FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist  Chat Chat  UsergroupsUsergroups  CalendarCalendar RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

David Shayler on islam channel

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7, Covid-1984 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> London Bombings of Thursday 7th July 2005
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
TRUTH
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 15 Feb 2006
Posts: 376

PostPosted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 9:03 am    Post subject: David Shayler on islam channel Reply with quote

http://www.islamchannel.tv/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Keith Mothersson
Angel - now passed away
Angel - now passed away


Joined: 01 Aug 2005
Posts: 303
Location: Perth

PostPosted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:16 am    Post subject: David on Zionist Bankers Reply with quote

Hi, David, and others,
Although most of what David said was, as usual, pretty spot on, I am concerned that David is putting some things in a way which could get him - and us by association - successfully tarred with the brush of anti-semitism.

(I say successfully - because I know anyone who critiques Israel and Zionism will be accused of anti-semitism sooner or later. I don't believe David is anti-semitic, just very aware of the misdeeds of Mossad, for example, among other intelligence agencies, but much more active and daring then most of them for perfectly understandable political-sociological and historical reasons. )

On the Islam chanel discussion I think it would have been more skilful for David, when referring to global banker-power- and if he had to characterise it as Zionist, to have added something to the effect that a huge amount of money power and corporate control which supports Zionism is actually Christian Zionist, not Jewish. Also we all need to keep reminding people that for a long time the majority of Jews opposed Zionism, and that many still do, while others would speak out much more in Jewish community organisations except that they are aware of the pretty heavy social and possibly financial or worse sanctions which the extreme Zionists mete out to 'self-hating Jews', 'arab-lovers', etc.

This is an important issue which we need to get right otherwise we are going to set ourselves up for failure, disunity, infiltration from fasists, etc.

_________________
For the defence of our one worldwide civilian Motherland, against whatever ruling or informal fraternities.

May all beings be happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
kbo234
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 10 Dec 2005
Posts: 2017
Location: Croydon, Surrey

PostPosted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:05 pm    Post subject: Re: David on Zionist Bankers Reply with quote

keith wrote:
David is putting some things in a way which could get him - and us by association - successfully tarred with the brush of anti-semitism.


This is the dilemma, isn't it? So many people feel it is right to condemn Zionism and the actions of the Israeli state yet hold back for fear of offending the Jewish people in general and for fear of being thought 'anti-semitic'.

However, the fact is that most Jews, overly Zionist or not, are in practice Zionists by virtue of the unqualified support the vast majority tend to give to Israel.

So we fail to speak our minds for fear of offending people who rightfully should be speaking up for themselves.

This fear in society is, I believe, disastrous for us all. It is a fear that has been deliberately created and fostered by the Zionists themselves. The press and public can criticise Bush, Blair and the rest of them all they like yet the Zionists behind them float through all the flak unscathed.

Who really controls UK/USA?

Enough is enough. let the the taboo be broken, let the truth be told.


Last edited by kbo234 on Thu Jul 13, 2006 2:25 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Ann Johnson
New Poster
New Poster


Joined: 12 Jul 2006
Posts: 3
Location: South

PostPosted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:58 pm    Post subject: Clarity required? Reply with quote

For those of us who didn't hear this show, is there a record of it anywhere? After all, it would seem unfair to criticise anyone such as David if we don't know for sure what he said? Misrepresentation is a bad thing practised by those in power--we should not copy them, even if unintentionally.
_________________
demystifier
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
andyb
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 26 Apr 2006
Posts: 1025
Location: SW London

PostPosted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 2:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

A recent Mr Fisk article re anti-semitism. Note the changing of the Webster's International dictionary meaning in the US, scary stuff.

Quote:

A Warning to Those Who Dare to Criticize Israel in the Land of Free Speech


Another Case Study: Mary Robinson

By ROBERT FISK

04/24/04 "The Independent" -- Behold Mary Robinson, former president of Ireland, former UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, would-be graduation commencement speaker at Emory University in the United States. She has made a big mistake. She dared to criticise Israel. She suggested--horror of horrors--that "the root cause of the Arab-Israeli conflict is the occupation". Now whoah there a moment, Mary! "Occupation"? Isn't that a little bit anti-Israeli?

