FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist  Chat Chat  UsergroupsUsergroups  CalendarCalendar RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Muslim News carry an article by me

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7, Covid-1984 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> London Bombings of Thursday 7th July 2005
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Keith Mothersson
Angel - now passed away
Angel - now passed away


Joined: 01 Aug 2005
Posts: 303
Location: Perth

PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 2:38 pm    Post subject: Muslim News carry an article by me Reply with quote

Pleased to report that the latest issue (July 28th) of the well-respected Muslim News (reaches 120,000 it says) carried the following version of my advert article, which is more spikey/’radical’ in places than the original.


RELEASE THE EVIDENCE


London - July 7th 2005. A day of slaughter, tears and solidarity. 56 precious lives lost, hundreds are injured, traumatised, bereaved. All of us made less secure, especially Muslims.
Before anyone could know, the Prime Minister hints at who was responsible. Despite the pre-war ‘framing’ of Iraq, most media rush to Islamophobic judgment. Although some people, including some Muslims, abuse their religion to target civilians, calm assessment should have suggested additional possibilities.

Apart from IRA or fascist bombs, State terrorism is far from unknown, ask the Irish, ask the survivors of the Bologna station massacre of 1980, successfully blamed on Red Brigade patsies (Reference 1)
The biggest slaughter since the Luftwaffe, yet a Public Inquiry would be ‘a distraction’. Too slow. Too expensive! We all know who did it, don’t we? But do ‘we’?
Take the lack of proof of the whereabouts of the designated perpetrators that morning. In the Luton station image (Photo image in attachment) ‘Hussain’s’ legs are incorrectly mirrored in glass, while ‘Khan’ appears entangled in the railings!

The Official Report says the men caught the 7.40 train, which runs contrary to the responsible officials at Thameslink, who repeatedly say the 7.40 didn’t run that day, while the 7.30 (left at 7.42) didn’t arrive until 8.39. (2) Having arrived by magic carpet, it isn’t perhaps too surprising that the reported movements of our four swarthy orientals at 8.26 and ‘around 8.30’ are equally peculiar.
Khan’s personal documents were found to have miraculously survived at the epicentre of three explosions. Lindsay’s DNA was allegedly found on his parking ticket – yet the government Report has his car towed away as unticketted.

Many credible initial reports were of military explosives, yet suddenly the story changed to HMTD or extremely unstable TATP – which doesn’t flash, so doesn’t match survivor accounts. ‘Expert examination continues’ – 10 months later! – ‘but it appears that the bombs were home made’ - wriggle room?

For the rest the Report ignores awkward material which doesn’t fit, e.g. the testimony of Aldgate survivor Bruce Lait and policewoman Lizzie Kenworthy, who independently reported a hole in the floor with the metal pushed up. (Perhaps the men got up even earlier and placed bombs under the trains that morning?)

No mention of radio and TV interviews with senior ex-policeman and security consultant, Peter Power: ‘At half past nine this morning we were actually running an exercise for a company of over a thousand people in London based on simultaneous bombs going off precisely at the railway stations where it happened this morning’.

As for the coincidences in Tavistock Sq – where a (doubtless innocent) van from a firm which offers specialist explosions appears to have drawn level with the rear of the 30 bus stopped just outside the offices of The Lancet – there is no possible public interest served by not reassuring Muslims and many others by releasing all the images from the working traffic cam.
From London, surveillance capital of the world, we have not one image of the four suspects on the day. Instead of connected footage from a score of cameras, we have to take alleged CCTV sightings on trust. But after the Lawrence Inquiry finding of ’institutional racism’, and now after Stockwell and Forest Gate, the Met have no right to demand trust .
It is clear that the police lied when they first said that the men were ‘cleanskins’ who had never come to their attention before, or only ‘peripherally’. It now seems that much time and money was spent on photographing Khan, tracking his car and tapping his phone. Why were transcripts of his conversations withheld from the Intelligence and Security Committee?

