View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
xmasdale Angel - now passed away
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 1959 Location: South London
|
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:47 am Post subject: 70m US adults want 9/11 investigation - Zogby poll |
|
|
Friday, August 07, 2009 5:36 PM
Zogby Poll: Over 70 Million American Adults Support New 9/11 Investigation
Friday, August 7, 2009
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=2502
The poll is the first scientific survey of Americans' belief in a 9/11 cover up or the need to investigate possible US government complicity, and was commissioned to inform deliberations at the June 2~4 "9/11: Revealing the Truth, Reclaiming Our Future" conference in Chicago. Poll results indicate 42% believe there has indeed been a cover up (with 10% unsure) and 45% think "Congress or an International Tribunal should re-investigate the attacks, including whether any US government officials consciously allowed or helped facilitate their success" (with 8% unsure).
Utica, NY (PRWEB) May 22, 2006 -- 911Truth.org urges 2006 reform candidates to recognize a powerful new constituency.
Although the Bush administration continues to exploit September 11 to justify domestic spying, unprecedented spending and a permanent state of war, a new Zogby poll reveals that less than half of the American public trusts the official 9/11 story or believes the attacks were adequately investigated.
The poll is the first scientific survey of Americans' belief in a 9/11 cover up or the need to investigate possible U.S. government complicity, and was commissioned to inform deliberations at the June 2~4 "9/11: Revealing the Truth, Reclaiming our Future" conference in Chicago. Poll results indicate 42% believe there has indeed been a cover up (with 10% unsure) and 45% think "Congress or an International Tribunal should re-investigate the attacks, including whether any US government officials consciously allowed or helped facilitate their success" (with 8% unsure). The poll of American residents was conducted from Friday, May 12 through Tuesday, May 16, 2006. Overall results have a margin of sampling error of +/- 2.9. All inquiries about questions, responses and demographics should be directed to Zogby International.
According to Janice Matthews, executive director of 911truth.org, "To those of us who have followed the mounting evidence for US government involvement in 9/11, these results are both heartening and frankly quite amazing, given the mainstream media's ongoing refusal to cover the most critical questions of that day. Our August 2004 Zogby poll of New Yorkers showed nearly half believe certain U.S. officials 'consciously' allowed the attacks to happen and 66% want a fresh investigation, but these were people closest to the tragedy and most familiar with facts refuting the official account. This revelation that so many millions nationwide now also recognize a 9/11 cover up and the need for a new inquiry should be a wake up call for all 2006 political candidates hoping to turn this country around. We think it also indicates Americans are awakening to the larger pattern of deceit that led us into Constitutional twilight and endless war, and that our independent media may have finally come of age."
Poll co-author W. David Kubiak concurs, saying "Despite years of relentless media promotion, whitewash and 9/11 Commission propaganda, the official 9/11 story still can't even muster 50% popular support. Since this myth has been the administration's primary source of political and war-making power, this level of distrust has revolutionary implications for everyone working for peace, justice and civil liberties. If we ever hope to reclaim this country, end aggression and restore international respect, we all must finally scrutinize that day when things started to go so terribly wrong. The media and movement leaders ignore this call at their peril, because tens of millions are clearly telling us here they are ready for 9/11 truth."
SCOPE: The poll covered five related areas: 1) Iraq - do Americans think the Bush administration exploited 9/11 to attack Iraq? (44% do, 44% don't); 2) Cover up - did the government and its 9/11 Commission conceal or refuse to investigate evidence that contradicts their official story? (only 48% said no); 3) The collapse of WTC 7, which was not even mentioned by the 9/11 Commission and has seldom been reported in the media -were respondents aware of this collapse and, if so, did they think it should be investigated (only 52% knew about it, but over 70% of this group believe it should have been investigated); 4) new investigation of official complicity - do respondents think we need one? (only 48% said no); and 5) mass media - how do people rate its performance, including its coverage of alternative 9/11 theories, unanswered questions and inquiry issues? (43% rate it positively, 55% negatively).
(Poll sponsors see knowledge of the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 as a bellwether issue, because if people do not know this elementary fact, they have probably not been exposed to any independent 9/11 research at all. Since only 52% of respondents had ever heard of this collapse and 45% support a reinvestigation, it may be reasonably inferred that a public fully informed of all the unreported 9/11 facts might support a new investigation by a margin of 80% or more.)
