senate concludes no links between al-qeada and saddam

[marky 54]

after reading a report that was held back, said to be for political reasons the senate said that the information mislead the american public and there was no links between al-qaeda and saddam and that the whitehouse should of know this. with the lack of weapons of mass destruction to-date the war in iraq seems built on flimsy evidence with nothing to support it. we can all conclude that saddam was a bad man and that it was good he is now out of power, but with iraq being a worse place than before saddam was removed, the question has to be asked was the war on iraq justified?. and was the american and british public misled?. bush also said this week that those that give false information are considered to be recruiting terrorists as it gives them a reason to attack us/uk troops in the middle east. so after hearing bush deny the senates claim's and say that there is reason to be there is the senate considered to be giving false information? and are they considered conspiracy theorists like most people have been for suggesting the war in iraq is illegal?

[blackcat]

Israel will fight to the last American to defend itself. The amount of lies that have to be told does not matter.

[Bicnarok]

Not suprised at all. Iraq was only attacked for taken over for Oil reasons, the same reason Afgahnistan was attacked to enable a pipeline to be built. Iran is next, will be interesting to see what reason they make up for that war.