Me
Moderate Poster
Joined: 16 Jul 2006
Posts: 431
|
 Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 7:18 am Post subject: Sorry coincidence theorists but it wasn’t aluminum…. |
 |
|
My latest debunk of the debunkers and phony "experts" still touting the official line of 9/11.
[This was in response to a poster at another board that claimed the plane at the Pentagon burned up and that's why hardly any of it was ever found]
As far as the molten steel that was found in the basements of WTC 1,2 & 7 - the only feeble attempt at an explanation that I’ve heard so far from any of the coincidence theorists is that it must’ve been melted aluminum from the planes.
For example in this recent article:
http://www.freenewmexican.com/news/47514.html
| Quote: | | In fact, say Greening and other "experts", the molten metal Jones cites was most likely aluminum from the planes… |
To begin with, there are so many reasons that this is patently false based on the findings of Steven Jones. One of the biggest problems with that argument of course is that 'building 7 wasn’t even hit by a plane'. Lets just pretend for a second for the sake of the argument that it was though and that’s where the mysterious pools indeed came from. Why is it then that these same pools weren’t found at the Pentagon where we’re told that the planes actually burned up (instantly which is humorous in itself  ) in the initial conflagration of jet fuel fed fires? Aluminum does not behave like water, it doesn’t just evaporate and waft away. If the aluminum from the planes had left giant puddles in the sub-levels of the WTC towers then the same should’ve been found at the Pentagon as well. They defeat their own arguments with their own glaring contradictions.
Also, (even if the aluminum did melt) the two massive titanium steel alloy engines should’ve been found as well because they wouldn’t have melted from the available temperatures. In the documentary 9/11 In Plane Site you can clearly see desks, computers and a podium (I believe?) right inside the impact zone which aren’t even so much as scathed or singed from this so-called “inferno” that somehow incinerated the entire plane.
(impact zone)
(podium and book undamaged)
Also…how did they positively identify the bodies if even the plane allegedly vanished from the overwhelming heat? Either it was tremendously hot or it wasn't. Heat isn't selective and the damage has to be uniform. It seems like only the things that the government wanted to disappear managed to disappear. Impervious black boxes designed to withstand crashes conveniently went away while flammable paper passports remained of course (also conveniently).
Other reasons that it couldn't have been aluminum:
http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html
| Quote: |
If aluminum (e.g., from the plane) had melted, it would melt and flow away from the heat source at its melting point of about 650 oC and thus would not reach the yellow color observed for this molten metal. |
| Quote: | | We also noted that while a steel pan holding the aluminum glowed red and then yellow hot, the molten aluminum inside retained its silvery-gray color, adding significantly to the evidence that the yellow-white molten metal dripping from the South Tower shortly before its collapse was NOT molten aluminum. |
(silvery aluminum)
(clearly 'not' silvery aluminum)
| Quote: | | “In the first few weeks, sometimes when a worker would pull a steel beam from the wreckage, the end of the beam would be dripping molten steel,” Fuchek said. |
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