SPONSOR: 911truth.org is a coalition of researchers, journalists and victim family members working to expose and answer the hundreds of still unresolved questions concerning 9/11, especially the nearly 400 questions that the Family Steering Committee filed with the 9/11 Commission. Initially welcomed by the commissioners as their "road map", these queries cut to the heart of 9/11 crimes and accountability, specifically raising the central issues of motive, means and cui bono (who profited?). The Commission ultimately ignored 80% of these issues, however, opting only to explore system failures, miscommunications and incompetence. The victim families' most incisive questions remain unaddressed to this day.
For more information on the Chicago "9/11: Revealing the Truth, Reclaiming our Future" conference and other developments, see http://www.911revealingthetruth.org and http://www.911truth.org or contact 911truth.org media spokesman, Michael Berger at 314-308-4893. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Frazzel Angel - now passed away
Joined: 05 Oct 2005 Posts: 480 Location: the beano
|
Posted: Tue Aug 25, 2009 7:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mr aronowitz wont be too happy then!
Just seen him on tv on 'booktalk' being interviewed for his conspiracy book. Im paraphrasing him but he more or less said that conspiracy theories such as 911 and the death of dr David Kelly cant be true because the people in power would have to be totally immoral!! in other words Mr A cannot accept that people in power are capable of such heinous acts. Well then Mr A, how do you explain that we were taken into an illegal war with Iraq and deliberately lied to by Bush and Blair!! These men would know full well that war means death misery destruction etc but they were immoral enough to lie inorder to justify the war! wake up mr a and smell the coffee!! _________________ "injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere" Martin Luther king |
|
Back to top |
|
|
xmasdale Angel - now passed away
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 1959 Location: South London
|
Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2009 9:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
Frazzel wrote: | Mr aronowitz wont be too happy then! |
I think you must mean Mr David Aaronovitch, the Times columnist, rather than Mr Simon Aronowitz who started this website.
David Aaronovitch has said some rather curious things about "conspiracy theories". His general line is to rubbish them, but he makes some exceptions.
He rubbishes the "conspiracy theory" that the Reichstag Fire was a false flag operation designed to increase the power of the Nazis, despite the fact that a Nazi witness in the Nuremberg trials said he had been involved in setting the operation up.
But he accepts that the Gulf of Tonkin "conspiracy theory" was real, a US propaganda invention to justify sending troops into Vietnam. He says he knows this because at the time he was a student activist agitating against the Vietnam war.
He admits that the conspiracy theory circulating in the 1930s that there was a plan to exterminate European Jews was well-founded; but he offers no suggestions on how to distinguish well-founded theories from those that are merely the product of paranoid minds.
I can accept that he may have seen through the Gulf of Tonkin incident, but can we really believe that in the 1930s, had he been around then, he would have been clamouring for an investigation into the "conspiracy theory" that there was a plan to exterminate Jews? It's easy to be wise with hindsight.
If he's really so interested in "conspiracy theories" why doesn't he devise a means for distinguishing the real from the bogus ones?
Some people would say that a former Communist Party member who now works for Rupert Murdoch was all along a tool of the establishment, or would that just be another paranoid "conspiracy theory"? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Caz Last Chance Saloon
Joined: 23 Apr 2006 Posts: 836
|
Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2009 11:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
xmasdale wrote: | Frazzel wrote: | Mr aronowitz wont be too happy then! |
I think you must mean Mr David Aaronovitch, the Times columnist, rather than Mr Simon Aronowitz who started this website.
|
Maybe you should have asked Frazzel first before you made that assumption.
Don't 'think' what someone else means. Ask them. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
IanFantom Validated Poster
Joined: 31 Jan 2007 Posts: 296 Location: Halifax, West Yorkshire
|
Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 12:01 pm Post subject: Re: 70m US adults want 9/11 investigation - Zogby poll |
|
|
I'm a bit confused over the date of this announcement. The link gives a Zogby report of 2006.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Andrew. Validated Poster
Joined: 27 Nov 2007 Posts: 1518
|
Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 3:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Caz wrote: | xmasdale wrote: | Frazzel wrote: | Mr aronowitz wont be too happy then! |
I think you must mean Mr David Aaronovitch, the Times columnist, rather than Mr Simon Aronowitz who started this website.
|
Maybe you should have asked Frazzel first before you made that assumption.
Don't 'think' what someone else means. Ask them. |
Do you mean a thought crime ?
Think
To reflect upon any subject; to muse; to meditate; to ponder; to consider; to deliberate.
No assumption. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ian neal Angel - now passed away
Joined: 26 Jul 2005 Posts: 3140 Location: UK
|
Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 4:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Based on what Fran says she is clearly referring to David Aaronovitch |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|