US rebuts 9/11 conspiracy theories

[Mark Gobell]

US rebuts 9/11 conspiracy theories

With an excellent actual photgraph illustrating the pancake collapse in progress, check this article:

WASHINGTON: The United States government is attacking conspiracy theories about the destruction of the World Trade Center in New York as the fifth anniversary of September 11 approaches.

According to a Scripps Howard/Ohio University poll carried out in July, more than one-third of Americans suspect US officials helped in the September 11 attacks or took no action to stop them so the United States could later go to war.

The State Department responded this week with a rebuttal of World Trade Center demolition theories and doubts about other events of the day that abound on the internet.

http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/0,2106,3785389a12,00.html

[Serge]

Demolitions always start with the bottom is claimed. Well that matches the evidence of explosions in the WTC basement by one of the Janitors of WTC. So its just a load bull from the Yank lie machine.

Where is this photo illustrating the pancake nonsense?

[SHERITON HOTEL]

They're shifting position, they always used to react to 9/11 questions with the turse... We will not honor that question with a reply

(what's the latest on those mystery twin tower impact point pre-impact flash/explosions, anyone know? they seem to have dodged it in that link from my first scanning)

[Wokeman]

I just love the way they issue a rebuttal, and then show a picture that contradicts it. That tower is plainly exploding. I have shown that pic to people before, and they've just said "Huh!"

[Wokeman]

Serge,
There isn't one!

[Mark Gobell]

Serge

I was attempting some mild sarcasm mentioning the pic.

As Wokeman says this fomer 110 storey sky-scraper weighing some 500,000 tons is plainly being blown to kingdom come.

Not pancaking with one floor falling on top of the other as Professor Eager at MIT claimed.

The caption under the pic is the clue me thinks:

DEMOLITION THEORY: Some people believe the twin towers were destroyed by secretly planted explosives, not burning passenger jets.

The article is from New Zealand media and my guess is they included it as a visual counterpoint to the absurd US State Departments official version contained in their article:

"This is how the collapses may have appeared to non-experts, but demolition experts point out many differences," said a department "special feature" available at http://usinfo.state.gov/media/misinformation.html.

A visual joke geddit ?

[Mark Gobell]

It is a particularly awesome photograph.

If I knew nothing about 9/11 and someone showed me that I would say "wow looks like that building is exploding".

That's one of the most incredible and frustrating aspects of this subject, the visual evidence alone is enough to prove that the US Government is lying.

[Serge]

[waking life]

[spiv]

I notice that whenever the American Government talks about demolition charges, trying to ridicule the theorist claims, they always point out that conventional demolition explosives start from the bottom of the building, and then relate that to the Twin Towers.

However, I don't think anyone who believes that explosives were put in the Twin Towers feels thay were exploded from the bottom, but were from the top down. Something, I would have thought, that even simple software could be programmed to do.

And if you watch the firefighters in the Naudet film talking about the "boom-boom-boom" of explosives they heard, note that their hands move from top to bottom. Watch them here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXD3bAbZCow

But, if you watch closely the films of the collapsing WTC7 building, that does, indeed, seem to fall from below!!

[Mark Gobell]

The attempt to debunk the fact that these buildings were brought down with explosives reminds me of the old "rearranging the deckchairs on the Titanic" adage.

We say:

"The visual evidence alone shows that the Twin Towers were brought down using explosives in a controlled demolition. There is scientific evidence to support this assertion that needs to be examined publicly, in the open and which has never been explained and cannot be explained by the US Government or their so called experts. Further, WTC7 fell in a classic controlled demolition, from the bottom up and that wasn't even hit by an aircraft. The US Government and their so called experts have never explained this event."

The US Government State Department and their so called experts say:

"No it wasn't. Controlled Demolitions all start from the bottom. The Twin Towers started to collapse from the top, where the planes hit"

We have never said:

"The controlled demolition of the Twin Towers started from the bottom."

We say again and again and again:

"The visual evidence alone shows that the Twin Towers were brought down using explosives in a controlled demolition. There is scientific evidence to support this assertion that needs to be examined publicly, in the open and which has never been explained and cannot be explained by the US Government or their so called experts. Further, WTC7 fell in a classic controlled demolition, from the bottom up and that wasn't even hit by an aircraft. The US Government and their so called experts have never explained this event."

The US Government, their so called experts can try to rearrange the deckchairs all they like.

The eyes of the world are watching their every move. The people are listening to every word they say, every lie they spin.

Rearranging the deckchairs is like watching the US Government and their so called experts drown on the flimsy decks of their own poorly built Titanic.

The people are the iceberg you thought you could avoid.

COME OUT OF THE WHITE HOUSE WITH YOUR HANDS UP