Recent articles and a book by Nafeez Ahmed (3) develop a ‘Londonistan’ picture of Kahn, Tanweer and others forming an exclusive ‘radical’ subculture in Beeston, and even being aided to make ‘secure’ contact with Finsbury Park and other figures linked to both ‘Al-Qaida’ and to MI5 and MI6. More and more people are asking not just ‘Could the Leeds 4 have been stopped? (the incompetence theory) but also ‘Did the authorities let it happen on purpose?’
However much ‘Leedsistan’ evidence is ambiguous: the London-end discrepancies demand we also ask: ‘Were Khan and his network being groomed as credible patsies?’ (and thus shielded from arrest before being duped or otherwise drawn in).
Many hypotheses remain open and jumping to premature conclusions will help no one. Nor will kneejerk sneers about ‘conspiracy theorists’. Most evidence must be released immediately – and progressive organisations must unite to force the rest of the truth to come out in a fully independent public inquiry with a wide remit, open procedures and ferocious legal powers, outwith the Inquiries Act 2005.
Anything less dishonours the dead and imperils the living.

References:

1) Nato’s Secret Armies, Daniele Ganser (Cass, 2005). See also Muslims, Jews and Christians Against 911 False Witness, www.mujca.com/ , and Scholars for 911 Truth www.st911.org/ .

2) Here and elsewhere see http://www.julyseventh.co.uk or http://www.officialconfusion.com/77/index.html
3) London Bombings – An Independent Inquiry (Duckworth, 2006)

Keith.mothersson@phonecoop.coop.
[the editor added that I was co-editor of julyseventh.co.uk]

_________________
For the defence of our one worldwide civilian Motherland, against whatever ruling or informal fraternities.

May all beings be happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Andrew Johnson
Mighty Poster
Mighty Poster


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 1919
Location: Derbyshire

PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 4:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Keith,

This is a super development. Well done.

_________________
Andrew

Ask the Tough Questions, Folks!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Jane
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 23 Aug 2005
Posts: 312
Location: Otley, West Yorks, England

PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 6:44 pm    Post subject: Well done, Keith! Reply with quote

Yes, count me in with Andrew there, Keith!

Congratulations!

Your message is finally being heard where it needs to be heard!

_________________
Romans 12:2 Do not conform any longer to the pattern of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and approve what God's will is—his good, pleasing and perfect will.

http://www.wytruth.org.uk/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
sonic
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 06 Dec 2005
Posts: 196

PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 8:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

WELL DONE KEITH, EXCELLENT!!!

Peace

Sonic.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kier
Minor Poster
Minor Poster


Joined: 25 Jun 2006
Posts: 50

PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 12:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

To save repeating posts, this topic is also being discussed here. Keith also recently had an article published in a Buddhist journal.

Thanks again, Keith.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wepmob2000
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 03 Aug 2006
Posts: 431
Location: North East England

PostPosted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 12:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well done

So now we know, it was all a conspiracy between the FBI, CIA, MI6 and Mossad, who brainwashed some boy scouts to carry out the bombings. Then we can blame the Muslims and take over the world, Mwa ha ha.

Gee thats brilliant boys, what next we bombed London during the war to make Germany look bad?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
scar
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Posts: 724
Location: Brighton

PostPosted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 2:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi wepmob2000,

Welcome to the forum.
If you have broadband then watch this:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=590416857132687483&q=mind+the+ gap

I'd be interested to hear what you make of it.

Cheers
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jane
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 23 Aug 2005
Posts: 312
Location: Otley, West Yorks, England

PostPosted: Sun Aug 13, 2006 7:47 pm    Post subject: What's happening in Lebanon and Palestine Reply with quote

dh and I both attended this meeting this afternoon in Bradford - having not planned to go together.

Quote:
What's happening in Lebanon and Palestine

Carlisle Business Centre, Carlisle Road, Manningham
Sunday 13 August
2:30-6:00pm

With range of speakers including Karl Dallas who will talk
about Bradford Palestine Solidarity group.

All welcome


Karl Dallas and Helen John (whom I had tried to phone this morning, intending to ask her to be there, not knowing she had already arranged to go and be a speaker!) both gave a speach. I feel immenesely proud to know them both - they are both getting older (I think Karl must be nearly 80!) but they are stronger and braver (essentially "fearless") then your average 16 year old!

