View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Wokeman Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Joined: 27 Jul 2005 Posts: 881 Location: Woking, Surrey, UK
|
Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 8:33 pm Post subject: 9/11 Dust Was Toxic and NUCLEAR! |
|
|
Posted by: 911eyewitness on Friday, June 16, 2006 - 12:32 PM
[ Edit | Delete ] 601 Reads
The reports on the dust debris that settled and flowed over the east of New York City on September 11, 2001 had more than just asbestos within it's poisonous mix. The WMD option in NYC may be hard to swallow, but it's footprint is everywhere.
As reported by the analysis:
"Radionuclides. We analyzed the gamma spectrum of the samples using an EG&G/Ortec high-purity Ge detector (50% relative efficiency) gamma counter (EG&G/Ortec Instruments, Inc., Oak Ridge, TN). We analyzed approximately 50 peaks based on statistical significance (counting/lack of interferences). These included thorium, uranium, actinium series, and primordial radionuclides. Liquid scintillation analyses were conducted for emissions on the total dust and smoke samples using a Packard Tri-Carb Model 2770 TR/SL (Packard Instrument, Meriden, CT). The MDA for alpha radioactivity was 0.30 DPM (0.14 pCi) based on a NIST-traceable 226Ra standard (National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD). When placed in the liquid scintillation fluid, the WTC samples are somewhat darker than the backgrounds and calibration standard, which may cause slight underreporting of the beta activity due to quenching and standard-to-sample efficiency bias. "
http://www.ehponline.org/members/2002/110p703-714lioy/lioy-full.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kbo234 Validated Poster
Joined: 10 Dec 2005 Posts: 2017 Location: Croydon, Surrey
|
Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 8:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It would be good to have these figures translated into plain english in terms of their significance. Are these levels slightly unusual or extraordinarily high? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Wokeman Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Joined: 27 Jul 2005 Posts: 881 Location: Woking, Surrey, UK
|
Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 9:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kbo234,
Yes, that would help. Perhaps someone will come forward to put the info in more people-friendly terms. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ConspiracyTheorySceptic Moderate Poster
Joined: 24 Apr 2006 Posts: 144
|
Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 11:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kbo234 asked:
Quote: | Are these levels slightly unusual or extraordinarily high? |
Kbo234
Don't you think that it is most unlikely that the figures were extraordinarily high, because, if they had been, 100s, maybe 1000s, of New Yorkers would have succumbed to radiation sickness?
CTS |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|