| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
SHERITON HOTEL
Moderate Poster
Joined: 18 Jun 2006
Posts: 988
|
 Posted: Wed Aug 30, 2006 11:34 am Post subject: That 'Popular Mechanics' radio person's promise |
 |
|
He made a promise on the Arizona radio show that he'd get back to the presenter on the question of how they collected terrorist DNA from the twin towers rubble and matched it against terrorist DNA they were holding, are we going to monitor this promise here?
We must surely? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
chipmunk stew
Moderate Poster
Joined: 19 Jul 2006
Posts: 833
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 30, 2006 1:45 pm Post subject: Re: That 'Popular Mechanics' radio person's promise |
|
|
| SHERITON HOTEL wrote: | He made a promise on the Arizona radio show that he'd get back to the presenter on the question of how they collected terrorist DNA from the twin towers rubble and matched it against terrorist DNA they were holding, are we going to monitor this promise here?
We must surely? |
As far as I know, he was simply wrong on that point. Does PM make this claim in their article or their book? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SHERITON HOTEL
Moderate Poster
Joined: 18 Jun 2006
Posts: 988
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 31, 2006 12:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Any word from Popular Mechanics yet? Should the PM radio person come clean and admit he was telling porkies or try and spin it out? what a dilemma! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
aggle-rithm
Moderate Poster
Joined: 22 Aug 2006
Posts: 557
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 31, 2006 1:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| SHERITON HOTEL wrote: | | Any word from Popular Mechanics yet? Should the PM radio person come clean and admit he was telling porkies or try and spin it out? what a dilemma! |
Not really. Even if it could be proved conclusively that the 19 terrorists weren't who we thought they were, then it simply means it must have been 19 OTHER terrorists. Either way, the evidence points to al Qaeda.
...and even if it could be proved that it WASN'T al Qaeda, the modus operandi is far more typical of terrorist groups than of large industrial nations, so why posit a govt. conspiracy?
You're trying to focus on relatively insignificant details to avoid facing the larger picture; which is that your world-view is totally bonkers. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
