Immoderate moderator: Urban 75 'editor'

[TonyGosling]

[ian neal]

Hi Tony

I would strongly advice against discussing 'the editor' and U 75 here because whilst U 75's moderation style is intensely biased and irritating IMO, I can see no value in dissecting just how biased and irritating it is in public. It won't change how U75 is run and will only create endless noise that saps the energy. Energy that is better directed towards introducing 9/11 truth to people who have not come across the movement before and whose minds are not already closed to the possibility (I would say fact) that 9/11 is an inside job.

What we can learn from U75 is that endless trading of insults between 2 entrenched camps destroys all reasoned debate.

If anyone can explain the value of debating this here, they will need to explain how to avoid some of the problems created by the Rachel (aka BK on U75) thread

We will convert GWB to Islam before we will ever convert 'the editor' and BK to the July 7 Truth campaign. Not that this campaign and the July 7 camapign are the same thing but obviously we have common interests. The J7 truth campaign IMO would be well served by separating itself from any contact with BK and U75

BW

Ian

[Futureproof]

My 1st post!

While I was waiting for this account to be activated I joined the forum in question.
I wish I hadnt bothered, I was banned after half a day lol.
The people in there and the mods are the most rude and abusive people I have encountered in any forum ( and I have been in many).

Upon entering a thread I was privileged to be called a cun* on at least 20 ocassions by 5 or 6 users constantly attacking me.

The hilarious thing is that a user told me I should have looked at the T&C because its NOT ok to discuss 7/7 or 9/11 unless you have "new information" but its perfectly fine to call someone a Cun*.

Judging by
1/ Tony's experience
2/ Rachel north having a safehome there where she is free to slander and humiliate conspiracy researchers.

It would not suprise me to find that some freemasons or and government assets are behind the scenes of that forum.

ps Ian I understand your viewpoint but the reason i posted this is to back up Tony's stance and to advise anyone here to steer well clear of the place.