Are you really suggesting that the military occupation of the West Bank and Gaza Strip by Israel, its use of extrajudicial executions against Palestinian gunmen, the Israeli gunning down of schoolboy stone-throwers, the wholesale theft of Arab land to build homes for Jews, is in some way wrong?

Maybe I misheard you. Sure I did. Because your response to these scurrilous libels, to these slurs upon your right to free speech, to these slanderous attacks on your integrity, was a pussy-cat's whimper. You were "very hurt and dismayed". It is, you told The Irish Times, "distressing that allegations are being made that are completely unfounded".

You should have threatened your accusers with legal action. When I warn those who claim in their vicious postcards that my mother was Eichmann's daughter that they will receive a solicitor's letter--Peggy Fisk was in the RAF in the Second World War, but no matter--they fall silent at once.

But no, you are "hurt". You are "dismayed". And you allow Professor Kenneth Stein of Emory University to announce that he is "troubled by the apparent absence of due diligence on the part of decision makers who invited her [Mary Robinson] to speak". I love the "due diligence" bit. But seriously, how can you allow this twisted version of your integrity to go unpunished?

Dismayed. Ah, Mary, you poor diddums.

I tried to check the spelling of "diddums" in Webster's, America's inspiring, foremost dictionary. No luck. But then, what's the point when Webster's Third New International Dictionary defines "anti-Semitism" as "opposition to Zionism: sympathy with opponents of the state of Israel".

Come again? If you or I suggest--or, indeed, if poor wee Mary suggests--that the Palestinians are getting a raw deal under Israeli occupation, then we are "anti-Semitic". It is only fair, of course, to quote the pitiful response of the Webster's official publicist, Mr Arthur Bicknell, who was asked to account for this grotesque definition.

"Our job," he responded, "is to accurately reflect English as it is actually being used. We don't make judgement calls; we're not political." Even more hysterically funny and revolting, he says that the dictionary's editors tabulate "citational evidence" about anti-Semitism published in "carefully written prose-like books and magazines". Preposterous as it is, this Janus-like remark is worthy of the hollowest of laughs.

Even the Malaprops of American English are now on their knees to those who will censor critics of Israel's Middle East policy off the air.

And I mean "off the air". I've just received a justifiably outraged note from Bathsheba Ratskoff, a producer and editor at the American Media Education Foundation (MEF), who says that their new documentary on "the shutting-down of debate around the Israeli-Palestinian conflict"--in reality a film about Israel's public relations outfits in America--has been targeted by the "Jewish Action (sic) Task Force". The movie Peace, Propaganda and the Promised Land was to be shown at the Boston Museum of Fine Arts.

So what happened? The "JAT" demanded an apology to the Jewish community and a "pledge (for) greater sensitivity (sic) when tackling Israel and the Middle East conflict in the future". JAT members "may want to consider threatening to cancel their memberships and to withhold contributions".

In due course, a certain Susan Longhenry of the Museum of Fine Arts wrote a creepy letter to Sut Jhally of the MEF, referring to the concerns of "many members of the Boston community"--otherwise, of course, unidentified--suggesting a rescheduled screening (because the original screening would have fallen on the Jewish Sabbath) and a discussion that would have allowed critics to condemn the film. The letter ended--and here I urge you to learn the weasel words of power--that "we have gone to great lengths to avoid cancelling altogether screenings of this film; however, if you are not able to support the revised approach, then I'm afraid we'll have no choice but to do just that".

Does Ms Longhenry want to be a mouse? Or does she want to have the verb "to longhenry" appear in Webster's? Or at least in the Oxford? Fear not, Ms Longhenry's boss overrode her pusillanimous letter. For the moment, at least.

But where does this end? Last Sunday, I was invited to talk on Irish television's TV3 lunchtime programme on Iraq and President Bush's support for Sharon's new wall on the West Bank. Towards the end of the programme, Tom Cooney, a law lecturer at University College, Dublin, suddenly claimed that I had called an Israeli army unit a "rabble" (absolutely correct--they are) and that I reported they had committed a massacre in Jenin in 2002.

