EMAIL THESE GUYS NOW!

[Snowygrouch]

All,
I cant believe it!

The "School Students Against The War" site BANNED
me within an hour of posting the David Ray Griffin event as well as scrubbing the posts!!!!

The email from the admin said "dont post spam" WHAT???!?!


Here are their details, let us swamp them with complaints.

Email:
contact@ssaw.org.uk
Telephone:
Simon-07788513563

The so called ANTI-WAR movement need a kick up the ****.
I phone the Stop The War Coalition (who are the group through which the SSAW operate) and the man said

SWC: "I dont want to get into a discussion about 9/11 now and I`m too buisy anyway"

Me: "why was I banned?"

SWC: "sorry I`m very buisy right now....bye -click-"

Calum

[kbo234]

This site looks very 'controlled' to me. The forum debates are terribly 'even-handed'. Long extremely well-written posts describing the anguish on both sides. Always both sides. Cutting moral and political judgements rather noticeable by their absence. More like a BBC newsnight debate than a bunch of angry kids expressing their outrage.

Maybe I didn't look for long enough but that was a clear first impression.

You want to protest about it? You're almost certainly wasting your time.

[Andrew Johnson]

Here's what I posted
=======
I have been a member of Amnesty international for over 10 years, and have been occasionally involved in letter writing and e-mailing campaigns.

Latterly, however, I have become involved in another more fundamental campaign, which underpins both Amnesty International and "Stop the War" (which might be better called "Start the Peace") movements.

It is a campaign which is ignored or censored or ridiculed or denied by many people - including those who should know better (eg STW and Amnesty). Its campaigning is based of verifiable scientific evidence, now analysed and reviewed by small but growing group of disparate academics.

I am a member of this group, whose website can be found here:

http://www.st911.org

Artciles and information prove that the attacks on 9/11 were an "Inside Job" and we now all need to avail ourselves of the facts if we are to stand a chance of halting the agenda of those who have seized power in the USA and, sadly, in the UK too.

Many people seem to imply that the Law of Gravity is a "Conspiracy Theory", because they cannot accept that the World Trade Centre Towers were demolished with explosives (some people are not even aware of the complete destruction of WTC 7 on Sept 11th, which was not hit by a plane).

Through an investigation of 9/11 issues, it can be seen the US global war machine was openly described in Rebuilding America's Defences, a document issued by PNAC. A few MP's have even mentioned this document as being the bluprint for the War on Terror, published as it was in the year 2000. See

http://www.newamericancentury.org/Rebuildi...g%20defences%22

Professor David Ray Griffin, member of St911 and a theologian who has written or edited over 20 books, has written a book called "New Pearl Harbor" which discusses these issues. See this page for a link to an online version.

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article8765.htm

Denial or deliberate ignorance of these issues seems to make no sense to Stop The War organisations and, for us who understand that the Law of Gravity cannot be broken, we often get the feeling that Stop the War movements who reject, deny or ridicule this information are acting irresponsibly and preventing members from analysing the evidence for themselves, and coming to their own conclusions.

Interested people can join our lively forum at

http://www.nineeleven.co.uk

and obtain free DVD's and leaflets etc, made by campaign members, rather than a central office (which we don't have).

I will be monitoring this forum to see if this post gets deleted (as a fellow campaign member has had his posts deleted).

Thanks for reading. Time is short.

Andrew Johnson
Scholars for 9/11 Truth (www.st911.org)

[Snowygrouch]

Hi,
I know you`re right but it pissed me off SO MUCH that after I registered and posted a message I got banned and scrubbed.

Most of the events are small harmless `gigs`, its probably infiltrated up to the eyeballs but that doesnt make me any less angry about the hypocrisy of it all.

AntiWar my A***!

I have expereince talking to anti-war lot on 9/11 and know their views are very ODD on the issue but I`ve never been so shocked by the TOTALITY of their utter impotency and probable infiltration.

Anyway I feel slightly less angry now but still intend to phone them later AGAIN to "tell `em how it is". Dont care if its fruitless I`m `right proper riled up` now and thats dangerous for people who get in my way.

Your point taken though

Calum

[brian]

Snowy, the response to Andrew's post is encouraging -

QUOTE (Andrew Johnson @ Aug 18 2006, 02:22 PM)
I will be monitoring this forum to see if this post gets deleted (as a fellow campaign member has had his posts deleted).


Your fellow campaign member's post was deleted because it was an unsolicited advert for an event with a £10 admission fee from somebody who signed up to the forum for no other reason than to advertise the event (it was his first and only post), i.e. it was spam.

[Snowygrouch]

Brian,
Thanks for the Update, I cant even view the forum myself to see what going on now......

Thanks to Andrew as well.

Regards

Calum

[chipmunk stew]

This all sounds terribly familiar.

Those is glass houses...

[ian neal]

When have any of your posts been deleted?

However I will start doing so if you don't respect the separation the moderators have choosen to make between critics corner and the rest of the site

[Andrew Johnson]

Here is the post.

http://forum.ssaw.org.uk/index.php?showtopic=556&st=0#entry1335747