Some Improvement - but more needs to be done

[gordboy]

The UK 911 campaign has made some progress, but I have some serious questions about the direction it is taking and personnel involved.

First of all, who is Ian Neal ? What qualifications has he to speak on behalf of 911 critics ? What qualifications does he have to rebuke people who criticise his narrow and often inexplicable stances ? I have been following the discussions on this site for quite some time now, and there is a clear pattern of bullying emerging.

Second of all, where are we going with this ? What are the objectives of a British 911 truth campaign ?

My view is that the real issues of 911 have yet to be properly discussed - how to facilitate the transition to a decent society, where policies are not determined by fake terrorist attacks.

I welcome your comments, but I have to caution you now that I will not respond to "we all have to pull together" entreaties. Only those seeking to deflect criticism ever have to resort to such transparently crude tactics.

I have no doubt that I will be roundly criticised for this post, but the issues are far too important to be left unaddressed.