I did not say they committed a massacre. But I should have. A subsequent investigation showed that Israeli troops had knowingly shot down innocent civilians, killed a female nurse and driven a vehicle over a paraplegic in a wheelchair. "Blood libel!" Cooney screamed. TV3 immediately--and correctly--dissociated themselves from this libel. Again, I noted the involvement of an eminent university--UCD is one of the finest academic institutions in Ireland and I can only hope that Cooney exercises a greater academic discipline with his young students than he did on TV3--in this slander. And of course, I got the message. Shut up. Don't criticise Israel.

So let me end on a positive note. Just as Bathsheba is a Jewish American, British Jews are also prominent in an organisation called Deir Yassin Remembered, which commemorates the massacre of Arab Palestinians by Jewish militiamen outside Jerusalem in 1948. This year, they remembered the Arab victims of that massacre--9 April--on the same day that Christians commemorated Good Friday.

The day also marked the fourth day of the eight-day Jewish Passover. It also fell on the anniversary of the 1945 execution by the Nazis of Pastor Dietrich Bonhoeffer at Flossenburg concentration camp. Jewish liberation 3,000 years ago, the death of a Palestinian Jew 2,000 years ago, the death of a German Christian 59 years ago and the massacre of more than 100 Palestinian men, women and children 56 years ago. Alas, Deir Yassin Remembered does not receive the publicity it merits.

Webster's dictionary would meretriciously brand its supporters "anti-Semitic", and "many members of the Boston community" would no doubt object. "Blood libel," UCD's eminent law lecturer would scream. We must wait to hear what UCD thinks. But let us not be "hurt" or "dismayed". Let's just keep on telling it how it is. Isn't that what American journalism school was meant to teach us?

Copyright: The Independent. UK.

_________________
"We will have to repent in this generation not merely for the vitriolic words and actions of the bad people, but for the appalling silence of the good people.” Martin Luther King
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Wokeman
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 27 Jul 2005
Posts: 881
Location: Woking, Surrey, UK

PostPosted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 6:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

In spite of Keith's comments, I feel that if people feel that Israel deserves to be criticised for its policies that it has adopted towards the Palestinian people, then so be it. If others choose to invoke inappropiate accusations of anti-semitism in reply that's their business. However, it does not help their case one iota.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Keith Mothersson
Angel - now passed away
Angel - now passed away


Joined: 01 Aug 2005
Posts: 303
Location: Perth

PostPosted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 9:50 pm    Post subject: Zionism Reply with quote

Israel's occupation is utterly abhorrent, but there are also political currents out there who would want to use the term 'Zionist' as a stalking horse for old-fashioned Nazi style anti-semitism, people who often had good enough ideas about social credit, or green local self-sufficiency, but who got captured into a conspiracist mindset which saw the jews as behind every social problem.

I think it important to see the so-called 'Christian' and imperialist uses of Zionism, israel and the discourse of 'anti-semitism' - and to avoid inadvertently stoking the fires of 'racial' interpretations based on the supposed 'essential natures' of 'the eternal jew', etc. None of which David was either saying or thinking but some of his listeners might have been, and besides, although Zionism is a form of racism (imo) so is anti-semitism, and we need to be sympathetic with genuine fears about the latter, even as we also robustly critique the former.

Alan Hart's book, Zionism, the Enemy of the Jews, is worth a read.

_________________
For the defence of our one worldwide civilian Motherland, against whatever ruling or informal fraternities.

May all beings be happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
John White
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 27 Mar 2006
Posts: 3187
Location: Here to help!

PostPosted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 11:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wokeman wrote:
In spite of Keith's comments, I feel that if people feel that Israel deserves to be criticised for its policies that it has adopted towards the Palestinian people, then so be it. If others choose to invoke inappropiate accusations of anti-semitism in reply that's their business. However, it does not help their case one iota.


More to the point, it devalues the currency of the word: "disagreeing with the State of Isreal" is far less abhorant a definition that "racist hatred of a person becuase of their genetic heritage"

The ADL's mudslinging hey day is clearly over

_________________
Free your Self and Free the World
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7, Covid-1984 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> London Bombings of Thursday 7th July 2005 All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group