Hi There, Newbie Here

[adam_n_eve]

Just joined up today after i read the vanity fair article / interview.

obviously i doubt i'll be bringing any 'new' evidence to the table as such but i do work in Architecture and have a decent knowledge of buildings construction, demolition and failure in a fire scenario, which was how i got into this all in the first place.

Anyway thanks for letting me join up, looks like i've got a lot of posts to catch up on.

ps, i haven't seen a picture of the cordite columns on here as yet. In my mind this is THE smoking gun ahead of the WTC7 collapse. the 45 deg shear on the columns behind the firemen only occur in controlled demolitions. the shears are used to allow the whole structure to slide down the sheared face and then drop vertically.

[Skeptic]

Yes that picture is excellent evidence.

Don't see anyway the official line can explain away that one - even the 'spintaneous thermite reaction' theory wouldn't account for the precision of the angle.

And one could never argue that the steels was joined at angles like this and then broke at the joins!

I'm new here too - I'm sure someone with knowledge of architecture will be very welcome.