The Sun article - Osama did it (again)

[foliagecop]

http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2006410854,00.html

I've emailed Oliver Harvey the following:

Mr Harvey, I've just read your article. As you may or may not know, the FBI confirmed a couple of months ago that they have no hard evidence that bin Laden was behind 9/11. See:

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=200606 10&articleId
=2623

and:

http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/terrorists/terbinladen.htm

In addition, the CIA has disbanded its unit dedicated to capturing bin Laden. See:

http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/0704-05.htm

I'm sure you understand the many questions that arise from the FBI's assertion that they have no hard evidence of bin Laden's involvement in 9/11. Questions involving the right to wage war (and to continue to wage war) on such a pretext, and so on. An article coming at the issue from this angle would be a very interesting and thought-provoking read, especially as the majority of your readers are likely unaware of what the FBI and CIA have been saying recently.

Yours,
Gordon Robertson.

From a 9/11 truth viewpoint, my wording may seem weak. I saw no point, however, in trying to argue the case with a Sun journalist. For all the obvious reasons. Pointing out unbalanced reporting, or factual errors, outwith of a so-called 'conspiracy' framework, may actually elicit a response from journalists that doesn't involve sneering cynicism, and playground-style put-downs.

And then again, it may not.

[Mark Gobell]

Nice one Foliagecop. Just sent mine in too.

Notice the "chance meeting" *.

This same Hamid Mir is now being quoted as the source of the story for Osama "The Scarlet Pimpernel" Bin Laden's nukes being smuggled into the US.

What a pile of do-do.

They seek him here, they seek him there.

Never guess who I had in the back of me cab the other day. Osama Bin Laden - couldn't believe it.

Take me to Kings Cross guv and and take your time. I'm not being followed.