Other people, including someone who used to work for the BBC, gave speaches as well, and most of them were encouraging the Muslim Community to be brave and speak out (as the Muslim MP's did) about what is going on - however, none of them, including Karl and Helen, however much I love and admire them and how some people may see them as members of "Reinvestigate 9/11" said a word to even encourage anyone in the room to consider that the recent accusations against the "Muslim Terrorists" may not be true! I certainly have no intenetion of criticising anyone who spoke - expecially Karl and Helen - but if only our message could get out at meetings like this - it would give the whole situation a totally different twist!

However, I certainly don't think the answer is to stand up and start sounding off about our views at such meetings...I think dh did the best thing - in leaving lots of our DVD's and leaflets out along with all the other literature on the tables before we left! That way people will pick them up, curious to know what they are, read it and play it and ...well I think that is the best way to grab their attention...

Not anger, shouting matches or calling people "Lier" who have no idea what you are talking about!

_________________
Romans 12:2 Do not conform any longer to the pattern of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and approve what God's will is—his good, pleasing and perfect will.

http://www.wytruth.org.uk/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Bushwacker
Relentless Limpet Shill
Relentless Limpet Shill


Joined: 07 Sep 2006
Posts: 1628

PostPosted: Thu Sep 07, 2006 4:52 pm    Post subject: Re: Muslim News carry an article by me Reply with quote

keith wrote:
In the Luton station image ‘Hussain’s’ legs are incorrectly mirrored in glass, while ‘Khan’ appears entangled in the railings!

The Official Report says the men caught the 7.40 train, which runs contrary to the responsible officials at Thameslink, who repeatedly say the 7.40 didn’t run that day, while the 7.30 (left at 7.42) didn’t arrive until 8.39. (2) Having arrived by magic carpet, it isn’t perhaps too surprising that the reported movements of our four swarthy orientals at 8.26 and ‘around 8.30’ are equally peculiar.

Yes, you would have thought the technical expertise of the security services would be up to using Photoshop, wouldn't you?

The train time has now been corrected, I think
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
numeral
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 23 Dec 2005
Posts: 500
Location: South London

PostPosted: Thu Sep 07, 2006 7:01 pm    Post subject: Re: Muslim News carry an article by me Reply with quote

Bushwacker wrote:
keith wrote:
In the Luton station image ‘Hussain’s’ legs are incorrectly mirrored in glass, while ‘Khan’ appears entangled in the railings!

The Official Report says the men caught the 7.40 train, which runs contrary to the responsible officials at Thameslink, who repeatedly say the 7.40 didn’t run that day, while the 7.30 (left at 7.42) didn’t arrive until 8.39. (2) Having arrived by magic carpet, it isn’t perhaps too surprising that the reported movements of our four swarthy orientals at 8.26 and ‘around 8.30’ are equally peculiar.

Yes, you would have thought the technical expertise of the security services would be up to using Photoshop, wouldn't you?

The train time has now been corrected, I think


Do you think so? Reid stated:
Quote:
In that context, I tell the House tonight that, at the end of last week, I was told that a discrepancy had indeed come to light. The official account that we provided to the House states that the train on which the bombers travelled left Luton station at 7.40 am. The police have now told us that that is incorrect—the train in fact left Luton station at 7.25 am. It did, however, arrive at Kings Cross at 8.23 am, as recorded in the official account. Although that does not appear to affect anything else in the official account, it is nevertheless an error, which is why I report it to the House. I can understand why this may be of concern to some. I have asked the police, as Members would expect, for a full report on how that discrepancy came about. I will ensure that the official account is amended and will write to the survivors and to the families of the victims on this matter.


http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200506/cmhansrd/cm060711/de btext/60711-0875.htm

Why would anyone think the 7.25 time was correct?

