View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Sinclair Moderate Poster
Joined: 10 Aug 2005 Posts: 395 Location: La piscina de vivo
|
Posted: Fri Aug 18, 2006 2:32 pm Post subject: Building a case against UK Government's view on OBL & 91 |
|
|
Look at the following UK Government documents:
1. http://www.fas.org/irp/news/2001/11/ukreport.html &
2. http://www.pm.gov.uk/files/pdf/100%20days1.pdf
These remain as validation for the UK Government's position held that Osama Bin Laden was responsible for the events on 911.
Can we together construct a response, with references/URL's, that shows the fallacy of their position. Thi should not include any physical evidence etc. from the days events, but rather it should counter the statements in these 2 documents.
For instance, there is an interesting thread on RI that provides info on the connections between the US & the Taliban/Al Queda, & how the US recruited & financed the Arab mujahedin & the British secret services trained some of them. (See HERE).
If such a thoroughly researched response was prepared & presented to the UK Government, then campaign material could be made out of the UK Government's inability/reluctance to respond.
Just a thought. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SHERITON HOTEL Moderate Poster
Joined: 18 Jun 2006 Posts: 988
|
Posted: Fri Aug 18, 2006 3:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Is the UK government still claiming Saddam Hussein was in league with OBL and Al quaida directly before their illegal invasion and occupation? The above links look like more dodgy dossiers to me.
Isn't it the case the FBI are NOT seeking to charge OBL in connection with 9/11 for lack of any hard evidence? I recall the Britgov' were trying to sell us that laughable OBL "9/11 I dunnit" grainy home video( the one where he put on two and a half stone and had a face job), that he carelessly left out for his old CIA buddies to find, as evidence of guilt. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sinclair Moderate Poster
Joined: 10 Aug 2005 Posts: 395 Location: La piscina de vivo
|
Posted: Fri Aug 18, 2006 4:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
SH,
My point exactly, if we challenge them on their 'current' position, we can see where they stand, and that includes providing any explanation.
If someone's MP could table a written question in the House of Commons..........
These 2 documents are laughable, particularly the 2nd one., like a 'Osama bin Laden dun 911' for Dummies
I think that there is mileage in this as a UK based campaign strategy........... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Andrew Johnson Mighty Poster
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 1919 Location: Derbyshire
|
Posted: Fri Aug 18, 2006 4:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sinclair,
This looks like a good strategy. Just as a general point, "Power of Nightmares" documents the connection between the CIA funded Mudjha Hadeen and Al Qaeda.
If you could construct a rebuttal, I can review it/comment (for what that would be worth).
There are also the facial measurements which were included in Steve Jones Feb lecture (I think he credited someone else with that segment). _________________ Andrew
Ask the Tough Questions, Folks! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|