| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
dave
New Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2005
Posts: 1
|
 Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 6:25 pm Post subject: fall rate |
 |
|
I recall on the DVD 'confronting' etc someone commenting on the fact that the tower(s) collapsed faster than gravity would allow,has this been substantiated ?
Dave. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Seb
Minor Poster
Joined: 13 Aug 2005
Posts: 82
Location: London
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 11:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I do remember that guy and in my opinion he was one of the least impressive guests.
I don't think that it was an accurate statement, perhaps we was referring to some of the rubble that would have been ejected from the towers?
I believe that the South Tower -- which came down first -- fell at freefall speed and the North Tower at virtually freefall speed. I will try and find some links for that. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Andrew Johnson
Mighty Poster
Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 1919
Location: Derbyshire
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2005 7:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The reason for the "faster than freefall speed" of 8.1 seconds as opposed to about 9.06 seconds freefall could be attributed to the vacuum effect sucking the floors down slightly as the air was blasted outwards from the centre. This was the suggestion given in George Humphrey's video "911 Great Illusion".
Get it here:
http://checktheevidence.com/video/911/
_________________
Andrew
Ask the Tough Questions, Folks! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