_________________
Follow the numbers
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Bushwacker
Relentless Limpet Shill
Relentless Limpet Shill


Joined: 07 Sep 2006
Posts: 1628

PostPosted: Thu Sep 07, 2006 10:57 pm    Post subject: Re: Muslim News carry an article by me Reply with quote

numeral wrote:
[quote="Bushwacker
The train time has now been corrected, I think


Do you think so? Reid stated:
Quote:
The police have now told us that that is incorrect—the train in fact left Luton station at 7.25 am. It did, however, arrive at Kings Cross at 8.23 am, as recorded in the official account.



Why would anyone think the 7.25 time was correct?[/quote]
Because in the course of proving the inaccuracy of the official account of them using the cancelled 7.40 train the 7/7 truth movement website has been carrying an e-mail from Thameslink's Communications Manager dated 25.8.05 giving the schedule and actual train times that day, which show a train leaving at 7.25.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
numeral
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 23 Dec 2005
Posts: 500
Location: South London

PostPosted: Thu Sep 07, 2006 11:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Reid said:
Quote:
The official account that we provided to the House states that the train on which the bombers travelled left Luton station at 7.40 am. The police have now told us that that is incorrect—the train in fact left Luton station at 7.25 am.


Why would anyone think that the train on which the bombers travelled was the one that left Luton station at 7.25?

_________________
Follow the numbers
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Bushwacker
Relentless Limpet Shill
Relentless Limpet Shill


Joined: 07 Sep 2006
Posts: 1628

PostPosted: Thu Sep 07, 2006 11:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

numeral wrote:
Reid said:
Quote:
The official account that we provided to the House states that the train on which the bombers travelled left Luton station at 7.40 am. The police have now told us that that is incorrect—the train in fact left Luton station at 7.25 am.


Why would anyone think that the train on which the bombers travelled was the one that left Luton station at 7.25?

Huh? Because that is the only train that fits with the timeline.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
numeral
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 23 Dec 2005
Posts: 500
Location: South London

PostPosted: Fri Sep 08, 2006 12:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bushwacker wrote:
numeral wrote:
Reid said:
Quote:
The official account that we provided to the House states that the train on which the bombers travelled left Luton station at 7.40 am. The police have now told us that that is incorrect—the train in fact left Luton station at 7.25 am.


Why would anyone think that the train on which the bombers travelled was the one that left Luton station at 7.25?

Huh? Because that is the only train that fits with the timeline.


Why would the narrative say 7.40 then?

_________________
Follow the numbers
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Bushwacker
Relentless Limpet Shill
Relentless Limpet Shill


Joined: 07 Sep 2006
Posts: 1628

PostPosted: Fri Sep 08, 2006 12:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

numeral wrote:
Bushwacker wrote:
numeral wrote:
Reid said:
Quote:
The official account that we provided to the House states that the train on which the bombers travelled left Luton station at 7.40 am. The police have now told us that that is incorrect—the train in fact left Luton station at 7.25 am.


Why would anyone think that the train on which the bombers travelled was the one that left Luton station at 7.25?

Huh? Because that is the only train that fits with the timeline.


Why would the narrative say 7.40 then?

That is what Reid has asked the police to make a report about. My guess is that they simply looked at the timetable and put in the scheduled train that fitted, without checking on the actual times.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
numeral
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 23 Dec 2005
Posts: 500
Location: South London

PostPosted: Fri Sep 08, 2006 12:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The 0740 is timetabled to arrive at 8.16. Why did the narrative say it arrived at 8.23?
_________________
Follow the numbers
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Bushwacker
Relentless Limpet Shill
Relentless Limpet Shill


Joined: 07 Sep 2006
Posts: 1628

PostPosted: Fri Sep 08, 2006 6:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

numeral wrote:
The 0740 is timetabled to arrive at 8.16. Why did the narrative say it arrived at 8.23?

I did not write the narrative! But I suppose it was because a train did arrive at 8.23, as confirmed by Thameslink, and presumably they had that time from records at Kings Cross. The mistake was in the apparent assumption that it was the 7.40 slightly late, whereas it was actually the 7.25 very late.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
numeral
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 23 Dec 2005
Posts: 500
Location: South London

PostPosted: Fri Sep 08, 2006 7:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bushwacker wrote:
numeral wrote:
The 0740 is timetabled to arrive at 8.16. Why did the narrative say it arrived at 8.23?

