brian Validated Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2005 Posts: 611 Location: Scotland
|
Posted: Sat Aug 27, 2005 2:01 pm Post subject: Weldon Responds to Omission of ‘Able Danger’ from the 9/11 R |
|
|
---The 9/11 Commission has released multiple statements over the past week, each of which has significantly changed - from initially denying ever being briefed to acknowledging being briefed on both operation ABLE DANGER and Mohammed Atta. The information was omitted primarily because they found it to be suspect despite having been briefed on it two times by two different military officers on active duty. Additionally, the 9/11 Commission also received documents from the Department of Defense on ABLE DANGER.
Despite their varied statements, two critical questions remain unanswered.
1) Why did the Department of Defense fail to pass critical information obtained through ABLE DANGER to the FBI between the summer and fall of 2000?
2) Why did the 9/11 Commission staff fail to properly follow-up on the three separate occasions when they received information on ABLE DANGER and Mohammed Atta?
I will continue to push for a full accounting of the historical record so that we may preclude these types of failures from happening again.” --
http://www.911citizenswatch.org/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file= article&sid=652&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0 |
|
brian Validated Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2005 Posts: 611 Location: Scotland
|
Posted: Sat Aug 27, 2005 2:14 pm Post subject: Project "Able Danger" |
|
|
"---Regarding this, NATIONAL REVIEW's Jim Geraghty exclaimed: "As for the 9-11 commission, after all that patting themselves on the back, all that gushing praise from left, right and center, after their work was called 'miraculous' by NEWSDAY, and the nomination for a National Book Award, and calling their own work 'extraordinary'...man, these guys stink. Really, if this checks out, and the staffers had information like this and they disregarded it, never believing that we in the public deserved to know that the plot's ringleader was identified, located and recommended to be arrested a year before the attacks...boy, these guys ought to be in stocks in the public square and have rotten fruit thrown at them. What a sham."
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=L. 20050827&articleId=868 |
|