Scholars for 911 Truth website get's amention.

[sonic]

Dear all although I posted this under 7/7 too, I think it is relative to this section as there is a mention in the full page advertisement of www.st911.org

Peace, Sonic.

Dear all, I was astonished to find a full page advert in Today's Independent.

Much of it is below:

THE INDEPENDENT TODAY IS CARRYING A FULL PAGE ADVERT WITH THE TITLE (Release The Evidence).

Some of the text reads: One year on - a time for Truth, London, July 7th 2005. A day of slaughter, tears and solidarity. 56 precious lives will be lost, hundreds are injured, traumatised, bereaved. All of us made less secure. Muslims suffer increased suspicion and attacks.

Before anyone could know, the Prime Minister hints at who was responsible. Despite the pre-war 'framing' of Iraq, most media take Blair as reliable and give credence to unattributablepolice and intelligence 'sources' (aka hereasay). Where facts are scarce or contradictory, the emitional appeal of the notion of 'Islamic terror' will plug the holes.

Although some people, including some Muslims, abuse their religion to target civillians, claim assessment should have been suggested additional possibilites:

Who did it Last time? Soho pub (fascist) and Bishopgate (IRA). Terrorism has also been practiced by British, US and other intelligence agencies, ask the Irish, as the survivors of the Bologna rail station massacre of 1980, successfully blamed on Red Brigade patsies (1) 'Britains 9-11? - as if that conspiracy tale is beyond question! (2)

The biggest slaughter in london since the Luftwaffe, yet - according to Blair - a Public Inquiry would be 'a distraction'. Too slow. Too expensive! 'Besides', went the subtext, 'we all know who did it, don't we?' But do 'we'? And did the promised 'narrative' (3) deal with Awkward facts or paper over the difficulties?

(Contd......see full article.


Also in the same article: More and more people are asking 'Could the Leeds 4 have been stopped? Was

July 7th Anniversary Ad-hoc Appeal


1) Against all attacks on harmless civillians
2) Don't presuppose 'Muslim Guilt'.
3)Support whilstleblowers
4)Release the evidence - CCTV, traffic cam, phone, computer, bank, etc
5)For a credible and searching Independent Public Enquiry: adequate Remit; extensive Powers; broad social Composition; widely acceptable (including in Beeston).
6)Support Amnesty's boycott of any public inquiry conducted under Blair's Inquiries Act 2005 (designed to shield spook wrong-doing).
7) An end to War of Terror raids on Muslim Communities.

[b]Further information from J7AAA, 2b Darnhall Cres, Perth PH2 0HH, or 01738 783677

UK Film Premier of Mind the Gaps and discussion with J7 Truth Campaigners: 2 July - Bristol, 7-11, Cube Cinema 0117-907-4190; 6 July - Totnes Methodist Hall 01803 762738[/b]it incompetence or something worse? In the light of severe 'London end' discrepencies should the question rather be: Were Khan and his network being groomed as credible patsies? (In which case it would be important that they were shielded from arrest before they were duped or otherwise drawn in). What proof do we really have that they even made it to Luton?

We just don't know, and we suggest the reader doesn't either. Please join in the pressure for the full truth to come out - whatever it turns out to be.

References

1. Nato's Secret Armies, Daniele Ganser (Cass, 2005) Or 'google' P20G
2. Scholars for 911 Truth: www.st911.org/
3. Report of the Official Account of the London Bombings of July 7th 2005.
4. Campaign against Criminalising Communities http://www.cacc.org.uk/
5. E-Mails 16/8/05 and 25/8/05 from Customer Relation, Kings Cross and Communications Manager, Luton
6. Bild am Sonntag, July 2005
7. Facts not referenced here can mostly be checkend on www.julyseventh.co.uk or http://www.officialconfusion.com/77/index.html. No groups or events mentiond in this advert are responsible for its contents.

Note the full page advert also carries the facous 'CCTV clip' are references in the advert allude to the apparant discrpancies.