I did not write the narrative! But I suppose it was because a train did arrive at 8.23, as confirmed by Thameslink, and presumably they had that time from records at Kings Cross. The mistake was in the apparent assumption that it was the 7.40 slightly late, whereas it was actually the 7.25 very late.


I would not even try to explain it. The MPS, in response to Reid's statement, said that they had never supplied the time the train left Luton to the Home Office. They said that the Home Office must have got the 7.40 time from two "erroneous firsthand witness statements" which the MPS passed on to the Home Office. The MPS are playing their cards very close to their chest. They will not give out any information if they can avoid doing so.

_________________
Follow the numbers


Last edited by numeral on Sat Sep 09, 2006 2:46 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Jane
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 23 Aug 2005
Posts: 312
Location: Otley, West Yorks, England

PostPosted: Fri Sep 08, 2006 7:41 pm    Post subject: Paying attention Reply with quote

They (I'm never quite sure who "they" are personally!) but "they" assume they can get away with all their grossly inaccurate reporting because no one is really paying close attention to what is going on.... I see it as like in a dream when (to quote “someone I know at work” - recent dream) strange things are going on - like you are keeping a panther in your office as a pet - your only concern being that it might suddenly "turn nasty" and attack you or someone else in the college! You never think "What the hell's going on here? We've got a panther in the office - this must be a dream or something!"

That's how I see it anyway, folks!

Well whoever makes up the nonsense that goes on in these "dreams" (I always strongly suspect that we are all in some way collectively responsible!!) - they have just been in for some big surprises! Some of us DO NOTICE and shall continue to notice all the inaccuracies in the dream landscape (and I think consequently the inaccuracies will become more and more blatant!).... because we are starting to see what is really going on and how nonsense the whole thing is for almost everyone involved (whether they realise it or not) and how it all could all be so much better...

_________________
Romans 12:2 Do not conform any longer to the pattern of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and approve what God's will is—his good, pleasing and perfect will.

http://www.wytruth.org.uk/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
scar
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Posts: 724
Location: Brighton

PostPosted: Fri Sep 08, 2006 9:30 pm    Post subject: Re: Paying attention Reply with quote

Damn right Jane!
Global Awakening, Aquarius Initiation, call it what you will, it is spreading like a virus, running rampant, out of their control.
Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bushwacker
Relentless Limpet Shill
Relentless Limpet Shill


Joined: 07 Sep 2006
Posts: 1628

PostPosted: Fri Sep 08, 2006 9:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

As you say, Jane, it was noticed, and lead to Reid having to make that statement to the Commons, which will not have pleased him at all. He is not the man to suffer an embarrassment like that without taking it out on someone, and there are probably some Home Office officials and policeman with very sore backsides!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jane
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 23 Aug 2005
Posts: 312
Location: Otley, West Yorks, England

PostPosted: Fri Sep 08, 2006 11:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Damn right Jane!
Global Awakening, Aquarius Initiation, call it what you will, it is spreading like a virus, running rampant, out of their control.


Yes, hope so Darling! Surely the "Holographic Universe" can do better then this bloody mess we are currently in!!!

Quote:
As you say, Jane, it was noticed, and lead to Reid having to make that statement to the Commons, which will not have pleased him at all. He is not the man to suffer an embarrassment like that without taking it out on someone, and there are probably some Home Office officials and policeman with very sore backsides!


I really intensely “dislike” that “Reid” b* for some reason…I try not to “hate” any of these “robots” as they are clearly not “Real people” yet – what is it with him? I can tell that Bush and Blair are not “Real” –but the “Reid” character? God, he is just so bloody sanctimonious – I would really like to give him a good slap across the face – and I am not a violent little person generally

_________________
Romans 12:2 Do not conform any longer to the pattern of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and approve what God's will is—his good, pleasing and perfect will.

http://www.wytruth.org.uk/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Bicnarok
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 03 Sep 2006
Posts: 334
Location: Cydonia

PostPosted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 8:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

excellent artikel
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7, Covid-1984 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> London Bombings of Thursday 7th July 2005 All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group