Globalists will kill ANYONE to achieve their goals

— Anna Chapman (@ImagineAnna) June 16, 2016

Jo Cox's murder by a far-right terrorist in 2016 is used by some members as a threat, while others label the assassination a "false flag" attack - implying that the murder was orchestrated to influence the referendum. pic.twitter.com/D3TeoFG47w

— tortoise (@tortoise) April 14, 2019